Lee Harvey Oswald: The Jacket Frame-Up

Lee Harvey Oswald surrounded by looks of hatred... they have all been 




told Lee was THE ONLY ONE INVOLVED --even though


 the FBI has not yet examined the rifle or any other evidence

They cut a several chunks of hair off for a "sample" --
humiliated him also by shaving all the hair from his pubic area,
since they needed a "sample" of that, too.
Soon we learn that "pubic hairs belonging to Oswald"
were found on a blanket that supposedly held the rifle.
Note that the Warren Commission published a photo
of these hairs as evidence, even though they are CUT.
Normal hairs FALL OFF and would have bulbs at the end.


IT MUST BE UNDERSTOOD THAT THE POLICE AND OTHERS
WERE WILLING TO MANIPULATE EVIDENCE.

Of course we cannot see any bulbs to prove a normally-fallen hair was found on the blanket. The photo is so bad that nothing of value can be seen. It could be hair from anybody, insofar as this poor photo is concerned. 

The WC testimony of Paul Strombaugh :

Mr. STOMBAUGH. . . . Pubic hairs ordinarily are rather thick. Oswald's hairs were relatively narrow. Pubic hairs also have what we term nobbiness. You can see a nob right here, it is twisted---- 

Mr. EISENBERG. Could you circle that with a pen, and mark it "A" on chart 672?.... 


Mr. STOMBAUGH. . . . The tips of Oswald's pubic hairs were not worn. . . . This would indicate to me that his pubic hairs were rather strong, much tougher than the average persons.

BESIDES LEARNING TOO MUCH ABOUT PUBIC HAIRS, WE DO NOT LEARN ENOUGH ABOUT

HOW FIBERS FROM THE BLANKET WERE FOUND ON THE RIFLE (JUST A COUPLE). RESEARCHER DAVID WRONE WAS RIGHTLY CONCERNED ABOUT THAT. HE WRITES: 

.

 It seems to me that the whole episode focuses upon the 

packag-er of the rifle to who shipped it to FBI SOG. I think [I was told...]

it was not shipped by package, as Stombaugh says, but was 

courier delivered. Further, Howard in Presumed Guilty  has the 

Dallas police photograph of the rifle resting on the blanket 

prior to being "shipped" to the lab. [MEANING, THE BLANKET WAS 

PLACED NEXT TO THE RIFLE WHEN IN POLICE HANDS== BEFORE IT WAS

EXAMINED FOR FIBERS FROM THE BLANKET!]  Thus I do not see how the 

rifle got from the Dallas police to the FPI to Stombaugh with any 

reasonable degree of clear and distinct purity to make the 

scientific credentials of P.S. mean anything. The premise is false.

 See lola4jvb4lho's YouTube Channel for more information about how Lee was framed. Here is one such video about the BLANKET:

ONE OF THE MOST BLATANT INSTANCES OF THE MISHANDLING OF EVIDENCE CONCERNS THE JACKETS ASSOCIATED WITH LEE OSWALD. ACCORDING TO THE WARRANER COMMISSION, LEE OSWALD THREW OFF A JACKET AS HE RAN AWAY AFTER SHOOTING OFFICER TIPPIT, ON HIS WAY TO THE TEXAS THEATER WHERE HE WOULD BE ARRESTED SHORTLY THEREAFTER.

THE PROBLEM IS, THERE ARE WAY TOO MANY JACKETS...AND COLORS.

NOT THAT THIS STOPPED THE WARREN COMMISSION FROM CLAIMING THE DISCARDED JACKET (THOUGH TOO BIG FOR OSWALD) WAS ANOTHER PIECE OF 'EVIDENCE' AGAINST HIM.

"THE AMAZING TECHNICOLOR JACKET" : ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF HOW LEE OSWALD WAS FRAMED

 A STUDY BY ED LeDOUX, et al:

"Oswald and the Amazing Technicolor Jacket"

..and the chameleon like qualities of the alleged assassin's coat.

Marina Oswald said Lee had only two jackets - one Dark Blue and one a lightweight Gray.


At least two witnesses at the scene of Tippit's slaying
reported his killer wore a White jacket.

One of these, Helen Markham, was shown Oswald's gray jacket
by a Warren Commission attorney who asked,
"Did you ever see this before?"
Despite having been shown the jacket by the FBI prior to her testimony, Markham replied:

"No, I did not....that jacket is a darker jacket than that, I know it
was."

Witness Domingo Benavides was shown a jacket by Commission Attorney David
Belin, who said, "I am handing you a jacket which had been marked as
Commission's Exhibit 163, and ask you to state whether this bears any
similarity to the jacket you saw this man with the gun wearing?"
Benavides responded:

"I would say this looks just like it..."

The problem here is that Commission's Exhibit 163 is Oswald's dark blue jacket.
The gray jacket is Commission's Exhibit 162.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ON THE BUS?

The driver, Cecil McWatters, and passenger Roy Milton Jones said the man who
boarded the bus was wearing a jacket.
Jones said the jacket was LIGHT BLUE in color. Interestingly, the cab driver
initially said the man who rode in his cab during the time in question was
wearing a faded BLUE jacket. The WC said the man in both instances was
Oswald, but the commission also insisted Oswald wasn't wearing a jacket
after he left the Book Depository. The commission had to deny the accounts
of a light blue jacket because it claimed Oswald left his blue jacket at
work that day, where it was "found" WEEKS later, and because that
jacket was not light blue. (WCR p. 163).


Roy Milton Jones described this man as follows:
Races White
Sex. Male
Age. 30-35
Height. 5'11"
Weight. 150
Builds Medium
Remarks. wore no glasses and no hat
Hairs. Dark brown, receding at temples
Dress. Light blue jacket and gray khaki
trousers

Mary Bledsoe describes Oswald's shirt, that is was undone, dirty, had a hole in the sleeve at the elbow. Why is Bledsoe the only one who notices this?

Only Bledsoe described such a shirt. No one else who saw Oswald that day referred to Oswald as wearing a ripped or torn shirt.

McWatters and Jones said Oswald was wearing a jacket. (2H 264;277, CE 2641, also Meagher p.81) McWatters thought he was identifying a man who most closely resembled Jones.

McWatters testifies, "...he was the shortest man in the lineup...and the lightest weight one...the rest of them were larger men....he kind of had a thin like face and he weighs less than any of them...I really thought he was the man who was on the bus...that stayed on the bus." (2H281)

Mr. Ball.- "Were you under the impression that this man that you saw in the lineup and whom you pointed out to the police, was the teenage boy who had been grinning?"

Mr. McWatters.- "I was, yes, sir;"

Bledsoe never went to a line up. She identified Oswald from photographs shown to her by the Dallas police of Oswald holding a gun. ( Meagher p. 80)

Only Bledsoe gives the condition of his shirt as undone, ripped, torn, dirty, and missing buttons. If Jones and McWatters saw Ozzie wearing a jacket then how did Bledsoe see the shirt? Was she on a different bus altogether?

Mr. Ball - "What bus did you catch?"

Mrs. Bledsoe - "Well, I don't remember whether it was the Marsalis or the Romana."

Later counsel asks this pointed question:

Mr. Ball. - "Did you remember seeing him get on or are you telling me something you read in the newspapers?" <6H410>

Then comes this exchange about the shirt:

Mr. Ball.- No, I am talking about---I am showing you this shirt now, and you said, "That is it." You mean---What do you mean by "that is it"?

Mrs. Bledsoe.- That is the one he had out there that day?

Mr. Ball.- Who had it out there?

Mrs. Bledsoe.- Some Secret Service man.

Mr. Ball.- He brought it out. Now, I am---you have seen this shirt then before?

Mrs. Bledsoe.- Yes.

Mr. Ball.- It was brought out by the Secret Service man and shown to you?

Mrs. Bledsoe.- Yes.

Mr. Ball.- Had you ever seen the shirt before that?

Mrs. Bledsoe.- Well---

Mr. Ball.- Have you?

Mrs. Bledsoe.- No; he had it on, though. (6H413)

To recap; Oswald is said to be on the bus with Bledsoe, then goes home and changes his clothes, takes off ripped torn shirt (WCR 604-605, 622), gets arrested and somehow has on the same ripped torn dirty shirt which is shown to Bledsoe. Right.

More plausible Oswald did not go home he rode by bus all the way to the theater. He wore only the clothes he had on when he left work, the same clothes he was arrested in.

Or... in a Rambler.
Oswald was under the impression that he left Dealey Plaza in "Mrs. Paine's" station wagon. Bert Sugar and Sybil Leek apparently had information that Paine borrowed a car similar to the one seen in Dealey Plaza. What was not mentioned, however, was that they claimed she "sometimes borrowed" the car from Jack Ruby. 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE CAB?

Cabdriver William Whaley, who reportedly drove Oswald home from downtown Dallas.
Whaley identified the gray jacket as the one Oswald was wearing in his cab.

Yet the Warren Commission, based on testimony from Earlene Roberts, stated that Oswald
put on the jacket AFTER arriving at his lodgings.

At the police lineup, Whaley picked out eighteen-year-old David Knapp instead of twenty-four-year-old Lee Harvey Oswald ( Knapp did not even resemble Oswald). Whaley had said that Oswald was number two in the lineup he witnessed. The numbers were from left to right and clearly visible; each man in the lineup had a number that was clearly visible to the man trying to identify the ‘suspect’. The Commission, however, said that Oswald was number three. Trying to explain this problem (this really meant that he didn’t identify Oswald but the man next to him), he said that he had counted from the right to the left, ignoring the numbers that were put there to aid identification (why make it easy when it can be done in a more difficult way?). This could mean, of course, he identified number 5, since he believed there were six people in that lineup.


Mr. Ball.
Did you notice how he was dressed?
Mr. Whaley.
Yes, sir. I didn't pay much attention to it right then. But it all came back when I really found out who I had. He was dressed in just ordinary work clothes. It wasn't khaki pants but they were khaki material, blue faded blue color, like a blue uniform made in khaki. Then he had on a brown shirt with a little silverlike stripe on it and he had on some kind of jacket, I didn't notice very close but I think it was a work jacket that ALMOST MATCHED THE PANTS
(EMPHASIS MINE- MEANING A FADED BLUE JACKET).
He, his shirt was open three buttons down here. He had on a T-shirt. You know, the shirt was open three buttons down there.


Whaley’s identity as the man who drove that taxi, however, is not an ‘open and shut’ issue.
Henry Wade said that man was “Darryl Click”. The mistake was explained as Wade having
misunderstood “Oak Cliff” as the name of the cabdriver.
On November 27, Click became Whaley.
Another cabdriver, Charles Kimerlin, however, would later say he was the man who
took Oswald to his boardinghouse.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Whaley and TWO jackets?

Mr. Ball.
Here is Commission No. 162 which is a gray jacket with zipper.
Mr. Whaley.
I thank that is the jacket he had on when he rode with me in the cab.
Mr. Ball.
Look something like it?
And here is Commission Exhibit No. 163, does this look like anything he had on?
Mr. Whaley.
He had this one on or the other one.
Mr. Ball.
That is right.
Mr. Whaley.
That is what I told you I noticed. I told you about the shirt being open, he had on the TWO JACKETS with the open shirt.
Mr. Ball.
Wait a minute, we have got the shirt which you have identified as the rust brown shirt with the GOLD stripe in it.
Mr. Whaley.
Yes, sir.
Mr. Ball.
You said that a jacket--
Mr. Whaley.
That jacket now it might have been clean, but the jacket he had on looked more the color, you know like a uniform set, but he had this coat here on over that other jacket, I am sure, sir.
Mr. Ball.
This is the blue-gray jacket, heavy blue-gray jacket.
Mr. Whaley.
Yes, sir. (EMPHASIS MINE)



How accommidating Mr. Whaley is.
So it was both jackets, or either jacket, you choose Mr. Ball,
but it still did not match exactly.
Even the shirt changed from silver striped to a gold striped one!

----------------------------------------------------------------
Per FBI report:
MARINA OSWALD was interviewed at 11611 Farrar,
A faded blue cloth Jacket with padding bearing
label "Sir Jac" with zipper front was exhibited to MARINA.
She immediately identified this jacket as being the property
of her husband, LEE HARVEY OSWALD. She said she recognized
the jacket because she has handled it and washed it for
OSWALD.


Does this dark blue jacket look faded? Why is the FBI altering the description of this jacket?

picture of LHO dark blue jacket* (SORRY, NO PHOTO)..

.[NOTE TO READERS: HERE IS WHAT ONE INTERNET SITE SHOWS--THE DISCARDED WHITE JACKET--WHICH THIS SITE SAYS LEE OSWALD WAS WEARING WHEN HE WAS ARRESTED --JUST ANOTHER LIE FOR THE NEWBIES OUT THERE:  

Researcher Gil Jesus has some interesting comments to make about the Cab driver, Whaley, who said Lee rode with him:

Whaley's Description of His Passenger

One of the more obvious examples of Whaley's lack of credibility comes in his description of the clothing of the passenger who the Commission claimed was Oswald.

"He was dressed in just ordinary work clothes. It wasn't khaki pants but they were khaki material, blue faded blue color, like a blue uniform made in khaki. Then he had on a brown shirt with a little silverlike stripe on it and he had on some kind of jacket, I didn't notice very close but I think it was a work jacket that almost matched the pants. ( 2 H 255 )

But shortly later in his testimony, Whaley changed his mind about the blue faded work pants and identified Commission Exhibit 157, Oswald's light grey pants, as the same color as the pants his passenger wore:

Mr. BALL. Here are two pair of pants, Commission Exhibit No. 157 and Commission Exhibit No. 156. Does it look anything like that?
Mr. WHALEY. I don't think I can identify the pants except they were the same color as that, sir.
Mr. BALL. Which color?
Mr. WHALEY. More like this lighter color, at least they were cleaner or something.
Mr. BALL. That is 157?
Mr. WHALEY. Yes, sir.

( 2 H 259-260 )

[and here are the two jackets attributed to Lee that Gil Jesus posts:  

here are the pants in question:  

----------------------------------------------------------------
Returning to the Essay by Ed LeDoux: 

Testifying to the Warren Commission, Earlene Roberts said:

"He (Oswald) went to his room and he was in his shirt sleeves...and he got
a jacket and put it on - it was kind of a zipper jacket."

Mr. Ball.- "You say he put on a separate jacket?"

Mrs. Roberts.- "A jacket."

Mr. BALL.- "I'll show you this jacket which is Commission Exhibit 162---have you ever seen this jacket before?"

Mrs. Roberts.- "Well, maybe I have, but I don't remember it. It seems like the one he put on was darker than that. Now, I won't be sure, because I really don't know, but is that a zipper jacket?"

Ruby associate Bertha Cheek was the sister of Earlene Roberts, the housekeeper at Oswald's rooming house. Ruby and Mrs. Cheek could have been involved in Cuban arms sales of which Oswald gained knowledge through his efforts to infiltrate the anti-Castro Cubans." 2
Mrs. Cheek was the sister of Earlene Roberts, housekeeper at 1026 N. Beckley, where Oswald was living at the time of the assassination. 3


Barbara Davis, another witness at the Tippit slaying, also could not
identify Oswald's gray jacket to the Warren Commission. In fact, she
stated the killer wore- "a dark coat...it looked like it was maybe a wool
fabric...more of a sporting jacket."

Cabdriver William Scoggins also failed to identify Oswald's jacket, saying,-"I thought it was a little darker."

Despite these problems of identification, the Commission went
right on asserting that the jacket belonged to Oswald.

Virginia Davis did not see a gray jacket.
Mr. BELIN.- "Do you remember what he had on?"
Mrs. DAVIS.- "He had on a light-brown-tan jacket."
Mr. BELIN.- "Do you remember what color his trousers were?"
Mrs. DAVIS.- "I think they were black. Brown jacket and trousers."


Ted Callaway ran from the car lot and saw the man with the gun. What does he say about the jacket?

Mr. Callaway.- "I told them he had some dark trousers and a light TANNISH gray windbreaker jacket, and I told him that he was fair complexion, dark hair."

Mr. Ball.- "I have a jacket here Commission's Exhibit No. 162. Does this look anything like the jacket that the man had on that you saw across the street with a gun?"

Mr. Callaway.- "Yes; it sure does. Yes, that is the same TYPE jacket.
Actually, I thought it had a little more TAN to it." (EMPHASIS MINE)


More Commission deception occurred in its reporting of the discovery of
the jacket. The Warren Report stated:

"Police Capt. W.R. Westbrook...walked through the parking lot behind the
service station and found a light-colored jacket lying under the rear of
one of the cars."

However, in his testimony, Westbrook was asked if he found some clothing.

He replied:

"Actually, I didn't find it - it was pointed out to me by... some
officer..."

According to the Dallas Police Radio log, a "white jacket" was found by
"279 (Unknown)" a full 15 minutes before Westbrook arrived on the scene.
The Commission made no effort to determine who really found the jacket, if
a jacket was actually found or if it was a white jacket which only later
was transformed into Oswald's gray jacket. Recently, the owner of the
Texaco station where the jacket reportedly was found told Texas
researchers that no one - neither the FBI, Dallas police nor the Warren
Commission - ever questioned him or his employees about this important
piece of evidence.
In addition, the jacket identified by federal
authorities as belonging to Oswald carried inside a laundry mark "30 030"
and a dry-cleaning tag "B 9738." A full-scale search by the FBI in both Dallas
and New Orleans failed to identify any laundry or dry cleaners using those
marks. (a fact not mentioned in the WC report)
Oswald's wife, Marina, testified she could not recall her husband
ever sending his jackets to a cleaning establishment, but that she did
recall washing them herself. (CE 1843).

Yet in CE 3000 Leslie Lawson, the owner/manager of Gray's Cleaners, 1209 Eldorado, Oak Cliff,
(that location is only a hundred yards from Oswald's rooming house) stated that he has seen Lee Harvey Oswald on one particular occasion and possibly on other occasions. Mr Lawson said that approximately a month earlier, Oswald handed in a tie, white shirt and black pair of trousers for cleaning. Two days later, when Oswald called to collect these items, he had been charged $1.25 and had complained about being charged 25 cents for the cleaning of his tie.

Lawson stated that he had seen Oswald at Reno's Speed Wash. A former Reno's employee, Joseph Johnson, was interviewed by the FBI on 28th July 1964 and stated that on the evening of 20th or 21st November 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald was 'washing laundry at Reno's Speed Wash. Oswald remained there, reading magazines, until midnight. (CE 3001)
Further investigation by the FBI turned up no laundry or dry-cleaning tags on any of Oswald's other clothing, and did not connect the laundry tag to any establishment.


If the jacket doesn't fit.

Oswald wore a size "small" shirt and jacket, all his clothes are size small, the "jacket" is a MEDIUM size, which adds to the suspicion that it was not his jacket. . If he had attorney Johnnie Cochran to represent him can you imagine what he would say?(sARCASM MINE)


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Officer J. M. Poe interviewed Mrs. Markham, she told him Tippit's killer had bushy hair. She said the killer was "a white male about 25 years old, 5'10", slender build, bushy hair, wearing a brown jacket" (Myers, With Malice, p. 118, emphasis added). The jacket that the police claimed Oswald discarded after allegedly shooting Tippit wasn't even close to being brown in color. The police initially said the jacket they reportedly "found" was white. The jacket that was finally submitted as evidence was gray with a slight touch of blue.



Mr. BALL. Did he have a jacket or a shirt? The man that you saw shoot Officer Tippit and run away, did you notice if he had a jacket on?

Mrs. MARKHAM. He had a jacket on when he done it.

Mr. BALL. What kind of a jacket, what general color of jacket?

Mrs. MARKHAM. It was a short jacket open in the front, kind of a grayish tan.

Mr. BALL. Did you tell the police that?

Mrs. MARKHAM. Yes, I did.

Comment: But the first police radio report on Tippit's killer, which was supposedly based at least partly on Mrs. Markham's description, said he was wearing a white jacket (CE 1974; Meagher, Accessories After the Fact, p. 272). In fact, three minutes after this report went out over the air, a police officer, who remains unidentified to this day, radios that he had the killer's white jacket in his possession. It would have been very hard to mistake Oswald's gray jacket for a white jacket after holding it and having a chance to look at for even just a few seconds.

To add to the confusion, one of the witnesses, Barbara Davis, said Tippit's killer was wearing a black coat. Is it not odd, and in fact astounding, that the "policeman" who allegedly "discovered" the killer's coat has never been identified (see Meagher, Accessories After the Fact, pp. 276-279; Lane, Rush to Judgment, pp. 203-204)?



Mr. BALL. Does it look like, anything like, the jacket the man had on?

Mrs. MARKHAM. It is short, open down the front. but that jacket it is a darker jacket than that, I know it was.

Mr. BALL. You don't think it was as light a jacket as that?

Mrs. MARKHAM. No, it was darker than that, I know it was.....




to Mark Lane:

Jacket :LIGHT GRAY looking jacket
Trousers :kind of dark trousers
Shirt :didn't see colour of shirt


in the men who killed kennedy (with her emphasis that she can exactly remember)

Jacket :BROWN jacket
Trousers :light gray trousers
Shirt :a light shirt


In his official report, Poe wrote that:

"We were met by a white female who identified herself as being Helen Marsalle, 328 E. 9th St., who stated she witnessed the shooting of the officer. When she went to his aid the suspect threatened to kill her and she ran. She identified the subject as a white male about 25 years old, 5'10", slender build, bushy hair, wearing a BROWN jacket"... "There were approximately six to eight witnesses, all telling officers that the subject was running west in the alley between tenth and Jefferson Streets"

Later in the day, Poe filed a Supplementary Offense report (Box 7, Folder # 2, Item # 37). Here he wrote:

"We were met by a white woman who identified herself as being Helen Marsille of 329 E. 9th Street who stated that she witnessed the shooting of the officer be an unknown white male of about 25 years of age about 5'10" wearing a BROWN jacket and dark pants. When she went to the aid of the Officer, the suspect threatened to kill her"...
"6 or 7 witnesses said that the suspect was running east in the alley that was between Tenth and Jefferson".


Here is radio transcript that shows when poe got to the scene:

1:22 Dispatcher Remain in the downtown vicinity, 26. Clear. 1:22.
26 (Ptm. G.W. Hammond) 10-4.
75 (Ptm. E.G. Sabastian) 75 Clear.
85 (Ptm. R.W. Walker) 85.
Dispatcher 85.
85 We have a description on this suspect over here on Jefferson. Last seen about 300 block of East Jefferson. He's a white male, about thirty, five eight, (siren) black hair, slender, wearing WHITE jacket, a white shirt and dark slacks. (Sirens)
Dispatcher Armed with what?
85 Unknown.
602 (ambulance) 602 in service.
105 (Ptm. J.M. Poe and L.E. Joz) 105.
Dispatcher 105.
105 We're at the location now.
Dispatcher 10-4.

So its Walker(85) who gives out description of white jacket before Poe talks to Markham.

------------------------------------------------------------------
The following exchange is logged at about 1:25 p.m.

279 (Unknown): "279, 279."

Dispatcher: "279" (Unknown).

279 (Unknown): "We believe we've got the suspect on shooting this officer out here. Got his white jacket. Believe he dumped it on this parking lot behind this service station at 400 block East Jefferson, across from Dudley Hughes (Funeral Parlor), and he had a
white jacket on. We believe this is it."

Dispatcher: "You do not have the suspect, is that correct?"

279 (Unknown): "No, just the jacket on the ground."


per Ian Griggs:
"Incidentally, radio call sign 279 is one of the difficult ones. It appears that it was allocated to at least two officers that day - three-wheel motorcyle officers J.R. Mackey and J.T. Griffin."

I agree the Lawrence exhibit (wh20) shows it assigned to both officers that day and shift. Why does not the other respond when he hears his number being used by the other? Griffin on parking duty and Mackey was at Stemmons Service Road & Industrial with W.E. Wilson and R.J. Kosan.



Calvin “Bud” Owens, Tippit’s supervisor from 10H79

Mr. OWENS. Yes--we were informed by a man whom I do not know, that the suspect that shot Officer Tippit had run across a vacant lot toward Jefferson, and thrown down his jacket, I think he said, WHITE, I'm not sure.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At 1:40PM Westbrook transmitted -

"We got a witness that saw him shed his jacket."


Did Westbrook ever tell us who this witness was who saw the jacket shed by the suspect? No.


Captain Westbrook's testimony at 7H 116-118:
"Yes; behind the Texaco service station, and some officer, I feel sure it was an officer, I still can't be positive - pointed this jacket out to me and it was laying slightly under the rear of one of the cars."

Now we find out it the witness maybe an officer but he is not sure who pointed it out.


Mr. BELIN. I am showing you Commission Exhibit 162, which appears to be a jacket with a zipper. Does that look like the Jacket you saw?
Mr. HUTSON. That looks like the jacket that was picked up by the officer behind the Texaco service station, behind the cars parked on the lot.

Mr. BELIN. Do you know the name of the officer that found it?
Mr. HUTSON. No, sir; I don't know.
Mr. BELIN. Do you know who he gave it to?
Mr. HUTSON. No, sir; I don't.
Mr. BELIN. You don't know if he gave it to Captain Westbrook?
Mr. HUTSON. I don't know. Captain Westbrook was there behind the house with us, and he was there at the time this was picked up with the man, but I don't know who had it in their hands.

Interrogations of Oswald do not mention any jacket; nothing in the official record indicates he was questioned about or confronted with the white jacket by the DPD, FBI or SEcret service.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE TSBD?

Marion Baker said in his report, "...as we reached the third or fourth floor I saw a man walking away from the stairway. Not second. Third or fourth. No lunchroom. No door with a glass panel. Just walking away from the stairway.

With regard to a description of this person, Baker said it was "a white man, approx 30 years old/5'9"/165 pounds, dark hair and wearing a LIGHT BROWN jacket."

Not a description of LHO, but one fitting Brennean's and Rowland's description of the man they saw.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
More witnesses

Frank Wright in interview.

Wright;"I was the first person out, and caught sight of Tippit in time to see him roll over once and then lie still." I saw a man standing in front of the car(Tippits) He was looking toward the man on the ground, the man who was standing in front of him(Tippit) was about medium height. He had on a LONG COAT, it ended just above his hands(?)I didnt see any gun. he ran around on the passenger side of the police car, he ran as fast as he could go, and GOT INTO HIS CAR, the car was about 1950-1951, maybe a Plymouth. He got in that car and drove away as fast as he could. I know what I saw, nothing in the world is going to change my opinion." (emphasis Wright's)


Jimmy Burt, across the street from the construction site where W.L Smith was working, watched the same man as he came from the direction of the Town and Country Cafe and continued walking west on 10th. Burt described him as a white male, approximately 5'8", wearing a light colored short jacket (interview of Burt by SA Christianson and Acklin 12/16/63). Burt watched as the man passed them and continued walking west toward Patton. As the man approached Tippit's patrol car, Tippit rolled down his passenger side car window and spoke to this man.

William Arthur Smith was with Burt at the time and described the same man seen by he and Burt as "a white male, about 5'7" to 5'8", 20 to 25 years of age, 150-160, a white shirt, light BROWN jacket and dark pants (interview of Smith by SA Ward and Basham 12/13/63). Both Burt and Smith watched this unknown man as he walked toward Patton, approached the squad car, spoke with Tippit, and then shot him. (emphasis mine)

Jack Roy Tatum was driving east on 10th St. As he "approached the squad car, he noticed this young white male with both hands in the pockets of his zippered jacket leaning over the passenger side of the squad car". "It looked as if Oswald and Tippit were talking to each other. There was conversation. It did seem peaceful." Tatum swore "he had on a light colored zipper jacket, dark trousers and what looked like a t-shirt on". He also remembered Oswald "as having dark hair, dark eyes of medium build and around 5'10". At the point where Tatum drove slowly past Tippit's squad car, he was less than 10 ft from Oswald. Tatum did not see Oswald wearing a brown shirt, just a white T-shirt (HSCA --- Moriarty 2/1/78)

Ted Callaway described Oswald to DPD Officer HW Summers as "white male, 27, 5'11",165 lbs, black wavy hair, fair complected, wearing LIGHT GRAY Eisenhower type jacket, dark trousers and a white shirt" (CE 705, pg 27). When interviewed many years later, Callaway again said "he had on a WHITE Eisenhower type jacket and a white T-shirt" --- again no brown shirt, just a white T-shirt.(emphasis mine)

Mary Brock was the next person who identified Oswald's clothing. She said Oswald was wearing "light clothing, a light colored jacket and with his hands in his pocket" (interview of Brock by SA Kesler and Mitchem 1/22/64).

FBI statement of Mary Brock:
"The man wearing a WHITE shirt AND jacket hurried west on Jefferson and passed the Ballew Texaco Station. Mary Brock said an individual with a "light complexion" and wearing "light clothing" walked passed her at a fast pace with his hands in his pockets." (emphasis mine)



DPD dispatch 1:22 PM: Last seen about the 300 block East Jefferson. He's a white male about 30 5'8". Black hair, slender, wearing a WHITE jacket, white shirt and dark slacks.

DPD dispatch 1:33 PM: w/m/30 5'8", very slender build, black hair, a WHITE jacket, white shirt and dark slacks. (emphasis mine)

The police broadcast of Tippit's killer described him as a "white male, 5'8", black hair, wearing a white jacket and shirt." Oswald passed Hardy's Shoe store and slipped into to the Texas Theater. Julia Postal, the cashier, called the police. Police broadcasts reported the suspect in the balcony of the theater. When the police arrived, they were told by a "young female", probably Julia Postal, that the man was in the balcony. All policemen who entered the front of the theater went to the balcony. They were questioning a young man when more police entered the main floor of the theater from the rear entrance.

They were looking for a man in a white shirt and white jacket in the balcony, but they arrested a man on the main floor wearing a brown shirt. Captain Westbrook told the officers to "get him out of here as fast as you can and don't let anybody see him". Harvey Oswald was brought out the front entrance, placed in a police car and escorted to jail.

The police homicide report of Tippit's murder read "suspect was later arrested in the balcony of the Texas neater at 231 W. Jefferson". Detective Stringfellow's report states "Oswald was arrested in the balcony of the Texas Theater". But the man in the balcony was not arrested. He may have been escorted out the rear of the theater and driven away in a police car. Bernard Haire, owner of a hobby shop two doors from the theater, witnessed this event. For 25 years Mr. Haire and other witnesses thought they had witnessed the arrest of Oswald at the rear of the Texas Theater. Who was this person if not Lee Oswald? Three police officers were directed to obtain the names and addresses of all theater patrons, but no list exists. There is no police report, no record of arrest, nor mention of any person taken from the rear of the theater.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Did they gather the names of theater witnesses?


Mr. Ball.
Were you the senior officer there?
Mr. Westbrook.
Possibly--I don't think there was another captain there. There was a lieutenant and then I ordered all of them to be sure and take the names of everyone in the theatre at that time.
Mr. Ball.
We have asked for names of people in the theatre and we have only come up with the name of George Applin. Do you know of any others?
Mr. Westbrook.
He possibly might have been the only one in there at the time the rest of them might have been working there, because I'm sure at that time of day you would have more employees than you would have patrons.
Mr. Ball.
You didn't take the names of any of the patrons?
Mr. Westbrook.
No, Sir.

Mr. Ely.
Yes; I have one. Captain, you mentioned that you had left orders for somebody to take the names of everybody in the theatre, and you also stated you did not have this list;
do you know who has it?
Mr. Westbrook.
No; possibly Lieutenant Cunningham will know, but I don't know who has the list.


From a FBI report:
Lieutenant CARL DAY of the Dallas Police Department furnished
a rifle slug which, according to his records, had come
from the residence of General EDWIN A . WALKER, 4811 Turtle Creek,
Dallas, Texas, on April 10, 1963, being contributed by Detective
D.G. Brown .
_-The slug was identified by a cross and the word, "DAY"
which Lieutenant DAY stated he had placed on the slug . He advised
that Detective D.G. Brown had been at the WALKER home and
had obtained the slug from an officer, whose identity he does
not know, but whose identity is known to Lieutenant CUNNINGHAM
of the Forgery Bureau of the Dallas Police Department .


So if you don't know something, blame it on Cunningham? Was he ever questioned by the WC? NO.

Out of twenty odd witnesses in the theater we are left with Evangelist Jack
Davis, and two other witness in the theater at the time, only because they testified, George Applin & John Gibson.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P.S.: Dr Liquori certified Tippit dead at 1:15 PM. That was at Methodist Hospital! per R.A. Davenport's report (note he changed it from 1:00 to 1:15 by typing over the :00)

picture of changed report by Davenport*



Per E.E. Taylor report: I along with Lt. Cunningham and J.B. Toney remained at the theater and took the names and addresses of the occupants of the theater.


But several witnesses placed Oswald, wearing a brown shirt, in the Texas
Theater at 1:15, not at 10th and Patton. Theater concession operator
Butch Burroughs sold Oswald popcorn at 1:15. Dallas Evangelist Jack
Davis said Oswald was sitting next to him while the opening credits to
the movie were running--at 1:20 p.m. Perhaps some of the twenty four
theater patrons would have remembered Oswald, but a list of their names
and addresses, taken by Dallas Police, disappeared.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4:45 PM At a Lineup for Helen Markham, Witness to Tippit Murder Oswald said:

"It isn't right to put me in line with these teenagers. . . . You know what you are doing, and you are trying to railroad me. . . . I want my lawyer. . . . You are doing me an injustice by putting me out there dressed different than these other men. . . . I am out there, the only one with a bruise on his head. . . . I don t believe the lineup is fair, and I desire to put on a jacket similar to those worn by some of the other individuals in the lineup. . . . All of you have a shirt on, and I have a T-shirt on. I want a shirt or something. . . . This T-shirt is unfair." (what jackets did the others "cops" have on, what color?) Why would Oswald want to wear a jacket if he had discarded the one he was wearing when he shot Tippit? And why didn't police facilitate the identification process by making him wear the "WHITE" jacket in the lineups?




In the end there was "No jacket", "One jacket", "Two jackets" and was "Black", "Brown", "Tan", "Blue", "Light Blue", "Grey", "Blue-Gray" and lastly "White."

As the saying goes "The FBI always gets their man" no matter what he is wearing,4

or what color................With all this, in addition to a broken chain of evidence,
the jacket cannot be considered evidence of Oswald's guilt in the killing of Officer
Tippit.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to Steve Thomas, Ian Griggs, Joseph Backes, Todd Teachout and others for your research efforts as this did help me with this multiple-multi-colored jacket phenomenon.



Ed


"Now facts are all very well but they have their little weaknesses. Americans often assume that Facts are solid, concrete (and discrete) objects like marbles, but they are very much not. Rather they are subtle essences, full of mystery and metaphysics, that change their color and shape, their meaning, according to the context in which they are presented. They must always be treated with skepticism, and the standard of judgment should not be how many Facts one can mobilize in support of a position but how skillfully one discriminates between them, how objectively one uses them to arrive at Truth, which is something different from, though not unrelated to, the Facts."—Macdonald, Critique of the Warren Report, Esquire, March 1965, p. 61.

Robert Morrow's Take on the Kennedy Assassination--and How Oswald-Did-It Researchers Complicate the Case

Here is ROBERT MORROW'S essay on the 1963 Coup d'Etat which (updated as OF 11/1/11). IT CONTAINS A GOOD OVERVIEW OF THOSE INVOLVED IN KENNEDY'S MURDER AND THE ONGOING COVER-UP THAT CONTINUES TO THIS DAY.

The LBJ-CIA Assassination of JFK

Fifty years after the assassination of John Kennedy, research is pointing the finger at Lyndon Johnson and the CIA as having engineered a coup d'etat. It is likely that Lyndon Johnson made a dirty deal with CIA Republicans to murder John Kennedy in the 1963 Coup d’Etat. (People like Clint Murchison Sr., H.L. Hunt, D.H. Byrd, Nelson Rockefeller, David Rockefeller, top Nelson Rockefeller aide Henry Kissinger, McGeorge Bundy, George Herbert Walker Bush, Gen. Edward Lansdale (CIA) and Gen. Charles Willoughby all are excellent candidates for elite sponsorship.) Lyndon Johnson and Allen Dulles may very well have been co-CEOs of the JFK assassination; with the CIA in charge of the killing of JFK, and Lyndon Johnson and (his close friend and neighbor of 19 years in Washington, DC) FBI director J. Edgar Hoover in charge of the cover up. 

Texas oil men and key LBJ supporters Clint Murchison, Sr. ands H.L. Hunt are thought to be key players in the JFK assassination because of their close ties to the inner core of US intelligence (Allen Dulles, Nelson Rockefeller, John J. McCloy), close ties to Lyndon Johnson and J. Edgar Hoover of the FBI, bankers Rockefellers; Murchison was even friends with key Kennedy-hater mafia godfather Carlos Marcellos of New Orleans. Not only that, Murchison, Sr. was a patient and partner of Dr. Alton Oschner, the former president of the American Cancer Society and who ran covert cancer research for the CIA. Oschner, likewise was a Kennedy-hater. John Simkin: “One of Ochsner's friends described him as being ‘like a fundamentalist preacher in the sense that the fight against communism was the only subject that he would talk about, or even allow you to talk about, in his presence.”
When JFK was slaughtered, Russia’s Khrushchev was literally crying, fearing nuclear war. Cuba’s Castro worried and feared an US invasion and gave an impressive speech the next day deconstructing the CIA’s deception provocation for war. Meanwhile at Clint Murchison’s home(NOTE, SHE WAS A SEAMSTRESS AND MAID AT , their family maid May Newman describes the scene: “The mood in the Murchison family home was very joyous and happy. For a whole week after like champagne and caviar flowed, every day of the week. But I was the only one in that household at that time that felt any grief for his assassination." 

AT THIS POINT,I WOULD LIKE TO INTERJECT INFORMATION ABOUT THE CONTROVERSY REVOLVING AROUND THE "MURCHISON PARTY" AND THE EVENT DESCRIBED ABOVE,USING AN OSWALD-DID-IT CRITIC'S WRITINGS,WHICH MIX FACT AND FICTION CONVINCINGLY. THE WRITER IS DAVE PERRY, WHO HAS WRITTEN THAT IF I AM TELLING THE TRUTH,I SHOULD BE ARRESTED.  HIS REFERENCES INCLUDE GARY MACK, CALLED 'THE TRAITOR OF THE 6TH FLOOR MUSEUM' FOR ONCE PRETENDING TO CRITICIZE THE WARREN COMMISSION,BUT FOR WHOM A BIG SALARY TO SUPPORT THE 6TH FLOOR MUSEUM'S CAMPAIGN THAT OSWALD KILLED KENNEDY HAS BEEN TOO MUCH OF AN ENTICEMENT FOR HIM TO REFUSE. I WILL INTRODUCE COMMENTS INTO HJIS CRITIQUE,WHICH HAS MANY PROBLEMS. i WILL ALSO PLACE IN RED THOSE WORDS THAT EXHIBIT PREJUDICE. II WILL UNDERLINE KEY PROBLEMS WITH THE WRITING AND ADD COMMENTS IN PARENTHESES.

(ref: http://mysite.verizon.net/dperry1943/guilty.html)

Dave Perry writes:

"May Newman is identified as a Seamstress and Companion to Virginia Murchison. The Guilty Men's narrator intones "She lived and worked in another Murchison house in Dallas for Virginia, Clint Sr.s' second wife. She speaks here for the first time."

Newman reports:

"I started working for Virginia Murchison in 1962 until her death in 1997, approximately 36 years."

As Newman speaks a single story brick ranch style house with a circular drive and the street number 9785 is shown in the background. The actual address is 9785 Audubon Place located within Dallas' Sunnybrook Estates.

Newman makes a puzzling statement. She maintains:

"I remember well the night before the assassination. I worked with a man called Jule Feifer (phonetic), black man, which was Virginia Murchison's chauffeur. He got a call from her stepson John at the big house. They were having a big party for a very special guest that was coming from Washington to go to the party, by the name of Bulldog, which I found out later was J. Edgar Hoover. And he said he was very excited about doing this going on this trip to the airport to take this very special guest to a very special party, big party. And I asked him when he came back if he got a good tip. And he said no and he was very, very upset. He had to go back that night to take J. Edgar Hoover to the airport to go back to Washington and he still didn't get a tip."

Newman also claims she had a conversation with Buella May Holeman (phonetic) who she identifies as John and Lupe Murchison's cook. 

(LATER,PERRY WILL TELL PEOPLE THAT JOHN AND LUPE HAVE NO INTEREST IN THE WELL-DOCUMENTED VENDETTA AGAINST KENNEDY BY CLINT MURCHISON SR'S --AND JR'S--VENDETTA AGAINST KENNEDY. BUT JOHN MURCHISON NEEDED TO KEEP IN FAVOR WITH HIS DISABLED FATHER. CLINT,JR, WHO I WAS TOLD BY MARY FERRELL HAD A COCAINE HABIT AND OTHER PROBLEMS,COULD NOT BE COUNTED ON FOR SECRECY.] 

Holeman indicates they are expecting a very important guest by the name of J. Edgar Hoover. Newman should come over and help prepare the principal meal of quail so she could meet him. Newman refused saying she might have gone if he was a movie star but at the time she didn't know who he was.

Newman also contends she was the only person in the Virginia Murchison household who felt remorse over Kennedy's death.

"The mood in the Murchison family home was very joyous and happy. For a whole week after like champagne and caviar flowed, every day of the week. But I was the only one in that household at that time that uh felt any grief for his assassination."

With all the claims and counterclaims concerning this party, let me explain.

Madeleine Brown, the only person professing attendance, indicated the party was held at Clint Sr.'s home 

[THE HOME ONCE BELONGED TO MURCHISON SR. THOUGH IT WAS NOW OCCUPIED BY HIS SON JOHN, AND JOHN'S WIFE,LUPE MURCHISON, THEY WERE FREQUENTLY ABSENT,LIVING ELSEWHERE ON A RANCH,AS LUPE DIDN'T LIKE THE HOUSE.]

"as a tribute honoring his life long friend, J. Edgar Hoover."

[IF MURCHISON,SR. HAD HIS OWN HOME ELSEWHERE, WHICH WAS THE CASE,WHY WOULD HE USE OF HIS SON'S HOUSE FOR THE TRIBUTE,WHICH WAS MORE REMOTE AND HARDER TO REACH UNOBSERVED, RATHER THAN HIS OWN FORMER MANSION, ON SOME 25 ACRES OF LAND SO CLOSE TO THE HEART OF DALLAS? CONSIDER, TOO,THAT IF A SECRET MEETING WAS TO BE HELD THERE, JUST IN CASE OF LEAKS, A COVER 'PARTY' IN MURCHISON SR'S OWN HOME WOULD BE TOO OBVIOUS. THESE ARE CONSIDERATIONS PERRY IGNORES.] 

"It was a rather large affair as the guest list included John McCloy, Richard Nixon, George Brown, R.L. Thornton and H.L. Hunt. This scenario is impossible because Clint Sr. had retreated to his Glad Oaks Ranch in 1959 after suffering a stroke in 1958."

[PERRY WANTS US TO BELIEVE THAT MURCHISON,SR. WOULD NOT HAVE ARRANGED FOR HIS FORMER HOME TO BE USED FOR THE PARTY,WITHOUT OFFERING EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY.NOBODY EVER QUESTIONED JOHN AND LUPE ABOUT THIS PARTY,THOUGH THE STORY FIRST WAS OUTED BY PENN JONES. PERRY THUS CANNOT QUOTE JOHN AND LUPE.]

In McClellan's book the party was held at Clint Jr.s' home. One can surmise where this revelation came from.

[ But the question is, would John Murchison prohibit a meeting about eradicating Kennedy,which occurred at the party 'honoring Hoover'? This is a question Perry ignores. .]

By the late-1980's Madeleine Brown had learned, through the research efforts of Gary Mack, of the inconsistencies in her original story. She made an appearance on the television show A Current Affair and described the party as being at Clint Jr.'s home. This also is impossible, as Clint Jr. was not an occupant of Newman's referenced "big house", and would have no reason, as I explained above, to have "a tribute honoring his life long friend, J. Edgar Hoover."

[Here Perry ignores the high intelligence factor of Clint Murchison,Jr. who would not be about to reveal anything incriminating, and the fact that Clint Murchison Sr. did not die until June 20, 1969.]

"Newman correctly attests that the occupant of the "big house" was John Murchison." 

[Note that Perry says 'occupants,' avoiding saying that John Murchison OWNED the house. A November 7, 2008 Dallas News article says, "After he suffered a stroke around 1960, Clint traded houses with his son John Murchison and John's wife, Lupe.

The big house then became the backdrop for Lupe and John's stunning collection of art by Mark Rothko, Roy Lichtenstein, Helen Frankenthaler and others. Then Perry uses Newman,who he says elsewhere is in error, to go on to discredit the "Clint Murchison Jr" connection. Yet he will attack other elements in the maid's story.] 

Once John took custody of the home his wife, Lupe, turned the 22,000 square foot house into what has been described as "a showcase for the eye-popping contemporary art" collected by the couple.

Next Newman introduces another home, that of Virginia who is Clint Sr.s' second wife. She, as well as, Virginia's chauffeur are asked to assist with a party now being held at the Murchison mansion occupied by John and Lupe! 

[Pewrry wants us to think this is impossible.  Yet,

John has absolutely no relationship with J. Edgar Hoover and therefore no interest in any party. There are lots of the claims and counterclaims but since the whole scenario is fabricated there can be no corroboration. The entire story of the party is a fraud created by one person only - Madeleine Brown.

Martin Shackelford made a valid point on April 8, 2004 when he mentioned in the alt.assassination.jfk newsgroup that:
"Oddly, Dave attributes the Murchison party as simply an invention of Madeleine Brown, despite the fact that another source (reportedly a chauffeur who had driven someone to the party) had reported the party to Penn Jones Jr. many years before Madeleine went public with her account."

AT THE END OF HIS ESSAY,  HE WRITES:

Martin Shackelford is correct. Years before Madeleine told her story Penn Jones did mention a party but the story involving an unnamed chauffeur [here Perry conveniently forgets to mention that Jones said the chauffeur was black,--just as the maid had said!---we get that information from Perry's close friend, Gary Mack, which is a portent of Mack's later activities generally supporting the 6th Floor Museum's agenda that Lee Oswald killed Kennedy. Here we will underline and bold face points where Mack is interesting: Gary Mack's account of Madeleine Brown's LBJ party story on 14th May, 1997.  Madeleine has claimed over the years that she attended a party at Clint Murchison’s house the night before the assassination and LBJ, Hoover and Nixon were there. The party story, without LBJ, first came from Penn Jones in Forgive My Grief. In that version, the un-credited source was a black chauffeur whom Jones didn’t identify, and the explanation Jones gave was that it was the last chance to decide whether or not to kill JFK. Of course, Hoover used only top FBI agents for transportation and in the FBI of 1963, none were black.  [NOTE THAT THIS EARLY VERSION DISMISSES A BLACK CHAUFFEUR. GARY MACK DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE BLACK CHAUFFEUR NEWMAN SAID WORKED AT THE MURCHISON MANSION] Actually, there is no confirmation for a party at Murchison’s. I asked Peter O’Donnell because Madeleine claimed he was there, too. Peter said there was no party. Madeleine even said there was a story about it in the Dallas Times Herald some months later (which makes no sense), but she had not been able to find it. Val Imm (Society Editor of the Dallas Times Herald) told Bob Porter (of the Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza staff) recently she had no memory of such an event and even looked through her notes - in vain.  WHO IS PETER O'DONNELL? AN EXTREME CONSERVATIVE,A FOUNDING MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION IN NOV,1964. Ref: http://www.seekgod.ca/cnp.c.htm  RESEARCHER JAMES FETZER in his book ASSASSINATION SCIENCE relates that he interviewed Madelein,who said O'Donnell drove Richard Nixon to the meeting. If this is true,O'Donnell would NEVER admit to the meeting. If the interview with O'Donnell had been conducted with somebody else, would they have been so certain that O'Donnell was telling the truth? Info source:  http://www.jmasland.com/results_forum.asp?subject=WHO+DID+IT+AND+WHAT+REALLY+HAPPENED&Submit=Search Could LBJ have been at a Murchison party? No. LBJ was seen and photographed in the Houston Coliseum with JFK at a dinner and speech. They flew out around 10pm and arrived at Carswell (Air Force Base in northwest Fort Worth) at 11:07 Thursday night. Their motorcade to the Hotel Texas arrived about 11:50 and LBJ was again photographed. He stayed in the Will Rogers suite on the 13th floor and Manchester (William Manchester - author of The Death of a President) says he was up late.  [GARY MACK DOES NOT TELL US THE SOURCES OF THE INFORMATION ABOVE. IT TURNS OUT THAT SOME OF THE ALIBI,IF SUCH WAS THE CASE,CAME FROM LBJ'S AIDE BILL MOYER,WEHO WOULD HAVE SAID ANYTHING TO PROTECT HIS BOSS. MANCHESTER'S STATEMENT MEANS LITTLE,SINCE LBJ MIGHT HAVE BEEN OBSERVED UPON HIS RETURN. MADELEINE BROWN SAYS LYNDON ARRIVED VERY LATE AND THAT THE MEETING DID NOT LAST VERY LONG.] Could Nixon have been at Murchison’s party? No. Tony Zoppi (Entertainment Editor of The Dallas Morning News) and Don Safran (Entertainment Editor of the Dallas Times Herald) saw Nixon at the Empire Room at the Statler-Hilton. He walked in with Joan Crawford (Movie actress). Robert Clary (of Hogan’s Heroes fame) stopped his show to point them out, saying “. . . either you like him or you don’t.” Zoppi thought that was in poor taste, but Safran said Nixon laughed. Zoppi’s deadline was 11pm, so he stayed until 10:30 or 10:45 and Nixon was still there.  [BUT MADELEINE BROWN DOES NOT TELL US WHEN NIXON ARRIVED. SHE SAYS O'DONNELL DRIVE HIM THERE. FURTHER, MACK'S STATEMENT THAT "ZOPPI'S DEADLINE WAS 11 PM,SO HE STAYED UNTIL 10:30 OR 10;45 AND NIXON WAS STILL THERE" DEFIES ALL LOGIC. I WAS A NEWS REPORTER MYSELF: THERE IS TRANSPORTATION TO THE NEWS OFFICE,WHICH WOULD TAKE SOME TIME, PARKING, ENTERING BIG BUILDING, GETTING INTO OFFICE,THEN WRITING UP THE EVENT ON A NEWS TYPEWRITER,WHICH ITSELF TAKES TIME. NIXON COULD HAVE LEFT AT 1-0:00 PM,FOR ALL WE KNOW.] http://www.spartacus...k/JFKbrownM.htm   is more allusion than reality. Jones' brief version of the event appears in Forgive My Grief (pp. 84-86). Jones first discussed a party that did take place on or about October 18, 1969 at "Number One Main Place Plaza" in Dallas. You haven't misread the date of 1969. Jones references a party that took place almost six years after the assassination. Then in a classic case of historical fraud  [PENN JONES WAS A RESPECTED RESEARCHER. DAVE PERRY'S  ACCUSATION IS SPECIOUS. IN THE NEXT SENTENCE, YOU LEARN THAT AN EARLIER PARTY IS REFERENCED THEN BY PENN JONES...] he comments: "An earlier unreported Murchison party was much more important than those of recent years. This party was held on the night of November 21, 1963 at the Murchison home (notice he doesn't mention which home), and we think, was the cover for an important conference of the assassination staff." (Emphasis mine) Jones originally thought the party took place in Sikes, Lousiana but for reasons known only to him changed it to the Murchison home. Jones then divines that two of the guests at his unreported party were Richard Nixon and J. Edgar Hoover. He actually gives Hoover the appellation "Task Force Commander." Lyndon Johnson's name appears nowhere in the article. [BUT LYNDON JOHNSON'S TEXAS CRONIES HAD GREAT POWER IN TEXAS AT THIS TIME, AND PENN JONES KNEW THIS VERY WELL,HAVING  HAD TO DEAL WITH TRYING TO HELP FORMER DALLAS WITNESS ROGER CRAIG.] At the end of his "report" he states, "Admittedly our information about Hoover's presence was learned second hand, but it is reliable. We will never tell how we got the information." Can you imagine the outcry if the government used the same deceitful techniques Jones uses to support his questionable claim? I tried to find the source of the allegation that "a chauffeur had driven someone to the party" but was never able to find it in print, and as shown above Jones was reticent about revealing his source. I believe he operated in this fashion so serious researchers would find it difficult to discover the true depth of the deception he used in his "investigations." It turned out that the chauffeur story originated with Roger Craig. Here is what Jones omitted from Craig's recounting 1 - the chauffeur was black and 2 - the chauffeur was in the employ of Clint Murchison, SR. [EVEN AS PERRY ATTACKS PENN JONES FOR NOT PROVIDING A CITATION FOR HIS INFORMATION (WHICH SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN MADELEIN BROWN) HE THEN TELLS US THAT  ROGER CRAIG PROVIDED THIS INFORMATION--WHILE HE,TOO, FAILS TO CITE A SOURCE,EITHER.]
With that history I merely had to determine who the chauffeur was. It turned out to be Warren Tilley, husband of Eula Tilley who I interviewed for the first time on August 21, 2002. Warren has throat cancer and is unable to speak but Eula did. Sometime between 1959 - 1960 Clint Murchison, Sr. moved to his Glad Oaks Ranch near Palestine, Texas after suffering a stroke. That is at least THREE YEARS before the assassination. On the day of and at the time of the assassination he was having lunch with his neighbor Woffard Cain. Earlier in the morning Warren had given him a ride in the car. Murchison and the Tilly's were nowhere near Dallas for months prior to or well after the assassination.Interested parties may want to pull out a map to see just where Palestine is located with respect to Dallas. [BUT THIS IS A CHAUFFEUR FOR THE MURCHISON,SR. AT HIS NEW HOME AND HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE DALLAS LOCATION. PERRY KNOWS THIS BUT PROFFERS THIS INFORMATION ANYWAY.]
	Roger Craig
Since Jones never mentioned what Murchison home was involved it was Madeleine and Madeleine alone that invented the FINAL SCENARIO of the "lavish party" at Clint Murchison, Sr's home. As her story unraveled she was forced to embellish and lie. She pleaded with Val Imm (Society Editor of The Dallas Times Herald) to find her story about the party because Madeleine had spent hours in an unsuccessful search at the public library. Imm couldn't because there was no party to write about. Back in 1969 Jones had already asserted the party was unreported. [THIS IS A TWISTING OF PENN JONES' STATEMENT. THE PARTY WAS NOT REPORTED BY THE WARREN COMMISSION, FBI, ETC. AS WELL AS BY MADELEINE BROWN, TO ANY AUTHORITY AT THE TIME. TO INCLUDE NEWSPAPER STORIES,JONES MIGHT HAVE USED THE TERM 'UNPUBLISHED' BUT DID NOT.] Madeleine not only had problems with Val Imm but the actual time of the party itself. She kept moving the start time up. She had to. To her chagrin she found out that, shortly after his arrival at Carswell Air Force Base northwest of Fort Worth, Lyndon Johnson was photographed at 11:07 PM Thursday night. Then she discovered Richard Nixon was with movie actress Joan Crawford at the Empire Room of the Statler Hilton in Dallas as late as 10:45 PM. Both Tony Zoppi(Entertainment Editor of The Dallas Morning News) and Don Safran (Entertainment Editor of The Dallas Times Herald) saw the two of them there at Robert Cleary's show. Cleary is known for his role as Corporal Louis Lebeau in the 1960s to 1970s television series Hogan's Heroes. Dave Perry April 9, 2004" NOW WE WILL RETURN TO ROBERT MORROW'S STORY:

The Warren Commission should have really been called the “Allen Dulles Commission” because he controlled it and made it the farce that it was. Dulles was probably an elite sponsor (i.e. murderer), as well as certainly Lyndon Johnson. The 3 hardcore cover up artists on the Warren Commission were the 3 Council on Foreign Relations members: Allen Dulles (president CFR 1946-50), John J. McCloy (then chairman of the CFR 1953-1970) and Gerald Ford (CFR member, later president). John J. McCloy was a Rockefeller man, former head of Chase Manhattan bank, and very deep US intelligence since the OSS days. John J. McCloy’s nickname was “Chairman of the American Establishment,” and he mixed at the highest levels of business, intelligence and he was close to the Kennedy-hating Texas business elite. Cover up artist Gerald Ford was secretly reporting to Hoover and the FBI what the Warren Commission was doing. In 1970, Newsweek called Gerald Ford the “CIA’s best friend in Congress.” The CFR especially 40 years ago, was heavily Rockefeller influenced and it top players were deep CIA.

The CIA has been called the military wing of the CFR; and actually that is not too far from the truth. The CFR was in its heyday from 1950-1990.

Here is an absolutely spectacular article why the National Security State murdered John Kennedy: http://www.lewrockwe...rshall10.1.html John Kennedy was despised by and did not control his CIA nor his Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Lyndon Johnson’s reasons to murder were out of his deep desperation and fear of what would become of him after his imminent expulsion from the 1964 Democratic ticket and his fears of going to jail over the exploding Bobby Baker scandal. LIFE magazine, being fed extremely damaging info by Robert Kennedy, was set to run an expose on Lyndon Johnson’s corruption that would blow him out of the water once and for all (Dec. 6th issue, but due to be printed and mailed on 11/29/63: source James Wagenvoord who worked at LIFE then). Bobby Baker was the protégé of a wildly corrupt LBJ in the Senate; Lyndon Johnson was like both a dad and a big brother to Bobby Baker (who named two of his children after LBJ: Lynda and Lyndon). Both Lyndon Johnson and Bobby Baker were receiving tremendous amounts of under-the-table money while Johnson was running the Senate. The Kennedys and LIFE Magazine were literally days away from politically executing Lyndon Johnson with the rope of the unraveling Bobby Baker scandal. After vaporizing the despised Lyndon Johnson, John Kennedy was going to replace LBJ most likely with Terry Sanford of North Carolina or possibly his good friend George Smathers of Florida as VP on the 1964 Democratic ticket.

The Kennedys and Lyndon Johnson were having a sub rosa fight: Jack and Robert Kennedy brought knives to the battle and Lyndon Johnson brought guns and it was settled on 11/22/63 at 12:30 PM in Dallas. 

Lately, I have been studying the role of McGeorge Bundy, the National Security Advisor for JFK and Henry Cabot Lodge, JFK’s insubordinate ambassador to Vietnam who Kennedy was planning to fire on Monday, 11/25/63. It is probable that both McGeorge Bundy and Henry Cabot Lodge were involved some way with the JFK assassination. McGeorge Bundy, astonishingly, was already drafting sharp escalations to JFK’s Vietnam policy NSAM 273 (which JFK would not have approved) on 11/21/63, the night before the 1963 Coup d’Etat! McGeorge Bundy was also assuring others very quickly on 11/22/63 that there was no conspiracy to kill JFK, at a time when it was impossible for him (or anyone) to credibly be saying that. Bundy later ran the Ford Foundation from 1966-1979.

JFK’s Secretary of State, Dean Rusk, who ran the Rockefeller Foundation from 1952-1961, and was also a hawk on Vietnam, is another one who merits close scrutiny in the Coup of 1963. Kennedy had appointed Rusk because it was unlikely that the Senate would confirm JFK’s first choice J. William Fulbright, who later became a prominent opponent of the Vietnam War. After the 1963 Coup d’Etat, Rusk lasted through all the blood and guts of Vietnam and all the way through Jan., 1969, as Johnson’s Secretary of State. Walt Rostow (CFR), another Vietnam hawk, replaced McGeorge Bundy (CFR) as National Security Advisor in 1966. The CFR and the Rockefellers, not John Kennedy, lusted for the Vietnam War.

The midlevel murderers (field operations) of JFK would include CIA guys like Richard Helms, David Atlee Phillips, James Angleton, David Morales, William King Harvey, E. Howard Hunt, Frank Sturgis, and perhaps Cord Meyer. Cord Meyer who ran Operation Mockingbird (media manipulation) certainly was heavily involved in the cover up of the JFK assassination. 

Deputy Harry Weatherford is a good candidate to have been on the Records Building as a sniper. Influential mobster Johnny Roselli was especially close friends with the CIA’s William King Harvey, a rabid Kennedy hater. The most likely mafia godfathers involved would be Carlos Marcello and Santo Trafficante, particularly in the Jack Ruby murder of Oswald and perhaps in the JFK Assassination as well and other murders in the post assassination cover up.

We now know Lyndon Johnson was far worse than he is presented in current biographies. Far beyond ballot stuffing, bribery, massive under-the-table kickbacks, and being a consummate and pathological liar, Lyndon Johnson was murdering a lot of people in Texas to cover up his eye popping corruption. A prime example is the murder of US agricultural official Henry Marshall in June, 1961, and who then Vice President Lyndon Johnson arranged to have murdered. In the 1980’s, Billie Sol Estes, a close and corrupt partner of LBJ, began confessing to the murders that he, Lyndon Johnson, Cliff Carter and LBJ’s personal hit man Malcolm Wallace committed. Lyndon Johnson, a manic depressive – and at times a barely functioning psychopath - murdered perhaps 10-20 people to avoid exposure before he got his knife wet with John Kennedy’s blood.

Lyndon Johnson and Sam Rayburn, taking advantage of Hoover’s dossier on JFK, used sexual blackmail and other threats on John Kennedy on the night of July 13th at the 1960 Democratic convention in Los Angeles in order to force Kennedy to put LBJ on the ticket. Johnson was not on JFK’s short list for VP; he was not on the long list. LBJ was not on the VP list – period. Johnson made a hostile take over of the vice presidential slot. 

John Kennedy told his close friend Hy Raskin: “You know we had never considered Lyndon, but I was left with no choice. He and Sam Rayburn made it damn clear to me that Lyndon had to be the candidate. Those bastards were trying to frame me. They threatened me with problems and I don’t need more problems. I’m going to have enough problems with Nixon.” Evelyn Lincoln, JFK’s secretary for 11+ years, also confirms that Lyndon Johnson used sexual blackmail combined with other threats to force JFK to put LBJ on the 1960 Democratic ticket.

On Inauguration Day 1961, Johnson's close confidant Bobby Baker predicted to his friend Don Reynolds that John Kennedy would not finish out his term and that he (JFK) would die a violent death. I think that Bobby Baker was intimating that LBJ was planning to murder JFK. For the rest of JFK's life, he and LBJ would be engaging in a sub rosa war.

My current thinking on US intelligence agent Lee Harvey Oswald is that he was indeed involved in the JFK assassination, but he was a patsy who shot NO ONE that day, neither John Kennedy nor Officer J.D. Tippit. Both murders were complete frame jobs. Oswald was a fake defector to Russia and his behavior in New Orleans 1963 was all about Oswald’s sheep dipping as he passed out pro-Castro flyers and pretended to be a “pro-Castro Marxist.” Meanwhile Oswald was working in concert in New Orleans with folks like David Ferrie and Guy Bannister whose politics were the equivalent of a 1960’s Strom Thurmond or Jesse Helms. Oswald’s fake public persona as a “pro-Casto Marxist” meant that he was an ideal pick as a patsy and his likely knowledge of and/or participation in the JFK Assassination meant that he had to be murdered quickly. The folks who killed Oswald wanted a “dead Red” not a “talking head.” The JFK assassination was a deception provocation intended to facilitate a US military invasion of Cuba. It was that bad and ugly. A US invasion of Cuba might have provoked a broader war with Russia and from the point of view of some like Air Force General Curtis LeMay that was fine because, astoundingly, he wanted to wage and “win” a nuclear WWIII. Curtis LeMay hated Kennedy so much that a child could have recruited him into a plot to kill Kennedy. LeMay told Kennedy during the Cuban Missile Crisis that he was an appeaser equivalent to Neville Chamberlain for not bombing Cuba.

That was the pool of sharks John Kennedy was swimming in: a desperate and psychopathic serial killer Vice-President Lyndon Johnson who was literally murdering a string of people down in Texas and who was waging a sub rosa war with the Kennedys, an out-of-control CIA hell bent on a coup; an FBI director Hoover who detested JFK and who was close friends and neighbors with LBJ, and a JCS military brass who wanted to invade Cuba, wage the war in Vietnam, and Curtis LeMay who, according to Robert McNamara, wanted to wage full scale nuclear war with Russia, giving them the “Sunday punch” while the USA still had first strike capability. Add to that the white hot mafia hatred that Robert Kennedy was engendering with his prosecutions. This same mafia had been working hand in glove with their friends the CIA to take out Castro in Cuba. Think of these enemies of JFK as fasces: “a bundle of wooden sticks with an axe blade emerging from the center, which is an image that traditionally symbolizes summary power and jurisdiction, and/or strength through unity.”

The elite domestic murderers of JFK did it for many reasons, both personal and ideological. At the core it was Lyndon Johnson, the CIA, and the shadow government of Texas oil barons and the Rockefellers. It was not either/or the Western “Cowboys” or the Eastern “Yankees” who murdered John Kennedy: it was the elites of both.

Most folks don’t know just how close Lyndon Johnson and J. Edgar Hoover were both personally and physically. For 19 years LBJ and Hoover lived literally 3 houses down and across the street, about 57 yards, in Washington, D.C. They often had Sunday brunch together at the Johnsons with other power brokers such as Sen. Richard Russell and House Speaker Sam Rayburn, both LBJ mentors. LBJ and Hoover were also extremely close to the Texas oil barons such as Clint Murchison, Sr. and H.L. Hunt who have been implicated in the JFK assassination.

I always want to learn and I am always willing to change my mind. Two excellent books to read on the JFK assassination are 1) LBJ: Mastermind of JFK’s Assassination (2010) by Phillip Nelsonhttp://www.lbj-themastermind.com/ and 2) JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why it Matters (2008) by James Douglass. Review: http://www.ctka.net/...nspeakable.html I also highly recommend 3) Brothers: The Hidden History of the Kennedy Years by David Talbot 4) The Dark Side of Camelot by Seymour Hersh 5) Family of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty by Russ Baker.

Richard Nixon knew the dirty truth about the JFK assassination, but I do not think he was directly involved. In fact, when Nixon was under intense Watergate pressure, his firewall strategy as recorded on the “smoking gun tape” (recorded 6/23/72) was to ominously say don’t investigate me because it you do “the President believes that this is going to open up the whole Bay of Pigs thing again” – an obvious reference to the JFK assassination. Nixon’s aide Dean Burch said that when George Herbert Walker Bush heard that “He broke out in assholes and ____ himself to death.” GHW Bush was probably an elite planner of the JFK assassination.

Howard Baker once asked Nixon, “What do you know about the Kennedy assassination?” Nixon replied “You don’t want to know.” (Source: Don Hewett, Kennedy Library Oral History.)

Lyndon Johnson himself told Madeleine Duncan Brown on the night of 12/31/63 that it was Texas oil barons and “renegade intelligence bastards” who murdered John Kennedy. LBJ and Madeleine had a son Steven Mark in 1950. (Source: Madeleine Brown.)

Edgar Hoover who along with LBJ was the primary architect of the cover up, told Billy Byars, Jr.: "If I told you what I really know, it would be very dangerous to the country. Our whole political system could be disrupted." Hoover was responding to a question of whether Oswald really shot JFK. (Source: Billy Byars, Jr.)

Without a doubt, top honors for being biggest source for disinformation on the Coup of 1963 has been the NY Times whose reporting on the JFK assassination has been the equivalent of 1950’s Soviet style propaganda, i.e. completely fraudulent and parroting the 1960’s fantastic whoppers of LBJ, FBI, CIA and the Warren Commission. CBS News, ABC News, the Washington Post and the former LIFE magazine and CIA assets in other major media have been equally bad. LIFE Magazine actually bought the rights to the Zapruder film early on and never showed it once to the American people in video form., which would have revealed the incriminating “back and to the left” head snap of John Kennedy, all but proving a kill shot from the Grassy Knoll (grassy knoll shooting area being an extremely close 33 yards away from JFK). Finally, when American hero Robert Groden showed the Zapruder film on Geraldo on ABC in 1975, millions of Americans knew without a doubt what a sham the Warren Commission was.

After he murdered John Kennedy and assumed the presidency, Lyndon Johnson gave over his Administration to the Council on Foreign Relations, both in regards to domestic and foreign policy. NSA chief McGeorge Bundy in particular immediately assumed a lot of power over LBJ. The CFR, the CIA, the Rockefellers, the JCS, and the military contractors wanted the Vietnam War. It is extremely significant that in spring, 1968, after LBJ had withdrawn from the presidential race, Democrat Lyndon Johnson secretly supported Republican Nelson Rockefeller for president. LBJ wanted someone who could stop Robert Kennedy, and more importantly, who would continue the cover up of the 1963 Coup d’Etat. Nelson Rockefeller personified the CFR, CIA and Eastern Establishment and I think he was a sponsor of the JFK assassination. Note: Rockefeller did not support fellow Republican Barry Goldwater in his 1964 race against Johnson.

A special word about the Council on Relations role in the 1963 Coup d’Etat and cover up: no other organization has been more responsible for the murder and cover up of John Kennedy than the CFR. Elite CFR members such as Allen Dulles, Nelson Rockefeller, George Herbert Walker Bush and McGeorge Bundy were probably sponsors of the JFK assassination. Certainly leadership CFR members such as Allen Dulles, John J. McCloy, and Gerald Ford played the most critical roles in the Warren Commission farce. Add in cover up roles played by McGeorge Bundy (CFR/CIA), Nelson Rockefeller (CFR/CIA), Henry Kissinger (CFR/CIA), Richard Helms (CFR/CIA), William Colby (CFR/CIA), Nicholas Katzenbach (CFR), Jack Valenti (CFR), Bill Moyers (CFR), Henry Luce (CFR), Clair Boothe Luce (CFR), William Coleman (CFR) James Reston NY Times (CFR), Anthony Lewis NY Times (CFR), William F. Buckley (CFR/CIA), Walter Cronkite CBS (CFR), Dan Rather CBS (CFR), Bob Schieffer CBS (CFR), Peter Jennings ABC (CFR), Daniel Schorr (CFR), Arthur Ochs Sulzberger NY Times (CFR), Michael Eisner Disney (CFR), Harrison Salisbury NY Times (CFR), Kenneth Gilmore Readers’ Digest (CFR), Tom Braden (CFR/CIA), Stephen Rosenfeld Washington Post (CFR), Bobbie Ray Inman (CFR/CIA), Arnold de Borchgrave (CFR), Donald Rumsfeld (CFR), Rupert Murdoch FOX (CFR), John McCain (CFR), Robert Gates CIA (CFR)… the list is almost endless. Note two things: 1) they are the key establishment players of BOTH major political parties spanning decades 2) their power and influence is directly proportional to the fantastic whoppers they tell about in the 1963 Coup d’Etat. For the older CFR members it is a case of PARTICIPATION and COVER UP in the JFK assassination. For the younger ones such as Bill Clinton (CFR), Douglas G. Brinkley (CFR), George Will (CFR/ABC), Charles Krauthammer (CFR/FOX), Bill Kristol (CFR/FOX), David Gergen (CFR), John Segenthaler (CFR), Frank Sesno (CFR), Evan Thomas (CFR), Michael Beschloss (CFR), Stephen M. Walt (CFR), George Stephanopolous (CFR/ABC), Jonathan Alter (CFR), Evan Thomas (CFR), Brian Williams (CFR/NBC), Daniel Pipes (CFR), Michael Gerson (CFR) it is a case of WILLFUL IGNORANCE as they still push the Big Lie. Note: Chris Matthews of Hardball, another willfully ignorant man, is close friends with Richard Haass, current president of CFR. I have never seen highly acclaimed political guru Michael Barone, a Bilderberger attendee, ever say anything credible on the JFK assassination.

Question: do we really expect the CFR to admit that some of its elite members slaughtered John Kennedy and many more played integral roles in the cover up? No, but it is important to highlight that the Council on Foreign Relations has stunk up the place with tremendous amounts of radioactive horse manure relating to the 1963 Coup d’Etat. 

The key thing to understand about the Council on Foreign Relations is that it has been joined at the hip with the CIA and that US intelligence has long used the CFR to manipulate the media. Covering up the JFK assassination has been a Holy Grail of the CFR/CIA.

The 1963 Coup d’Etat was very similar to the 1992 election between George Herbert Walker Bush, Ross Perot and Bill Clinton. In 1963, there was a Texas Vice President, a desperate and dangerous Lyndon Johnson - supported by the CFR, the intelligence agencies, military contractors and the oil industry - who feared exposure of his criminality and was on the verge of political and personal annihilation. So Lyndon Johnson used the CIA to murder his political rival John Kennedy.

In the 1992, there was a Texas President, a desperate and dangerous George Herbert Walker Bush, supported by the CFR, the intelligence agencies, military contractors and the oil industry - who feared exposure of his criminality and was on the verge of political and personal annihilation. Ross Perot was well aware of the gargantuan Bush/Clinton/CIA drug smuggling of the 1980’s. So George Herbert Walker Bush used elite CIA “Pegasus” assassins to threaten to murder Ross Perot. GHW Bush feared what Perot, a self-funded (and therefore uncontrollable) billionaire might do in office. Bush, like LBJ 29 years before, faced both political and potentially personal annihilation if an untainted Ross Perot were elected.

Ross Perot was leading in a Time/CNN poll in June, 1992, with 37% to 24% Clinton, 24% Bush. On July 16, 1992, Ross Perot, a billionaire who could self-fund and was leading in the polls significantly, QUIT the presidential race because he feared that a desperate George Herbert Walker Bush might literally assassinate him. Google “Chip Tatum Pegasus” and read about the elite CIA assassin who quit rather than follow the orders of George Herbert Walker Bush and neutralize Ross Perot: 
http://whatreallyhap...ATUM/tatum.html An incensed Perot later got back in the race only to ensure the election of Bill Clinton.

I think that George Herbert Walker Bush (CIA/CFR) became a made man with the JFK assassination in 1963. Read the book Family of Secrets by Russ Baker to learn more about the possible role of GHW Bush. Also read this link: http://www.jfkmurder...ed.com/bush.htm 

One of the first things the Bill Clinton (CIA/CFR) did after he got elected in 1992 was to ask Webb Hubbell at Justice to find out who really killed John Kennedy. Bill Clinton is a coward; he is good friends with GHW Bush today and Clinton today says he thinks a lone nut killed Kennedy - something he surely does not believe.

The Discovery Channel has put out some incredibly bogus, poorly done disinfo presentations such as Inside the Target Car. Any MSM site that features Vincent Bugliosi, Gerald Posner, especially Hugh Aynesworth, Edward Jay Epstein, Gus Russo, Michael Shermer, Dale Meyers, Max Holland, Dave Perry or Gary Mack prominently and positively is giving you counterfeit money. Edward Epstein and Gerald Posner in particular are thought by many credible JFK researchers to be CIA propagandists. If you google “JFK assassination” the first 2 links that come up are lone nutter controlled disinfo sites: 1) Wikipedia 2) John McAdam’s site. John McAdams is a very lowly regarded man who basically controls JFK related content on Wikipedia as well as his own site. Both Wikipedia and the NY Times are both tremendously dishonest sources for information relating to the 1963 Coup d’Etat. Finally, another major source of disinformation on the Coup of 1963 is the Sixth Floor Museum in Dallas, which blithely recycles the shredded vapors of the Warren Commission, as if it had an ounce of truth in it. Gary Mack, the curator of the Sixth Floor Museum, simply does not have credibility on the JFK assassination.

A special note on Wikipedia: any entry related to the JFK assassination or US intelligence agent Lee Harvey Oswald is locked down to prevent editing by the public. Wiki founder Jimmy Wales has a fondness for governmental fairy tales and JFK experts are prevented from editing entries on the site.

In the near future there are going to be efforts by both Tom Hanks (HBO series) and Leonardo DiCaprio (a movie Legacy of Secrecy) to take on the JFK assassination. Sadly, these are both going to be disinformation efforts; the ONLY legitimate take on the JFK assassination is that it was a full blown domestic coup d’etat. Tom Hanks is a clueless lone nutter.

Legacy of Secrecy, produced by Warner Brothers, is a deeply flawed attempt to blame the JFK assassination on “the mob only,” leaving out Lyndon Johnson, the National Security State and the shadow government of Texas oil barons and Rockefellers. Courtenay Lynda Valenti, an executive vice president of production at Warner Brothers,
is very likely (short of a DNA test) the biological daughter (born in 1963) of Lyndon Johnson and Mary Margaret Valenti. Mary Margaret Valenti, a Texas beauty, had been a secretary/mistress of Lyndon Johnson and it is believed that Jack Valenti was letting his “wife” sleep with Lyndon Johnson. Back in the 1960’s Courtenay Lynda Valenti was known as the “baby in Lyndon Johnson’s White House” and was often referred to by LBJ as “Lynda” and “his little heartbeat.” As an adult, Courtenay Lynda Valenti is now producing some major disinformation on the 1963 Coup d’Etat: Legacy of Secrecy. Her brother John “Lyndon” Valenti (namesake only of LBJ) also works at Warner Brothers. Jack Valenti, her “dad,” issued a 7-page statement in 1992 denouncing Oliver Stone’s JFK as “a propaganda masterpiece and equally a hoax.”

Similar to Jack Valenti, another sycophant of Lyndon Johnson is biographer Doris Kearns Goodwin who met Johnson in 1967 at age 23 (LBJ, age 58). Sally Quinn, in a revealing article in the Wash Post (8/24/75), entitled “A Tale of Hearts and Minds,” wrote that Doris said LBJ “pressed me very hard sexually the first year,” that he courted her aggressively, then he asked her to marry him, that he was jealous of other men in her life.” Doris, after spending much face time with LBJ, ghost wrote LBJ’s presidential autobiography Vantage Point and later a biography on him which, no surprise, did not include any references to Johnson’s pivotal role in the JFK assassination. Doris has all but admitted that she was having sex with Lyndon Johnson. 

The best discussion boards on the internet for good info are 1) Education Forum 2) Deep Politics Forum 3) www.assassinationresearch.com 3) JFKmurdersolved.com and 4) Mary Ferrell Foundation – www.maryferrell.org 5) JFK Lancer. On Facebook, the premier spots are JFK-The Grassy Knoll Witnesses (run by Rusty Yardum) http://www.facebook....115305938487641 and JFK Assassination http://www.facebook....133383230054271 run by Al Tavers. Black Op radio’s web site www.blackopradio.com (Len Osanic) is an excellent place to listen to high quality interviews with folks such as JFK expert Jim DiEugenio. Deep Politics Quarterly (Walt Brown) http://www.manuscriptservice.com/DPQ/ and www.ctka.net (Jim DiEugenio) are 2 other quality spots on the internet.

As for videos, I highly recommend going to You Tube and watching the extremely important The Men Who Killed Kennedy - (episodes 7, 8, and 9). Much of these episodes focus on the role of Lyndon Johnson in the 1963 Coup d’Etat and they were BANNED from the History Channel because they were so accurate. LBJ aide Jack Valenti (CFR) organized a suppression campaign on the videos along with Lady Bird Johnson, Warren Commission con man Gerald Ford (CFR), Jimmy Carter (CFR) and Bill Moyers (CFR). Also, on You Tube watch the spectacular “Evidence of Revision” and Jesse Ventura’s 2010 Conspiracy Theory show on the JFK assassination (You Tube  ). In addition, I recommend JFK the movie by Oliver Stone, director’s cut. Oliver Stone, despite immense criticism in the MSM by CIA assets, pretty much nailed the JFK assassination. It was a full blown Coup d’Etat by Lyndon Johnson, the CIA and key elements of the U.S. military.

Robert Morrow is a political researcher with over 200+ books on the 1963 Coup d’Etat, aka JFK assassination. His email is Morrow321@aol.com and he accepts phone calls at 512-306-1510.

If you want to get quickly “up to speed” on the JFK assassination, here is what to read:

1) LBJ: Mastermind of JFK’s Assassination by Phillip Nelson 
2) JFK and the Unspeakable:Why He Died and Why it Matters by James Douglass
3) Brothers: the Hidden History of the Kennedy Years by David Talbot 
4) The Dark Side of Camelot by Seymour Hersh 
5) Family of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty by Russ Baker. 
6) Google the essay “LBJ-CIA Assassination of JFK” by Robert Morrow.
7) Google “National Security State and the Assassination of JFK by Andrew Gavin Marshall.” 
8) Google “Chip Tatum Pegasus.” 
9) Google “Vincent Salandria False Mystery Speech.” Read everything that Vincent Salandria ever wrote.
10) Google “Murray Rothbard the JFK Flap”
11) Google “Preserving the Legacy by Mat Wilson”
11) Google “Bertrand Russell 16 Questions on the Assassination”
12) Watch on You Tube the extremely important videos The Men Who Killed Kennedy, episodes 7, 8, and 9 which focus on the role of Lyndon Johnson. 
13) Watch on You Tube Jesse Ventura’s show on the JFK assassination. 
14) Watch the movie JFK director’s cut by Oliver Stone. 
15) Watch on You Tube “Evidence of Revision.” – 8 hours of fantastic and rare footage relating to the JFK assassination.

Another key point: Lee Harvey Oswald was U.S. intelligence and he shot NO ONE on 11/2263. Re: Oswald's intelligence connections read 1) "Oswald and the CIA" by John Newman 2) "Spy Saga: Lee Harvey Oswald and US Intelligence" by Philip Melanson 3) "History Will Not Absolve Us" by Martin Schotz (Chapter V Oswald and U.S. Intelligence by Christopher Sharrett) 4) "Me and Lee" by Judyth Vary Baker (Oswald's mistress in New Orleans, summer 1963) 5) Google “Lee Harvey Oswald’s reading habits summer 1963”