tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-83093262134161276542024-03-04T23:22:57.590-08:00Lee-Harvey-Oswald-Not-GuiltyUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger32125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-7197829891151022532017-04-17T23:15:00.001-07:002017-04-18T05:50:25.431-07:00Antonio Veciana says Lee Harvey Oswald was CIA!<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJ1PZfFdm0gbFXojrCoVYRwKfKEn3308zIYgeoqsqUM1d40uNPMRbj-igbVKveTqx8CdWsDSxMrlZ-jT7FZbIwIl7vxxQANzHX0MVf7EIJgMvKgSBYkniHLgbfTLDS_QqieYTNaAjElQM/s1600/veciana+trained+to+kill+and+me+and+lee+covers+best.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="234" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJ1PZfFdm0gbFXojrCoVYRwKfKEn3308zIYgeoqsqUM1d40uNPMRbj-igbVKveTqx8CdWsDSxMrlZ-jT7FZbIwIl7vxxQANzHX0MVf7EIJgMvKgSBYkniHLgbfTLDS_QqieYTNaAjElQM/s320/veciana+trained+to+kill+and+me+and+lee+covers+best.JPG" width="320" /> </a>Antonio Veciana says Lee Harvey Oswald was CIA! His book "Trained to
Kill: The Inside Story of CIA Plots against Castro, Kennedy, and Che" is
now available (Skyhorse Pub.). Veciana, a leader of the CIA's Alpha 66, has finally admitted that David Atlee Phillips was his CIA handler -
and Lee Harvey Oswald's handler as well. "The truth is coming out,"
says Judyth Vary Baker, whose book "Me & Lee" goes into more detail
than Veciana's (hers is 608 pages, with documents and wit<span class="text_exposed_show">nesses).
Veciana says he and Oswald met with Phillips in Dallas in Sept, 1963.
Veciana, who was shot in the head after testifying to the HSCA, refused
to give Phillips' real name until 2013. At last he has openly verified
what Baker first revealed in 1999. In 2003, Baker stated Phillips was
Oswald's handler in the History Channel Documentary "The Love Affair"
(#8 in the series "The Men Who Killed Kennedy."). "You will enjoy
reading Veciana's 232 page book," Baker says, "but you will also enjoy
getting all the dots connected with ME & LEE" (Trine Day). Both
books are available at <a href="http://amazon.com/Amazon" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Amazon.com</a></span></div>
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-10594118324875258022017-03-25T16:23:00.000-07:002017-03-25T16:29:58.717-07:00NIXON AND "THE BAY OF PIGS THING""Tape Reveals Nixon Knew About Kennedy Assassination On June 17, 2014, journalist Jefferson Morley placed a very important NIXON TAPE online at his JFK Facts site, writing "The 42nd anniversary of the Watergate burglary reminded me of Richard Nixon’s obsession with the “whole of Bay of Pigs thing.”<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfDmDD9ELX0Ok6mHWvqTH6t_5xrOrgZT_GhkmcQcix8mj5_KsN5aIJQ19igNDxl8s8BBltYIkb4hIJt4iOfT69StDjaWZEuvKGakZreULmIzzNeIdEtaKUhsqmzQNmR0m3QnC2gmF8px0/s1600/nixon+cavorting+around+jfk+death+limo+disgusting.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="427" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfDmDD9ELX0Ok6mHWvqTH6t_5xrOrgZT_GhkmcQcix8mj5_KsN5aIJQ19igNDxl8s8BBltYIkb4hIJt4iOfT69StDjaWZEuvKGakZreULmIzzNeIdEtaKUhsqmzQNmR0m3QnC2gmF8px0/s640/nixon+cavorting+around+jfk+death+limo+disgusting.jpg" width="640" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><b>Nixon cavorting on JFK's (rebuilt) Limo after he became President</b></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
H.R.
Haldeman, White House chief of staff for Nixon, wrote in his memoirs
that he had come to the conclusion that his boss used the phrase as a
kind of coded reference to the assassination of President Kennedy. A tape of a conversation between <a href="https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=8309326213416127654#editor/target=post;postID=1059411832487525802" target="" title="Nixon tapes">Nixon and CIA director Richard Helms</a>
in October 1971 lends credence to the notion. Listen to the tape,
published online by <b>Luke A. Nichter</b>, a history professor at Texas
A&M University." <br />
"Nixon, it is clear, was interested in what he called the ‘Who Shot John?’ angle.<br />
You can listen to a shorter version (it is unedited, just cut off after the relevant part, so you'll hear a lot of squeaking of Nixon's desk chair and noise muffling some of it. such as when Nixon, who has been talking to his aide John Erlichmanm apparently rises and greets Helms, who enters the room, but it's the "real deal.")<br />
<span id="more-15460"></span><b></b><br />
<b> Morley continues: </b><br />
<b> " ‘The Dirty Tricks Department’</b><br />
Before
Helms arrives, Nixon’s aide John Erlichman tells the president Helms
has been stonewalling his request for documents about the Bay of Pigs.
Erlichman makes it clear that he didn’t tell Helms his real purpose. “I
was kind of mysterious about it,” he explains.<br />
But they think they
have leverage on Helms. At one point Ehrlichman says, “Helms is scared
to death of this guy [Howard] Hunt we got working for us because he
knows where a lot of the bodies are buried,” This is spoken eight months
<i>before</i> Hunt and six other men were arrested at the Watergate
office complex for breaking into the offices of the Democratic National
Committee.<br />
When then CIA director arrives, Nixon offers some
typically awkward and forced small talk about baseball player Ted
Williams and then gets down to business. He says he wants to address the
“sensitive” issue of the documents he is seeking. He assures Helms that
he fully supports what he calls “the dirty tricks department.”<br />
“I
know what happened in Iran and I know what happened in Guatemala and I
totally approve of that. I know what happened with the planning of the
Bay of Pigs,” he says.”The problem was not the CIA. My interest there is
solely to know the facts.”<br />
When Helms doesn’t say much, Nixon presses his case by reminding Helms he is the president.<br />
“First. This is my information,” he says, “Second, I need it for a defensive reasons, for a negotiation.”<br />
When
those arguments elicit no response. Nixon tries another justification:
He needs the information to protect the CIA. In making his case, Nixon
talks about what might be in the records and he utters these words (at
around 17:00 in the file):<br />
<blockquote>
“The ‘Who shot John?’
angle. Is Eisenhower to blame? Is Kennedy to blame? Is Johnson to blame?
Is Nixon to blame? Etc, etc. It may become, not by me, a very vigorous
issue but if it does, I need to know what is necessary to protect
frankly the intelligence gathering and the Dirty Tricks Department and I
will protect it. I have done more than my share of lying to protect
you, and I believe it’s totally right to do it.”</blockquote>
(NOTE: The reference to "Kennedy" probably means Bobby Kennedy, who was involved in assembling anti-Castro wipe-out campaigns, the resources of which were able to be diverted to kill his own brother.<b> Morley continues:</b><br />
<br />
<b>"What does it mean?</b> The
reference to ‘Who shot John” can only be a reference to Kennedy’s
assassination. It seems clear that Nixon thought that the CIA records on
the Bay of Pigs might contain information about who was behind the
assassination. This indicates, at a minimum, that Nixon did not have
confidence in the official theory that Kennedy was killed by one man
alone. It suggests that he thought the CIA knew more about JFK’s
assassination than it let on. And, it is quite clear, that If the CIA’s
actions did become an issue, Nixon would protect “the Dirty Tricks
Department.”<br />
Nixon never got the documents he wanted. After the
arrest of the Watergate burglars on June 17, 1972, Nixon tried to enlist
Helms in a cover-up. In a meeting on June 20, Nixon said an
investigation of the burglary could “open up the whole Bay of Pigs
thing,” causing the usually unflappable Helms to shout, “This has
nothing to do with the Bay of Pigs!”<br />
In his posthumous memoir,
Helms claimed that he did not know what Nixon was referring to. But if
he remembered the conversation of October 10, 1971, he knew exactly what
Nixon was talking about."<br />
<h4 class="style10">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;">Note: we owe a debt of gratitude to Luke A. Nichter, who is much more than "a history professor at Texas
A&M University" as Morley describes him. <span class="apple-style-span" style="color: black;"><span class="style27" style="color: black;"><span class="style8" style="line-height: 115%;"><span class="style9"><span class="style24">Nichter</span><span class="style24"> is "a noted expert on Nixon</span></span></span></span><span class="style33" style="color: black;"><span class="style8" style="line-height: 115%;"></span></span></span></span></span></span><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: "georgia" , "times new roman" , serif;"><span class="apple-style-span" style="color: black;"><span class="style33" style="color: black;"><span class="style8" style="line-height: 115%;"><span class="style9"><span class="style24">'s 3,451 hours of secret
White House tapes. He is a <i>New York
Times</i> bestselling author or
editor of six
books... <span class="style12"><span class="style15" style="line-height: 115%;"><span class="style34"><span class="style27" style="color: black; line-height: 107%;">the editor, with Douglas Brinkley, of <i>
<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Nixon-Tapes-1971-1972-Douglas-Brinkley/dp/0544570332/">The Nixon Tapes: 1971-1972</a> </i>(Houghton Mifflin Harcourt)</span></span></span><span style="color: black; line-height: 107%;"><span class="style24" style="color: black; line-height: 107%;"><span class="style35" style="line-height: 115%;"> and...</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="style24"><span class="style27">a former founding Executive
Producer of C-SPAN's
<i>
<a href="http://www.c-span.org/History/">American History TV</a></i>,</span></span>
<span class="style12"><span class="style35">launched during
January 2011 ...</span></span><span class="style35" style="line-height: 107%;">Luke is a recognized advocate for government openness, having
filed more than 1,000 Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) requests for the purpose of opening historically important
records to public access </span>
<span class="style34" style="line-height: 107%;">
<span class="style27"><span class="style24" style="line-height: 107%;"> —
work that has been
<a href="https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/january-2014/aha-supports-release-of-watergate-documents-asks-for-unsealing-of-grand-jury-records-regarding-us-v-liddy">officially endorsed by the American
Historical Association</a></span></span></span><span class="style35" style="line-height: 107%;">. He has an ongoing petition before Judge Royce Lamberth
of the District Court for the District of Columbia</span><span class="style27"><span class="style24" style="line-height: 107%;"> — </span></span><a href="http://lukenichter.com/12-mc-74-RCL.htm"><span style="line-height: 107%;"><i>
<span class="style35">In Re: Petition of Luke Nichter</span></i></span><span class="style24" style="line-height: 107%;"><span class="style27">, Case No. Misc. 12-74</span></span></a><span class="style35" style="line-height: 107%;"> — which
has
<a href="http://www.archives.gov/research/investigations/watergate/us-v-liddy.html">
unsealed thousands of pages of government
records</a> in the custody of the National Archives and
Records Administration.</span></span></span></span></h4>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-54165147029251349922016-07-03T11:11:00.001-07:002016-09-15T10:50:55.245-07:00LEE HARVEY OSWALD NEVER BOUGHT A MAIL-ORDER RIFLE: Steven Gaal Explains THIS ESSAY BY STEVEN GAAL REVEALS HOW LEE OSWALD WAS FRAMED AS THE 'OWNER' OF A RIFLE HE NEVER ORDERED<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiaacf5zPxU8JcA9mZO2ILLgD2U5nmkfvfmhJkHgQn4mHJncegNSeCTuLhjB3uO_ZMdzcuziI9mm1JeEL-hFaOzp5dyZk4zBt4RQojJIercSyT-AAHM-lnv4EpbHMzz3F-adNb7_tAhLYY/s1600/mannlicher+carcano++a+comm-exhb1303-mndc01.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="169" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiaacf5zPxU8JcA9mZO2ILLgD2U5nmkfvfmhJkHgQn4mHJncegNSeCTuLhjB3uO_ZMdzcuziI9mm1JeEL-hFaOzp5dyZk4zBt4RQojJIercSyT-AAHM-lnv4EpbHMzz3F-adNb7_tAhLYY/s320/mannlicher+carcano++a+comm-exhb1303-mndc01.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
(As posted at The Education Forum in rebuttal to Warren Commission defenders)<br />
Purchasing the Rifle<br />
---------------------------------------<br />
It has long been held that a key piece of evidence in the guilt of Lee
Oswald is documentation that he bought a Mannlicher-Carcano rifle and
the .38 <br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh18NRf4zrbdbYmSDI5UFi3lkTOIDgIaTMloSQoMMKC4TIV0swdNtBD6W33ZGd5J86-otJYx1CTCQFBJRY7lofAsrj6GoJizduCAZvZ3fMJNJ6Glki50Jpg-YH1_LeQoFlfMi8Q1Ti-l8s/s1600/7+point+65+mauser+stamped+on+barrel.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="204" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh18NRf4zrbdbYmSDI5UFi3lkTOIDgIaTMloSQoMMKC4TIV0swdNtBD6W33ZGd5J86-otJYx1CTCQFBJRY7lofAsrj6GoJizduCAZvZ3fMJNJ6Glki50Jpg-YH1_LeQoFlfMi8Q1Ti-l8s/s320/7+point+65+mauser+stamped+on+barrel.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">YES, '7.65 mm MAUSER' HAS BEEN STAMPED on some Mausers!</td><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
pistol. In his possessions was a found a receipt dated March 12,
for the money order he allegedly used to purchase the rifle (no
receipts were ever found for the pistol in his belongings). The purchase
amount was $21.45. This was for one rifle with a four power scope, but
no clip or bullets. The letter had a postmark of 10:30 AM. So, Oswald
had a window of 8:30 AM to 10:30 AM to purchase the money order and mail
it off.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUER4X9XCwt1bHF3iyoBi8uLSonUnKl5nPp4puwz7O222iU_DkFsmOjXxfm044bbI3obTqg3XTYcIK4w9ziyPVuJpog_oTke49P1_DqbkMFY11EkqUttApY14zHT9YtMwrgEONydmFr4g/s1600/7+point+65+mauser+stamped+barrel+roger+craig.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="318" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUER4X9XCwt1bHF3iyoBi8uLSonUnKl5nPp4puwz7O222iU_DkFsmOjXxfm044bbI3obTqg3XTYcIK4w9ziyPVuJpog_oTke49P1_DqbkMFY11EkqUttApY14zHT9YtMwrgEONydmFr4g/s320/7+point+65+mauser+stamped+barrel+roger+craig.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
One important fact to remember is Oswald’s post office box was
authorized for his name only. He ordered everything under his alias, A.
Hidell. Any piece of mail coming to his box with the alias would be
marked “addressee unknown, return to sender.” Keep this in mind for as
we shall see later, the box plays an important role in Oswald’s
acquiring of the weapons.<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgz77M9EEv5_166agiBIGhOXFiOsz0-ItJKeQMTa1p_t1uZ63HINMlOJ0NAxPC_XEw9V6mogKy2drSen8McywD654yOdx_rzgd60YBJGshPyqLLWpsGudulmWT0H8wAL3LRPg2KufX06UU/s1600/WH_Vol19_0157a+post+office+box+lee+oswald+check+this.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgz77M9EEv5_166agiBIGhOXFiOsz0-ItJKeQMTa1p_t1uZ63HINMlOJ0NAxPC_XEw9V6mogKy2drSen8McywD654yOdx_rzgd60YBJGshPyqLLWpsGudulmWT0H8wAL3LRPg2KufX06UU/s400/WH_Vol19_0157a+post+office+box+lee+oswald+check+this.jpg" width="252" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">NO 'HIDELL' ON LEE'S P O BOX IN DALLAS</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
Another hitch is that Oswald’s work records show he was employed that
morning at Jaggars-Chiles-Stovell with no absences. The nearest post
office was 11 blocks away. A long walk back and forth for a man with no
car. Even more curious is the postmark date has zone 12 listed on it.
Zone 12 was roughly two miles away in downtown Dallas. Since it was
established that the money order was purchased in zone 3, who would buy a
money order at one office and then travel two miles to another one to
mail it? Plus, Oswald didn’t have the time even if he had a friend to
drive him there and back.<br />
The order arrives at Klein’s Sporting Goods in Chicago the next
morning [sent via Airmail: the Warren Commission was told that an overnight train could accomplish this, without mentioning that the order was posted TOO LATE to be collected, sorted and placed on the train that came early enough to make that possible. JVB]. Very good for pre-FedEx days! Kline’s
reportedly deposited the money order in its bank account on March 13.
However, under closer inspection the money order is missing many of the
bank routing stamps which would show its path through the banking
system. Only the endorsement stamp of Klein’s is there; it’s missing the
stamps from the First National Bank of Chicago, the Federal Reserve
Bank of Chicago, and finally, the Federal Postal Money Order Center in
Kansas City. None of those three routing stamps are on the back of the
money order. The stamps have to be there to show that each bank pays
only once, if not you have a mess on your hands. Other money orders that
Oswald bought, such as the ones he used to pay off his State Dept.
loan, all have these routing stamps. So this is most unusual and never
investigated by the Warren Commission, the FBI, or any other agency. It
certainly gives weight to the idea that Oswald’s payment never made it
through the banking system.<br />
One problem with the case and which is largely ignored, was in the spring
of 1963 Klein’s was only selling the 36” model of the Mannlicher-Carcano.
This is clearly shown in ads they had running in various sporting
magazines. The rifle found on the sixth floor near the sniper’s nest
was the 40” model. Kline’s was not selling that model in March of
1963.<br />
Adding to that, the FBI went through Klein’s microfilm records and
found no sale of a Mannlicher-Carcano with a serial number of C2766 for
March of 1963 or any month in that year. They went back a year and
never found one sold with that matching serial number in 1962 either.
It seems to have disappeared from the inventory.<br />
However, there are several accounting records with the amount of
$21.45 listed. One entry is for March, 1963, but another for February
15th. One is listed under the heading, “checks.” But checks are a
different type of financial instrument than a money order and should not
be listed under that heading. There is also a listing for “other
banks” but what banks are those? There is no serial numbers identified
for the amount of $21.45. It could be C2766 or somebody else’s order.
It should be noted that Klein’s went out of business in 1973 and its
remaining financial records were destroyed. Also, many accounting
records on microfilm disappeared while in FBI custody (Armstrong,
p.475). <br />
What is known is Klein’s received a shipment of rifles (carton #3766)
and Mannlicher-Carcano, C2766, in that shipment. Also, it was stated
by Louis Feldsott, President of Crescent Firearms (wholesaler) in a
sworn affidavit to the Warren Commission that he found a record of a
sale of a Mannlicher-Carcano, C2766 to Klein’s Sporting Goods, Inc., for
June 18, 1962.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjWNT44TxwTdLI8uNrJFVJV6Uf8jwbgz_G_SMUTOZ9c4RSV3GxiaKXXcv6UHHwpkLopA4_WqOp9ggaf0r4YrgjPmC5xl6zqLS4eYLTpfiSEFzXE_Ne3fCJshE3bh9zKU38x-247Q2rKJds/s1600/cursive+style+on+money+order+jkleins+lee+oswald+framed.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="221" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjWNT44TxwTdLI8uNrJFVJV6Uf8jwbgz_G_SMUTOZ9c4RSV3GxiaKXXcv6UHHwpkLopA4_WqOp9ggaf0r4YrgjPmC5xl6zqLS4eYLTpfiSEFzXE_Ne3fCJshE3bh9zKU38x-247Q2rKJds/s320/cursive+style+on+money+order+jkleins+lee+oswald+framed.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
Affidavit of Louis Feldsott, President of Crescent Firearms.<br />
June of 1962 is an important date. It’s the same month Oswald, his
wife and child, traveled back to the USA from the Soviet Union. His DOD
ID card expires that year (sidebar–his mother’s tax returns are sealed
from 1956, ending in 1962.). Apparently, one must conclude that
somebody created false paperwork to connect Oswald to the <br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZGSMqa4Dp7CLqfnV9i4Bg9iHAfXTLtF8uq4eY6KSa2P0YSWu0-lbz-S3y81IfIvrWv29aIeToTP-Rfb5GLJAZB06SxnFHYZYTIB_Xid-CiJjiESgEMNIDUyyOzhKlCUQVnLDa7W2KNOE/s1600/MONEY+ORDER+RIFLE+NOT+STAMPED+BY+BANK+AS+RECEIVED.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZGSMqa4Dp7CLqfnV9i4Bg9iHAfXTLtF8uq4eY6KSa2P0YSWu0-lbz-S3y81IfIvrWv29aIeToTP-Rfb5GLJAZB06SxnFHYZYTIB_Xid-CiJjiESgEMNIDUyyOzhKlCUQVnLDa7W2KNOE/s400/MONEY+ORDER+RIFLE+NOT+STAMPED+BY+BANK+AS+RECEIVED.gif" width="307" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">back of money order</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
rifle, from
Klein’s Sporting Goods accounting to bogus money order missing it
routing track.<br />
(It should be noted the original money order was found in the
National Archives by one of the employees there, Robert Jackson.
Jackson was never interviewed by the FBI in regards to how he found it.
How it made it there is unknown. Oswald’s receipt was found in his
personal possessions but that is suspect because of the all the
difficulties already mentioned.)<br />
<b>The Controversy With Post Office Delivery</b><br />
It’s been implied by some researchers, such as John Armstrong (Harvey
and Lee) that Oswald’s P. O. Box was authorized for his name only and
any mail arriving with another name, in this case his Hidell alias
would result in a return to sender. This makes getting his gun shipment
to him problematic to say the least. The Warren Commission knew this
and simply stated in the final report that, “It is not known whether the
application for post office box 2915 listed ‘A. Hidell’ was a person
entitled to receive mail at this box.” They had the original
application, published in evidence volume 19, page 286. While it lists
Lee Oswald as the applicant there is no authorization for mail under his
name only.<br />
There are other issues at play to further complicate this besides the
mail box. [NOTE by JVB: the Warren Commission was told by Holmes, the Postal Inspector, that a note --that there was a package in Lee Oswald's box -- could have been possible, so Oswqald could ask for the rifle, but it would have been illegal to hand over a RIFLE for "Hidell" to Lee Oswald, who could presumably take the rifle for himself. That fact makes this excuse by the postmaster absurd.].<br />
One of the postal regulations at the time required that
anybody purchasing a firearm had to fill out and sign a 2162 form. Not
only the buyer but the seller as well. This form was to be kept on file
for four years. This form was never found on either end, from buyer or
shipper. The FBI never requested it and Klein’s never volunteered a
copy. Dallas Postal Inspector Harry Holmes told the Warren Commission
that it basically didn’t matter than Oswald could have received the
rifle under his alias. Interestingly, Holmes had been monitoring
Oswald’s mail for up to a year since he was receiving subversive
materials in the mail (i.e., FPCC and other communist literature) but
couldn’t tell the Warren Commission that Oswald had received a package
with a gun in it. <br />
Why didn’t he know? Oswald’s box was basically
flagged. Oddly, Holmes apparently never mentioned that Oswald would
have to have filled out the aforementioned 2162 form if that were the
case.<br />
All indications are that Oswald did not pick up the rifle package at
the Post Office in Dallas. There is no paperwork to prove it and no
witnesses to the fact.<br />
<b>The Smith & Wesson Pistol</b><br />
If the weirdness with rifle is not enough, enter the .38 caliber pistol
that Oswald allegedly used to kill Dallas police officer J. D. Tippet.
Sold from Seaport Traders, Oswald [supposedly] took order of a snub nosed Smith
&Wesson .38. Before he could order it he would be required under
Texas law to get a “certificate of good character” from either the
Justice of the Peace or a District Court Judge. This would be hard to do
since he was ordering the pistol under his Alek Hidell alias. Imagine
applying for a certificate verifying your character using a phony name!
Apparently, he never did. The certificate would have to have been shown to the
shipper before the firearm was released to the buyer.<br />
Like the Mannlicher-Carcano, there is not a lot of solid documentary
proof that Oswald bought the pistol. There is one invoice (#70638)
saying the gun was shipped COD via Railway Express Agency to a A. J.
Hidell. This particular invoice is a copy--the original was never
obtained by the FBI. It also states that it was shipped to his post
office box address, which of course can’t be done and was shipped to the REA
office for pick-up. The FBI could have checked the bank records of both
Seaport Traders and REA but never did. [Holmes, the Postal Inspector, insinuated that the rifle and the revolver came to the same P.O. Box--JVB] <br />
When a shipment would arrive at REA it was common procedure to send a
postcard alerting the buyer the gun had arrived. Once again, since
Oswald had a post office box authorized in his name only, he would never
have seen the postcard. It would have been marked “returned to sender”
like his rifle should have been. Researcher John Armstrong looked into
this in great detail and found that a phone call would determine if an
order arrived at REA. No ID was required to show up and pay the COD
charge and retrieve the package. Anybody could have appeared at the
office and paid for the pistol.<br />
There are no receipts of any kind that were found in Oswald’s
personal belongings. No invoices, no postcard alerting the arrival of
the shipment, no receipt for paying of COD charges...nothing. Oswald
obtained a leather holster and bullets for it but no receipts for any of
those items either.<br />
----------------------------------------------<br />
In Summary<br />
Here are the major points covered:<br />
•Post office box address only authorized for his name Lee Oswald.
Anything sent with another name (as the rifle allegedly was) would be
marked return to sender.<br />
•Money Order not marked with proper routing stamps proving his path through the banking system.<br />
•Work records at Jaggars-Chiles-Stovell show Oswald was employed at the time the MO was allegedly purchased and mailed.<br />
•No finger prints found on the MO or the order coupon.<br />
•MO eventually found in the National Archives in Washington, DC rather than the final resting place in Kansas City, MO.<br />
•No 2162 form ever found from the buyer or the shipper.<br />
•Oswald ordered the 36” model but apparently possessed the 40” model not for sale at Klein’s Sporting Goods at the time of sale.<br />
•Klein's financial records did not list a sale of a rifle with C2766 in
March of 1963 but instead, June of 1962–when Oswald could not
possibility have ordered it and spent part of that month out of the
country.<br />
•No “certificate of good character” acquired for use in receiving the .38 handgun.<br />
•Both the rifle and pistol are different models than the ones he ordered.<br />
How do we resolve all of this? Evidently, somebody else bought the guns
and fabricated a false paper trial linking it all to Oswald. The
missing routing stamps on the back of money order indicate that it was
most likely never deposited in Klein’s bank account and even the VP of
the company could not verify it was deposited. Oswald’s work records
show he never left work the morning of March 12 when he is supposed to
have mailed the order to Klein’s for the rifle. When means he couldn’t
have done it. In regards to the .38 revolver, that is even more murky
and nearly undocumented. Only one receipt is in existence and it is a
copy. Oswald himself may not have been aware of the set up that was
going on behind his back. If he did he never told a soul. The guilty
man has been framed once again.<br />
------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
Sources: Newman, John, Oswald and the CIA; Armstrong, John, Harvey
and Lee; McKnight, Gerald, Breach of Trust; Warren Commission Report;
Douglass, James, JFK and the Unspeakable; www.ctka.net (Probe Magazine
article archive); www.history-matters.com [slightly edited for spelling by JVB] <br />
<br />
<div class="edit">
<b>Edited by Steven Gaal, 26 May 2015 - 11:52 PM.</b></div>
<div class="edit">
<br /></div>
<div class="edit">
<b>LEARN MORE AT <a href="http://www.judythbaker.blogspot.com/">http://www.judythbaker.blogspot.com</a></b></div>
<div class="edit">
<b>READ ABOUT THE REAL LEE HARVEY OSWALD IN JUDYTH'S BOOK<a href="http://www.judythbaker.com/"> ME & LEE.</a> </b></div>
<div class="edit">
<b><a href="http://www.jfkconference.com/">LEARN MORE BY ATTENDING THE JFK ASSASSINATION CONFERENCE IN DALLAS</a> </b>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-41301109645013716202016-06-25T03:24:00.002-07:002016-06-25T03:24:40.799-07:00LEE HARVEY OSWALD: HE WASN'T A DEADBEAT!<div class="mtm _5pco" data-ft="{"tn":"K"}">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgG4u1_TieT8feCTwaXCeU9O3RAkpbEOI61F9073Io8JNR1LQnVClpDJ6CUC4JlHfn2c8L1Yfn4wbNrSB14v7oRrzRba5kZaU1RR_CvrEbfrsA6OVcSNiL10CRwFZCgcmForHG-7UpWV0k/s1600/lees+apartment+righthand+side+4905+magazine+original.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgG4u1_TieT8feCTwaXCeU9O3RAkpbEOI61F9073Io8JNR1LQnVClpDJ6CUC4JlHfn2c8L1Yfn4wbNrSB14v7oRrzRba5kZaU1RR_CvrEbfrsA6OVcSNiL10CRwFZCgcmForHG-7UpWV0k/s320/lees+apartment+righthand+side+4905+magazine+original.jpg" width="303" /></a>This
is what 4905 Magazine St. looked like in 1963. It is the small
apartment with overhead sunscreens and the fenced-ij front yard, set
back from the road. At the front it is gated, and you can see the white
mailbox there for 4905. The big part of the house to which it is
attached held 4907 (to the right--note the big white mailbox) and 4909
to the left. Behind it was 4911.<br />
All four addresses had their own
mailboxes (even though Lee used 4907 for mail, he did so to protect his
Russian-born wife and child... my critics try to say that Lee had no
mailbox of his own. This was not true, though he did not place that
address on his correspondence. 4907 was EMPTY until mid-July, when Mr.
and Mrs. Eric Rogers moved in. Mrs. Rogers was ill and could do very
little. Lee paid Mr. Rogers' utility bill, which went up about 30%
after Mr. and Mrs. Rogers moved in. Prior to that, lee used 4907 as a
kind of office, as it was vacant (*I have that reference from the Polk
Directory). <br /> When Lee left in September, the Rogers' utility
bill went in the red by mid-month, and Lee was later accused by the
Warren Commission of being a deadbeat for not paying it, even though we
know from the Rogers' testimony that they continued to live in the
apartment and were still there in 1964 when they were interviewed by the
Commission. They obviously had to start paying that utility bill
themselves. My critics try to say that Lee never paid the utility bill
for thje Rogers and that I have blackened the Rogers' name. Rogers did
not get a job until the end of September, when he began working for
Meal-a-Minute. <br /> Lee did not use the address of 4907 publicly
until he began handing out FPCC Hands Off Cuba flyers at the Trade Mart,
as I recall. He was not about to put 4905 on them, where his wife and
child lived in that set-back apartment that was all safely fenced in.
But from the beginning -- even when vacant-- all mail to the Oswalds
came to 4907. This was at the height of the Cold War, and mail from the
USSR, The Daily Worker, etc. was coming to that vacant apartment and was
not connected in the postman's mind to 4907. Then the Rogers moved in.
However, Lee still kept his mail coming to 4907, but obviously, the
Rogers needed to have some incentive to keep receiving such mail. Their
utility bill got paid and they allowed the mail to come to their
address.<br /> This simple arrangement is not believed by my critics.
According to them, for some reason unknown to normal people, they insist
that all mail to 4905 AND 4907 went ONLY to 4907, the vacant apartment,
. When the Warren Commission asked Mr. Rogers about this mail problem.
Rogers had this to say: Mr. Liebeler.<br /> You lived right next door to Oswald?<br /> Mr. Rogers.<br /> My apartment was in the front and my window was fight next--near his apartment.<br /> Mr. Liebeler.<br /> You met Oswald and came to know him? Did you ever meet him?<br /> Mr. Rogers.<br /> No; I never met him. He didn't bid the time to anyone.<br /> Mr. Liebeler.<br /> Did you talk to him or anything?<br /> Mr. Rogers.<br /> No; never did.<br /> Mr. Liebeler.<br /> Did you know what his name was?<br /> Mr. Rogers.<br /> Just by mail coming in the box on the front.<br /> Mr. Liebeler.<br /> Did you ever talk to his wife?<br /> Mr. Rogers.<br /> She spoke Russian. She did bid the time of day, that's all, but he didn't. He wouldn't bid the time to no one.<br /> Mr. Liebeler.<br /> <snip><br /> Mr. Liebeler.<br /> Now do you remember anybody else that visited Oswald at his apartment?<br /> Mr. Rogers.<br />
Probably at the time they had this--you know--Fair Play for Cuba,
something like that. I think they were radio interviewers, I think.
Looked like local people. Didn't look like--heard him saying something
about wanting to play on radio. That's all."<br /> NOTE THAT ERIC ROGERS
KNEW ABOUT "FAIR PLAY FOR CUBA." HOW? At one point Lee plastered some
signs all over his porch and Mrs. Garner told him to take them down. But
he uses 'radio interviewers' -- plural-- when only one person ever
admitted coming to Lee's apartment. He had to ask at Eric Rogers' home,
because the only address he had was for 4907.<br /> Later in the same
testimony, Eric Rogers says that a mailman 'brought a big package in"
for Lee Oswald-- He says it this way:</snip><br />
Mr. Liebeler. Did you ever see any rifle or firearms of any type in his possession at that time?<br />
Mr. Rogers. No; I never. We did see one time some the mailman
brought a big package in. I wouldn't say what it was, of course. I guess
they checked that through the mail.<br /> Mr. Liebeler. When was that?<br /> Mr. Rogers. It was in the summer, some time before he left, somewhere around that time.<br />
The words "Brought a big package in" sounds like a delivery to the door
of the Oswald's, having to go through the fenced-in yard straight to
their apartment. Rogers guesses that "they checked that through the
mail." <br />
Mr. Rogers accidentally shows that he knows a lot about Lee getting ready to move, for he says this: <br />
Mr. Rogers. He left that following evening. I figured he was
moving. I don't know. If he was moving, he was supposed to tell the
landlord.<br /> Mr. Liebeler. Did he talk to the landlord about it?<br /> Mr. Rogers.<br />
No; but she knew about it. He didn't talk to her. He didn't talk to
nobody. He would give you the money and wouldn't say nothing. He was
quiet himself, that's all.<br /> HOW DID MR. ROGERS KNOW THAT LEE DIDN'T TALK TO THE LANDLORD, BUT SHE 'KNEW ABOUT IT'? Any comments?<br />
Marina and Ruth Paine used the 4907 address to writ to each other.
All Russian materials came to 4907. The flyers said 4907. Yet it is
certain that lee lived at 4905. I contend that he could have had his
mail directed to 4905 but did not do so to protect his family. This is
also why he placed "4907 Magazine Street" on the Hands Off Cuba flyers..<br /> My critics try to say that all mail came to 4907 anyway and that the utility bill paid for 4907 was really for 4905.<br />
I was there and I hope that common sense will guide you as to the
real reason that the utility bill went into the red by the end of
September when Lee left. The bill was NOT for BOTH 4907 AND 4905 as
these people try to tell you. Lee paid the bill because he was using the
vacant apartment as an office. By having the Rogers move in, Lee was
able to place '4907' on the flyers without having to use 4905 instead.
Lee paid the utility bill at 4907 in May, June, July, August and part of
September, even though Eric Rogers said this:<br />
Mr. Liebeler.<br /> When did you move there?<br /> Mr. Rogers.<br /> It was around in the in July, around July.<br />
These people have to prove that the Rogers paid their utility bill for
4907 for at least 2 weeks in July, for all of August, and of course for
all of September all the way to July 21, 1964 when Eric Rogers stated
that he was still living at 4907. Instead, they insist that Lee Oswald
paid on 4905 by paying for the 4907 utility bill. It seems that
"anything goes" no matter how absurd, if only it can be used to
discredit me. SEE THE ATTACHED STATEMENT THAT LEE OSWALD WAS RESPONSIB
LE FOR THE UTILITY BILL AT 4907, EVEN THOUGH THE ROGERS WERE LIVING
THERE, AND THAT HE LEFT THE BILL AT 4907 UNPAID IN SEPTEMBER, AND
THEREFORE WAS A DEADBEAT, below...<br /> For objecting to this false
statement, I am attacked on Facebook and online with posts defending
poor old Mr. Rogers as a truth-teller. Sure he was. Just as Kerry
Thornley was. Just as Marina Oswald was. Just as Ruth Paine was..<br />
I won't be here forever to defend the truth. Share this. Pass it on!
It matters! This is an example pof how facts that prove who lee Oswald
really was are being twisted right before our eyes, today, by armchair
'researchers' who basically object to everything I say, but who
themselves do nothing to to exonerate that innocent man. They are
obstructing justice for our fallen president, and with my last breath, i
come against that.<br /> To those of you who read this: SAVE IT, SHARE
IT, AND SHOW TO INTELLIGENT PEOPLE. <br /> thank you for whatever you do to spread the truth.<br /> JVB</div>
<br /><div class="UFIList" data-reactroot="">
<h6 class="accessible_elem">
Comments</h6>
<div>
<div class="UFIRow _48ph _48pi UFIComment _4oep" data-ft="{"tn":"R0"}" role="article">
<div class="clearfix">
<div class="_ohe lfloat">
<a class="img _8o _8s UFIImageBlockImage" data-ft="{"tn":"T"}" data-hovercard="/ajax/hovercard/hovercard.php?id=1370435247&extragetparams=%7B%22on_public_ufi%22%3Afalse%2C%22hc_location%22%3A%22ufi%22%7D" href="https://www.facebook.com/reuel.smith.1?fref=ufi" tabindex="-1"><img alt="Reuel Smith" class="img UFIActorImage _54ru img" src="https://scontent-amt2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-1/c15.0.32.32/p32x32/1621755_10201793388741005_1705805684_n.jpg?oh=a6536aee7a10a080bb0ab51fcff13c80&oe=5802D3D1" /></a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="UFIRow _48ph _48pi UFIComment _4oep" data-ft="{"tn":"R0"}" role="article">
<div class="clearfix">
<div class="">
<div class="UFIImageBlockContent _42ef clearfix">
<div class="">
<div class="UFICommentContentBlock">
<div class="UFICommentContent">
<span><a class=" UFICommentActorName" data-ft="{"tn":";"}" data-hovercard="/ajax/hovercard/hovercard.php?id=1370435247&extragetparams=%7B%22is_public%22%3Afalse%2C%22hc_location%22%3A%22ufi%22%7D" dir="ltr" href="https://www.facebook.com/reuel.smith.1?fref=ufi">Reuel Smith</a></span><span> <span data-ft="{"tn":"K"}"><span class="UFICommentBody"><span>also, what about the statement "he would give you the money.."?</span></span></span></span><span></span></div>
<div class="fsm fwn fcg UFICommentActions">
<a class="UFILikeLink" data-ft="{"tn":">"}" data-testid="ufi_comment_like_link" href="https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1640824346244044&id=100009494826384&comment_id=1640837379576074&reply_comment_id=1640847059575106&notif_t=mentions_comment&notif_id=1466845765537090#" role="button" title="Like this comment"></a><span><a class="uiLinkSubtle" data-ft="{"tn":"N"}" data-testid="ufi_comment_timestamp" href="https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1640824346244044&id=100009494826384&comment_id=1640837049576107&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R0%22%7D"><abbr class="livetimestamp" data-shorten="true" data-utime="1466845762" title="Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 5:09am"><span class="timestampContent"><br /></span></abbr></a></span></div>
<span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="UFIRow UFIComment _4oep" data-ft="{"tn":"R"}" role="article">
<div class="clearfix">
<div class="_ohe lfloat">
<a class="img _8o _8s UFIImageBlockImage" data-ft="{"tn":"T"}" data-hovercard="/ajax/hovercard/hovercard.php?id=1397054691&extragetparams=%7B%22on_public_ufi%22%3Afalse%2C%22hc_location%22%3A%22ufi%22%7D" href="https://www.facebook.com/Judyth.vary.baker" tabindex="-1"><img alt="Judyth Baker" class="img UFIActorImage _54ru img" src="https://scontent-amt2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-1/c1.0.32.32/p32x32/10003419_10203583776900477_6074143781712783705_n.jpg?oh=849b56e53d263027127a97dc5607fd0c&oe=57F16E38" /></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="UFIRow UFIComment _4oep" data-ft="{"tn":"R"}" role="article">
<div class="clearfix">
<div class="">
<div class="UFIImageBlockContent _42ef clearfix">
<div class="">
<div>
<div class="UFICommentContent">
<span><a class=" UFICommentActorName" data-ft="{"tn":";"}" data-hovercard="/ajax/hovercard/hovercard.php?id=1397054691&extragetparams=%7B%22is_public%22%3Afalse%2C%22hc_location%22%3A%22ufi%22%7D" dir="ltr" href="https://www.facebook.com/Judyth.vary.baker">Judyth Baker</a></span><span> <span data-ft="{"tn":"K"}"><span class="UFICommentBody"><span>yes...
Lee said he gave the Rogers money for watching out for Marina and his
little girl, in that people came to THEM inquiring for Lee, due to THEIR
address being printed on the HANDS OFF CUBA flyers. See this:</span></span></span></span><div>
<div class="mvs">
<a class="_2rn3 _4-eo" data-testid="ufi_comment_photo" href="https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10209936093384419&set=p.10209936093384419&type=3" rel="theater"><div class="uiScaledImageContainer _4-ep" style="height: 210px; width: 132px;">
<img alt="Judyth Baker's photo." class="scaledImageFitHeight img" height="210" src="https://scontent-amt2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p75x225/13438866_10209936093384419_905547839963965404_n.jpg?oh=9d7f127350d058ae98bd4a0c2c129ff7&oe=57C1AED5" width="133" /></div>
</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-84971491719134717112014-11-30T08:36:00.000-08:002014-11-30T09:01:14.416-08:00<b><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #c0a154; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 20.2859992980957px;">THE SHOW WAS </span><a href="http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2014/11/29" style="background-color: #c0a154; color: #993322; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 20.2859992980957px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">COAST TO COAST</a><span style="background-color: #c0a154; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 20.2859992980957px;">, AND LISTENERS </span></span></b><br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #c0a154; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 20.2859992980957px;"><br /></span></span></b>
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #c0a154; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 20.2859992980957px;">FINALLY HEARD SOME TRUTH ABOUT </span><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Me-Lee-Came-Harvey-Oswald/dp/1936296373" style="background-color: #c0a154; color: #993322; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 20.2859992980957px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">THE REAL LEE </a></span></b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Me-Lee-Came-Harvey-Oswald/dp/1936296373" style="background-color: #c0a154; color: #993322; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 20.2859992980957px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">HARVEY OSWALD</a><span style="background-color: #c0a154; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 20.2859992980957px;"> AND </span><a href="http://www.amazon.com/David-Ferrie-Participant-Anti-Castro-Assassination/dp/1937584542" style="background-color: #c0a154; color: #993322; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 20.2859992980957px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">THE REAL DAVID W. FERRIE</a><span style="background-color: #c0a154; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 20.2859992980957px;">. </span></span></b><br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: #c0a154; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 20.2859992980957px;"><br /></span></span></b>
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKDNerf5mgd-KuspSrg2-Ou1MbYuuRuAdRsJrXZkovAlhvpkPNsnUNaEIEKCgKLf42_Z8BivyVBxJVjzvxOTznqxWR5oTZtlFG-K1BZw5OxgqZcAvdphU-UQwnIxl_JHHiF5IZIiZXaaH0/s320/david+ferrie+in++hat+circa+1963.jpg" height="214" width="320" /> <b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 16.2288017272949px;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">DAVID W. FERRIE -- SKILLED PILOT, LINGUIST, CANCER RESEARCH ASSOCIATE AND PATRIOT--HE PRETENDED TO HATE JFK AND GATHERED INFORMATION ABOUT THE IMPENDING ASSASSINATION.</span></b><br />
<b><span style="background-color: #c0a154; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20.2859992980957px;"><br /></span></b>
<b><span style="background-color: #c0a154; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 20.2859992980957px;">BOTH BOOKS, PUBLISHED BY </span><a href="http://www.trineday.com/" style="background-color: #c0a154; color: #993322; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 20.2859992980957px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">TRINE DAY</a><span style="background-color: #c0a154; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 20.2859992980957px;">, ARE FILLED WITH HUNDREDS OF PHOTOS AND DOCUMENTS REVEALING THE PLAYERS, MOVERS AND SHAKERS IN THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION.</span></b><br />
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhVFN2PjOr058VhLjDiZa6J3qPKoMLVcoTIS21rRIzyL00GDF6j-RVSZ-Wlk9aJXMb72df5xFncS8nq2Ly5tLYzM8utbfHT2I4Wx7yQ7ntb-jv7FQfDZH1Utn0F6n0LbP5vaeifr0eVkyzw/s320/lee+harvey+oswald+marine+wallet+photo+best+quality.jpg" height="320" width="272" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 16.2288017272949px; text-align: center;"><b><span style="color: red;">LEE OSWALD -PROUD MARINE AT AGE 17-PATRIOT TO THE END!</span></b></span><br />
<b style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 16.2288017272949px; text-align: center;"><br /></b>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="background-color: #c0a154; clear: both; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20.2859992980957px;">
<b><a href="http://judythbaker.blogspot.com/"><span style="color: red;">ORDER AN AUTOGRAPHED COPY </span><span style="color: black;">OF</span> <span style="color: red;">ME and LEE: HOW I CAME TO KNOW, LOVE AND LOSE LEE HARVEY OSWALD</span><span style="color: black;"> by clicking </span><span style="color: red;">here</span><span style="color: black;">.</span><span style="color: black;"> </span></a> You can also order unsigned books from <span style="color: #333333;"><a href="http://www.trineday.com/">TRINE DAY BOOKS</a>, BARNES and NOBLE, OR AMAZON.COM</span></b><span style="color: #333333;">!</span><span style="color: #333333;"> THIS IS THE BOOK THAT HAS OPENED THE EYES OF THOUSANDS TO THE TRUTH ABOUT THE FALSELY ACCUSED ASSASSIN. LEE WAS EXACTLY WHO HE SAID HE WAS --A PATSY-- AND I MEMORIZED HIS WORDS, SAVED DOCUMENTS, FOUND WITNESSES TO PROVE IT, BECAUSE I LOVED HIM, AND KNOW WHAT HE SACRIFICED, TRYING TO SAVE KENNEDY. </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="background-color: #c0a154; clear: both; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20.2859992980957px;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="background-color: #c0a154; clear: both; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20.2859992980957px;">
<b>"PLEASE TELL MY LITTLE GIRLS I WAS A GOOD GUY," LEE BEGGED OF ME. I HAVE KEPT MY PROMISE.</b> </div>
<div class="separator" style="background-color: #c0a154; clear: both; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20.2859992980957px;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="background-color: #c0a154; clear: both; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20.2859992980957px;">
<span style="text-align: center;"><b><span style="color: #333333;">YOU CAN OBTAIN AN AUTOGRAPHED, HARDCOVER, FIRST PRINTING EDITION OF ME and LEE BY ORDERING THROUGH PAYPAL</span> <a href="http://judythbaker.blogspot.com/"><span style="color: black;">AT THIS WEBSITE! (see Paypal button)</span></a></b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="background-color: #c0a154; clear: both; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20.2859992980957px;">
<span style="text-align: center;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="background-color: #c0a154; clear: both; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20.2859992980957px; text-align: left;">
<span style="text-align: center;"><b><span style="color: #660000;">A CALL FOR VINDICATION</span></b>!JOIN ME IN DEMANDING THAT A WORLD COURT BE CONVENED TO EXONERATE LEE HARVEY OSWALD AND TO FOCUS ON THE US GOVERNMENT</span><span style="line-height: 20.2859992980957px;"> COVER-UP OF THE TRUTH, INCLUDING VICE PRESIDENT LYNDON B. JOHNSON'S INVOLVEMENT !</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="background-color: #c0a154; clear: both; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20.2859992980957px; text-align: left;">
<span style="line-height: 20.2859992980957px;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="background-color: #c0a154; clear: both; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20.2859992980957px; text-align: left;">
<span style="color: red;">WANT TO LEARN MORE? VISIT</span> <a href="http://judythbaker.blogspot.com/"><span style="color: black;">http://judythbaker.blogspot.com</span><span style="color: blue;">/</span></a><span style="color: blue;"> </span><span style="color: red;"> !!!!!!</span></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-65356645990006448462014-05-13T18:31:00.002-07:002014-05-13T18:31:38.415-07:00http://jfkthelonegunmanmyth.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-tippit-murder-unresolved-issues.htmlUnknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-8492015264675693072013-06-08T19:51:00.001-07:002013-06-08T19:52:06.235-07:00IF THEY SAY LEE OSWALD KILLED KENNEDY--SHOW THEM THIS!<center style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;">
<br /><span style="color: #660000; font-size: 28px;"><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">"Aren't hard facts and evidence always more believable than wild speculation and conjecture? And aren't many/most/all [JFK] conspiracy theories created out of just that -- speculation?"</span></span></center>
<center style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 23.125px;">
<span style="color: #660000;"><span style="font-size: 28px;"><b><i><br /></i></b></span></span></center>
<center style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 23.125px;">
<b><i><span style="color: red;">THIS IS WHAT DAVID VON PEIN WRITES IN HIS BLOG, DECLARING:</span></i></b><br />----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br /><br /><span class="fixed_width" style="color: #000099; font-family: Courier, Monospaced; font-weight: bold;">LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S SOLE GUILT....<br /><br />POINT-BY-POINT:</span></center>
<center style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 23.125px;">
<span class="fixed_width" style="color: #000099; font-family: Courier, Monospaced; font-size: 39px; font-weight: bold;"><br /></span></center>
<center style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 23.125px;">
IN HIS ESSAY,WE'LL LOOK AT HOW DVP BEGINS HIS ARGUMENT, AND WHEHER HE CAN BE TRUSTED TO GIVE YOU THE FACTS. THEN YOU DECIDE WHETHER YOU WISH TO READ HIS HUGE BLOG ON THE SUBJECT. I'M JUDYTH VARY BAKER, A WITNESS WHO KNEW LEE HARVEY OSWALD IN 1963.I SATE UNEQUIVOCALLY THAT OSWALD WAS INNOCENT.</center>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjoEa5bfqxarov02DSPCfK374hfKFYmGHU_Fr35uyOfDZLay91lVK1uIaCO89db3NZUU8x4K7TkEwndAwJsG0vBi73CIcVtu2ca7lLGFBZIAV1qk-rv0fgmLBxqEJC8qKc5n4IZkal9KQM/s1600/judyth+july+20+1963+portrait.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjoEa5bfqxarov02DSPCfK374hfKFYmGHU_Fr35uyOfDZLay91lVK1uIaCO89db3NZUU8x4K7TkEwndAwJsG0vBi73CIcVtu2ca7lLGFBZIAV1qk-rv0fgmLBxqEJC8qKc5n4IZkal9KQM/s200/judyth+july+20+1963+portrait.jpg" width="195" /></a>Judyth, 1963</div>
<center style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 23.125px;">
<span class="fixed_width" style="font-family: Courier, Monospaced; font-size: 39px; font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: red;"><br /></span></span></center>
LEE OSWALD HIMSELF TOLD US,<b>"DO NOT BELIEVE THE SO-CALLED EVIDENCE." </b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRE01OfOI5MnNKslIQXyoFICkcpYO-UOvIk9FsGoYSkZ4_hL5bve9FR6TejbdRIoOp6z3Fj1luV-wOQ4cPIbbKzOPjmS-g_F0QnglupEl-jtD-cFpYS1PzJLA2MVioG79-5VoUBUZp-7w/s1600/lee+midnite+press+conference+photo+HEAD+SHOT.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRE01OfOI5MnNKslIQXyoFICkcpYO-UOvIk9FsGoYSkZ4_hL5bve9FR6TejbdRIoOp6z3Fj1luV-wOQ4cPIbbKzOPjmS-g_F0QnglupEl-jtD-cFpYS1PzJLA2MVioG79-5VoUBUZp-7w/s320/lee+midnite+press+conference+photo+HEAD+SHOT.jpg" width="243" /></a>Lee H.Oswald, 11/22/63</div>
<br />
<b>THIS MAN -- <a href="http://judythvarybaker%2Cblogspot.com/">LEE HARVEY OSWALD</a>-- HAD NO MOTIVE TO KILL KENNEDY. HE ADMIRED KENNEDY. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lt6AE8ytJk">HE DENIED KILLING KENNEDY.</a> </b><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/-d8WrAxVDTo?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<b><br /></b>
<b>BELOW, YOU WILL FIND COGENT ARGUMENTS REFUTING THE SO-CALLED EVIDENCE.</b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b><u><i><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: red;">PART ONE: THE FIRST FIVE ARGUMENTS</span></span></i></u></b><br />
<br style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;" />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;">DVP WROTE: "When one piece of evidence that favors Lee Harvey Oswald's guilt is piled atop another, and another, and another....I'm just curious to know how many pieces of evidence that show Oswald killed President John F. Kennedy in 1963 it takes to sway a person away from the notion of conspiracy? Or, if nothing else, to sway that person away from the </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; line-height: 23.125px;">"Oswald is completely innocent"</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;"> claims?"</span><br />
<br style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;" />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><b>==CORRECTION: Calling faked information 'evidence' does not make it so.</b> <b>When one piece of faked evidence is piled atop another, and another, and another... we must question the veracity and honesty of the person who dares pretend such evidence is solid, real and irrefutable.==</b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><b><br /></b></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><b><br style="background-color: white;" /></b></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;">DVP: "From everything I can see, it's a veritable mountain of </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-style: italic; line-height: 23.125px;">"Oswald Is Guilty"</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;"> evidence (both circumstantial and physical). And not a single speck of it has been shown to be refutable with 100% absolute certainty."</span><br />
<br />
<b style="color: red;">OH, REALLY? </b><span style="color: red;"> DVP WROTE: </span><b><span style="color: red;">"Not a single speck of it has been shown to be refutable with 100% absolute certainty." </span>That's a pretty high standard. And it's unreasonable. When determining the guilt of the accused, a wide variety of evidence is tendered to the court. DVP mentions 'circumstantial and physical' kinds of evidence. He accepts this evidence and will not allow it to be rejected unless it has been proven to be 100% wrong.</b><br />
<br />
<b>Consider two people describing what a burglar stole from a house. Each is asked to describe what was stolen from them. One says her jewelry was stolen. The other says his watch and wallet were stolen. DVP's argument would say this evidence is not 100% acceptable because the witnesses described different items as being stolen. However--and it is important--the witnesses were responding to the question "What was stolen from you?" They were not asked "Can you list everything that was stolen?"</b><br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: red;">Evidence-gathering can be subjective. I</span>t is not subject,in other words, to a stringent standard where "100%" agreement is necessary in order to accept the evidence. What is accepted as evidence? What is rejected? What honest researchers have learned, in the case of Oswald's so-called guilt, is that many statements, matters of evidence, and witnesses were rejected, not considered,or never identified. </b><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.theconspiracyzone.org/posts/28149">VIEW HERE JUST A FEW OF THE DOZENS OF EXAMPLES OF HOW LEE OSWALD WAS FRAMED</a><br />
<br />
<b>WE MUST <u>CONSIDER THE NATURE OF EVIDENCE,</u> AND WHY EVIDENCE DOESN'T HAVE TO BE 100% IRREFUTABLE </b><b>IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED.</b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>THIS IS A TWO-EDGED SWORD: MUCH OF THE EVIDENCE AGAINST LEE OSWALD MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, JUST AS MUCH OF THE EVIDENCE SUPPORTING ARGUMENTS FOR HIS INNOCENCE MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY. </b><br />
<br />
<u><b><span style="font-size: large;">DEFINITION OF EVIDENCE</span></b>(</u>SKIP THIS PART IF YOU UNDERSTAND THAT MOST EVIDENCE IS 'NOT' 100% IRREFUTABLE.<br />
<br />
<h2 class="header Heading3" style="border: 0px; font-family: 'Museo Slab 500', serif; font-size: 21px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Relevant Evidence</h2>
<ul style="border: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<li class="step " style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px 0px 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><div class="stepMeat" style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div itemprop="step" style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: Georgia; font-size: 15px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-top: 10px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The most basic rule of evidence requires that proposed evidence be relevant to the case. This means that you can introduce only evidence that tends to make a fact in the case more or less likely. Relevant evidence does not have to be particularly strong, it just has to be related in some way to the fact it is being offered to prove or disprove. The judge decides whether the proposed evidence is relevant. However, even relevant evidence is not allowed if another rule of evidence requires its exclusion.</div>
</div>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
<h2 class="header Heading3" style="border: 0px; font-family: 'Museo Slab 500', serif; font-size: 21px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Real Evidence</h2>
<ul style="border: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<li class="step " style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px 0px 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><div class="stepMeat" style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div itemprop="step" style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: Georgia; font-size: 15px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-top: 10px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Real evidence is a tangible object that played a part in the dispute. Examples of real evidence include the weapon used in a crime or the actual contract that was breached.</div>
</div>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
<h2 class="header Heading3" style="border: 0px; font-family: 'Museo Slab 500', serif; font-size: 21px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Demonstrative Evidence</h2>
<ul style="border: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<li class="step " style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px 0px 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><div class="stepMeat" style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div itemprop="step" style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: Georgia; font-size: 15px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-top: 10px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Demonstrative evidence is used in conjunction with the testimony of a witness. Demonstrative evidence helps the judge or jury understand to what the witness is testifying. Demonstrative evidence is admissible when it is a fair and accurate representation of the witness's testimony. A map or photograph used during witness testimony would be considered demonstrative evidence.</div>
</div>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
<h2 class="header Heading3" style="border: 0px; font-family: 'Museo Slab 500', serif; font-size: 21px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Documentary Evidence</h2>
<ul style="border: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<li class="step " style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px 0px 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><div class="stepMeat" style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div itemprop="step" style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: Georgia; font-size: 15px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-top: 10px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Documentary evidence is usually a piece of writing that documents a fact or event that is in dispute. Common examples of documentary evidence include deeds, leases, ticket stubs, licenses and contracts. In some instances in which documentary evidence is present, it is the only evidence allowed on that issue. For example, if a lease is admitted into evidence in a renter's dispute, no one can testify about the contents of the lease.</div>
</div>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
<h2 class="header Heading3" style="border: 0px; font-family: 'Museo Slab 500', serif; font-size: 21px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Testimonial Evidence</h2>
<ul style="border: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<li class="step " style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; list-style: none; margin: 0px 0px 20px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><div class="stepMeat" style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div itemprop="step" style="border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="border: 0px; font-family: Georgia; font-size: 15px; font-style: inherit; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-top: 10px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Testimonial evidence is verbal evidence given by a witness. Testimonial evidence is only admitted when the witness takes an oath to be honest and the witness has personal knowledge about what she is testifying. The witness must be able to remember and communicate what she perceived. Generally, witnesses may not testify to hearsay, that is, about what they heard another person say. There are exceptions to the hearsay rule, but they are quite complicated and require the expertise of a lawyer or judge to determine.</div>
</div>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
<span style="border: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Read more: <a href="http://www.ehow.com/info_8390755_kind-evidence-acceptable-court-law.html#ixzz2VfsuLH6B" style="border: 0px; color: #003399; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">What Kind of Evidence Is Acceptable in a Court of Law? | eHow</a> <a href="http://www.ehow.com/info_8390755_kind-evidence-acceptable-court-law.html#ixzz2VfsuLH6B" style="border: 0px; color: #003399; cursor: pointer; font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">http://www.ehow.com/info_8390755_kind-evidence-acceptable-court-law.html#ixzz2VfsuLH6B</a></span><br />
<br style="background-color: white;" />
<b>NOW, BACK TO DVP:</b><br />
<br style="background-color: white;" />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;">HE WRITES: "Does the average researcher just simply ignore all of the evidence that supports Oswald's lone guilt (and every bit of hard evidence supports it), or is the idea of a conspiracy in JFK's assassination so ingrained into subsequent generations of people since the event took place that they feel they have no choice BUT to go with the flow and believe the conspiracy theorists?"</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;"><b>LET'S EXAMINE THE ABOVE STATEMENT.</b></span><br />
"<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;"><b>Does the average researcher</b> j<b>ust simply ignore all of the evidence </b>that supports Oswald's lone guilt...?"</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;">DVP ARGUES THAT THE EVIDENCE (THAT DVP ACCEPTS) IS 'IGNORED' BY THE 'AVERAGE' RESEARCHER. <u>WHAT IS AN 'AVERAGE' RESEARCHER? </u>WE ASSUME HE MEANS THIS:</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><b><span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">"One who conducts scholarly or scientific investigation or </span></b></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><b><span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></b></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><b><span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">i</span></b></span><b style="color: #444444; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">nquiry. </span></b><b style="color: #444444; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">See Synonyms at inquiry. 2. Close, careful study."</span></b><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><b><a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/researcher">(definition 'researcher')</a></b></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;">THE VERY MEANING OF 'RESEARCH' IS TO </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;">CONDUCT CLOSE, </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;">CAREFUL STUDY, DVP ASKS IF "ALL OF THE EVIDENCE THAT </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;">SUPPORTS OSWALD'S LONE GUILT" IS BEING IGNORED BY THE </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;">'AVERAGE RESEARCHER.' </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;">BASED </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;">ON THE DEFINITION OF A </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;">RESEARCHER, DVP'S QUESTION </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;">IS INAPPROPRIATE.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><b><br /></b></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #444444; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><b>DVP'S NEXT STATEMENT:</b></span><br />
<br style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;" />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;">DVP:"For I ask --- How could ALL of the following evidence against Lee Harvey Oswald have been either fabricated, planted, distorted, or in some manner faked? There's just TOO MUCH stuff here on the </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 23.125px;">"Oswald Did It"</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;"> table to ignore.</span><br />
<br />
DVP PRESENTS A LOGICAL FALLACY (BIFURCATION) BY ASKING HOW COULD 'ALL' THE EVIDENCE HAVE BEEN PLANTED, DISTORTED, OR IN SOME MANNER FAKED? (HE LEAVES OUT 'IGNORED' AND 'UNFOUNDED.').<br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;"><span style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><u><b>BIFURCATION:</b></u> (either-or, black or white, </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-weight: bold; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;">all or nothing fallacy</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;">) </span></span><br />
<span style="color: red;"><span style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: red;"><span style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;">assumes that two categories are mutually exclusive and exhaustive. </span></span><br />
<span style="color: red;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: red;"><span style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 17.600000381469727px;"><a href="http://commfaculty.fullerton.edu/rgass/fallacy3211.htm">(BIFURCATION)</a></span></span><br />
<span style="color: red;"><span style="font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 17.59375px;"><br /></span></span></span>
<span style="color: red;"><span style="font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 17.59375px;">DVP REPEATS HE FALLACY AGAIN:</span></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;">DVP: "Granted, I'd agree that perhaps one or two of these things could have been manufactured to set up a patsy. <span style="color: red;"><u>But ALL of these items?</u></span>! And <span style="color: red;"><b>complete silence</b></span> be maintained by the many, many operatives who must certainly have been involved in the acts themselves and ensuing 40-year cover-up?!"</span><br />
<br />
<b>NOTE WELL: NUMEROUS OPERATIVES OVER THE YEARS <u>HAVE </u>SPOKEN OUT, SUCH AS DON ADDAMS, RICHARD HELMS AND E. HOWARD HUNT:</b><br />
<br />
<b><a href="http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/jfk_hunt_last_confessions_rolling_stone.htm">THE CIA'S E. HOWARD HUNT CONFESSED THAT OSWALD DIDN'T DO IT</a></b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.infowars.com/images2/us/ba_obit_e_howard_hunt_ny123.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="270" src="http://www.infowars.com/images2/us/ba_obit_e_howard_hunt_ny123.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<b><br style="background-color: white;" /></b>
<b><i>NOW</i>, WHO'S IGNORING EVIDENCE?</b><br />
<b><br /></b>
DVP CONTINUES IN THE SAME FALLACIOUS VEIN:<br />
<br style="background-color: white;" />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;"><b>DVP: </b>"Common sense (to me) dictates otherwise. And the "otherwise" leads anybody who isn't prone to cry "Conspiracy!" <span style="color: red;">a</span><b><span style="color: red;">t every turn in the road </span></b>to finally envision the fact that 24-year-old Lee Oswald was a lone nut who DID indeed pull off what the majority of people say couldn't happen in a million years."</span><br />
<br />
DVP NOW CALLS ON 'AUTHORITY' TO BOLSTER HIS ARGUMENT:<br />
<br style="background-color: white;" />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;">"Author and ballistics expert Larry M. Sturdivan said it very well in his 2005 book</span><a href="http://www.amazon.com/review/R6EGCI0WHHGAD" style="background-color: white; color: #4900cc; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;"><span style="font-style: italic;">"The JFK Myths"</span></a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;">, when he said this on page 246:</span><br />
<br style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;" />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; line-height: 23.125px;">"While one of the pieces of physical evidence could conceivably have been faked by an expert, there is no possibility that an expert, or team of super-experts, could have fabricated <span style="color: red;">the perfectly coordinated whole</span>...with superhuman abilities to fake physical evidence that is in complete agreement with all the other faked evidence."</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-style: italic; line-height: 23.125px;"></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;"> -- Larry Sturdivan"</span><br />
<br />
<b style="background-color: #ffffcc; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica;">DVP USES: "APPEAL TO AUTHORITY":</b><span style="background-color: #ffffcc; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica;"> (</span><i style="background-color: #ffffcc; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica;">ipse dixit</i><span style="background-color: #ffffcc; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica;"> --also called </span><i style="background-color: #ffffcc; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica;">ad verecundiam</i><span style="background-color: #ffffcc; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica;"> sometimes) attempts to justify an argument by citing a highly admired or well-known (but not necessarily qualified) figure who supports the conclusion being offered.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica;">LARRY M. STURDIVAN is a wound ballistics expert who appears in TV specials arguing that Oswald killed JFK. All well and good. His argument assumes that the faked evidence is "perfectly coordinated." But this is not the case. Had it been so,we would not be exerting ourselves to defend Oswald.It would have been an open-and-shut case. Since that is not the case, Sturdivant's statement is merely <b><span style="color: red;">an appeal to authority, </span></b>since it has nothing to do with his expertise on ballistics.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica;"><b><span style="font-size: large;"> </span>DVP then gives us a long list of statements that he presents as solid fact. He begins with this statement:</b></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 23.125px;"><b><br /></b></span>
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 23.125px;"><b>"Lee Harvey Oswald murdered President John F. </b></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 23.125px;"><b><br /></b></span>
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 23.125px;"><b>Kennedy without the assistance of others in November of </b></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 23.125px;"><b><br /></b></span>
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 23.125px;"><b>1963 in Dallas, Texas, USA."</b></span><br />
<br />
<b style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 23.125px;"><u>"The evidence against Lee H. Oswald includes these </u></b><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 23.125px;"><b><u><br /></u></b></span>
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 23.125px;"><b><u>subtle tidbits:"</u></b></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;">'</span>SUBTLE?' 'TIDBITS'? THE SERIOUS CHARGES, BELOW, ARE LISTED AS FACTS. OUR COMMENTS ARE IN <u><span style="color: red;">RED AND UNDERLINED</span></u>.</b><br />
<br style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;" />
<b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;">1.) </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;">Lee Harvey Oswald owned the rifle found on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository on Friday afternoon, November 22, 1963.</span></b><br />
<br />
AS A WITNESS MYSELF, I KNEW LEE HARVEY OSWALD AND HIS TASTE IN GUNS. HE SPOKE WITH CRESCENT CITY GARAGE OWNER ADRIAN ALBA ABOUT BUYING A FINE RIFLE. <b>I NEVER SAW A RIFLE BELONGING TO LEE OSWALD.</b> FURTHER, YOU CANNOT FIND A LOGICAL WAY FOR THE RIFLE TO HAVE REACHED NEW ORLEANS FROM TEXAS, AND THEN TO HAVE BEEN RETURNED TO TEXAS VIA RUTH PAINE'S CAR, WITHOUT ITS EVER BEING SEEN.<br />
<br />
MARINA TOLD THE WARREN COMMISSION THAT <u>LEE SAT WITH THE RIFLE DAY AFTER DAY IN BROAD VIEW OF A BUSY ROAD,</u> YET NOT A SINGLE NOSY NEIGHBOR--AND THERE WERE PLENTY OF THEM--EVER SAW A RIFLE IN LEE'S HANDS. THEY KNEW WHEN HE HAD VISITORS, THEY SAID THEY SAW HIM READING ON THE PORCH FOR HOURS, AND THEY EVEN KNEW HOW MANY SUITCASES LEE TOOK WITH HIM WHEN HE LEFT FOR GOOD. BUT THEY NEVER REPORTED A RIFLE IN NEW ORLEANS. EVEN IF THE RIFLE REMAINED IN TEXAS, WE HAVE ONLY THE WORD OF THE DEMOHRENSCHILDTS AND MARINA THAT IT EVER EXISTED, THE DEMOHRENSCHILDTS ARE THE ONLY PERSONS TO HAVE SUPPLIED A BACKYARD PHOTO THAT WAS OBVIOUSLY MADE FROM A NEGATIVE THAT COULD BE LINKED TO THE SUSPICIOUS CAMERA 'FOUND' WEEKS LATER OH-SO-CONVENIENTLY IN RUTH PAINE'S GARAGE.<br />
<br />
LEE OSWALD WOULD NEVER HAVE PURCHASED A TRACEABLE, CLUMSY, INFERIOR RIFLE BY MONEY ORDER, FURTHER, IT WAS ORDERED UNDER THE NAME 'HIDELL'-- BUT OSWALD'S LIST OF RECIPIENTS AT THE POST OFFICE BOX HAD NO SUCH NAME,SO HOW WAS THE RIFLE DELIVERED? CONVENIENTLY, THE POST OFFICE HAD NO RECORD OF ITS DELIVERY,OR OF THE HANDGUN THAT SUPPOSEDLY CAME THE SAME DAY (CAN'T HAVE 'TWO''LOST' RECEIPTS, CAN WE? SO THEY WERE ANNOUNCED TO HAVE BEEN DELIVERED ON THE SAME DAY-- EVEN THOUGH THE TWO ITEMS WERE ORDERED WEEKS APART FROM EACH OTHER.).<br />
<br />
MIRACULOUSLY, THE RIFLE ORDER REACHED CHICAGO, AND THE MONEY ORDER WITH IT WAS PROCESSED --AND RIFLE PACKED --ONE DAY LATER, THOUGH THE MAIL ORDER WAS SUPPOSEDLY SENT ALL THE WAY FROM DALLAS TO CHICAGO BY REGULAR MAIL,USING A POSTBOX DROP MILES FROM WHERE OSWALD, WHO HAD NO CAR, WORKED AT THE TIME. DVP GETS AROUND ALL OF THIS BY SIMPLY STATING THIS HAIRY RIFLE PROBLEM AS 'FACT.' <br />
<br />
THIS GIVES THE READER A GOOD INDICATION OF HOW ACCURATE THE REST OF HIS LONG PROPAGANDA PIECE WILL BE. FOR FULL INFORMATION, SEE THESE LINKS:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://michaelgriffith1.tripod.com/faulty.htm">"FAULTY EVIDENCE: THE CASE AGAINST LEE HARVEY OSWALD" by Michael T.Griffith</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm">"The Rifle" by Gil Jesus</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle_shells.htm">"The Spent Rifle Shells"by Gil Jesus</a><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;">MARINA OSWALD DID ADMIT TO TAKING PHOTOS. BUT WHAT DVP DOESN'T TELL YOU IS THAT MARINA SAID SHE TOOK HER PHOTOS FROM A DIFFERENT DIRECTION: SEE:</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;"><br /></span>
<a href="http://www.mtgriffith.com/web_documents/fraud.htm">http://www.mtgriffith.com/web_documents/fraud.htm</a><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 23.125px;"><br /></span>
AND FOR A GOOD GENERAL SUMMARY, SEE:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://newsblaze.com/story/20090509170209kays.nb/topstory.html">"The Backyard Photos of Lee Harvey Oswald Are Fakes" by John Kays</a><br />
<br />
AS WELL AS MY OWN ESSAY:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/38733842/Farid-s-Folly-and-the-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-Backyard-Photo-Fiasco">http://www.scribd.com/doc/38733842/Farid-s-Folly-and-the-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-Backyard-Photo-Fiasco</a><br />
<br />
SEE YOUTUBE CHANNEL <b>LOLA4JVB4LHO</b> FOR VIDEOS CONCERNING LEE OSWALD'S INNOCENCE.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-78580762319863336032013-01-18T16:30:00.000-08:002013-01-18T18:22:38.898-08:00Eben Rey Interviews Judyth Vary Baker About the Kennedy Assassination, Her Book ME & LEE and Weaponizing Cancer<br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Eben Rey Interviews Judyth Vary Baker About the Kennedy Assassination, Me & Lee, and Weaponizing Cancer</span></b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/98/Eben_Rey_in_the_studio.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="240" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/98/Eben_Rey_in_the_studio.JPG" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: small;">GO HERE TO DOWNLOAD PART ONE OF THE INTERVIEW:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"> http://www.divshare.com/download/23471933-c55</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">GO HERE TO DOWNLOAD PART TWO OF THE INTERVIEW:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">http://www.divshare.com/download/23471953-4b1</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">GO HERE TO DOWNLOAD PART THREE OF THE INTERVIEW:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">http://www.divshare.com/download/23471972-db8</span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/98/Eben_Rey_in_the_studio.JPG">Eben Rey</a> is one of the most fascinating women I've ever met. She's strong, compassionate, and literate, with an open mind, unafraid to tackle controversial subjects.</span></b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Eben had already read <i>Me & Lee</i> and comprehended the enormity of what had happened in the cover-up of the Kennedy assassination, as well as the tragic consequences for those of us who wanted to cure cancer in the 60's and 70's. The cancer treatment industry-- focused on cutting, irradiating and chemically poisoning cancer cells-- would not be very interested in curing cancer when treating cancer was such a lucrative endeavor. Why cure cancer, and, for that matter, why prevent it?</span></b><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b>
<b>The interview below was originally supposed to last an hour (including breaks) but we ended up recording much more. The interview is broken into three segments for listening ease. Feel free to share this interview with everyone who is interested in the truth about the Kennedy assassination, the true role of Lee Harvey Oswald, and how <a href="http://dillsnapcogitation.wordpress.com/2010/05/05/how-the-discovery-of-cancer-causing-monkey-viruses-in-polio-vaccines-led-to-a-covert-bio-weapons-project/">cancer was weaponized.</a></b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<b><span style="font-size: large;">I entered the USA for the first time in over five and a half years to give interviews and seminars on the contents of <a href="http://www.meandlee.com/">Me & Lee: How I Came to Know, Love and Lose Lee Harvey Oswald.</a> We had very little publicity, but wherever people heard about our sudden arrivals, we received tremendous welcomes. I will never forget the kindness of the people, and what it meant to them to learn firsthand information from a living witness. We encountered no hecklers whatsoever: all of that happened afterwards on the Internet. I wondered if the reason we encountered no problems was because I had a professional bodyguard with me. If I were a troublemaker, I certainly wouldn't want to have to deal with HIM!</span></b><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b>
<b>In Chicago, I didn't have to worry, either, with <a href="http://www.militaryhub.com/military-people.cfm?id=42">former UDT-12/Navy Seal trained Jesse Ventura </a>at my side, a man who towered over me and who brooks no foolishness. Jesse demonstrates immense self discipline, not responding to inappropriate questions and keeping his head; he doesn't drink, and only chews on his cigars. My Dallas hero, <a href="http://jfkhistory.org/">Robert Groden</a>, also flew in from Dallas, and <a href="http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/">Dr. Jim Fetzer </a>also came to Chicago to join in the discussions. Without <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm5346870/">Phil Singer,</a> and, of course, my publisher <a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/thestenchoftruth/2011/02/05/interview-with-kris-millegan-publisher-at-trine-day-and-skull-and-bones-expert">Kris Millegan</a>, a stay in Chicago would not have been safe or possible. In Knoxville, I was also safely surrounded by researchers and friends, notably former ORIN employee and researcher <a href="http://www.doewatch.com/whistleblowing/">Jim Phelps</a>. There at the <a href="https://foursquare.com/v/the-haslam-family-flexible-theatre/4f5a9f4ee4b085f52c88f893">Haslam Theater</a>, I was accompanied by my son, who flew up from Florida, as we viewed <a href="http://www.setc.org/fringefestival">Lisa Soland</a>'s fine play about Me & Lee -- "The Sniper's Nest." </b></span><br />
<b><br /></b>
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh8waW1vLoUMk6jPTP9RmC8wGsAzAVqzDraJt9YzGPHh60P_bPGYjXCp5k-ruvf0azPiz6sn6FQB2ijR5d2jjzI-3VbwuNU6XWPN5q-GDbjnNdQEPxnzy6_YMaOuXMOMie2f6sBcwHkmiM/s1600/Sniper's+Bed+snipers+nest.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh8waW1vLoUMk6jPTP9RmC8wGsAzAVqzDraJt9YzGPHh60P_bPGYjXCp5k-ruvf0azPiz6sn6FQB2ijR5d2jjzI-3VbwuNU6XWPN5q-GDbjnNdQEPxnzy6_YMaOuXMOMie2f6sBcwHkmiM/s640/Sniper's+Bed+snipers+nest.JPG" width="512" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><b><span style="font-size: small;">Caitlin Campbell is Judy Vary Baker, and Walker Harrison is Lee Harvey Oswald in Lisa Soland's Play, "The Sniper's Nest"</span></b></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b><br /></b>
<b><span style="font-size: large;">I commented that Lisa got "her" "just right." i'm almost 70 years old now. That girl seems so far away now... that girl in New Orleans, whose career in cancer research was destroyed because she objected to using one or more "volunteers" from <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/07/burl-cain-angola-prison">Angola Prison</a> for a cancer experiment at Jackson, LA's mental hospital that, if successful, would kill the volunteers. I had to lay it all aside, breaking my heart.</span></b><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b>
<b>I'd never actually ever recover from the order to become "a vanilla girl" -- or die. At least writing the book, and now seeing the play "The Sniper's Nest" is bringing the suppressed information to the fore. Too late for Lee Oswald, but not too late for his wife, Marina, his children June and Rachel, and their children. And it's not too late for America, to wake up and realize what was taken from them, when their government arranged for <a href="http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/videos/jfk/jfk-ii---the-bush-connection-2003-1.html">the murder of John F. Kennedy</a> and the immediate framing of Oswald and cover up that followed. Many were duped, for far too long, even though from the very beginning, <a href="http://michaelgriffith1.tripod.com/faulty.htm">the framing of Lee Harvey Oswald</a> and his murder only 47 hours after his arrest, in the presence of 70 Dallas police, brought <a href="http://karws.gso.uri.edu/jfk/the_critics/lane/Natl-Guardian/Natl_Guardian.html">serious questions to bear, especially by attorney Mark Lane.</a></b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b>
<b>The truth will set us free, if it's not too late.</b></span><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>JVB</b>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-17601662168064627852012-08-03T15:44:00.001-07:002012-08-03T15:54:47.187-07:00LEE HARVEY OSWALD, THE COKE, THE SHIRT, AND MARRION BAKER'S TESTIMONY<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEirwqsVzwB0gh6guj6zKHuqeM9338nemGJLvutoJTHtL_1ezXFZ6og_UdMDtTrt9Z0xLfv0GoBxO55tRyxsszA4UrpmVHwQyAkQ3Qsei4sE34Zft2onzez3ewMgqnFtoyl4zBTjcDOFFk0/s1600/lee+portrait++2012+001.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEirwqsVzwB0gh6guj6zKHuqeM9338nemGJLvutoJTHtL_1ezXFZ6og_UdMDtTrt9Z0xLfv0GoBxO55tRyxsszA4UrpmVHwQyAkQ3Qsei4sE34Zft2onzez3ewMgqnFtoyl4zBTjcDOFFk0/s320/lee+portrait++2012+001.jpg" width="206" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">This man tried to save the President.<br />
He would be arrested as Kennedy's killer an hour after the deed.<br />
He would be murdered by the Mafia to silence him, only 47 hours later.</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
FBI AGENT DON ADAMS SAW HIS EVIDENCE WIPED OUT --EVIDENCE THAT PROVES A CONSPIRACY KILLED JFK AND THAT LEE HARVEY OSWALD WAS INNOCENT!<br />
<div>
<br />
IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THIS VIDEO, SEE IT NOW!</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/Go0EmDeu5DY?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<div>
<br />
<br />
<div align="center" style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;">SO..."WHERE WAS OSWALD FROM 11:50 to 12:35 <span class="GramE">P.M.</span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div align="center" style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in; text-align: center;">
<span class="GramE"><span style="font-family: Arial;">ON THE DAY OF THE ASSASSINATION?"</span></span><span style="font-family: Arial;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div align="center" style="font-size: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://www.mtgriffith.com/web_documents/wherewasoswald.htm">Michael T. Griffith</a> (excerpt)</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"> "Oswald was at the sniper's nest on the sixth floor at the time of the shooting, then how is it he was seen by the building manager and a pistol-waving police officer less than 90 seconds afterwards on the <i>second</i> floor</span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 12pt;">, standing in the lunchroom with a Coke in his hand, giving every appearance of being perfectly calm and relaxed? (The manager was Roy Truly and the policeman was Officer Marrion Baker.)</span></div>
<div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Jim Moore and other lone-gunman theorists assume that Oswald bought the Coke after the encounter with the manager and the policeman (3:53). However, the available evidence indicates Oswald purchased the Coke before the second-floor encounter (5: 50-52). Oswald had no reason to lie about when he bought the Coke. When he mentioned the Coke-buying during his questioning, he did so in passing, and he could not have known the important role the timing of this detail would subsequently play in the investigation. I agree with what David Lifton has said on this subject: <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;">The original news accounts said that when Baker first saw Oswald, the latter was drinking a Coke. This seemingly minor fact was crucial, because if Oswald had time to operate the machine, open the bottle, and drink some soda, that would mean he was on the second floor even earlier than the Commission's reconstructions allowed. In a signed statement Officer Baker was asked to make in September 1964, at the tail-end of the investigation, he wrote: "I saw a man standing in the lunchroom drinking a coke." A line was drawn through "drinking a coke," and Baker initialed the corrected version. [<st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Dallas</st1:place></st1:city>] Police Captain Will Fritz, in his report on his interrogation of Oswald, wrote: "I asked Oswald where he was when the police officer stopped him. He said he was on the second floor drinking a Coca Cola when the officer came in." If I were a juror, I would have believed Oswald already had the Coke in hand, and indeed, had drunk some of it, by the time the officer entered the lunchroom. (18:351)<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><br /></span></div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td><a href="http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRTECHXGBNRS0CJyJE-HToplZAoqXbC6KenSDQgZdTes32_qWJ2SBOwXAfX7A" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="640" src="http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRTECHXGBNRS0CJyJE-HToplZAoqXbC6KenSDQgZdTes32_qWJ2SBOwXAfX7A" width="292" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="font-size: 16px;">"...DRINKING A COKE" TESTIMONY CROSSED OUT</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: x-small;">BUT ACCORDING TO CRITICS, THE DEPOSITION WAS WRITTEN JUST TWO DAYS BEFORE THE WARREN COMMISSION CEASED ITS INVESTIGATION AND THE WRITER WAS IN A BIG HURRY AND SIMPLY WROTE DOWN SOME EXTRA WORDS THAT MARRION BAKER NEVER SAID--SO BAKER HAD TO CROSS THEM OUT. YES, THE FBI AGENT TAKING THE DEPOSITION JUST REPEATED A MYTH HE'D HEARD. BAKER ALSO TOLD THE WARREN COMMISSION HE SAW NOTHING IN LEE'S HANDS AT THAT TIME. ALL WELL AND GOOD. BUT WHY, THEN, DO WE HAVE <u>THIS</u>:</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;">1) TESTIMONY INCLUDES A COKE:</span></div>
<div>
<br />
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 0in;">
</div>
Mrs Robert A Reid, a TSBD Clerical Sup</div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: small;">ervisor... described eating her lunch in the second floor lunchroom about noon, then going downstairs to see the motorcade. After Kennedy was shot, she was frightened, and ran up the front stairs to her second floor office.</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="font-size: medium;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: medium;">
MR BELIN: "And then what did you do?"<br />
MRS REID: "Well, I kept walking and I looked up and Oswald was coming in the back door of the office. I met him by the time I passed my desk several feet and I told him: 'Oh, the President has been shot, but maybe they didn't hit him.' ..... He had gotten a coke and was holding it in his hands ..... The only time I had seen him in the office was to come and get change and he already had his coke in his hand ..... " (3H 274).</div>
<div style="font-size: medium;">
Mrs Reid saw Lee Oswald after Baker and Truly saw him. (3H 275). Reid also said that Lee's coke bottle was full. (3H 278). We cannot prove when the coke was purchased from her account. Griffith, however, tells us that A WARREN COMMISSION COUNSEL also said Baker saw a coke in Lee Oswald's possession:</div>
<br />
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 1in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;">"During a radio program on December 23, 1966, Albert Jenner, a former senior WC counsel, said that when Baker saw Oswald in the lunchroom, Oswald was holding a Coke in his hand. <span class="GramE">Said Jenner, "the first man this policeman saw, was Oswald with a bottle of Coke" (17:226)."</span></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Now, why would he do that? Is it true that this coke might have become a "myth" by then, as Oswald-did-it theorists maintain? But if so, how? And why would a Warren Commissioner senior counsel bring it up? Griffith goes on to say:</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;">"The fact that Oswald was holding a Coke when Baker confronted him in the lunchroom was one of the details that Chief Jesse Curry of the <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Dallas</st1:place></st1:city> police mentioned to reporters the day after the shooting."</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;">OOPS! Jesse Curry was mentioning all sorts of evidence AGAINST Lee Oswald. Who told Curry<u> just one day after the shooting </u>that BAKER saw Lee Oswald with a coke in his hand? This was the earliest account of the coke's existence -- and Curry connects it firmly with Baker:</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"> "</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #383838; font-family: 'Times New Roman', Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 16.799999237060547px; line-height: 23.799999237060547px; text-align: justify;">When <a href="http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.php/Essay_-_Rewriting_History_-_Bugliosi_Parses_the_Testimony">Jesse Curry</a> retired as police chief of Dallas, Texas, he wrote a book called "JFK Assassination File." In a 1969 interview for the Dallas Morning News around the time of publication, Curry stated,</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #383838; font-family: 'Times New Roman', Georgia, Times, serif; font-size: 16.799999237060547px; line-height: 23.799999237060547px; margin-left: 67.8933334350586px; text-align: center; width: 543.2000122070313px;">
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 14px;">
<i style="line-height: 1em;">"We don't have any proof that Oswald fired the rifle, and never did.</i><br />
<i style="line-height: 1em;">Nobody's yet been able to put him in that building with a gun in his hand."</i> [1]</div>
</div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"> Griffith adds that "As late as ten days later this detail was still being reported in major newspapers, such as the<i>Washington Post</i>."<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;">We can consider the early statement by Curry as too important to dismiss. </span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Griffith next argues that:</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;">"Oswald simply could not have made it to the second floor without first being seen by Roy Truly, who was running ahead of Patrolman Baker. The <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Dallas</st1:place></st1:city> police descriptions of the rifle in its hiding place indicate that the alleged murder weapon was very carefully stashed under and between a stack of book boxes at the <i>opposite</i> end of the sixth floor from where the shots were supposedly fired. It is reasonable to assume Oswald would have attempted to wipe his fingerprints off the rifle (at least those parts of the rifle he had just handled while firing it). Someone wiped off the Carcano before it was "discovered" because the FBI found no identifiable prints on it when it examined the weapon on November 23. This would mean that in less than 90 seconds Oswald squeezed out of the sniper's nest, ran all the way to the opposite end of the sixth floor, wiped off the rifle (at least those parts that he would have just handled while firing it), carefully hid it under and between some boxes, ran down four flights of stairs to the second floor (actually eight small flights), went through the foyer door, and then made his way to the lunchroom, yet did not appear the least bit winded or nervous when seen by the manager and the policeman. And, if we add the Coke-buying, Oswald's alleged journey becomes even more implausible.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;">The WC's own reenactments of Officer Baker's encounter with Oswald indicated that it occurred no more than 75 seconds after the shots were fired. There is no way Oswald could have done everything the Commission said he did and still have made it to the lunchroom in time to be seen by Baker and without being seen by Truly."</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Today we are told that Lee could not have made it down those stairs and across that hall and into that room, door closed even in 90 seconds. Some dishonest "time trials" have been made with athletes who ran down simulated stairway lengths (but not even built the same way)--which have been criticized elsewhere for their rigged results. But even those rigged trial runs could not get around the startling testimony we now have from Victoria Adams--"The girl on the stairs":</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
</div>
<div id="outer_postBodyPS" style="background-color: white; font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small; height: 200px; overflow: hidden; z-index: 1;">
<div id="postBodyPS">
"On November 22, 1963, a young Victoria Elizabeth Adams stood behind a fourth-floor window of the Texas School Book Depository in Dallas. She watched as John Kennedy was murdered in the streets below. Then, with a co-worker in tow, she ran down the back stairs of the building in order to get outside and determine what had happened.<br />
At that precise moment, her life changed forever.<br />
<br /></div>
</div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/images/4/43/Pict_essay_thomasbugfritz_1_2ndfloorlunchroom_lrg.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="234" src="http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/images/4/43/Pict_essay_thomasbugfritz_1_2ndfloorlunchroom_lrg.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br />
<div id="outer_postBodyPS" style="background-color: white; font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small; height: 200px; overflow: hidden; text-align: start; z-index: 1;">
<div id="postBodyPS">
Unbeknownst to her but certainly in the forefront of the government's thinking was the fact that if Miss Adams was telling the truth, then she had descended those stairs at the same time Lee Oswald would have been on them as he made his escape from the sixth floor sniper's nest."</div>
<div id="postBodyPS">
Yet Miss Adams saw no one.<br />
And even though the stairs were old, wooden, and very creaky under any weight, she heard no one on them.<br />
<br />
<br />
Her story presented obvious problems for the Warren Commission’s conclusion that Oswald was the sole assassin. When Miss Adams was called to testify before a Commission attorney, she was quickly discredited, humiliated, and eventually branded a liar. Behind closed doors she pleaded with the government to conduct time tests of her actions if she wasn’t believed. She begged the government to question her co-workers, particularly the woman who had accompanied her down the stairs, if she was felt to have been inaccurate.</div>
</div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small; text-align: start;">
But she was ignored.</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div id="postBodyPS" style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small; text-align: start;">
And so, knowing the truth of what she had done and now fearing for her life because of it, she went into hiding and became willing to die with that private knowledge.<br />
Intrigued by what little was available about Miss Adams, the author went in search of her. It took him 35 years to eventually find this elusive witness. Along the way, many of the rumors and speculations surrounding the JFK assassination were finally put to rest. And in the end, the truth of what Miss Adams did was discovered.<br />
This is an important story, unique in this mess surrounding the Kennedy assassination and buried for decades. It is an account the government did not want us to hear, and actually went to the extreme of fabricating evidence in order to prevent us from hearing it."</div>
<div id="postBodyPS" style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small; text-align: start;">
<br /></div>
<div id="postBodyPS" style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small; text-align: start;">
These are the words written for the book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/The-Girl-Stairs-Assassination-ebook/dp/B004GNFU9S">THE GIRL ON THE STAIRS</a> by author Barry Ernest. </div>
<br />
<br />
And if Lee wasn't on the stairs, he was in that room. The door was closed...Lee had to walk across the room, insert coins, wait for the coke to roll down, open the coke... and he was not seen crossing a wide hallway from stairs on the other side of that wide hallway, before entering the lunchroom. LEE OSWALD WAS NOT ON THE 6TH FLOOR 90 SECONDS EARLIER. He did not go down those stairs. Curry himself said Baker had seen Lee with a coke just a day after the assassination. Or should we believe that the words were accidentally written down in haste by somebody taking an oral deposition, which then needed correction by Baker himself? Probably the most shameful batch of lies about Lee Oswald were written in the book MARINA AND LEE by Priscilla Johnson McMillan, who has been linked to the CIA. She went out of her way to impress upon readers --who would be unaware of her intentions, but which would plant the image in their head--that Lee had no coke in his hands, for she wrote, on p. 531: "When Baker and Truly reached the second-floor landing, Baker caught a glimpse of someone in the lunchroom. Revolver in hand, he rushed to the door and saw a man 20 feet away walking to the far end of the room. The man was empty-handed." </td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.collectorsweekly.com/assets/stories/D.FAgg1Ki1tPuwghKg1Zbw.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://www.collectorsweekly.com/assets/stories/D.FAgg1Ki1tPuwghKg1Zbw.jpg" width="240" /></a></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"> The way Baker was <a href="http://karws.gso.uri.edu/jfk/history/wc_period/warren_report/MarrionLBaker.html">questioned by Dulles </a>(and by Belin) for the Warren Commission was absolutely shameful, as an attempt was made to get Baker to say Lee Oswald wore the SAME SHIRT in the TSBD that he was wearing when arrested. This was important because a bus transfer ticket, obtained from his pocket due to Lee's 'escape by public transit'--would not have been in a different shirt. The ticket had to be planted because it has not a single crease in it and was never tested for fingerprints, unlike so many other pieces of evidence. To get Baker to say it was the SAME SHIRT was essential, but the poor man just wasn't cooperating very well. The persistence of Dulles is shocking as he tried to get around Lee's "escape by car" as seen by officer Roger Craig, which meant a conspirator was involved: (Baker's "brown jacket" and the 'other' short he saw, as well as the gist of the leading questions, are underlined)</span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-right: 0in;">
</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Baker.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>At that particular time I was looking at his face, and it seemed to me like he had a l<u>ight brown jacket on</u> and maybe some kind of white-looking shirt.<br />Anyway, as I noticed him walking away from me, it was kind of dim in there that particular day, and it was hanging out to his side.</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Belin.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>Handing you what has been marked as Commission Exhibit 150, would this appear to be a<u>nything that you have ever seen before</u>?</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Baker.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>Yes, sir; I believe t<u>hat is the shirt that he had on when he came</u>. I wouldn't be sure of that. It seemed to me like <u>that other shirt was a little bit darker</u> than that whenever I saw him in the homicide office there.</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Belin.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i><u>What about when you saw him in the School Book Depository Building, does this look familiar as anything he was wearing,</u> if you know?</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Baker.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>I couldn't say whether that was--it seemed to me it was <u>a light-colored brown</u> but I couldn't say it was that or not.</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Dulles.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>Lighter brown did you say, I am just asking what you said. I couldn't quite hear.</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Baker.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>Yes, sir; all I can remember it was in my recollection of it it was <u>a light brown jacket.</u></i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Belin.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i><u>Are you referring to this Exhibit 150 as being similar to the jacket</u> or similar to the shirt that you saw or, if not, similar to either one?</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Baker.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>Well, <u>it would be similar in color to it</u>--I assume it was a jacket, it was hanging out. Now, I was looking at his face and I wasn't really paying any attention. After Mr. Truly said he knew him, so I didn't pay any attention to him, so I just turned and went on.</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Belin.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>Now, you did see him later at the police station, is that correct?</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Baker.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>Yes, sir.</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Belin.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i><u>Was he wearing anything that looked like Exhibit 150</u> at the police station?</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Baker.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>He did have <u>a brown-type shirt</u> on that was out.</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Belin.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i><u>Did it appear to be similar to any clothing you had seen when you saw him at the School Book Depository Building</u>?</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Baker.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i><u>I could have mistaken it for a jacket, but to my recollection it was a little colored jacket, that is all I can say</u>.</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Dulles.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>You saw Oswald later in the lineup or later</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Baker.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>I never did have a chance to see him in the lineup.<u> I saw him when I went to give the affidavit</u>, the statement that I saw him down there, of the actions of myself and Mr. Truly as we went into the building and on up what we are discussing now.<br />(At this point Senator Cooper entered the hearing room.)</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Belin.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>Officer Baker</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Dulles.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i><u>I didn't get clearly in mind, I am trying to check up, as to whether you saw Oswald maybe in the same costume later in the day. </u>Did you see Oswald later in the day of November 22d?</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Baker.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>Yes, sir; I did.</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Dulles.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>Under what circumstances? Don't go into detail, I just want to tie up these two situations.</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Baker.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>As I was in the homicide office there writing this, giving this affidavit, I got hung in one of those little small offices back there, while the Secret Service took Mr. Oswald in there and questioned him and I couldn't get out by him while they were questioning him, and I did get to see him at that time.</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Dulles.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>You saw him for a moment at that time?</i></dd>
<dt style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Baker.<i></i></dt>
<dd style="font-size: medium;"><i>Yes, sir.</i></dd><dd style="font-size: medium;"><i><br /></i></dd><dd style="font-size: medium;">It should be clear that witnesses were being pushed to say what the Commission wanted. Some witnesses later insisted that their testimony had been changed. Those who defend the Warren Commission today either have double-digit IQ's, must be enamored of anti-conspiracy writers, and/or be in the pay of those still attempting to blame the Kennedy assassination on the one man who was trying to stop it. It is my hope that you will read the true story of Lee Oswald in my book, <a href="http://www.meandlee.com/">ME & LEE.</a></dd></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-59355540121790390732012-07-28T16:05:00.000-07:002012-07-28T16:12:28.332-07:00Lee Harvey Oswald: The Jacket Frame-Up<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/c81.0.403.403/p403x403/428867_393782290683318_1983871189_n.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/c81.0.403.403/p403x403/428867_393782290683318_1983871189_n.jpg" width="640" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><h4>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><a aria-controls="u8czn4_1" aria-haspopup="true" aria-owns="u8czn4_1" class="actorName" data-ft="{"type":35,"tn":";"}" data-hovercard="/ajax/hovercard/page.php?id=158304380897778" href="https://www.facebook.com/Lee.Harvey.Oswald.Innocent" id="js_6" style="background-color: #edeff4; color: #3b5998; cursor: pointer; font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-weight: bold; line-height: 9.333333015441895px; text-align: left;">Lee Harvey Oswald</a><span style="background-color: #edeff4; color: #333333; font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; line-height: 9.333333015441895px; text-align: left;"> </span></span><span class="commentBody" data-jsid="text" style="background-color: #edeff4; color: #333333; font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; line-height: 9.333333015441895px; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">surrounded by looks of hatred... they have all been </span></span><br />
<span class="commentBody" data-jsid="text" style="background-color: #edeff4; color: #333333; font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; line-height: 9.333333015441895px; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span><br />
<span class="commentBody" data-jsid="text" style="background-color: #edeff4; color: #333333; font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; line-height: 9.333333015441895px; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></span><br />
<span class="commentBody" data-jsid="text" style="background-color: #edeff4; color: #333333; font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; line-height: 9.333333015441895px; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">told Lee was THE ONLY ONE INVOLVED --even though</span></span><br />
<span class="commentBody" data-jsid="text" style="background-color: #edeff4; color: #333333; font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; line-height: 9.333333015441895px; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /><br /> the FBI has not yet examined the rifle or any other evidence</span></span></h4>
</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjl12qAYn9JN242rBBlr5lwtM2Zod7-dabhuZ6ttadr5-plweqvsaFWSR4Rg6kkxwIt9zkX_Zyc7m9xV_kG22-VoVNtwFo7khSDhI-3I17JXtHZZAL8beDedY8Gzdx5pVSrk1bEiKgj3Q/s1600/lee+arrest+humiliated+chopped+swatches+of+hair+off+shaved+pubic.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjl12qAYn9JN242rBBlr5lwtM2Zod7-dabhuZ6ttadr5-plweqvsaFWSR4Rg6kkxwIt9zkX_Zyc7m9xV_kG22-VoVNtwFo7khSDhI-3I17JXtHZZAL8beDedY8Gzdx5pVSrk1bEiKgj3Q/s320/lee+arrest+humiliated+chopped+swatches+of+hair+off+shaved+pubic.jpg" width="295" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: small;">They cut a several chunks of hair off for a "sample" --</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">humiliated him also by shaving all the hair from his pubic area,</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">since they needed a "sample" of that, too. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Soon we learn that "pubic hairs belonging to Oswald"</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">were found on a blanket that supposedly held the rifle.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Note that the Warren Commission published a photo</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">of these hairs as evidence, even though they are CUT.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Normal hairs FALL OFF and would have bulbs at the end.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">IT MUST BE UNDERSTOOD THAT THE POLICE AND OTHERS</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">WERE WILLING TO MANIPULATE EVIDENCE.</span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhd3gt5d2ZXepM0sAyZ_nva3nlX1deAjH0_p6k1UiL8KRwFaNaiqvaq6wJOaBusyHajDA-HirwFpqAvOJ5YBnEtutZ4MSwzPTEjQRosUYiwglfsL3pWXJ9SQ0S92_oN25f1g_6OeCjcRqKx/s640/pubic+hairs+does+not+show+tips+bulbs+WH_Vol17.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="536" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhd3gt5d2ZXepM0sAyZ_nva3nlX1deAjH0_p6k1UiL8KRwFaNaiqvaq6wJOaBusyHajDA-HirwFpqAvOJ5YBnEtutZ4MSwzPTEjQRosUYiwglfsL3pWXJ9SQ0S92_oN25f1g_6OeCjcRqKx/s640/pubic+hairs+does+not+show+tips+bulbs+WH_Vol17.jpg" width="640" /></a><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
Of course we cannot see any bulbs to prove a normally-fallen hair was found on the blanket. The photo is so bad that nothing of value can be seen. It could be hair from anybody, insofar as this poor photo is concerned. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The WC testimony of Paul Strombaugh :</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. STOMBAUGH. . . . Pubic hairs ordinarily are rather thick. Oswald's hairs were relatively narrow. Pubic hairs also have what we term nobbiness. You can see a nob right here, it is twisted---- </span></span></div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. EISENBERG. Could you circle that with a pen, and mark it "A" on chart 672?.... </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;" /></span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. STOMBAUGH. . . . The tips of Oswald's pubic hairs were not worn. . . . This would indicate to me that his pubic hairs were rather strong, much tougher than the average persons.</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">BESIDES LEARNING TOO MUCH ABOUT PUBIC HAIRS, WE DO NOT LEARN ENOUGH ABOUT</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">HOW FIBERS FROM THE BLANKET WERE FOUND ON THE RIFLE (JUST A COUPLE). RESEARCHER <a href="http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/S%20Disk/Stombaugh%20Paul/Item%2004.pdf">DAVID WRONE </a>WAS RIGHTLY CONCERNED ABOUT THAT. HE WRITES: </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="line-height: 18px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"><span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"></span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;"> It seems to me that the whole episode focuses upon the </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">packag-er of the rifle to who shipped it to FBI SOG. I think [I was told...]</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;"><span style="background-color: white;">it was not shipped by package, as Stombaugh says, but was </span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">courier delivered. Further, Howard in Presumed Guilty has the </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">Dallas police photograph of the rifle resting on the blanket </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">prior to being "shipped" to the lab. [MEANING, THE BLANKET WAS </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">PLACED NEXT TO THE <span style="background-color: white;">RIFLE WHEN IN POLICE HANDS== BEFORE IT WAS</span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;"><span style="background-color: white;">EXAMINED FOR FIBERS FROM THE BLANKET!] Thus I do not see how the </span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">rifle got from the Dallas police to the FPI to Stombaugh with any </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">reasonable degree of clear and distinct purity to make the </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">scientific credentials of P.S. mean anything. The premise is false.</span></div>
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
See <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/lola4jvb4lho?feature=results_main">lola4jvb4lho's YouTube Channel </a>for more information about how Lee was framed. Here is one such video about the BLANKET:</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/MwHpfpZeWeQ?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">ONE OF THE MOST BLATANT INSTANCES OF THE MISHANDLING OF EVIDENCE CONCERNS THE JACKETS ASSOCIATED WITH LEE OSWALD. ACCORDING TO THE WARRANER COMMISSION, LEE OSWALD THREW OFF A JACKET AS HE RAN AWAY AFTER SHOOTING OFFICER TIPPIT, ON HIS WAY TO THE TEXAS THEATER WHERE HE WOULD BE ARRESTED SHORTLY THEREAFTER.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">THE PROBLEM IS, THERE ARE WAY TOO MANY JACKETS...AND COLORS.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">NOT THAT THIS STOPPED THE WARREN COMMISSION FROM CLAIMING THE DISCARDED JACKET (THOUGH TOO BIG FOR OSWALD) WAS ANOTHER PIECE OF 'EVIDENCE' AGAINST HIM.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
"<a href="http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=8916">THE AMAZING TECHNICOLOR JACKET" : ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF HOW LEE OSWALD WAS FRAMED</a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
A STUDY BY ED LeDOUX, et al:</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">"Oswald and the Amazing Technicolor Jacket" </span></div>
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">..and the chameleon like qualities of the alleged assassin's coat.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Marina Oswald said Lee had only two jackets - one Dark Blue and one a lightweight Gray.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">At least two witnesses at the scene of Tippit's slaying</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">reported his killer wore a White jacket.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">One of these, Helen Markham, was shown Oswald's gray jacket</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">by a Warren Commission attorney who asked,</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">"Did you ever see this before?"</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Despite having been shown the jacket by the FBI prior to her testimony, Markham replied:</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">"No, I did not....that jacket is a darker jacket than that, I know it</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">was."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Witness Domingo Benavides was shown a jacket by Commission Attorney David</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Belin, who said, "I am handing you a jacket which had been marked as</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Commission's Exhibit 163, and ask you to state whether this bears any</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">similarity to the jacket you saw this man with the gun wearing?"</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Benavides responded:</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">"I would say this looks just like it..."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The problem here is that Commission's Exhibit 163 is Oswald's dark blue jacket.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The gray jacket is Commission's Exhibit 162.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">--------------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">ON THE BUS?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The driver, Cecil McWatters, and passenger Roy Milton Jones said the man who</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">boarded the bus was wearing a jacket.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Jones said the jacket was LIGHT BLUE in color. Interestingly, the cab driver</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">initially said the man who rode in his cab during the time in question was</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">wearing a faded BLUE jacket. The WC said the man in both instances was</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Oswald, but the commission also insisted Oswald wasn't wearing a jacket</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">after he left the Book Depository. The commission had to deny the accounts</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">of a light blue jacket because it claimed Oswald left his blue jacket at</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">work that day, where it was "found" WEEKS later, and because that</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">jacket was not light blue. (WCR p. 163).</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Roy Milton Jones described this man as follows:</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Races White</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Sex. Male</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Age. 30-35</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Height. 5'11"</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Weight. 150</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Builds Medium</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Remarks. wore no glasses and no hat</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Hairs. Dark brown, receding at temples</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Dress. Light blue jacket and gray khaki</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">trousers</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mary Bledsoe describes Oswald's shirt, that is was undone, dirty, had a hole in the sleeve at the elbow. Why is Bledsoe the only one who notices this?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Only Bledsoe described such a shirt. No one else who saw Oswald that day referred to Oswald as wearing a ripped or torn shirt.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">McWatters and Jones said Oswald was wearing a jacket. (2H 264;277, CE 2641, also Meagher p.81) McWatters thought he was identifying a man who most closely resembled Jones.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">McWatters testifies, "...he was the shortest man in the lineup...and the lightest weight one...the rest of them were larger men....he kind of had a thin like face and he weighs less than any of them...I really thought he was the man who was on the bus...that stayed on the bus." (2H281)</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.- "Were you under the impression that this man that you saw in the lineup and whom you pointed out to the police, was the teenage boy who had been grinning?"</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. McWatters.- "I was, yes, sir;"</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Bledsoe never went to a line up. She identified Oswald from photographs shown to her by the Dallas police of Oswald holding a gun. ( Meagher p. 80)</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Only Bledsoe gives the condition of his shirt as undone, ripped, torn, dirty, and missing buttons. If Jones and McWatters saw Ozzie wearing a jacket then how did Bledsoe see the shirt? Was she on a different bus altogether?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball - "What bus did you catch?"</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mrs. Bledsoe - "Well, I don't remember whether it was the Marsalis or the Romana."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Later counsel asks this pointed question:</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball. - "Did you remember seeing him get on or are you telling me something you read in the newspapers?" <6H410></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Then comes this exchange about the shirt:</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.- No, I am talking about---I am showing you this shirt now, and you said, "That is it." You mean---What do you mean by "that is it"?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mrs. Bledsoe.- That is the one he had out there that day?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.- Who had it out there?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mrs. Bledsoe.- Some Secret Service man.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.- He brought it out. Now, I am---you have seen this shirt then before?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mrs. Bledsoe.- Yes.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.- It was brought out by the Secret Service man and shown to you?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mrs. Bledsoe.- Yes.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.- Had you ever seen the shirt before that?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mrs. Bledsoe.- Well---</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.- Have you?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mrs. Bledsoe.- No; he had it on, though. (6H413)</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">To recap; Oswald is said to be on the bus with Bledsoe, then goes home and changes his clothes, takes off ripped torn shirt (WCR 604-605, 622), gets arrested and somehow has on the same ripped torn dirty shirt which is shown to Bledsoe. Right.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">More plausible Oswald did not go home he rode by bus all the way to the theater. He wore only the clothes he had on when he left work, the same clothes he was arrested in.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Or... in a Rambler.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Oswald was under the impression that he left Dealey Plaza in "Mrs. Paine's" station wagon. Bert Sugar and Sybil Leek apparently had information that Paine borrowed a car similar to the one seen in Dealey Plaza. What was not mentioned, however, was that they claimed she "sometimes borrowed" the car from Jack Ruby. 1</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">---------------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">IN THE CAB?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Cabdriver William Whaley, who reportedly drove Oswald home from downtown Dallas.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Whaley identified the gray jacket as the one Oswald was wearing in his cab.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Yet the Warren Commission, based on testimony from Earlene Roberts, stated that Oswald</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">put on the jacket AFTER arriving at his lodgings.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">At the police lineup, Whaley picked out eighteen-year-old David Knapp instead of twenty-four-year-old Lee Harvey Oswald ( Knapp did not even resemble Oswald). Whaley had said that Oswald was number two in the lineup he witnessed. The numbers were from left to right and clearly visible; each man in the lineup had a number that was clearly visible to the man trying to identify the ‘suspect’. The Commission, however, said that Oswald was number three. Trying to explain this problem (this really meant that he didn’t identify Oswald but the man next to him), he said that he had counted from the right to the left, ignoring the numbers that were put there to aid identification (why make it easy when it can be done in a more difficult way?). This could mean, of course, he identified number 5, since he believed there were six people in that lineup.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Did you notice how he was dressed?</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Whaley.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Yes, sir. I didn't pay much attention to it right then. But it all came back when I really found out who I had. He was dressed in just ordinary work clothes. It wasn't khaki pants but they were khaki material, blue faded blue color, like a blue uniform made in khaki. Then he had on a brown shirt with a little silverlike stripe on it and he had on some kind of jacket, I didn't notice very close but I think it was a work jacket that ALMOST MATCHED THE PANTS</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">(EMPHASIS MINE- MEANING A FADED BLUE JACKET).</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">He, his shirt was open three buttons down here. He had on a T-shirt. You know, the shirt was open three buttons down there.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Whaley’s identity as the man who drove that taxi, however, is not an ‘open and shut’ issue.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Henry Wade said that man was “Darryl Click”. The mistake was explained as Wade having</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">misunderstood “Oak Cliff” as the name of the cabdriver.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">On November 27, Click became Whaley.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Another cabdriver, Charles Kimerlin, however, would later say he was the man who</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">took Oswald to his boardinghouse.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">----------------------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Whaley and TWO jackets?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Here is Commission No. 162 which is a gray jacket with zipper.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Whaley.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">I thank that is the jacket he had on when he rode with me in the cab.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Look something like it?</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">And here is Commission Exhibit No. 163, does this look like anything he had on?</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Whaley.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">He had this one on or the other one.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">That is right.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Whaley.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">That is what I told you I noticed. I told you about the shirt being open, he had on the TWO JACKETS with the open shirt.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Wait a minute, we have got the shirt which you have identified as the rust brown shirt with the GOLD stripe in it.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Whaley.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Yes, sir.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">You said that a jacket--</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Whaley.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">That jacket now it might have been clean, but the jacket he had on looked more the color, you know like a uniform set, but he had this coat here on over that other jacket, I am sure, sir.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">This is the blue-gray jacket, heavy blue-gray jacket.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Whaley.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Yes, sir. (EMPHASIS MINE)</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">How accommidating Mr. Whaley is.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">So it was both jackets, or either jacket, you choose Mr. Ball,</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">but it still did not match exactly.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Even the shirt changed from silver striped to a gold striped one!</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">----------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Per FBI report:</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">MARINA OSWALD was interviewed at 11611 Farrar,</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">A faded blue cloth Jacket with padding bearing</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">label "Sir Jac" with zipper front was exhibited to MARINA.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">She immediately identified this jacket as being the property</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">of her husband, LEE HARVEY OSWALD. She said she recognized</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">the jacket because she has handled it and washed it for</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">OSWALD.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Does this dark blue jacket look faded? Why is the FBI altering the description of this jacket?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">picture of LHO dark blue jacket* (SORRY, NO PHOTO)..</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">.[NOTE TO READERS: HERE IS WHAT <a href="http://www.awesomestories.com/assets/oswalds-jacket-worn-at-the-time-of-his-arrest">ONE INTERNET SITE</a> SHOWS--THE DISCARDED WHITE JACKET--WHICH THIS SITE SAYS LEE OSWALD WAS WEARING WHEN HE WAS ARRESTED --JUST ANOTHER LIE FOR THE NEWBIES OUT THERE: </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.awesomestories.com/images/user/6c1c704397.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="316" src="http://www.awesomestories.com/images/user/6c1c704397.gif" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;" /></div>
<br />
<a href="http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/cab_ride.htm">Researcher Gil Jesus </a>has some interesting comments to make about the Cab driver, Whaley, who said Lee rode with him:<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<div align="left">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Whaley's Description of His Passenger</span></b></div>
<div align="left">
<span style="font-size: medium;">One of the more obvious examples of Whaley's lack of credibility comes in his description of the clothing of the passenger who the Commission claimed was Oswald.</span></div>
<div align="left">
<span style="font-size: small;"><i>"He was dressed in just ordinary work clothes. <span style="background-color: cyan;">It wasn't khaki pants but they were khaki material, blue faded blue color, like a blue uniform made in khaki</span>. Then <span style="background-color: #ff99ff;">he had on a brown shirt with a little silverlike stripe on it</span> and <span style="background-color: yellow;">he had on some kind of jacket,</span> I didn't notice very close but I think it was <span style="background-color: yellow;">a work jacket that almost matched the pants. </span>( 2 H 255 )</i></span></div>
<div align="left">
<br /></div>
<div align="left">
<span style="font-size: medium;">But shortly later in his testimony, <span style="background-color: yellow;">Whaley changed his mind about the blue faded work pants and identified Commission Exhibit 157, Oswald's light grey pants, as the same color as the pants his passenger wore</span>:</span></div>
<div align="left">
<span style="font-size: small;"><i>Mr. BALL. Here are two pair of pants, Commission Exhibit No. 157 and Commission Exhibit No. 156. Does it look anything like that?<br />Mr. WHALEY. I don't think I can identify the pants except <span style="background-color: yellow;">they were the same color as that</span>, sir.<br />Mr. BALL. Which color?<br />Mr. WHALEY. More like this lighter color, at least they were cleaner or something.<br />Mr. BALL. That is 157?<br />Mr. WHALEY. Yes, sir.</i></span></div>
<div align="left">
<span style="font-size: small;"><i>( 2 H 259-260 )</i></span></div>
<div align="left">
<span style="font-size: small;"><i><br /></i></span></div>
<div align="left">
<span style="font-size: small;"><i>[and here are the two jackets attributed to Lee that Gil Jesus posts: </i></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/ce162_16H520.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="372" src="http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/ce162_16H520.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/ce156-157_16H_518.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="522" src="http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/ce156-157_16H_518.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<div align="left">
<span style="font-size: small;"><i>here are the pants in question: </i></span></div>
</div>
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">----------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Returning to the Essay by Ed LeDoux: </span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Testifying to the Warren Commission, Earlene Roberts said:</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">"He (Oswald) went to his room and he was in his shirt sleeves...and he got</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">a jacket and put it on - it was kind of a zipper jacket."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.- "You say he put on a separate jacket?"</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mrs. Roberts.- "A jacket."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. BALL.- "I'll show you this jacket which is Commission Exhibit 162---have you ever seen this jacket before?"</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mrs. Roberts.- "Well, maybe I have, but I don't remember it. It seems like the one he put on was darker than that. Now, I won't be sure, because I really don't know, but is that a zipper jacket?"</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Ruby associate Bertha Cheek was the sister of Earlene Roberts, the housekeeper at Oswald's rooming house. Ruby and Mrs. Cheek could have been involved in Cuban arms sales of which Oswald gained knowledge through his efforts to infiltrate the anti-Castro Cubans." 2</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mrs. Cheek was the sister of Earlene Roberts, housekeeper at 1026 N. Beckley, where Oswald was living at the time of the assassination. 3</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Barbara Davis, another witness at the Tippit slaying, also could not</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">identify Oswald's gray jacket to the Warren Commission. In fact, she</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">stated the killer wore- "a dark coat...it looked like it was maybe a wool</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">fabric...more of a sporting jacket."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Cabdriver William Scoggins also failed to identify Oswald's jacket, saying,-"I thought it was a little darker."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Despite these problems of identification, the Commission went</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">right on asserting that the jacket belonged to Oswald.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Virginia Davis did not see a gray jacket.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. BELIN.- "Do you remember what he had on?"</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mrs. DAVIS.- "He had on a light-brown-tan jacket."</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. BELIN.- "Do you remember what color his trousers were?"</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mrs. DAVIS.- "I think they were black. Brown jacket and trousers."</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Ted Callaway ran from the car lot and saw the man with the gun. What does he say about the jacket?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Callaway.- "I told them he had some dark trousers and a light TANNISH gray windbreaker jacket, and I told him that he was fair complexion, dark hair."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.- "I have a jacket here Commission's Exhibit No. 162. Does this look anything like the jacket that the man had on that you saw across the street with a gun?"</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Callaway.- "Yes; it sure does. Yes, that is the same TYPE jacket.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Actually, I thought it had a little more TAN to it." (EMPHASIS MINE)</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">More Commission deception occurred in its reporting of the discovery of</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">the jacket. The Warren Report stated:</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">"Police Capt. W.R. Westbrook...walked through the parking lot behind the</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">service station and found a light-colored jacket lying under the rear of</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">one of the cars."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">However, in his testimony, Westbrook was asked if he found some clothing.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">He replied:</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">"Actually, I didn't find it - it was pointed out to me by... some</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">officer..."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">According to the <a href="http://karws.gso.uri.edu/jfk/the_critics/meagher/Notes_for_a_new_investigation.html">Dallas Police Radio log</a>, a "white jacket" was found by</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">"279 (Unknown)" a full 15 minutes before Westbrook arrived on the scene.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The Commission made no effort to determine who really found the jacket, if</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">a jacket was actually found or if it was a white jacket which only later</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">was transformed into Oswald's gray jacket. Recently, the owner of the</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Texaco station where the jacket reportedly was found told Texas</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">researchers that no one - neither the FBI, Dallas police nor the Warren</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Commission - ever questioned him or his employees about this important</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">piece of evidence.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">In addition, the jacket identified by federal</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">authorities as belonging to Oswald carried inside a laundry mark "30 030"</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">and a dry-cleaning tag "B 9738." A full-scale search by the FBI in both Dallas</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">and New Orleans failed to identify any laundry or dry cleaners using those</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">marks. (a fact not mentioned in the WC report)</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Oswald's wife, Marina, testified she could not recall her husband</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">ever sending his jackets to a cleaning establishment, but that she did</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">recall washing them herself. (CE 1843).</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Yet in CE 3000 Leslie Lawson, the owner/manager of Gray's Cleaners, 1209 Eldorado, Oak Cliff,</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">(that location is only a hundred yards from Oswald's rooming house) stated that he has seen Lee Harvey Oswald on one particular occasion and possibly on other occasions. Mr Lawson said that approximately a month earlier, Oswald handed in a tie, white shirt and black pair of trousers for cleaning. Two days later, when Oswald called to collect these items, he had been charged $1.25 and had complained about being charged 25 cents for the cleaning of his tie.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Lawson stated that he had seen Oswald at Reno's Speed Wash. A former Reno's employee, Joseph Johnson, was interviewed by the FBI on 28th July 1964 and stated that on the evening of 20th or 21st November 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald was 'washing laundry at Reno's Speed Wash. Oswald remained there, reading magazines, until midnight. (CE 3001)</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Further investigation by the FBI turned up no laundry or dry-cleaning tags on any of Oswald's other clothing, and did not connect the laundry tag to any establishment.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">If the jacket doesn't fit.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Oswald wore a size "small" shirt and jacket, all his clothes are size small, the "jacket" is a MEDIUM size, which adds to the suspicion that it was not his jacket. . If he had attorney Johnnie Cochran to represent him can you imagine what he would say?(sARCASM MINE)</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Officer J. M. Poe interviewed Mrs. Markham, she told him Tippit's killer had bushy hair. She said the killer was "a white male about 25 years old, 5'10", slender build, bushy hair, wearing a brown jacket" (Myers, With Malice, p. 118, emphasis added). The jacket that the police claimed Oswald discarded after allegedly shooting Tippit wasn't even close to being brown in color. The police initially said the jacket they reportedly "found" was white. The jacket that was finally submitted as evidence was gray with a slight touch of blue.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. BALL. Did he have a jacket or a shirt? The man that you saw shoot Officer Tippit and run away, did you notice if he had a jacket on?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mrs. MARKHAM. He had a jacket on when he done it.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. BALL. What kind of a jacket, what general color of jacket?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mrs. MARKHAM. It was a short jacket open in the front, kind of a grayish tan.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. BALL. Did you tell the police that?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mrs. MARKHAM. Yes, I did.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Comment: But the first police radio report on Tippit's killer, which was supposedly based at least partly on Mrs. Markham's description, said he was wearing a white jacket (CE 1974; Meagher, Accessories After the Fact, p. 272). In fact, three minutes after this report went out over the air, a police officer, who remains unidentified to this day, radios that he had the killer's white jacket in his possession. It would have been very hard to mistake Oswald's gray jacket for a white jacket after holding it and having a chance to look at for even just a few seconds.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">To add to the confusion, one of the witnesses, Barbara Davis, said Tippit's killer was wearing a black coat. Is it not odd, and in fact astounding, that the "policeman" who allegedly "discovered" the killer's coat has never been identified (see Meagher, Accessories After the Fact, pp. 276-279; Lane, Rush to Judgment, pp. 203-204)?</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. BALL. Does it look like, anything like, the jacket the man had on?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mrs. MARKHAM. It is short, open down the front. but that jacket it is a darker jacket than that, I know it was.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. BALL. You don't think it was as light a jacket as that?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mrs. MARKHAM. No, it was darker than that, I know it was.....</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">to Mark Lane:</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Jacket :LIGHT GRAY looking jacket</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Trousers :kind of dark trousers</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Shirt :didn't see colour of shirt</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">in the men who killed kennedy (with her emphasis that she can exactly remember)</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Jacket :BROWN jacket</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Trousers :light gray trousers</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Shirt :a light shirt</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">In his official report, Poe wrote that:</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">"We were met by a white female who identified herself as being Helen Marsalle, 328 E. 9th St., who stated she witnessed the shooting of the officer. When she went to his aid the suspect threatened to kill her and she ran. She identified the subject as a white male about 25 years old, 5'10", slender build, bushy hair, wearing a BROWN jacket"... "There were approximately six to eight witnesses, all telling officers that the subject was running west in the alley between tenth and Jefferson Streets"</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Later in the day, Poe filed a Supplementary Offense report (Box 7, Folder # 2, Item # 37). Here he wrote:</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">"We were met by a white woman who identified herself as being Helen Marsille of 329 E. 9th Street who stated that she witnessed the shooting of the officer be an unknown white male of about 25 years of age about 5'10" wearing a BROWN jacket and dark pants. When she went to the aid of the Officer, the suspect threatened to kill her"...</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">"6 or 7 witnesses said that the suspect was running east in the alley that was between Tenth and Jefferson".</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Here is radio transcript that shows when poe got to the scene:</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">1:22 Dispatcher Remain in the downtown vicinity, 26. Clear. 1:22.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">26 (Ptm. G.W. Hammond) 10-4.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">75 (Ptm. E.G. Sabastian) 75 Clear.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">85 (Ptm. R.W. Walker) 85.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Dispatcher 85.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">85 We have a description on this suspect over here on Jefferson. Last seen about 300 block of East Jefferson. He's a white male, about thirty, five eight, (siren) black hair, slender, wearing WHITE jacket, a white shirt and dark slacks. (Sirens)</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Dispatcher Armed with what?</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">85 Unknown.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">602 (ambulance) 602 in service.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">105 (Ptm. J.M. Poe and L.E. Joz) 105.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Dispatcher 105.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">105 We're at the location now.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Dispatcher 10-4.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">So its Walker(85) who gives out description of white jacket before Poe talks to Markham.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The following exchange is logged at about 1:25 p.m.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">279 (Unknown): "279, 279."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Dispatcher: "279" (Unknown).</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">279 (Unknown): "We believe we've got the suspect on shooting this officer out here. Got his white jacket. Believe he dumped it on this parking lot behind this service station at 400 block East Jefferson, across from Dudley Hughes (Funeral Parlor), and he had a</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">white jacket on. We believe this is it."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Dispatcher: "You do not have the suspect, is that correct?"</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">279 (Unknown): "No, just the jacket on the ground."</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">per Ian Griggs:</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">"Incidentally, radio call sign 279 is one of the difficult ones. It appears that it was allocated to at least two officers that day - three-wheel motorcyle officers J.R. Mackey and J.T. Griffin."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">I agree the Lawrence exhibit (wh20) shows it assigned to both officers that day and shift. Why does not the other respond when he hears his number being used by the other? Griffin on parking duty and Mackey was at Stemmons Service Road & Industrial with W.E. Wilson and R.J. Kosan.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Calvin “Bud” Owens, Tippit’s supervisor from 10H79</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. OWENS. Yes--we were informed by a man whom I do not know, that the suspect that shot Officer Tippit had run across a vacant lot toward Jefferson, and thrown down his jacket, I think he said, WHITE, I'm not sure.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">---------------------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">At 1:40PM Westbrook transmitted -</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">"We got a witness that saw him shed his jacket."</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Did Westbrook ever tell us who this witness was who saw the jacket shed by the suspect? No.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Captain Westbrook's testimony at 7H 116-118:</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">"Yes; behind the Texaco service station, and some officer, I feel sure it was an officer, I still can't be positive - pointed this jacket out to me and it was laying slightly under the rear of one of the cars."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Now we find out it the witness maybe an officer but he is not sure who pointed it out.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. BELIN. I am showing you Commission Exhibit 162, which appears to be a jacket with a zipper. Does that look like the Jacket you saw?</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. HUTSON. That looks like the jacket that was picked up by the officer behind the Texaco service station, behind the cars parked on the lot.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. BELIN. Do you know the name of the officer that found it?</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. HUTSON. No, sir; I don't know.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. BELIN. Do you know who he gave it to?</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. HUTSON. No, sir; I don't.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. BELIN. You don't know if he gave it to Captain Westbrook?</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. HUTSON. I don't know. Captain Westbrook was there behind the house with us, and he was there at the time this was picked up with the man, but I don't know who had it in their hands.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Interrogations of Oswald do not mention any jacket; nothing in the official record indicates he was questioned about or confronted with the white jacket by the DPD, FBI or SEcret service.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">------------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">IN THE TSBD?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Marion Baker said in his report, "...as we reached the third or fourth floor I saw a man walking away from the stairway. Not second. Third or fourth. No lunchroom. No door with a glass panel. Just walking away from the stairway.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">With regard to a description of this person, Baker said it was "a white man, approx 30 years old/5'9"/165 pounds, dark hair and wearing a LIGHT BROWN jacket."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Not a description of LHO, but one fitting Brennean's and Rowland's description of the man they saw.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">-------------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">More witnesses</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Frank Wright in interview.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Wright;"I was the first person out, and caught sight of Tippit in time to see him roll over once and then lie still." I saw a man standing in front of the car(Tippits) He was looking toward the man on the ground, the man who was standing in front of him(Tippit) was about medium height. He had on a LONG COAT, it ended just above his hands(?)I didnt see any gun. he ran around on the passenger side of the police car, he ran as fast as he could go, and GOT INTO HIS CAR, the car was about 1950-1951, maybe a Plymouth. He got in that car and drove away as fast as he could. I know what I saw, nothing in the world is going to change my opinion." (emphasis Wright's)</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Jimmy Burt, across the street from the construction site where W.L Smith was working, watched the same man as he came from the direction of the Town and Country Cafe and continued walking west on 10th. Burt described him as a white male, approximately 5'8", wearing a light colored short jacket (interview of Burt by SA Christianson and Acklin 12/16/63). Burt watched as the man passed them and continued walking west toward Patton. As the man approached Tippit's patrol car, Tippit rolled down his passenger side car window and spoke to this man.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">William Arthur Smith was with Burt at the time and described the same man seen by he and Burt as "a white male, about 5'7" to 5'8", 20 to 25 years of age, 150-160, a white shirt, light BROWN jacket and dark pants (interview of Smith by SA Ward and Basham 12/13/63). Both Burt and Smith watched this unknown man as he walked toward Patton, approached the squad car, spoke with Tippit, and then shot him. (emphasis mine)</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Jack Roy Tatum was driving east on 10th St. As he "approached the squad car, he noticed this young white male with both hands in the pockets of his zippered jacket leaning over the passenger side of the squad car". "It looked as if Oswald and Tippit were talking to each other. There was conversation. It did seem peaceful." Tatum swore "he had on a light colored zipper jacket, dark trousers and what looked like a t-shirt on". He also remembered Oswald "as having dark hair, dark eyes of medium build and around 5'10". At the point where Tatum drove slowly past Tippit's squad car, he was less than 10 ft from Oswald. Tatum did not see Oswald wearing a brown shirt, just a white T-shirt (HSCA --- Moriarty 2/1/78)</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Ted Callaway described Oswald to DPD Officer HW Summers as "white male, 27, 5'11",165 lbs, black wavy hair, fair complected, wearing LIGHT GRAY Eisenhower type jacket, dark trousers and a white shirt" (CE 705, pg 27). When interviewed many years later, Callaway again said "he had on a WHITE Eisenhower type jacket and a white T-shirt" --- again no brown shirt, just a white T-shirt.(emphasis mine)</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mary Brock was the next person who identified Oswald's clothing. She said Oswald was wearing "light clothing, a light colored jacket and with his hands in his pocket" (interview of Brock by SA Kesler and Mitchem 1/22/64).</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">FBI statement of Mary Brock:</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">"The man wearing a WHITE shirt AND jacket hurried west on Jefferson and passed the Ballew Texaco Station. Mary Brock said an individual with a "light complexion" and wearing "light clothing" walked passed her at a fast pace with his hands in his pockets." (emphasis mine)</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">DPD dispatch 1:22 PM: Last seen about the 300 block East Jefferson. He's a white male about 30 5'8". Black hair, slender, wearing a WHITE jacket, white shirt and dark slacks.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">DPD dispatch 1:33 PM: w/m/30 5'8", very slender build, black hair, a WHITE jacket, white shirt and dark slacks. (emphasis mine)</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The police broadcast of Tippit's killer described him as a "white male, 5'8", black hair, wearing a white jacket and shirt." Oswald passed Hardy's Shoe store and slipped into to the Texas Theater. Julia Postal, the cashier, called the police. Police broadcasts reported the suspect in the balcony of the theater. When the police arrived, they were told by a "young female", probably Julia Postal, that the man was in the balcony. All policemen who entered the front of the theater went to the balcony. They were questioning a young man when more police entered the main floor of the theater from the rear entrance.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">They were looking for a man in a white shirt and white jacket in the balcony, but they arrested a man on the main floor wearing a brown shirt. Captain Westbrook told the officers to "get him out of here as fast as you can and don't let anybody see him". Harvey Oswald was brought out the front entrance, placed in a police car and escorted to jail.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The police homicide report of Tippit's murder read "suspect was later arrested in the balcony of the Texas neater at 231 W. Jefferson". Detective Stringfellow's report states "Oswald was arrested in the balcony of the Texas Theater". But the man in the balcony was not arrested. He may have been escorted out the rear of the theater and driven away in a police car. Bernard Haire, owner of a hobby shop two doors from the theater, witnessed this event. For 25 years Mr. Haire and other witnesses thought they had witnessed the arrest of Oswald at the rear of the Texas Theater. Who was this person if not Lee Oswald? Three police officers were directed to obtain the names and addresses of all theater patrons, but no list exists. There is no police report, no record of arrest, nor mention of any person taken from the rear of the theater.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">-----------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Did they gather the names of theater witnesses?</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Were you the senior officer there?</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Westbrook.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Possibly--I don't think there was another captain there. There was a lieutenant and then I ordered all of them to be sure and take the names of everyone in the theatre at that time.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">We have asked for names of people in the theatre and we have only come up with the name of George Applin. Do you know of any others?</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Westbrook.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">He possibly might have been the only one in there at the time the rest of them might have been working there, because I'm sure at that time of day you would have more employees than you would have patrons.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ball.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">You didn't take the names of any of the patrons?</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Westbrook.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">No, Sir.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Ely.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Yes; I have one. Captain, you mentioned that you had left orders for somebody to take the names of everybody in the theatre, and you also stated you did not have this list;</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">do you know who has it?</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Mr. Westbrook.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">No; possibly Lieutenant Cunningham will know, but I don't know who has the list.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">From a FBI report:</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Lieutenant CARL DAY of the Dallas Police Department furnished</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">a rifle slug which, according to his records, had come</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">from the residence of General EDWIN A . WALKER, 4811 Turtle Creek,</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Dallas, Texas, on April 10, 1963, being contributed by Detective</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">D.G. Brown .</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">_-The slug was identified by a cross and the word, "DAY"</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">which Lieutenant DAY stated he had placed on the slug . He advised</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">that Detective D.G. Brown had been at the WALKER home and</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">had obtained the slug from an officer, whose identity he does</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">not know, but whose identity is known to Lieutenant CUNNINGHAM</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">of the Forgery Bureau of the Dallas Police Department .</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">So if you don't know something, blame it on Cunningham? Was he ever questioned by the WC? NO.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Out of twenty odd witnesses in the theater we are left with Evangelist Jack</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Davis, and two other witness in the theater at the time, only because they testified, George Applin & John Gibson.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">P.S.: Dr Liquori certified Tippit dead at 1:15 PM. That was at Methodist Hospital! per R.A. Davenport's report (note he changed it from 1:00 to 1:15 by typing over the :00)</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">picture of changed report by Davenport*</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Per E.E. Taylor report: I along with Lt. Cunningham and J.B. Toney remained at the theater and took the names and addresses of the occupants of the theater.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">But several witnesses placed Oswald, wearing a brown shirt, in the Texas</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Theater at 1:15, not at 10th and Patton. Theater concession operator</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Butch Burroughs sold Oswald popcorn at 1:15. Dallas Evangelist Jack</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Davis said Oswald was sitting next to him while the opening credits to</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">the movie were running--at 1:20 p.m. Perhaps some of the twenty four</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">theater patrons would have remembered Oswald, but a list of their names</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">and addresses, taken by Dallas Police, disappeared.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">4:45 PM At a Lineup for Helen Markham, Witness to Tippit Murder Oswald said:</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">"It isn't right to put me in line with these teenagers. . . . You know what you are doing, and you are trying to railroad me. . . . I want my lawyer. . . . You are doing me an injustice by putting me out there dressed different than these other men. . . . I am out there, the only one with a bruise on his head. . . . I don t believe the lineup is fair, and I desire to put on a jacket similar to those worn by some of the other individuals in the lineup. . . . All of you have a shirt on, and I have a T-shirt on. I want a shirt or something. . . . This T-shirt is unfair." (what jackets did the others "cops" have on, what color?) Why would Oswald want to wear a jacket if he had discarded the one he was wearing when he shot Tippit? And why didn't police facilitate the identification process by making him wear the "WHITE" jacket in the lineups?</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">In the end there was "No jacket", "One jacket", "Two jackets" and was "Black", "Brown", "Tan", "Blue", "Light Blue", "Grey", "Blue-Gray" and lastly "White."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">As the saying goes "The FBI always gets their man" no matter what he is wearing,4</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">or what color................With all this, in addition to a broken chain of evidence,</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">the jacket cannot be considered evidence of Oswald's guilt in the killing of Officer</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Tippit.</span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Thanks to Steve Thomas, Ian Griggs, Joseph Backes, Todd Teachout and others for your research efforts as this did help me with this multiple-multi-colored jacket phenomenon.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Ed</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14.166666030883789px; line-height: 18.333332061767578px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">"Now facts are all very well but they have their little weaknesses. Americans often assume that Facts are solid, concrete (and discrete) objects like marbles, but they are very much not. Rather they are subtle essences, full of mystery and metaphysics, that change their color and shape, their meaning, according to the context in which they are presented. They must always be treated with skepticism, and the standard of judgment should not be how many Facts one can mobilize in support of a position but how skillfully one discriminates between them, how objectively one uses them to arrive at Truth, which is something different from, though not unrelated to, the Facts."—Macdonald, Critique of the Warren Report, Esquire, March 1965, p. 61.</span>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-46195145187780385132011-12-05T00:54:00.001-08:002011-12-05T03:52:26.184-08:00Robert Morrow's Take on the Kennedy Assassination--and How Oswald-Did-It Researchers Complicate the Case<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px;">Here is ROBERT MORROW'S essay on the 1963 Coup d'Etat which (updated as OF 11/1/11). IT CONTAINS A GOOD OVERVIEW OF THOSE INVOLVED IN KENNEDY'S MURDER AND THE ONGOING COVER-UP THAT CONTINUES TO THIS DAY.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The LBJ-CIA Assassination of JFK</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Fifty years after the assassination of John Kennedy, research is pointing the finger at Lyndon Johnson and the CIA as having engineered a coup d'etat. It is likely that Lyndon Johnson made a dirty deal with CIA Republicans to murder John Kennedy in the 1963 Coup d’Etat. (People like Clint Murchison Sr., H.L. Hunt, D.H. Byrd, Nelson Rockefeller, David Rockefeller, top Nelson Rockefeller aide Henry Kissinger, McGeorge Bundy, George Herbert Walker Bush, Gen. Edward Lansdale (CIA) and Gen. Charles Willoughby all are excellent candidates for elite sponsorship.) Lyndon Johnson and Allen Dulles may very well have been co-CEOs of the JFK assassination; with the CIA in charge of the killing of JFK, and Lyndon Johnson and (his close friend and neighbor of 19 years in Washington, DC) FBI director J. Edgar Hoover in charge of the cover up. </span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Texas oil men and key LBJ supporters Clint Murchison, Sr. ands H.L. Hunt are thought to be key players in the JFK assassination because of their close ties to the inner core of US intelligence (Allen Dulles, Nelson Rockefeller, John J. McCloy), close ties to Lyndon Johnson and J. Edgar Hoover of the FBI, bankers Rockefellers; Murchison was even friends with key Kennedy-hater mafia godfather Carlos Marcellos of New Orleans. Not only that, Murchison, Sr. was a patient and partner of Dr. Alton Oschner, the former president of the American Cancer Society and who ran covert cancer research for the CIA. Oschner, likewise was a Kennedy-hater. John Simkin: “One of Ochsner's friends described him as being ‘like a fundamentalist preacher in the sense that the fight against communism was the only subject that he would talk about, or even allow you to talk about, in his presence.”</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">When JFK was slaughtered, Russia’s Khrushchev was literally crying, fearing nuclear war. Cuba’s Castro worried and feared an US invasion and gave an impressive speech the next day deconstructing the CIA’s deception provocation for war. Meanwhile at Clint Murchison’s home(NOTE, SHE WAS A SEAMSTRESS AND MAID AT , their family maid May Newman describes the scene: “The mood in the Murchison family home was very joyous and happy. For a whole week after like champagne and caviar flowed, every day of the week. But I was the only one in that household at that time that felt any grief for his assassination." </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"><br /></span><br />
<div style="text-align: -webkit-auto;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: xx-small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 20px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #1c2837;">AT THIS POINT,I WOULD LIKE TO INTERJECT INFORMATION ABOUT THE CONTROVERSY REVOLVING AROUND THE "MURCHISON PARTY" AND THE EVENT DESCRIBED ABOVE,USING AN OSWALD-DID-IT CRITIC'S WRITINGS,WHICH MIX FACT AND FICTION CONVINCINGLY. THE WRITER IS DAVE PERRY, WHO HAS WRITTEN THAT IF I AM TELLING THE TRUTH,I SHOULD BE ARRESTED. HIS REFERENCES INCLUDE GARY MACK, CALLED 'THE TRAITOR OF THE 6TH FLOOR MUSEUM' FOR ONCE PRETENDING TO CRITICIZE THE WARREN COMMISSION,BUT FOR WHOM A BIG SALARY TO SUPPORT THE 6TH FLOOR MUSEUM'S CAMPAIGN THAT OSWALD KILLED KENNEDY HAS BEEN TOO MUCH OF AN ENTICEMENT FOR HIM TO REFUSE. I WILL INTRODUCE COMMENTS INTO HJIS CRITIQUE,WHICH HAS MANY PROBLEMS. i WILL ALSO </span><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: red;">PLACE IN RED </span></b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #1c2837;">THOSE WORDS THAT EXHIBIT PREJUDICE. II WILL UNDERLINE KEY PROBLEMS WITH THE WRITING AND ADD COMMENTS IN PARENTHESES.</span></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: -webkit-auto;">
<b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: xx-small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 20px;">(ref: </span></span><a href="http://mysite.verizon.net/dperry1943/guilty.html" style="text-align: left;">http://mysite.verizon.net/dperry1943/guilty.html</a>)</b></div>
<div style="text-align: -webkit-auto;">
<b>Dave Perry writes:</b></div>
<div style="text-align: -webkit-auto;">
</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><b>"May Newman</b></span> is identified as a Seamstress and Companion to <b>Virginia Murchison</b>. <i>The Guilty Men</i>'s narrator <span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: red;"><b>intones</b></span> "She lived and worked in another Murchison house in Dallas for Virginia, Clint Sr.s' second wife. She speaks here for the first time."</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
Newman reports:</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white;">
"I started working for Virginia Murchison in 1962 until her death in 1997, approximately 36 years."</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white;">
As Newman speaks a single story brick ranch style house with a circular drive and the street number 9785 is shown in the background. The actual address is 9785 Audubon Place located within Dallas' Sunnybrook Estates.</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
Newman makes a puzzling statement. She maintains:</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white;">
"I remember well the night before the assassination. I worked with a man called <b>Jule Feifer</b> (phonetic), black man, which was Virginia Murchison's chauffeur. He got a call from her stepson John at the big house. They were having a big party for a very special guest that was coming from Washington to go to the party, by the name of Bulldog, which I found out later was J. Edgar Hoover. And he said he was very excited about doing this going on this trip to the airport to take this very special guest to a very special party, big party. And I asked him when he came back if he got a good tip. And he said no and he was very, very upset. He had to go back that night to take J. Edgar Hoover to the airport to go back to Washington and he still didn't get a tip."</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white;">
Newman also claims she had a conversation with <b>Buella May Holeman</b> (phonetic) who she identifies as <u>John and Lupe Murchison's cook.</u> </div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
(LATER,PERRY WILL TELL PEOPLE THAT JOHN AND LUPE HAVE NO INTEREST IN THE WELL-DOCUMENTED VENDETTA AGAINST KENNEDY BY CLINT MURCHISON SR'S --AND JR'S--VENDETTA AGAINST KENNEDY. BUT JOHN MURCHISON NEEDED TO KEEP IN FAVOR WITH HIS DISABLED FATHER. CLINT,JR, WHO I WAS TOLD BY MARY FERRELL HAD A COCAINE HABIT AND OTHER PROBLEMS,COULD NOT BE COUNTED ON FOR SECRECY.] </div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
Holeman indicates they are expecting a very important guest by the name of J. Edgar Hoover. Newman should come over and help prepare the principal meal of quail so she could meet him. Newman refused saying she might have gone if he was a movie star but at the time she didn't know who he was.</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
Newman also contends she was the only person in the Virginia Murchison household who felt remorse over Kennedy's death.</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white;">
"The mood in the Murchison family home was very joyous and happy. For a whole week after like champagne and caviar flowed, every day of the week. But I was the only one in that household at that time that uh felt any grief for his assassination."</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white;">
With all the claims and counterclaims concerning this party, let me explain.</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
Madeleine Brown, the only person professing attendance, indicated the party was held at Clint Sr.'s home </div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
[THE HOME ONCE BELONGED TO MURCHISON SR. THOUGH IT WAS NOW OCCUPIED BY HIS SON JOHN, AND JOHN'S WIFE,LUPE MURCHISON, THEY WERE FREQUENTLY ABSENT,LIVING ELSEWHERE ON A RANCH,AS LUPE DIDN'T LIKE THE HOUSE.]</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
"as a tribute honoring his life long friend, J. Edgar Hoover."</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
[IF MURCHISON,SR. HAD HIS OWN HOME ELSEWHERE, WHICH WAS THE CASE,WHY WOULD HE USE OF HIS SON'S HOUSE FOR THE TRIBUTE,WHICH WAS MORE REMOTE AND HARDER TO REACH UNOBSERVED, RATHER THAN HIS OWN FORMER MANSION, ON SOME 25 ACRES OF LAND SO CLOSE TO THE HEART OF DALLAS? CONSIDER, TOO,THAT IF A SECRET MEETING WAS TO BE HELD THERE, JUST IN CASE OF LEAKS, A COVER 'PARTY' IN MURCHISON SR'S OWN HOME WOULD BE TOO OBVIOUS. THESE ARE CONSIDERATIONS PERRY IGNORES.] </div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
"It was a rather large affair as the guest list included John McCloy, Richard Nixon, George Brown, R.L. Thornton and H.L. Hunt. <b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: red;">This scenario is impossible because Clint Sr. had retreated to his Glad Oaks Ranch in 1959 after suffering a stroke in 1958."</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b> [PERRY WANTS US TO BELIEVE THAT MURCHISON,SR. WOULD NOT HAVE ARRANGED FOR HIS FORMER HOME TO BE USED FOR THE PARTY,WITHOUT OFFERING EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY.NOBODY EVER QUESTIONED JOHN AND LUPE ABOUT THIS PARTY,THOUGH THE STORY FIRST WAS OUTED BY PENN JONES. PERRY THUS CANNOT QUOTE JOHN AND LUPE.]</b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: red;">In McClellan's book the party was held at Clint Jr.s' home. One can surmise where this revelation came from.</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b>[ But the question is, would John Murchison prohibit a meeting about eradicating Kennedy,which occurred at the party 'honoring Hoover'? This is a question Perry ignores. .]</b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
By the late-1980's Madeleine Brown had learned, through the research efforts of <b>Gary Mack</b>, of the inconsistencies in her original story. She made an appearance on the television show <i>A Current Affair</i> and described the party as being at Clint Jr.'s home. This also is impossible, as Clint Jr. was not an occupant of Newman's referenced "big house", and would have no reason, as I explained above, to have "a tribute honoring his life long friend, J. Edgar Hoover."</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b>[Here Perry ignores the high intelligence factor of Clint Murchison,Jr. who would not be about to reveal anything incriminating, and the fact that Clint Murchison Sr. did not die until June 20, 1969.]</b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
"Newman correctly attests that the occupant of the "big house" was John Murchison." </div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b>[Note that Perry says 'occupants,' avoiding saying that John Murchison OWNED the house. A November 7, 2008 Dallas News article says, "</b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; line-height: 22px;">After he suffered a stroke around 1960, Clint traded houses with his son John Murchison and John's wife, Lupe.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; line-height: 22px;">The big house then became the backdrop for Lupe and John's stunning collection of art by Mark Rothko, Roy Lichtenstein, Helen Frankenthaler and others.</span><b> Then Perry uses Newman,who he says elsewhere is in error, to go on to discredit the "Clint Murchison Jr" connection.</b> <b>Yet he will attack other elements in the maid's story.] </b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
Once John took custody of the home his wife, Lupe, turned the 22,000 square foot house into what has been described as "a showcase for the eye-popping contemporary art" collected by the couple.</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
Next Newman introduces another home, that of Virginia who is Clint Sr.s' second wife. She, as well as, Virginia's chauffeur are asked to assist with a party now being held at the Murchison mansion occupied by <b>John and Lupe<span style="font-size: medium;">!</span></b> </div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
[Pewrry wants us to think this is impossible. Yet,</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
John has absolutely no relationship with J. Edgar Hoover and therefore no interest in any party. There are lots of the claims and counterclaims but since the whole scenario is fabricated there can be no corroboration. The entire story of the party is a fraud created by one person only - Madeleine Brown.</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="color: #000099; font-size: medium;">Martin Shackelford made a valid point on April 8, 2004 when he mentioned in the alt.assassination.jfk newsgroup that:</span></b><br />
<span style="color: #000099; font-size: medium;"><b>"Oddly, Dave attributes the Murchison party as simply an invention of Madeleine Brown, despite the fact that another source (reportedly a chauffeur who had driven someone to the party) had reported the party to Penn Jones Jr. many years before Madeleine went public with her account."</b></span></blockquote>
AT THE END OF HIS ESSAY, HE WRITES:<br />
<br /><table border="0" height="886" style="background-color: white;"><tbody>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2">Martin Shackelford is correct. Years before Madeleine told her story Penn Jones did mention a party but the story involving an unnamed chauffeur <b>[here Perry conveniently forgets to mention that Jones said the chauffeur was black,--just as the maid had said!---we get that information from Perry's close friend, Gary Mack, which is a portent of Mack's later activities generally supporting the 6th Floor Museum's agenda that Lee Oswald killed Kennedy. Here we will underline and bold face points where Mack is interesting:</b><br />
<br />
<div class="post_body" style="background-color: #fafbfc; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 14px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 235px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px;">
<div class="post entry-content " id="" style="line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 3px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px; padding-top: 10px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #1c2837;">Gary Mack's account of Madeleine Brown's LBJ party story on 14th May, 1997. </span><br /><br />Madeleine has claimed over the years that she attended a party at Clint Murchison’s house the night before the assassination and LBJ, Hoover and Nixon were there. The party story, without LBJ, first came from Penn Jones in Forgive My Grief. <u><b>In that version, the un-credited source was a black chauffeur whom Jones didn’t identify, </b></u>and the explanation Jones gave was that it was the last chance to decide whether or not to kill JFK. Of course, <u><b>Hoover used only top FBI agents for transportation and in the FBI of 1963, none were black.</b></u></div>
<div class="post entry-content " id="" style="line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 3px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px; padding-top: 10px;">
<br /></div>
<div class="post entry-content " id="" style="line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 3px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px; padding-top: 10px;">
[NOTE THAT THIS EARLY VERSION DISMISSES A BLACK CHAUFFEUR. GARY MACK DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE BLACK CHAUFFEUR NEWMAN SAID WORKED AT THE MURCHISON MANSION]</div>
<div class="post entry-content " id="" style="line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 3px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px; padding-top: 10px;">
Actually, there is no confirmation for a party at Murchison’s. I asked<b><u> Peter O’Donnell </u></b>because Madeleine claimed he was there, too. Peter said there was no party. Madeleine even said there was a story about it in the Dallas Times Herald some months later (which makes no sense), but she had not been able to find it. Val Imm (Society Editor of the Dallas Times Herald) told Bob Porter (of the Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza staff) recently she had no memory of such an event and even looked through her notes - in vain. </div>
<div class="post entry-content " id="" style="line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 3px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px; padding-top: 10px;">
<b>WHO IS PETER O'DONNELL? AN EXTREME CONSERVATIVE,A FOUNDING MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION IN NOV,1964. Ref: <a href="http://www.seekgod.ca/cnp.c.htm" style="line-height: 14px;">http://www.seekgod.ca/cnp.c.htm</a> </b></div>
<div class="post entry-content " id="" style="line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 3px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px; padding-top: 10px;">
<b>RESEARCHER JAMES FETZER in his book ASSASSINATION SCIENCE relates that he interviewed Madelein,who said O'Donnell drove Richard Nixon to the meeting. If this is true,O'Donnell would NEVER admit to the meeting. If the interview with O'Donnell had been conducted with somebody else, would they have been so certain that O'Donnell was telling the truth?</b></div>
<div class="post entry-content " id="" style="line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 3px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px; padding-top: 10px;">
<b>Info source:</b> <a href="http://www.jmasland.com/results_forum.asp?subject=WHO+DID+IT+AND+WHAT+REALLY+HAPPENED&Submit=Search">http://www.jmasland.com/results_forum.asp?subject=WHO+DID+IT+AND+WHAT+REALLY+HAPPENED&Submit=Search</a></div>
<div class="post entry-content " id="" style="line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 3px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px; padding-top: 10px;">
<br />Could LBJ have been at a Murchison party? No. LBJ was seen and photographed in the Houston Coliseum with JFK at a dinner and speech. They flew out around 10pm and arrived at Carswell (Air Force Base in northwest Fort Worth) at 11:07 Thursday night. Their motorcade to the Hotel Texas arrived about 11:50 and LBJ was again photographed. He stayed in the Will Rogers suite on the 13th floor and Manchester (William Manchester - author of The Death of a President) says he was up late. </div>
<div class="post entry-content " id="" style="line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 3px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px; padding-top: 10px;">
<b>[GARY MACK DOES NOT TELL US THE SOURCES OF THE INFORMATION ABOVE. IT TURNS OUT THAT SOME OF THE ALIBI,IF SUCH WAS THE CASE,CAME FROM LBJ'S AIDE BILL MOYER,WEHO WOULD HAVE SAID ANYTHING TO PROTECT HIS BOSS. MANCHESTER'S STATEMENT MEANS LITTLE,SINCE LBJ MIGHT HAVE BEEN OBSERVED UPON HIS RETURN. MADELEINE BROWN SAYS LYNDON ARRIVED VERY LATE AND THAT THE MEETING DID NOT LAST VERY LONG.]</b></div>
<div class="post entry-content " id="" style="line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 3px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px; padding-top: 10px;">
Could Nixon have been at Murchison’s party? No. Tony Zoppi (Entertainment Editor of The Dallas Morning News) and Don Safran (Entertainment Editor of the Dallas Times Herald) saw Nixon at the Empire Room at the Statler-Hilton. He walked in with Joan Crawford (Movie actress). Robert Clary (of Hogan’s Heroes fame) stopped his show to point them out, saying “. . . either you like him or you don’t.” Zoppi thought that was in poor taste, but Safran said Nixon laughed. Zoppi’s deadline was 11pm, so he stayed until 10:30 or 10:45 and Nixon was still there. </div>
<div class="post entry-content " id="" style="line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 3px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px; padding-top: 10px;">
<b>[BUT MADELEINE BROWN DOES NOT TELL US WHEN NIXON ARRIVED. SHE SAYS O'DONNELL DRIVE HIM THERE. FURTHER, MACK'S STATEMENT THAT "ZOPPI'S DEADLINE WAS 11 PM,SO HE STAYED UNTIL 10:30 OR 10;45 AND NIXON WAS STILL THERE" DEFIES ALL LOGIC. I WAS A NEWS REPORTER MYSELF: THERE IS TRANSPORTATION TO THE NEWS OFFICE,WHICH WOULD TAKE SOME TIME, PARKING, ENTERING BIG BUILDING, GETTING INTO OFFICE,THEN WRITING UP THE EVENT ON A NEWS TYPEWRITER,WHICH ITSELF TAKES TIME. NIXON COULD HAVE LEFT AT 1-0:00 PM,FOR ALL WE KNOW.]</b></div>
<div class="post entry-content " id="" style="line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 3px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px; padding-top: 10px;">
<br /><a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKbrownM.htm" rel="nofollow external" title="External link">http://www.spartacus...k/JFKbrownM.htm</a> </div>
</div>
<ul class="post_controls" style="background-color: #fafbfc; background-image: url(http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/public/style_images/master/gradient_bg.png); background-position: 50% 50%; background-repeat: repeat no-repeat; clear: both; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 0.8em; list-style-image: initial; list-style-position: initial; list-style-type: none; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 28px; padding-left: 6px; padding-right: 10px; padding-top: 6px; text-align: right;">
<li class="multiquote" id="multiq_42715" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; background-image: url(http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/public/style_images/master/post_button_left.png); background-origin: initial; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: no-repeat no-repeat; float: right; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px;"></li>
</ul>
<br />
<br />
<br />
is more allusion than reality. Jones' brief version of the event appears in <i>Forgive My Grief</i> (pp. 84-86). Jones first discussed a party that did take place on or about October 18, 1969 at "Number One Main Place Plaza" in Dallas. <span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: red;">You haven't misread the date of 1969. Jones references a party that took place almost six years after the assassination. Then in a classic case of historical fraud </span><br />
<br />
<b>[PENN JONES WAS A RESPECTED RESEARCHER. DAVE PERRY'S</b><br />
<b> ACCUSATION IS SPECIOUS. IN THE NEXT SENTENCE, YOU LEARN THAT</b><br />
<b>AN EARLIER PARTY IS REFERENCED THEN BY PENN JONES...]</b><br />
<br />
he comments:<br />
"An earlier <b>unreported</b> Murchison party was much more important than those of recent years. This party was held on the night of November 21, 1963 at the Murchison home<b> (notice he doesn't mention which home)</b>, and we think, was the cover for an important conference of the assassination staff." (Emphasis mine)<br />
Jones originally thought the party took place in Sikes, Lousiana but for reasons known only to him changed it to the Murchison home. Jones then divines that two of the guests at his unreported party were Richard Nixon and J. Edgar Hoover. He actually gives Hoover the appellation "Task Force Commander." <b>Lyndon Johnson's name appears nowhere in the article.</b><br />
<b><br /></b><br />
<b>[BUT LYNDON JOHNSON'S TEXAS CRONIES HAD GREAT POWER IN TEXAS</b><br />
<b>AT THIS TIME, AND PENN JONES KNEW THIS VERY WELL,HAVING </b><br />
<b>HAD TO DEAL WITH TRYING TO HELP FORMER DALLAS WITNESS</b><br />
<b>ROGER CRAIG.]</b><br />
<b><br /></b><br />
At the end of his "report" he states, "Admittedly our information about Hoover's presence was learned second hand, but it is reliable. We will never tell how we got the information."<br />
Can you imagine the outcry if the government used the same deceitful techniques Jones uses to support his questionable claim?<br />
I tried to find the source of the allegation that "a chauffeur had driven someone to the party" but was never able to find it <b>in print</b>, and as shown above Jones was reticent about revealing his source. I believe he operated in this fashion so serious researchers would find it difficult to discover the true depth of the deception he used in his "investigations."<br />
It turned out that the chauffeur story originated with Roger Craig. Here is what Jones omitted from Craig's recounting 1 - the chauffeur was black and 2 - the chauffeur was in the employ of Clint Murchison, <b>SR</b>.<br />
<br />
<b>[EVEN AS PERRY ATTACKS PENN JONES FOR NOT PROVIDING A CITATION </b><b>FOR HIS INFORMATION (WHICH SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN MADELEIN BROWN) </b><b>HE THEN TELLS US THAT ROGER CRAIG PROVIDED THIS </b><b>INFORMATION--WHILE HE,TOO, FAILS TO CITE A SOURCE,EITHER.]</b><br />
<br />
<br /></td></tr>
<tr><td height="169" rowspan="2" width="75%">With that history I merely had to determine who the chauffeur was. It turned out to be Warren Tilley, husband of Eula Tilley who I interviewed for the first time on August 21, 2002. Warren has throat cancer and is unable to speak but Eula did. Sometime between 1959 - 1960 Clint Murchison, Sr. moved to his Glad Oaks Ranch near Palestine, Texas after suffering a stroke. That is at least <b>THREE YEARS</b> before the assassination. On the day of and at the time of the assassination he was having lunch with his neighbor Woffard Cain. Earlier in the morning Warren had given him a ride in the car. <b>Murchison and the Tilly's were nowhere near Dallas for months prior to or well after the assassination.</b>Interested parties may want to pull out a map to see just where Palestine is located with respect to Dallas.<br /><br /><b>[BUT THIS IS A CHAUFFEUR FOR THE MURCHISON,SR. AT HIS NEW HOME AND HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE DALLAS LOCATION. PERRY KNOWS THIS BUT PROFFERS THIS INFORMATION ANYWAY.]</b></td><td height="169" width="25%"><div align="center">
<img height="136" src="http://mysite.verizon.net/dperry1943/images/craig.jpg" width="182" /></div>
</td></tr>
<tr><td width="25%"><div align="center">
<b>Roger Craig</b></div>
</td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" height="215">Since Jones never mentioned what Murchison home was involved it was <b><span style="font-size: medium;">Madeleine and Madeleine alone</span></b> that invented the <b>FINAL SCENARIO </b>of the "lavish party" at Clint Murchison, Sr's home. As her story unraveled she was forced to embellish and lie. She pleaded with <b>Val Imm</b> (Society Editor of <i>The Dallas Times Herald</i>) to find her story about the party because Madeleine had spent hours in an unsuccessful search at the public library. Imm couldn't because there was no party to write about. Back in 1969 Jones had already asserted the party was <b>unreported</b>.<br />
<br />
<b>[THIS IS A TWISTING OF PENN JONES' STATEMENT. THE PARTY WAS NOT REPORTED BY THE WARREN COMMISSION, FBI, ETC. AS WELL AS BY</b><br />
<b>MADELEINE BROWN, TO ANY AUTHORITY AT THE TIME. TO INCLUDE NEWSPAPER STORIES,JONES MIGHT HAVE USED THE TERM 'UNPUBLISHED' BUT DID NOT.]</b><br />
<br />
Madeleine not only had problems with Val Imm but the actual time of the party itself. She kept moving the start time up. She had to. To her chagrin she found out that, shortly after his arrival at Carswell Air Force Base northwest of Fort Worth, Lyndon Johnson was photographed at <b>11:07 PM</b> Thursday night. Then she discovered Richard Nixon was with movie actress <b>Joan Crawford</b> at the Empire Room of the Statler Hilton in Dallas as late as <b>10:45 PM</b>. Both <b>Tony Zoppi</b>(Entertainment Editor of <i>The Dallas Morning News</i>) and <b>Don Safran</b> (Entertainment Editor of <i>The Dallas Times Herald</i>) saw the two of them there at <b>Robert Cleary</b>'s show. Cleary is known for his role as Corporal Louis Lebeau in the 1960s to 1970s television series <i>Hogan's Heroes</i>.<br />
Dave Perry April 9, 2004"<br />
<br />
<b>NOW WE WILL RETURN TO ROBERT MORROW'S STORY:</b></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"><br /></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The Warren Commission should have really been called the “Allen Dulles Commission” because he controlled it and made it the farce that it was. Dulles was probably an elite sponsor (i.e. murderer), as well as certainly Lyndon Johnson. The 3 hardcore cover up artists on the Warren Commission were the 3 Council on Foreign Relations members: Allen Dulles (president CFR 1946-50), John J. McCloy (then chairman of the CFR 1953-1970) and Gerald Ford (CFR member, later president). John J. McCloy was a Rockefeller man, former head of Chase Manhattan bank, and very deep US intelligence since the OSS days. John J. McCloy’s nickname was “Chairman of the American Establishment,” and he mixed at the highest levels of business, intelligence and he was close to the Kennedy-hating Texas business elite. Cover up artist Gerald Ford was secretly reporting to Hoover and the FBI what the Warren Commission was doing. In 1970, Newsweek called Gerald Ford the “CIA’s best friend in Congress.” The CFR especially 40 years ago, was heavily Rockefeller influenced and it top players were deep CIA.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The CIA has been called the military wing of the CFR; and actually that is not too far from the truth. The CFR was in its heyday from 1950-1990.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Here is an absolutely spectacular article why the National Security State murdered John Kennedy: </span><a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig10/marshall10.1.html" rel="nofollow external" style="background-color: #fafbfc; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;" title="External link">http://www.lewrockwe...rshall10.1.html</a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"> John Kennedy was despised by and did not control his CIA nor his Joint Chiefs of Staff.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Lyndon Johnson’s reasons to murder were out of his deep desperation and fear of what would become of him after his imminent expulsion from the 1964 Democratic ticket and his fears of going to jail over the exploding Bobby Baker scandal. LIFE magazine, being fed extremely damaging info by Robert Kennedy, was set to run an expose on Lyndon Johnson’s corruption that would blow him out of the water once and for all (Dec. 6th issue, but due to be printed and mailed on 11/29/63: source James Wagenvoord who worked at LIFE then). Bobby Baker was the protégé of a wildly corrupt LBJ in the Senate; Lyndon Johnson was like both a dad and a big brother to Bobby Baker (who named two of his children after LBJ: Lynda and Lyndon). Both Lyndon Johnson and Bobby Baker were receiving tremendous amounts of under-the-table money while Johnson was running the Senate. The Kennedys and LIFE Magazine were literally days away from politically executing Lyndon Johnson with the rope of the unraveling Bobby Baker scandal. After vaporizing the despised Lyndon Johnson, John Kennedy was going to replace LBJ most likely with Terry Sanford of North Carolina or possibly his good friend George Smathers of Florida as VP on the 1964 Democratic ticket.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The Kennedys and Lyndon Johnson were having a sub rosa fight: Jack and Robert Kennedy brought knives to the battle and Lyndon Johnson brought guns and it was settled on 11/22/63 at 12:30 PM in Dallas. </span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Lately, I have been studying the role of McGeorge Bundy, the National Security Advisor for JFK and Henry Cabot Lodge, JFK’s insubordinate ambassador to Vietnam who Kennedy was planning to fire on Monday, 11/25/63. It is probable that both McGeorge Bundy and Henry Cabot Lodge were involved some way with the JFK assassination. McGeorge Bundy, astonishingly, was already drafting sharp escalations to JFK’s Vietnam policy NSAM 273 (which JFK would not have approved) on 11/21/63, the night before the 1963 Coup d’Etat! McGeorge Bundy was also assuring others very quickly on 11/22/63 that there was no conspiracy to kill JFK, at a time when it was impossible for him (or anyone) to credibly be saying that. Bundy later ran the Ford Foundation from 1966-1979.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">JFK’s Secretary of State, Dean Rusk, who ran the Rockefeller Foundation from 1952-1961, and was also a hawk on Vietnam, is another one who merits close scrutiny in the Coup of 1963. Kennedy had appointed Rusk because it was unlikely that the Senate would confirm JFK’s first choice J. William Fulbright, who later became a prominent opponent of the Vietnam War. After the 1963 Coup d’Etat, Rusk lasted through all the blood and guts of Vietnam and all the way through Jan., 1969, as Johnson’s Secretary of State. Walt Rostow (CFR), another Vietnam hawk, replaced McGeorge Bundy (CFR) as National Security Advisor in 1966. The CFR and the Rockefellers, not John Kennedy, lusted for the Vietnam War.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The midlevel murderers (field operations) of JFK would include CIA guys like Richard Helms, David Atlee Phillips, James Angleton, David Morales, William King Harvey, E. Howard Hunt, Frank Sturgis, and perhaps Cord Meyer. Cord Meyer who ran Operation Mockingbird (media manipulation) certainly was heavily involved in the cover up of the JFK assassination. </span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Deputy Harry Weatherford is a good candidate to have been on the Records Building as a sniper. Influential mobster Johnny Roselli was especially close friends with the CIA’s William King Harvey, a rabid Kennedy hater. The most likely mafia godfathers involved would be Carlos Marcello and Santo Trafficante, particularly in the Jack Ruby murder of Oswald and perhaps in the JFK Assassination as well and other murders in the post assassination cover up.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">We now know Lyndon Johnson was far worse than he is presented in current biographies. Far beyond ballot stuffing, bribery, massive under-the-table kickbacks, and being a consummate and pathological liar, Lyndon Johnson was murdering a lot of people in Texas to cover up his eye popping corruption. A prime example is the murder of US agricultural official Henry Marshall in June, 1961, and who then Vice President Lyndon Johnson arranged to have murdered. In the 1980’s, Billie Sol Estes, a close and corrupt partner of LBJ, began confessing to the murders that he, Lyndon Johnson, Cliff Carter and LBJ’s personal hit man Malcolm Wallace committed. Lyndon Johnson, a manic depressive – and at times a barely functioning psychopath - murdered perhaps 10-20 people to avoid exposure before he got his knife wet with John Kennedy’s blood.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Lyndon Johnson and Sam Rayburn, taking advantage of Hoover’s dossier on JFK, used sexual blackmail and other threats on John Kennedy on the night of July 13th at the 1960 Democratic convention in Los Angeles in order to force Kennedy to put LBJ on the ticket. Johnson was not on JFK’s short list for VP; he was not on the long list. LBJ was not on the VP list – period. Johnson made a hostile take over of the vice presidential slot. </span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">John Kennedy told his close friend Hy Raskin: “You know we had never considered Lyndon, but I was left with no choice. He and Sam Rayburn made it damn clear to me that Lyndon had to be the candidate. Those bastards were trying to frame me. They threatened me with problems and I don’t need more problems. I’m going to have enough problems with Nixon.” Evelyn Lincoln, JFK’s secretary for 11+ years, also confirms that Lyndon Johnson used sexual blackmail combined with other threats to force JFK to put LBJ on the 1960 Democratic ticket.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">On Inauguration Day 1961, Johnson's close confidant Bobby Baker predicted to his friend Don Reynolds that John Kennedy would not finish out his term and that he (JFK) would die a violent death. I think that Bobby Baker was intimating that LBJ was planning to murder JFK. For the rest of JFK's life, he and LBJ would be engaging in a sub rosa war.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">My current thinking on US intelligence agent Lee Harvey Oswald is that he was indeed involved in the JFK assassination, but he was a patsy who shot NO ONE that day, neither John Kennedy nor Officer J.D. Tippit. Both murders were complete frame jobs. Oswald was a fake defector to Russia and his behavior in New Orleans 1963 was all about Oswald’s sheep dipping as he passed out pro-Castro flyers and pretended to be a “pro-Castro Marxist.” Meanwhile Oswald was working in concert in New Orleans with folks like David Ferrie and Guy Bannister whose politics were the equivalent of a 1960’s Strom Thurmond or Jesse Helms. Oswald’s fake public persona as a “pro-Casto Marxist” meant that he was an ideal pick as a patsy and his likely knowledge of and/or participation in the JFK Assassination meant that he had to be murdered quickly. The folks who killed Oswald wanted a “dead Red” not a “talking head.” The JFK assassination was a deception provocation intended to facilitate a US military invasion of Cuba. It was that bad and ugly. A US invasion of Cuba might have provoked a broader war with Russia and from the point of view of some like Air Force General Curtis LeMay that was fine because, astoundingly, he wanted to wage and “win” a nuclear WWIII. Curtis LeMay hated Kennedy so much that a child could have recruited him into a plot to kill Kennedy. LeMay told Kennedy during the Cuban Missile Crisis that he was an appeaser equivalent to Neville Chamberlain for not bombing Cuba.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">That was the pool of sharks John Kennedy was swimming in: a desperate and psychopathic serial killer Vice-President Lyndon Johnson who was literally murdering a string of people down in Texas and who was waging a sub rosa war with the Kennedys, an out-of-control CIA hell bent on a coup; an FBI director Hoover who detested JFK and who was close friends and neighbors with LBJ, and a JCS military brass who wanted to invade Cuba, wage the war in Vietnam, and Curtis LeMay who, according to Robert McNamara, wanted to wage full scale nuclear war with Russia, giving them the “Sunday punch” while the USA still had first strike capability. Add to that the white hot mafia hatred that Robert Kennedy was engendering with his prosecutions. This same mafia had been working hand in glove with their friends the CIA to take out Castro in Cuba. Think of these enemies of JFK as fasces: “a bundle of wooden sticks with an axe blade emerging from the center, which is an image that traditionally symbolizes summary power and jurisdiction, and/or strength through unity.”</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The elite domestic murderers of JFK did it for many reasons, both personal and ideological. At the core it was Lyndon Johnson, the CIA, and the shadow government of Texas oil barons and the Rockefellers. It was not either/or the Western “Cowboys” or the Eastern “Yankees” who murdered John Kennedy: it was the elites of both.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Most folks don’t know just how close Lyndon Johnson and J. Edgar Hoover were both personally and physically. For 19 years LBJ and Hoover lived literally 3 houses down and across the street, about 57 yards, in Washington, D.C. They often had Sunday brunch together at the Johnsons with other power brokers such as Sen. Richard Russell and House Speaker Sam Rayburn, both LBJ mentors. LBJ and Hoover were also extremely close to the Texas oil barons such as Clint Murchison, Sr. and H.L. Hunt who have been implicated in the JFK assassination.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">I always want to learn and I am always willing to change my mind. Two excellent books to read on the JFK assassination are 1) LBJ: Mastermind of JFK’s Assassination (2010) by Phillip Nelson</span><a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.lbj-themastermind.com/" rel="nofollow external" style="background-color: #fafbfc; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;" title="External link">http://www.lbj-themastermind.com/</a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"> and 2) JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why it Matters (2008) by James Douglass. Review: </span><a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.ctka.net/2008/jfk_unspeakable.html" rel="nofollow external" style="background-color: #fafbfc; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;" title="External link">http://www.ctka.net/...nspeakable.html</a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"> I also highly recommend 3) Brothers: The Hidden History of the Kennedy Years by David Talbot 4) The Dark Side of Camelot by Seymour Hersh 5) Family of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty by Russ Baker.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Richard Nixon knew the dirty truth about the JFK assassination, but I do not think he was directly involved. In fact, when Nixon was under intense Watergate pressure, his firewall strategy as recorded on the “smoking gun tape” (recorded 6/23/72) was to ominously say don’t investigate me because it you do “the President believes that this is going to open up the whole Bay of Pigs thing again” – an obvious reference to the JFK assassination. Nixon’s aide Dean Burch said that when George Herbert Walker Bush heard that “He broke out in assholes and ____ himself to death.” GHW Bush was probably an elite planner of the JFK assassination.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Howard Baker once asked Nixon, “What do you know about the Kennedy assassination?” Nixon replied “You don’t want to know.” (Source: Don Hewett, Kennedy Library Oral History.)</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Lyndon Johnson himself told Madeleine Duncan Brown on the night of 12/31/63 that it was Texas oil barons and “renegade intelligence bastards” who murdered John Kennedy. LBJ and Madeleine had a son Steven Mark in 1950. (Source: Madeleine Brown.)</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Edgar Hoover who along with LBJ was the primary architect of the cover up, told Billy Byars, Jr.: "If I told you what I really know, it would be very dangerous to the country. Our whole political system could be disrupted." Hoover was responding to a question of whether Oswald really shot JFK. (Source: Billy Byars, Jr.)</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Without a doubt, top honors for being biggest source for disinformation on the Coup of 1963 has been the NY Times whose reporting on the JFK assassination has been the equivalent of 1950’s Soviet style propaganda, i.e. completely fraudulent and parroting the 1960’s fantastic whoppers of LBJ, FBI, CIA and the Warren Commission. CBS News, ABC News, the Washington Post and the former LIFE magazine and CIA assets in other major media have been equally bad. LIFE Magazine actually bought the rights to the Zapruder film early on and never showed it once to the American people in video form., which would have revealed the incriminating “back and to the left” head snap of John Kennedy, all but proving a kill shot from the Grassy Knoll (grassy knoll shooting area being an extremely close 33 yards away from JFK). Finally, when American hero Robert Groden showed the Zapruder film on Geraldo on ABC in 1975, millions of Americans knew without a doubt what a sham the Warren Commission was.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">After he murdered John Kennedy and assumed the presidency, Lyndon Johnson gave over his Administration to the Council on Foreign Relations, both in regards to domestic and foreign policy. NSA chief McGeorge Bundy in particular immediately assumed a lot of power over LBJ. The CFR, the CIA, the Rockefellers, the JCS, and the military contractors wanted the Vietnam War. It is extremely significant that in spring, 1968, after LBJ had withdrawn from the presidential race, Democrat Lyndon Johnson secretly supported Republican Nelson Rockefeller for president. LBJ wanted someone who could stop Robert Kennedy, and more importantly, who would continue the cover up of the 1963 Coup d’Etat. Nelson Rockefeller personified the CFR, CIA and Eastern Establishment and I think he was a sponsor of the JFK assassination. Note: Rockefeller did not support fellow Republican Barry Goldwater in his 1964 race against Johnson.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">A special word about the Council on Relations role in the 1963 Coup d’Etat and cover up: no other organization has been more responsible for the murder and cover up of John Kennedy than the CFR. Elite CFR members such as Allen Dulles, Nelson Rockefeller, George Herbert Walker Bush and McGeorge Bundy were probably sponsors of the JFK assassination. Certainly leadership CFR members such as Allen Dulles, John J. McCloy, and Gerald Ford played the most critical roles in the Warren Commission farce. Add in cover up roles played by McGeorge Bundy (CFR/CIA), Nelson Rockefeller (CFR/CIA), Henry Kissinger (CFR/CIA), Richard Helms (CFR/CIA), William Colby (CFR/CIA), Nicholas Katzenbach (CFR), Jack Valenti (CFR), Bill Moyers (CFR), Henry Luce (CFR), Clair Boothe Luce (CFR), William Coleman (CFR) James Reston NY Times (CFR), Anthony Lewis NY Times (CFR), William F. Buckley (CFR/CIA), Walter Cronkite CBS (CFR), Dan Rather CBS (CFR), Bob Schieffer CBS (CFR), Peter Jennings ABC (CFR), Daniel Schorr (CFR), Arthur Ochs Sulzberger NY Times (CFR), Michael Eisner Disney (CFR), Harrison Salisbury NY Times (CFR), Kenneth Gilmore Readers’ Digest (CFR), Tom Braden (CFR/CIA), Stephen Rosenfeld Washington Post (CFR), Bobbie Ray Inman (CFR/CIA), Arnold de Borchgrave (CFR), Donald Rumsfeld (CFR), Rupert Murdoch FOX (CFR), John McCain (CFR), Robert Gates CIA (CFR)… the list is almost endless. Note two things: 1) they are the key establishment players of BOTH major political parties spanning decades 2) their power and influence is directly proportional to the fantastic whoppers they tell about in the 1963 Coup d’Etat. For the older CFR members it is a case of PARTICIPATION and COVER UP in the JFK assassination. For the younger ones such as Bill Clinton (CFR), Douglas G. Brinkley (CFR), George Will (CFR/ABC), Charles Krauthammer (CFR/FOX), Bill Kristol (CFR/FOX), David Gergen (CFR), John Segenthaler (CFR), Frank Sesno (CFR), Evan Thomas (CFR), Michael Beschloss (CFR), Stephen M. Walt (CFR), George Stephanopolous (CFR/ABC), Jonathan Alter (CFR), Evan Thomas (CFR), Brian Williams (CFR/NBC), Daniel Pipes (CFR), Michael Gerson (CFR) it is a case of WILLFUL IGNORANCE as they still push the Big Lie. Note: Chris Matthews of Hardball, another willfully ignorant man, is close friends with Richard Haass, current president of CFR. I have never seen highly acclaimed political guru Michael Barone, a Bilderberger attendee, ever say anything credible on the JFK assassination.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Question: do we really expect the CFR to admit that some of its elite members slaughtered John Kennedy and many more played integral roles in the cover up? No, but it is important to highlight that the Council on Foreign Relations has stunk up the place with tremendous amounts of radioactive horse manure relating to the 1963 Coup d’Etat. </span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The key thing to understand about the Council on Foreign Relations is that it has been joined at the hip with the CIA and that US intelligence has long used the CFR to manipulate the media. Covering up the JFK assassination has been a Holy Grail of the CFR/CIA.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The 1963 Coup d’Etat was very similar to the 1992 election between George Herbert Walker Bush, Ross Perot and Bill Clinton. In 1963, there was a Texas Vice President, a desperate and dangerous Lyndon Johnson - supported by the CFR, the intelligence agencies, military contractors and the oil industry - who feared exposure of his criminality and was on the verge of political and personal annihilation. So Lyndon Johnson used the CIA to murder his political rival John Kennedy.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">In the 1992, there was a Texas President, a desperate and dangerous George Herbert Walker Bush, supported by the CFR, the intelligence agencies, military contractors and the oil industry - who feared exposure of his criminality and was on the verge of political and personal annihilation. Ross Perot was well aware of the gargantuan Bush/Clinton/CIA drug smuggling of the 1980’s. So George Herbert Walker Bush used elite CIA “Pegasus” assassins to threaten to murder Ross Perot. GHW Bush feared what Perot, a self-funded (and therefore uncontrollable) billionaire might do in office. Bush, like LBJ 29 years before, faced both political and potentially personal annihilation if an untainted Ross Perot were elected.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Ross Perot was leading in a Time/CNN poll in June, 1992, with 37% to 24% Clinton, 24% Bush. On July 16, 1992, Ross Perot, a billionaire who could self-fund and was leading in the polls significantly, QUIT the presidential race because he feared that a desperate George Herbert Walker Bush might literally assassinate him. Google “Chip Tatum Pegasus” and read about the elite CIA assassin who quit rather than follow the orders of George Herbert Walker Bush and neutralize Ross Perot: </span><br />
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/MENA/TATUM/tatum.html" rel="nofollow external" style="background-color: #fafbfc; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;" title="External link">http://whatreallyhap...ATUM/tatum.html</a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"> An incensed Perot later got back in the race only to ensure the election of Bill Clinton.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">I think that George Herbert Walker Bush (CIA/CFR) became a made man with the JFK assassination in 1963. Read the book Family of Secrets by Russ Baker to learn more about the possible role of GHW Bush. Also read this link: </span><a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/bush.htm" rel="nofollow external" style="background-color: #fafbfc; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;" title="External link">http://www.jfkmurder...ed.com/bush.htm</a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"> </span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">One of the first things the Bill Clinton (CIA/CFR) did after he got elected in 1992 was to ask Webb Hubbell at Justice to find out who really killed John Kennedy. Bill Clinton is a coward; he is good friends with GHW Bush today and Clinton today says he thinks a lone nut killed Kennedy - something he surely does not believe.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The Discovery Channel has put out some incredibly bogus, poorly done disinfo presentations such as Inside the Target Car. Any MSM site that features Vincent Bugliosi, Gerald Posner, especially Hugh Aynesworth, Edward Jay Epstein, Gus Russo, Michael Shermer, Dale Meyers, Max Holland, Dave Perry or Gary Mack prominently and positively is giving you counterfeit money. Edward Epstein and Gerald Posner in particular are thought by many credible JFK researchers to be CIA propagandists. If you google “JFK assassination” the first 2 links that come up are lone nutter controlled disinfo sites: 1) Wikipedia 2) John McAdam’s site. John McAdams is a very lowly regarded man who basically controls JFK related content on Wikipedia as well as his own site. Both Wikipedia and the NY Times are both tremendously dishonest sources for information relating to the 1963 Coup d’Etat. Finally, another major source of disinformation on the Coup of 1963 is the Sixth Floor Museum in Dallas, which blithely recycles the shredded vapors of the Warren Commission, as if it had an ounce of truth in it. Gary Mack, the curator of the Sixth Floor Museum, simply does not have credibility on the JFK assassination.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">A special note on Wikipedia: any entry related to the JFK assassination or US intelligence agent Lee Harvey Oswald is locked down to prevent editing by the public. Wiki founder Jimmy Wales has a fondness for governmental fairy tales and JFK experts are prevented from editing entries on the site.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">In the near future there are going to be efforts by both Tom Hanks (HBO series) and Leonardo DiCaprio (a movie Legacy of Secrecy) to take on the JFK assassination. Sadly, these are both going to be disinformation efforts; the ONLY legitimate take on the JFK assassination is that it was a full blown domestic coup d’etat. Tom Hanks is a clueless lone nutter.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Legacy of Secrecy, produced by Warner Brothers, is a deeply flawed attempt to blame the JFK assassination on “the mob only,” leaving out Lyndon Johnson, the National Security State and the shadow government of Texas oil barons and Rockefellers. Courtenay Lynda Valenti, an executive vice president of production at Warner Brothers,</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">is very likely (short of a DNA test) the biological daughter (born in 1963) of Lyndon Johnson and Mary Margaret Valenti. Mary Margaret Valenti, a Texas beauty, had been a secretary/mistress of Lyndon Johnson and it is believed that Jack Valenti was letting his “wife” sleep with Lyndon Johnson. Back in the 1960’s Courtenay Lynda Valenti was known as the “baby in Lyndon Johnson’s White House” and was often referred to by LBJ as “Lynda” and “his little heartbeat.” As an adult, Courtenay Lynda Valenti is now producing some major disinformation on the 1963 Coup d’Etat: Legacy of Secrecy. Her brother John “Lyndon” Valenti (namesake only of LBJ) also works at Warner Brothers. Jack Valenti, her “dad,” issued a 7-page statement in 1992 denouncing Oliver Stone’s JFK as “a propaganda masterpiece and equally a hoax.”</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Similar to Jack Valenti, another sycophant of Lyndon Johnson is biographer Doris Kearns Goodwin who met Johnson in 1967 at age 23 (LBJ, age 58). Sally Quinn, in a revealing article in the Wash Post (8/24/75), entitled “A Tale of Hearts and Minds,” wrote that Doris said LBJ “pressed me very hard sexually the first year,” that he courted her aggressively, then he asked her to marry him, that he was jealous of other men in her life.” Doris, after spending much face time with LBJ, ghost wrote LBJ’s presidential autobiography Vantage Point and later a biography on him which, no surprise, did not include any references to Johnson’s pivotal role in the JFK assassination. Doris has all but admitted that she was having sex with Lyndon Johnson. </span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">The best discussion boards on the internet for good info are 1) Education Forum 2) Deep Politics Forum 3) www.assassinationresearch.com 3) JFKmurdersolved.com and 4) Mary Ferrell Foundation – www.maryferrell.org 5) JFK Lancer. On Facebook, the premier spots are JFK-The Grassy Knoll Witnesses (run by Rusty Yardum) </span><a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/JFK-The-Grassy-Knoll-Witnesses/115305938487641" rel="nofollow external" style="background-color: #fafbfc; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;" title="External link">http://www.facebook....115305938487641</a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"> and JFK Assassination </span><a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?saved&&note_id=197818803570567#!/home.php?sk=group_133383230054271" rel="nofollow external" style="background-color: #fafbfc; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;" title="External link">http://www.facebook....133383230054271</a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"> run by Al Tavers. Black Op radio’s web site www.blackopradio.com (Len Osanic) is an excellent place to listen to high quality interviews with folks such as JFK expert Jim DiEugenio. Deep Politics Quarterly (Walt Brown) </span><a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.manuscriptservice.com/DPQ/" rel="nofollow external" style="background-color: #fafbfc; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;" title="External link">http://www.manuscriptservice.com/DPQ/</a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"> and www.ctka.net (Jim DiEugenio) are 2 other quality spots on the internet.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">As for videos, I highly recommend going to You Tube and watching the extremely important The Men Who Killed Kennedy - (episodes 7, 8, and 9). Much of these episodes focus on the role of Lyndon Johnson in the 1963 Coup d’Etat and they were BANNED from the History Channel because they were so accurate. LBJ aide Jack Valenti (CFR) organized a suppression campaign on the videos along with Lady Bird Johnson, Warren Commission con man Gerald Ford (CFR), Jimmy Carter (CFR) and Bill Moyers (CFR). Also, on You Tube watch the spectacular “Evidence of Revision” and Jesse Ventura’s 2010 Conspiracy Theory show on the JFK assassination (You Tube </span><object height="355" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;" width="425"><embed src="http://youtube.com/v/sHUKPXR5TbQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></object><span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;"> ). In addition, I recommend JFK the movie by Oliver Stone, director’s cut. Oliver Stone, despite immense criticism in the MSM by CIA assets, pretty much nailed the JFK assassination. It was a full blown Coup d’Etat by Lyndon Johnson, the CIA and key elements of the U.S. military.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Robert Morrow is a political researcher with over 200+ books on the 1963 Coup d’Etat, aka JFK assassination. His email is Morrow321@aol.com and he accepts phone calls at 512-306-1510.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">If you want to get quickly “up to speed” on the JFK assassination, here is what to read:</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">1) LBJ: Mastermind of JFK’s Assassination by Phillip Nelson </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">2) JFK and the Unspeakable:Why He Died and Why it Matters by James Douglass</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">3) Brothers: the Hidden History of the Kennedy Years by David Talbot </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">4) The Dark Side of Camelot by Seymour Hersh </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">5) Family of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty by Russ Baker. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">6) Google the essay “LBJ-CIA Assassination of JFK” by Robert Morrow.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">7) Google “National Security State and the Assassination of JFK by Andrew Gavin Marshall.” </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">8) Google “Chip Tatum Pegasus.” </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">9) Google “Vincent Salandria False Mystery Speech.” Read everything that Vincent Salandria ever wrote.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">10) Google “Murray Rothbard the JFK Flap”</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">11) Google “Preserving the Legacy by Mat Wilson”</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">11) Google “Bertrand Russell 16 Questions on the Assassination”</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">12) Watch on You Tube the extremely important videos The Men Who Killed Kennedy, episodes 7, 8, and 9 which focus on the role of Lyndon Johnson. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">13) Watch on You Tube Jesse Ventura’s show on the JFK assassination. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">14) Watch the movie JFK director’s cut by Oliver Stone. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">15) Watch on You Tube “Evidence of Revision.” – 8 hours of fantastic and rare footage relating to the JFK assassination.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: #fafbfc; color: #1c2837; font-family: arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; text-align: -webkit-auto;">Another key point: Lee Harvey Oswald was U.S. intelligence and he shot NO ONE on 11/2263. Re: Oswald's intelligence connections read 1) "Oswald and the CIA" by John Newman 2) "Spy Saga: Lee Harvey Oswald and US Intelligence" by Philip Melanson 3) "History Will Not Absolve Us" by Martin Schotz (Chapter V Oswald and U.S. Intelligence by Christopher Sharrett) 4) "Me and Lee" by Judyth Vary Baker (Oswald's mistress in New Orleans, summer 1963) 5) Google “Lee Harvey Oswald’s reading habits summer 1963” </span></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-23749232359815385672011-11-28T04:27:00.001-08:002011-11-28T04:41:04.777-08:00Peter Dale scott, the Doomsday Project,and the Kennedy Assassination<a href="http://musicians4freedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Chronos-Films-Media-Peter-Dale-Scott-Deep-Politics-Conference-e10345717.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://musicians4freedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Chronos-Films-Media-Peter-Dale-Scott-Deep-Politics-Conference-e10345717.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Peter Dale Scott talks to COPA</div><div><br /></div>In the COPA video below, November 2011, Peter Dale Scott,philosopher,poet and Deep Politics maestro, offers the information behind the Doomsday Project--and why we should pay attention. "Fabricated provocations" and other deceptions have been offered to the people to justify many deeds of evil,.<div><br /></div><div><iframe src="http://www.ustream.tv/embed/recorded/18644880" width="608" height="368" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border: 0px none transparent;"></iframe></div><div><br /></div><div>Hear why Kennedy was murdered, how <a href="http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com/">Lee Harvey Oswald </a>was framed, and how this matter links the perpetrators to later events that have affected America ever since. Scott compares the events of 9-11 with those in the Kennedy assassination, remarking upon their amazing similarities. "Oswald...at some prior point had been designated for an...operation...(probably) against Cuba...but, as exploited legends began to accumulate...Oswald...was no longer a designated subject,but [now became] a designated culprit." In the book <a href="http://www.meandlee.com/">Me & Lee</a>, you can read just how this was accomplished.</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-75535026529419214272011-07-27T00:35:00.000-07:002011-07-27T01:09:30.844-07:00Oswald Not Guilty: Dr. Henry Lee and Dr. Jerry Labriola<span class="Apple-style-span"><b><br /></b><span class="Apple-style-span" >Researcher Don Roberdeaus, whose diagrams show Oswald's</span></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" > innocence, brought this article about a forensically-savvy</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" > mystery writer's research to everyone's attention.</span></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhNzEPsGwS9edeTLD-hQtyDZoEHgGdDoAs5NGEEewHmiO6viDx66hIzh6kX0a0eQD_WiuyYa8ZhbMP39ekTRP1WJC2jnegVoUovTmAHBd4NsrileiVQBEnPkg4IYMmb1lYmHwgiBBoSW7fT/s1600/roberdeau+clear+copy+oswald+bag.gif" style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 887px; height: 968px;" border="0" alt="" />(you can read the original article <a href="http://trumbull.patch.com/articles/the-doctor-calls-on-the-library">HERE</a>)<br /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>Mystery writer Dr. Jerry Labriola dropped in on the Trumbull Library one recent night.</b><br /></span><br />By Aaron Leo<br />Email the author<br />May 27, 2011<br /><br /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span">O.J. Simpson had means, motive and opportunity to commit murder, but<br />the Los Angeles Police and the prosecution team bungled the probe,<br />leading to acquittal, according to Dr. Jerry Labriola, who has teamed with<br />famed forensic scientist Dr. Henry Lee in analyses of several criminal<br />investigations.<br /><br />The 1963<a href="http://meandlee.com/"> assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy</a>? It was a<br />conspiracy, possibly Mafia-related. And there was another gunman.<br /><br />Labriola, a medical doctor for more than 35 years, speculated on the two<br />cases to 13 listeners at the Trumbull Library while promoting his latest<br />book, Scent of Danger...<br /><br />Labriola explained his beliefs after outlining the facts of both cases.<br /><br />"There are a lot of irregularities here," he said of the trial of O.J. Simpson<br />for the murder of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend<br />Ronald Goldman in the ex-football player's home in 1994.<br /><br />First, much of the blood found at the scene belonged to the victims and<br />little to Simpson. The little blood of Simpson's that was found contained an<br />anti-clotting agent used in labs.<br /><br />Police might have planted evidence to bolster their case but not to frame<br />Simspon, Labriola said. The couple had fought frequently before the<br />murders, and Simpson had beaten his ex-wife until she was<br />unrecognizable at times, he noted.<br /><br />Still, the blood spatter was inconsistent with the prosecution's theory and<br />police mishandled the investigation by failing to bring blood evidence to<br />the lab immediately, Labriola said.<br /><br />"That's a no-no," the doctor said.<br /><br />The discrediting of LAPD Det. Mark Fuhrman also helped the defense sway<br />the jury in the nine-month trial, he said. Regardless, Simpson was later<br />found liable for their deaths in a civil suit.<br /><br />In the case of Kennedy, analysis showed <a href="http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com/">Lee Harvey Oswald</a> could not<br />have fired twice in the space of time Kennedy would have been<br />vulnerable.<br /><br />Further, the<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmShDlQo7rU"> "magic bullet"</a> theory doesn't work, he added.<br /><br />"There were all sorts of rumors swirling around," Labriola said of the time<br />after the killing.<br /><br />He argued that <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb46jE6xHrs">the Mafia was a likely candidate for the killing</a> because<br />Jack Ruby, who killed Oswald, was a known mafia associate. JFK's brother<br />Robert was also prosecuting the mob, which was also upset at being<br />forced out following the Bay of Pigs incident in Cuba, Labriola said.<br /><br />The Kennedy brothers also shared girlfriends with the mob, the doctor<br />said.<br /><br />Regardless, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHwbOWLs82M">the details of the death were covered up or destroyed</a>, such<br />as the original autopsy notes and real photos of the wound to Kennedy's<br />head, Labriola charged.<br /><br />"What was released to the public was a farce," the doctor said.<br /><br />"After nearly 50 years, an abundance of theories abound in this case," he<br />added. But what has changed after near 50 years is the reach of forensic<br />science.<br /><br />"So many people can be brought under the umbrella of forensic science,"<br />Labriola said.<br /><br />While television crime scene investigation shows are correct, they are<br />overdramatized. But they have highlighted the importance of the field.<br /><br />"They're one of the reasons why it's become so popular," said Labriola,<br />who sold and signed books after the talk.<br /><br />That's the case for Trumbull High School senior Jillian Wyckoff, 18, who<br />plans on studying the field after the graduation this year.<br /><br />"I've been watching those shows for years," she said. She likens the work<br />to "fighting crime with science."<br /><br />Her mother, Lynda Gabrielson, said the field allows all kinds of people to<br />serve in law enforcement.</span><end quote=""><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span><br /><i>Best Regards in Research,<br /><br />Don</i><br /></end><div><end quote=""><br /></end></div><div><end quote=""><span class="Apple-style-span">DON'S RESEARCH HAS PROVIDED VALUABLE INSIGHTS INTO THE CASE, PROVING LEE HARVEY OSWALD WAS NOT GUILTY OF ASSASSINATING JOHN F. KENNEDY.</span></end></div><div><end quote=""><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></end></div><div><end quote=""><span class="Apple-style-span">SEE SOME OF HIS FINE WORK <a href="http://droberdeau.blogspot.com/2009/08/1-men-of-courage-jfk-assassination_09.html">HERE.</a> And <a href="http://droberdeau.blogspot.com/2011/05/page-10.html">HERE.</a></span></end></div></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-82241227733084078132011-03-26T03:40:00.001-07:002016-07-03T02:12:37.460-07:00"VICTORY" (... _ ) IN MORSE CODE PLAYED ON DALLAS POLICE CHANNEL MEANT KENNEDY WAS SUCCESSFULLY MURDERED!<a href="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRtNzUC2SG0xN9de4RzfFCNyuXrkpCNNgI7K9XQnXLqP9KeF0OEng" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" src="https://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRtNzUC2SG0xN9de4RzfFCNyuXrkpCNNgI7K9XQnXLqP9KeF0OEng" style="cursor: hand; cursor: pointer; float: left; height: 65px; margin: 0 10px 10px 0; width: 277px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
'VICTORY' MORSE CODE...(Dit-dit-dit-<span style="font-weight: bold;">daaaah</span>) as spoken...three quick clicks,followed by a longer one...<br />
<br />
Ludwig Von Beethoven made the "V" for "Victory" world-famous forever in the opening notes of his marvelous Fifth Symphony:<br />
<br />
The Morse Code word for "Victory" can be clearly heard moments after President Kennedy was slain in Dallas...you hear the usual Dallas Police remarks...and then , near the end of those remarks...VICTORY...as Kennedy is shot....hear it here:<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="390" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/a1QECm8Rww0" title="YouTube video player" width="480"></iframe>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-21753956051272904492011-02-25T18:15:00.000-08:002011-02-25T20:39:06.103-08:00COVER UPS AND THE TRUTH: J EDGAR HOOVER WANTS TO MAKE SURE LEE OSWALD IS CONSIDERED GUILTY<p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: Arial; ">It’s time to get the real story out!<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; "><span class="Apple-style-span">(adapted from material written by Edward T.Haslam, author of <a href="http://www.doctormarysmonkey.com/">Dr. Mary's Monkey</a>)</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><br /></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><img width="82" height="107" src="http://doctormarysmonkey.com/jvb/pages/Donate_files/image004.jpg" align="left" hspace="12" shapes="_x0000_s1028" /><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; ">Americans who believe in our <b>Justice </b>system know that <a href="http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com/">Lee Harvey Oswald </a>is <b>legally innocent</b>. The law says “innocent until proven guilty.” Not only was he never found guilty of killing either Officer Tippit or President Kennedy, he was never given a trial nor even allowed his legal right to an attorney. He should have been protected by federal marshals to prevent his murder while in the custody of the Dallas Police, but he was not. We can't change what happened, but we can change what people know about it. We should never let <st1:place st="on"><st1:country-region st="on">America</st1:country-region></st1:place> forget that our justice system failed us (and Lee) at the critical moment. If Lee had lived to talk, the lies would have been exposed many years ago. Lee died so their lies could live.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><o:p> </o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><img width="246" height="215" src="http://doctormarysmonkey.com/jvb/pages/Donate_files/image006.gif" align="left" hspace="12" shapes="_x0000_s1029" /><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; ">If you are an American that believes in the <b>Constitution</b>, remember that <b>Separation of Powers </b>was established by our Founders to prevent the Executive, Judicial and Legislative branches from conspiring against the People. But that is exactly what happened when LBJ appointed his blue-ribbon commission to formally approve the corrupt investigation of J. Edgar Hoover which had already been written and presented to LBJ. There was no real investigation. "The President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy" contained two Senators, two Congressmen, one Supreme Court Judge, and two un-elected members (one banker who was formerly Deputy Secretary of Defense and one former CIA official fired by President Kennedy) Executive Branch. And the evidence was controlled by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover. The so-called “Warren Commission” violated the Separation of Powers and was <b>unconstitutional</b>.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; ">When Lee's mother tried to have a lawyer represent his interest in the case, her request was denied. Why?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; ">Was it really “The Warren Commission?”<span> </span>About the only thing Earl Warren did for the Warren Commission was to show up for this photo op.<span> </span>Allowing LBJ to use his name concealed the fact that it was really J. Edgar Hoover’s investigation and the conclusions had already been reached.<br /><br /><br /><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7j5xgNH-P6M" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br /><br /><br /><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4BL1Uns8Kw&feature=related" style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; "><img border="0" width="91" height="116" src="http://doctormarysmonkey.com/jvb/pages/Donate_files/image007.jpg" align="left" hspace="12" shapes="_x0000_s1030" /></a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4BL1Uns8Kw&feature=related" style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; "></a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4BL1Uns8Kw&feature=related" style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; "></a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4BL1Uns8Kw&feature=related" style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; "></a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4BL1Uns8Kw&feature=related" style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; "></a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4BL1Uns8Kw&feature=related" style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; "></a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4BL1Uns8Kw&feature=related" style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; "></a><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; ">Today it is well-known that <b>J. Edgar Hoover </b>was being blackmailed for his homosexual activities by the Mafia, the very people that the government should have been investigating in the JFK assassination.<span> </span>Want more information on the corruption of J. Edgar Hoover?<span> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; ">Also see Anthony Summers book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Official-Confidential-Secret-Edgar-Hoover/dp/067188087X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1238515919&sr=8-1" style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">Official and Confidential: The Secret Life of J. Edgar Hoover</a></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><o:p>J Edgar Hoover and Lyndon Baines Johnson discussed how to STOP investigations into Kennedy's assassination:</o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>Hear Hoover and LBJ plot to stop investigations not controlled by them:</b></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /><br /><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Tosw3kKsKDY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe><br /><br /><br />The people in power in the 1960s may have gotten away with their murders and cover-ups at the time, but we are smarter now, better informed, and wiser. With your help we can continue to educate the public about what really happened. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: Arial; ">It’s time to<span> </span></span><b><span style="font-size: 36pt; font-family: Arial; ">FREE LEE</span></b><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: Arial; "><span> </span>from the lies of 1963.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: Arial; ">####</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: Arial; "></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><b><span style="font-family: Arial; ">Bringing this story to light takes "blood, sweat, toil and tears." </span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><b><span style="font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left; margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><b><span style="font-family: Arial; ">Even the smallest donation makes a BIG difference.</span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 13px; ">I'm not alone--people are joining the fight. 2013 is ahead,</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 126.95pt; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 13px; ">and we want the truth to be revealed about Lee Harvey Oswald and the <a href="http://www.judythbaker.blogspot.com/">JFK assassination</a>.<span> <b>Your copying these files and posting them helps to spread the word!</b> </span> Internet service, domain names, website hosting, phone calls, press releases, paper, ink, travel to interviews, and promotion are expensive, and only donations keep everything going!.<span> </span>The opposition is well financed. But we still fight on. With your help, we can win.</span></p><p></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-72825922358325235162011-02-15T11:56:00.000-08:002011-02-15T12:53:19.403-08:00How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy Assassination<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://blog.cleveland.com/nationworld_impact/2009/06/medium_cyril-wecht.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 240px; height: 312px;" src="http://blog.cleveland.com/nationworld_impact/2009/06/medium_cyril-wecht.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/uploads/profile/photo-3674.jpg"><br /></a><div><div><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; "><br /></span></h1><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; "><br /></span></h1><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; "><br /></span></h1><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; "><br /></span></h1><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; "><br /></span></h1><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; "><br /></span></h1><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; "><br /></span></h1><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; "><br /></span></h1><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; "><br /></span></h1><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; "><br /></span></h1><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; "><br /></span></h1><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; "><br /></span></h1><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; "><br /></span></h1><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; "> The Mainstream Media LIES</span></h1><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; "> about the Kennedy Assassination</span></h1><div id="watch-headline-user-info" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; height: 27px; max-height: 27px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 15px;"><b><br /></b></span></span></div></div></div><div><b>SAMPLE BULLETS FIRED BY THE FBI SHOWS "MAGIC BULLET" 399 COULD NOT HAVE MADE THE WOUNDS THAT KILLED KENNEDY AND ALMOST KILLED CONNALLY---THEREFORE, <a href="http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com/">LEE HARVEY OSWALD </a>WAS INNOCENT: </b></div><div><b><br /></b></div><div><b>"...THEIR EXPERIMENT!....SHOWS IT CAN'T BE DONE!" CYRIL WECHT,FOREMOST FORENSICS EXPERT, TELLS YOU WHY THE MAGIC BULLET IS INDEED "MAGIC" HERE:</b></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXxZjoXf6eU&NR=1">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXxZjoXf6eU&NR=1</a></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><b>ASK YOURSELF: DO YOU BELIEVE EVERYTHING MAINSTREAM MEDIA,OWNED BY ONLY A FEW GIANT CORPORATIONS, TELLS YOU?</b></div><div><b><br /></b></div><div><b>IS THE MEDIA YOUR FRIEND, OR THE FRIEND OF THE BANKERS AND CEOS WHO OWN THEM?</b></div><div><b><br /></b></div><div><b><br /></b></div><div><b><br /></b></div><div><b>WHEN YOU LEARN THE TRUTH ABOUT LEE HARVEY OSWALD,AND HOW HE WAS FRAMED BY THE GOVERNMENT, THEN YOU'LL LEARN HOW TO RECOGNIZE HOW THE TRUTH CAN BE TWISTED TO KEEP THE PEOPLE BELIEVING WHATEVER IS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE WHATEVER IS WANTED.</b></div><div><b><br /></b></div><div><b>THINK ABOUT IT.</b></div><div><b><br /></b></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span">THE MEDIA HELPED FRAMED LEE OSWALD, AND THEY'RE STILL DOING IT TODAY.</span></b></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span">WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?</span></b></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span">ONCE YOU REALIZE THE GOVERNMENT LIED --AND THE MEDIA STILL LIES--ABOUT THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION, AND BOTH ARE STILL LYING ABOUT IT EVEN TODAY, YOU KNOW THEY'LL LIE ABOUT<i> ANYTHING!</i></span></b></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></b></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span"> </span><span class="Apple-style-span"><a href="http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2010/02/judyth-vary-baker-living-in-exile.html">WITNESSES SUCH AS MYSELF ARE STILL BEING HOUNDED AND THREATENED</a>, SO THE TRUTH ABOUT THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION WON'T REACH THE PUBLIC. </span></b></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></b></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span">IT MUST NOT BE KNOWN THAT PRESIDENTS ARE CONTROLLED--OR RISK ASSASSINATION.</span></b></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><b><br /></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>HERE'S JUST A SMALL BIT OF THE MASSIVE EVIDENCE THAT PROVES OSWALD WAS NOT GUILTY:</b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><b><br /></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; "><div><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; ">How the Mainstream Media</span></h1><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; ">LIES about</span></h1><h1 id="watch-headline-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.8333em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; height: 1.1363em; max-height: 1.1363em; line-height: 1.1363em; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; font-family: arial, sans-serif; "><span id="eow-title" class="long-title" dir="ltr" title="How the Mainstream Media LIES about the Kennedy assassination--Part 1" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; letter-spacing: -0.5px; ">the Kennedy Assassination--</span></h1></div></span></b></span></div><div>HEAR AND SEE WITNESSES WHO SAID THEY HEARD SHOTS FROM GRASSY KNOLL OR THE OVERPASS...THAT INFORMATION WAS REMOVED FROM FBI REPORTS...</div><div>PROOF THAT THE FBI LIED IN THEIR REPORTS---FROM GIL JESUS:</div><div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODXoISgU-0M&feature=related">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODXoISgU-0M&feature=related</a></div><div><br /></div><div>OSWALD DID NOT SHOOT KENNEDY THROUGH THE NECK:</div><div>ENTRANCE WOUND IN KENNEDY'S NECK CAME FROM A SHOT FROM THE FRONT:PARKLAND DOCTORS TESTIFIED THEMSELVES, AND THIS WITNESS AFFIRMS:</div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vY5dNpTYWT8&NR=1">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vY5dNpTYWT8&NR=1</a></div><div><br /></div><div>THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF CARRYING THE RIFLE INTO THE TSBD IS DEMONSTRATED BY GIL JESUS HERE:</div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_-5L_JNF6g&NR=1">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_-5L_JNF6g&NR=1</a></div><div><br /></div>DECEPTION BY OMISSION: BBC DOESN'T TELL VIEWERS KENNEDY SHOT BY BULLET FROM FRONT--MEANING OSWALD DID NOT KILL KENNEDY:<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O41R8lxWvP8&NR=1">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O41R8lxWvP8&NR=1</a><br /><div><br /></div><div>GEN.WALKER SHOT AT:BULLET COULDNOT BE LINKED TO THE RIFLE<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rkewy7Wlwnk&NR=1"></a><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>LEE OSWALD WAS IN THE THEATER BEFORE TIPPIT WAS SHOT! HEAR THIS WITNESS TESTIMONY! TIPPIT WAS TOO FAR FROM THE THEATER TO HAVE BEEN SHOT BY LEE OSWALD....</div><div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5p4AvezLnG0&NR=1">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5p4AvezLnG0&NR=1</a></div><div><br /></div><div>AUTOMATIC SHELLS REPLACED WITH AUTOMATIC SPECIAL SHELLS TO FRAME OSWALD:</div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjRHGZQXRxM&NR=1">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjRHGZQXRxM&NR=1</a></div><div><br /></div><div><b>also see:</b></div><div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rkewy7Wlwnk&NR=1">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rkewy7Wlwnk&NR=1</a><div><br /></div><div>TIPPIT MURDER: BULLET COULD NOT BE LINKED TO REVOLVER:</div><div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W70l3QPUiXI&NR=1">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W70l3QPUiXI&NR=1</a></div><div><br /></div><div>MINOR DETAILS BUILD UP TO CONVICT INNOCENT OSWALD...AS SOWN HERE...</div><div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCq6osCy9Yg&NR=1">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCq6osCy9Yg&NR=1</a></div><div><br /></div><div>JACK RUBY TREMENDOUSLY RELIEVED THAT HE WAS ABLE TO KIL LLEE OSWALD--CLEARLY HIS LIFE DEPENDED ON IT..."I WOULD SAY HIS LIFE DEPENDED ON HIM GETTING OSWALD."</div><div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDWSuPr_Ghk&NR=1">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDWSuPr_Ghk&NR=1</a></div><div><br /></div><div><div>HOW COME AN FBI AGENT CAME TO THE TEXAS THEATER WHERE A MAN HAD ENTERED WITHOUT BUYING A TICKET? WHAT MADE IT POSSIBLE FOR SO MANY POLICE TO CONVERGE ON JUST ONE MAN, LOCATED MILES FROM THE SCENE OF THE ASSASSINATION?</div><div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPifBXt96aI&feature=related">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPifBXt96aI&feature=related</a></div></div><div><br /></div><div><b><a href="http://www.meandlee.com/">GET THE BOOK ME & LEE:HOW I CAME TO KNOW,LOVE AND LOSE LEE HARVEY OSWALD. THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE.</a></b></div><div><br /></div><div>JVB</div><div><br /></div></div></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-86769494868734042082010-12-14T09:56:00.000-08:002011-02-03T16:02:53.002-08:00Robert Groden: Homeland Security called him "Terrorist" -- and his July Arrest by Police Is Coming to Court!<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.roger-craig.com/images/170_robert_2009.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 170px; height: 220px;" src="http://www.roger-craig.com/images/170_robert_2009.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />Robert Groden is a bright jewel of truth that has been shining for years at Dealey Plaza, though his light is often dimmed by the police.<br /><br />Listen to this excerpt where Alex Jones interviews JFK assassination expert Robert Groden, who gave the American people <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmShDlQo7rU">the Zapruder film,</a> and also happens to be one of my personal heroes:<br /><br />Alex Jones: "People can't handle it anymore, Robert...America is dying....it's almost like it's a cartoon of a po<a href="javascript:void(0)">Publish Post</a>lice state, it's so over the top."<br /><br />"One of the times I was harassed in Dealey Plaza..." Groden tells us, "I was harassed not only by the Dallas police, but [also] by Homeland Security...half a dozen years ago..." "The Sixth Floor Museum kept calling the police (to seek the arrest of Groden)..." The Homeland Security officers told Groden he was "a terrorist" and forced him to leave. The people "were panic-stricken..."<br /><br />However, the Sixth Floor Museum can "lie to little kids" with impunity, as Alex Jones has commented, and no "conspiracy theory" books are allowed in that expensive monument to government lies. You will not find a fitting monument to our slain President in Dallas. Nor will you find the truth in that Museum of Lies. You will not find a box in the sniper's nest labeled "a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHwbOWLs82M">fingerprint of LBJ hitman Mac Wallace was found here</a>" or that "three spent cartridges, supposedly from Oswald's rifle were described as lying <span style="font-weight:bold;">here</span>, all in a row. Who would take time to line them up before leaving the sniper's nest?"<br /><br />As you'll hear in the interview below, Groden is going to court to face charges that he was selling material in Dealey Plaza without a permit. Let's forget the small fact that the City of Dallas does not have permits to buy for such activities! Or that he was the only person arrested -- while loonies with "garbage" for sale and the homeless, peddling unsavory wares there, were ignored.<br /><br />Groden says 95% or more of those he speaks to in Dealey Plaza don't believe the Official Version. Those days are over. Despite the reports of (paid-for!) polls, implying that the percentage of those interviewed state Oswald didn't kill JFK is lower, only a few folks with double-digit IQ's, old soldiers who believe whatever they are told by the government, and close friends of Bugliosi (what close friends? Like Jesse Ventura? (not!) ) now state with confidence that "Oswald did it."<br /><br />Here's an interview of Groden with Alex Jones, where we hear the truth about the Discovery Channel's faked 'reconstructions'of the Kennedy assassination:<br /><br /><object width="518" height="347"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SzrTh8tUziw?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SzrTh8tUziw?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="518" height="347"></embed></object><div><br /></div><div>visit http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com tolearn more about the kennedy Assassination and the book <a href="http://www.meandlee.com">Me & Lee:How I Came to Know,Love and Lose Lee Harvey Oswald.</a></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-44220143824444644922010-11-25T16:27:00.000-08:002010-11-25T17:38:41.327-08:00ALL ABOUT ED HASLAM,GEORGE KNAPP, GEORGE BARBOUR ...COAST TO COAST NOV. 21, 2010With reluctance, i consented to an interview on Coast to Coast late on November 21st (22nd for me). There will be no more radio interviews, if I can help it!<br /><br />The twenty minutes of interview granted (more time would have been inadvisable) required a trip out of the country I was living in, a few hours later, for my safety.<br /><br />Kudos to EDWARD T. HASLAM, who gave listeners excellent information, including how his book,<span style="font-style:italic;"> Dr. Mary's Monkey</span> (which was an outgrowth of his first book, <span style="font-style:italic;">Mary, Ferrie & the Monkey Virus</span>)related to the question in his mind about the underground laboratory he had discovered near David Ferrie's residence: WHERE was the necessary technician who had to be involved? More about the interview, below...plus the video I hope you'll enjoy....<br /><br />Only today have I been able to re-establish connections with my "cutouts," who post messages and pass emails on to me. You have no idea how important your donations have been to help me 'stay legal' (I can only stay 90 days at a time in an EU country). <br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">CANCER ON THE RAMPAGE</span><br /><br />This Thanksgiving, as my family once again gathered without me, I learned that my former husband's brother died of lung and brain cancer the very day of the Coast to Coast interview. His wife is battling a cancer that required surgery just days before her husband died-- both her breasts had to be removed. It doesn't end there... Sadly, I leaned that my former husband, who has also been battling cancer, is losing the battle. he is scheduled for chemotherapy in January, if he is still alive at that time.<br /><br />What were once rare cancers are no longer rare. The virus component found in so many of these once-rare cancers is well-known, but rarely mentioned by the media to the public.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">TRANS-RESVERATROL AND A HEALTHY, ANTI-CANCER DIET<br /></span><br />I do wish to clarify some information touched upon in the program, before inviting you to watch the interesting video below. <br /><br />One available way to help prevent certain kinds of cancer, and PERHAPS to help those suffering from cancer --<span style="font-weight:bold;">always <span style="font-style:italic;"></span></span>consult your doctors--- besides a good 'anti-cancer" diet rich in colorful, organically-grown fruits and vegetables, is a good source of <span style="font-weight:bold;">TRANS-resveratrol</span>. That;'s the most active part of resveratrol, mentioned on the program. also, as "reversatrol" --an easy error to make, but one which needs correction here, again, in print.<br /><br />To elaborate a bit on diet: some additional supplementary items I'd recommend, at this time, in an 'anti-cancer" diet include:<br /><br />Organic blueberry, blackberry, cranberry and pomegranate juices, organic apple cider,organic purple grape juice, organic apple cider vinegar (be sure to balance with sufficient calcium and magnesium), lightly cooked, grated sugar beets, asparagus, inositol (form of niacin), omega-3 sources such as mercury-free salmon, vitamin D3 (taken on days when it's impossible to get natural sunlight--but not with inositol) and green teas-- free of fluorides -- as wise additions to any diet. (The above list is not all-inclusive.,<br /><br />Avoid preserved meats and any heat-blackened surfaces on meat or fish. I wouldn't give aspartame or any other artificial sweetener to rats, let alone human beings, not wishing to shorten their lifespans.<br /><br />Was unable to give any such advice on Coast to Coast: wish it had been possible to do so.<br /><br />One other comment: concerning BACTERIOPHAGES.... <span style="font-weight:bold;">Yes, we could have cured many kinds of soft-tissue cancers decades ago</span>. That's the tragic truth. Chemotherapy makes BIG BUCKS for BIG PHARMA: the bottom line on why we don;t have a true cure for cancer yet. Nevertheless, I urge more research into using not 'macrophjage" which was suggested on the program, but <span style="font-weight:bold;">bacteriophage</span> as a resource to cure cancer. Bacteriophage that have been appropriately genetically altered hold the very key to curing certain soft tissue cancers, and will provide us with a basic building block with which to destroy any evolving new cancers that might develop resistance. Bacteriophage could remain in a treated person;s body, after defeating cancer there, for an unknown but probably extended period of time, ready to 'come to life' the moment the cancer might try to reappear. Now that's the kind of virus in a vaccine that people SHOULD think about accepting into their bodies!<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">WOULD I LIKE TO BE IN A LABORATORY, DIRECTING RESEARCH IN THIS AREA? JUST GIVE ME A FIGHTING CHANCE!</span><br /><br />HAVING MADE THESE REMARKS ABOUT 'TRANS-RESVERATROL,' 'ANTI-CANCER DIETS' AND 'GENETICALLY MODIFIED BACTERIOPHAGES'-- LET'S LOOK AT THE VIDEO I HOPE YOU'LL VIEW WITH ENJOYMENT:<br /><br />In the YouTube video shown here, you'll see both George Knapp (the same individual who interviewed me on Coast to Coast), and also John Barbour, a kind and honest celebrity with a passion for the truth, who spoke after I did, whose appropriate and supportive comments were much appreciated.<br /><br />This video presents an introduction to Barbour's award-winning documentary, THE GARRISON TAPES--where he states, concerning New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison ---famed in the movie <span style="font-style:italic;">JFK</span> for conducting the ONLY investigation into anyone else besides the innocent Oswald: "if [Garrison] had nothing, they would have stepped aside and let him fall on his face. Instead..."<br /><br />Well, that <span style="font-weight:bold;">"instead" </span>leads to the misery and humiliation and attacks that garrison had to endure. I am quite familiar, myself, with that process. Honest researchers know that what the CIA and the media did to Garrison was illegal and constituted an obstruction of justice.<br /><br />"Oswald did not fire the rifle" --<span style="font-weight:bold;">Garrison</span><br /><br />note that this is a good video---<span style="font-weight:bold;">except</span> for the statement in the beginning by our fine newsfolks, where they repeat the now-familiar mantra that npeople continue to believe that "Oswald did not act alone" -- a rote statement that has TAKEN THE PLACE OF "Was Oswald the shooter?"<br /><br />This evolution in the statement is evidence of the tenacious, insidious way that the sold-out media has been brainwashed to re-word the essential question of WHO killed Kennedy. <span style="font-weight:bold;">"Did Oswald act alone?"</span> implies that Oswald shot Kennedy, but asks if he was involved or not in a conspiracy. It veers from the truth 180 degrees.<br /><br />The question should be, <span style="font-weight:bold;">"Since we know Oswald didn't kill Kennedy, then who was responsible for protecting those who did?"</span><br /><br />That leads to whence the perpetrators do not wish you to go.<br /><br />As anyone who's read my book, <span style="font-weight:bold;">Me & Lee<span style="font-style:italic;"></span></span> , knows, Lee Oswald was a hero. <br /><br />Now for the video (by the way, Jim Garrison also said that Lee was a hero!):<br /><br /> <br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuMH3os2I1o<br /><br /><object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZuMH3os2I1o?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZuMH3os2I1o?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-9990285500208076582010-11-20T14:05:00.000-08:002010-11-20T14:14:07.956-08:00Jim Douglass --COPA ADDRESS: JFK AND THE UNSPEAKABLE<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT4oKl_s2-l6DmKV686lT42Zwp2XyAoGf7hRxHbTsqOhxZEhBBt"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 183px; height: 276px;" src="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT4oKl_s2-l6DmKV686lT42Zwp2XyAoGf7hRxHbTsqOhxZEhBBt" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">NO CLEARER VOICE HAS BEEN RAISED IN DEFENSE OF A GREAT PRESIDENT, KILLED BY HIS OWN GOVERNMENT</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">TRANSCRIPT FROM COPA:</span><br /><br />Jim Douglass COPA Keynote, November 20 Dallas<br />Thanks to Bill Kelly for this transcript of Jim Douglass’ incisive talk at the COPA regional meeting in Dallas last November.<br /><br />"I want to speak tonight about the hope that comes from our confronting the truth of the assassination of President Kennedy. Concerned friends have asked me over the years if engaging in such a probe into darkness hasn’t made me profoundly depressed. On the contrary, it has given me great hope. As Martin Luther King said, the truth crushed to earth will rise again. Gandhi spoke hopefully of experiments in truth, because they take us into the most powerful force on earth and in existence – truth-force, satyagraha. That is how I think of this work, as an experiment in truth – one that will open us up, both personally and as a country, to a process of nonviolent transformation. I believe this experiment we are doing into the dark truth of Dallas (and of Washington) can be the most hopeful experience of our lives. But as you know, it does require patience and tenacity to confront the unspeakable. We, first of all, need to take the time to recognize the sources in our history for what happened in Dallas on November 22, 1963.<br /><br />The doctrine of “plausible deniability” in an old government document provides us with a source of the assassination of President Kennedy. The document was issued in 1948, one year after the CIA was established, 15 years before JFK’s murder. That document, National Security Council directive 10/2, on June 18, 1948, “gave the highest sanction of the [U.S.] government to a broad range of covert operations” – propaganda, sabotage, economic warfare, subversion of all kinds – that were seen as necessary to “win” the Cold War against the Communists. The government’s condition for those covert activities by U.S. agencies, coordinated by the CIA, was that they be “so planned and executed that…if uncovered the US government can plausibly disclaim any responsibility for them.”<br /><br />In the 1950’s, under the leadership of CIA Director Allen Dulles, the doctrine of “plausible deniability” became the CIA’s green light to assassinate national leaders, conduct secret military operations, and overthrow governments that our government thought were on the wrong side in the Cold War. “Plausible deniability” meant our intelligence agencies, acting as paramilitary groups, had to lie and cover their tracks so effectively that there would be no trace of U.S. government responsibility for criminal activities on an ever-widening scale.<br /><br />The man who proposed this secret, subversive process in 1948, diplomat George Kennan, said later, in light of its consequences, that it was “the greatest mistake I ever made.” President Harry Truman, under whom the CIA was created, and during whose presidency the plausible deniability doctrine was authorized, had deep regrets. He said in a statement on December 22, 1963:<br /><br />“For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from its original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the Government. This has led to trouble and may have compounded our difficulties in several explosive areas.<br /><br />“We have grown up as a nation, respected for our free institutions and for our ability to maintain a free and open society. There is something about the way the CIA has been functioning that is casting a shadow over our historic position and I feel that we need to correct it.”<br /><br />Truman later remarked: “The CIA was set up by me for the sole purpose of getting all the available information to the president. It was not intended to operate as an international agency engaged in strange activities.”<br /><br />President Truman’s sharp warning about the CIA, and the fact that warning was published one month to the day after JFK’s assassination, should have given this country pause. However, his statement appeared only in an early edition of The Washington Post, then vanished without comment from public view.<br /><br />What George Kennan and Harry Truman realized much too late was that, in the name of national security, they had unwittingly allowed an alien force to invade a democracy. As a result, we now had to deal with a government agency authorized to carry out a broad range of criminal activities on an international scale, theoretically accountable to the president but with no genuine accountability to anyone. Plausible deniability became a rationale for the CIA’s interpretation of what the executive branch’s wishes might be. <br /><br />But for the Agency’s crimes to remain plausibly deniable, the less said the better – to the point where CIA leaders’ creative imaginations simply took over. It was all for the sake of “winning” the Cold War by any means necessary and without implicating the more visible heads of the government. One assumption behind Kennan’s proposal unleashing the CIA for its war against Communism was that the Agency’s criminal power could be confined to covert action outside the borders of the United States, with immunity from its lethal power granted to U.S. citizens. That assumption proved to be wrong.<br /><br />During the Cold War, the hidden growth of the CIA’s autonomous power corresponded to the public growth of what was called a fortress state. What had been a struggling post-war democracy in our country was replaced by the institutions of a national security state. President Truman had laid the foundations for that silent takeover by his momentous decision to end the Second World War by a demonstration of nuclear weapons on the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in order to stop a Soviet advance to Japan. Truman’s further, post-war decision for U.S. nuclear dominance in the world rather than allowing for international control of nuclear weapons was his second disastrous mistake, in terms of initiating the nuclear arms race in the world and subverting democracy in the U.S.A. <br /><br />A democracy within a national security state cannot survive. The president’s decision to base our security on nuclear weapons created the contradiction of a democracy ruled by the dictates of the Pentagon. A democratic national security state is a contradiction in terms.<br /><br />The insecure basis of our security then became weapons that could destroy the planet. To protect the security of that illusory means of security, which was absolute destructive power, we now needed a ruling elite of national security managers with an authority above that of our elected representatives. So from that point on, our military-industrial managers made the real decisions of state. President Truman simply ratified their decisions and entrenched their power, as he did with the establishment of the CIA, and as his National Security Council did with its endorsement of plausible deniability.<br /><br />His successor, President Eisenhower, also failed to challenge in his presidency what he warned against at its end — the military-industrial complex. He left the critical task of resisting that anti-democratic power in the hands of the next president, John Kennedy.<br /><br />When President Kennedy then stood up to the Pentagon, the CIA, and the military-industrial complex, he was treated as a traitor. His attempt to save the planet from the weapons of his own state was regarded as treason. The doctrine of plausible deniability allowed for the assassination of a president seen as a national security risk himself.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQSkWlYsFPTGrhlyhvaplxN45LoGjKFDKsVj7VqukAQvL5EXJRPNg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 258px; height: 195px;" src="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQSkWlYsFPTGrhlyhvaplxN45LoGjKFDKsVj7VqukAQvL5EXJRPNg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br /><br />The CIA’s “plausible deniability” for crimes of state, as exemplified by JFK’s murder, corresponds in our politics to what the Trappist monk and spiritual writer Thomas Merton called “the Unspeakable.” Merton wrote about the unspeakable in the 1960’s, when an elusive, systemic evil was running rampant through this country and the world. The Vietnam War, the escalating nuclear arms race, and the interlocking murders of John Kennedy, Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, and Robert Kennedy were all signs of the unspeakable.<br /><br />For Merton, the unspeakable was ultimately a void, an emptiness of any meaning, an abyss of lies and deception. He wrote the following description of the unspeakable shortly after the publication of The Warren Report, which he could have been describing: “[The Unspeakable] is the void that contradicts everything that is spoken even before the words are said; the void that gets into the language of public and official declarations at the very moment when they are pronounced, and makes them ring dead with the hollowness of the abyss.”<br /><br />The void of the unspeakable is the dark abyss, the midnight reality of plausible deniability, that we face when we peer into our national security state’s murder of President Kennedy. And that is precisely where hope begins.<br /><br />Why President Kennedy was murdered can be, I believe, a profound source of hope to us all, when we truly understand his story.<br /><br />Now how can that possibly be? The why of his murder as a source of hope?<br /><br />Let’s begin with the way Kennedy himself looked at the question.<br />One summer weekend in 1962 while out sailing with friends, President Kennedy was asked what he thought of Seven Days in May, a best-selling novel that described a military takeover in the United States. JFK said he would read the book. He did so that night. The next day Kennedy discussed with his friends the possibility of their seeing such a coup in the U.S. These words were spoken by him after the Bay of Pigs and before the Cuban Missile Crisis:<br /><br />“It’s possible. It could happen in this country, but the conditions would have to be just right. If, for example, the country had a young President, and he had a Bay of Pigs, there would be a certain uneasiness. Maybe the military would do a little criticizing behind his back, but this would be written off as the usual military dissatisfaction with civilian control. Then if there were another Bay of Pigs, the reaction of the country would be, ‘Is he too young and inexperienced?’ The military would almost feel that it was their patriotic obligation to stand ready to preserve the integrity of the nation, and only God knows just what segment of democracy they would be defending if they overthrew the elected establishment.”<br /><br />Pausing a moment, he went on, “Then, if there were a third Bay of Pigs, it could happen.”<br /><br />Waiting again until his listeners absorbed his meaning, he concluded with an old Navy phrase, “But it won’t happen on my watch.”<br /><br />Let’s remember that JFK gave himself three strikes before he would be out by a coup, although he bravely said it wouldn’t happen on his watch.<br /><br />As we know, and as he knew, the young president John Kennedy did have a Bay of Pigs.<br /><br /> The president bitterly disappointed the CIA, the military, and the CIA-trained Cuban exile brigade by deciding to accept defeat at the Bay of Pigs rather than escalate the battle. Kennedy realized after the fact that he had been drawn into a CIA scenario whose authors assumed he would be forced by circumstances to drop his advance restrictions against the use of U.S. combat forces. He had been lied to in such a way that, in order to “win” at the Bay of Pigs, he would be forced to send in U.S. troops. But JFK surprised the CIA and the military by choosing instead to accept a loss. “They couldn’t believe,” he said, “that a new president like me wouldn’t panic and try to save his own face. Well, they had me figured all wrong.”<br /><br />We know how JFK reacted to the CIA’s setting him up. He was furious. When the enormity of the Bay of Pigs disaster came home to him, he said he wanted “to splinter the CIA in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.”<br /><br />He ordered an investigation into the whole affair, under the very watchful eyes of his brother, Attorney General Robert Kennedy.<br /><br />He fired CIA Director Allen Dulles, Deputy Director Richard Bissell, Jr., and Deputy Director General Charles Cabell. That was a huge decision – firing the top of the CIA’s hierarchy, including the legendary leader who had come to personify the agency, Allen Dulles.<br /><br />The president then took steps “to cut the CIA budget in 1962 and again in 1963, aiming at a 20 per cent reduction by 1966.” John Kennedy was cutting back the CIA’s power in very concrete ways, step by step.<br /><br />We know how the CIA and the Cuban exile community regarded Kennedy in turn because of his refusal to escalate the battle at the Bay of Pigs. They hated him for it. They did not forget what they thought was unforgivable.<br /><br />In terms of JFK’s own analysis of the threat of an overthrow of his presidency, he saw the Bay of Pigs as the first strike against him. It was the first big stand he took against his national security elite, and therefore the first cause of a possible coup d’etat.<br /><br />However, in terms of our constitution, our genuine security, and world peace, the position Kennedy took in facing down the CIA and the military at the Bay of Pigs, rather than surrendering to their will, was in itself a source of hope. No previous post-war president had shown such courage. Truman and Eisenhower had, in effect, turned over the power of their office to their national security managers. Kennedy was instead acting like he really was the president of this country – by saying a strong no to the security elite on a critical issue. If we the people had truly understood what he was doing then on our behalf, we would have thought the president’s stand a deeply hopeful one.<br /><br />In terms of his Seven Days in May analysis of a coming coup, John Kennedy did have a second “Bay of Pigs.” The president alienated the CIA and the military a second time by his decisions during the Cuban Missile Crisis.<br /><br />JFK had to confront the unspeakable in the Missile Crisis in the form of total nuclear war. At the height of that terrifying conflict, he felt the situation spiraling out of control, especially because of the actions of his generals. For example, with both sides on hair-trigger alert, the U.S. Air Force test-fired missiles from California across the Pacific, deliberately trying to provoke the Soviets in a way that could justify our superior U.S. forces blanketing the USSR with an all-out nuclear attack. As we know from Kennedy’s secretly taped meeting with his Joint Chiefs of Staff on October 19, 1962, the Chiefs were pushing him relentlessly to launch a pre-emptive strike on Cuba, and ultimately the Soviet Union. In this encounter the Chiefs’ disdain for their young commander-in-chief is summed up by Air Force Chief of Staff General Curtis LeMay when he says:<br /><br />LeMay: “This [blockade and political action] is almost as bad as the appeasement [of Hitler] at Munich…I think that a blockade, and political talk, would be considered by a lot of our friends and neutrals as being a pretty weak response to this. And I’m sure a lot of our own citizens would feel that way too.<br /><br />“In other words, you’re in a pretty bad fix at the present time.”<br />President Kennedy responds: “What did you say?”<br /><br />LeMay: “I say, you’re in a pretty bad fix.”<br /><br />President Kennedy: [laughing] “You’re in with me, personally.”<br /><br />As the meeting draws to a close, Kennedy rejects totally the Joint Chiefs’ arguments for a quick, massive attack on Cuba. The president then leaves the room but the tape keeps on recording. Two or three of the generals remain, and one says to LeMay, “You pulled the rug right out from under him.”<br /><br />LeMay: “Jesus Christ. What the hell do you mean?”<br /><br />Other General: “…He’s finally getting around to the word ‘escalation.’ If somebody could keep ‘em from doing the goddamn thing piecemeal, that’s our problem…”<br /><br />The White House tapes show Kennedy questioning and resisting the mounting pressure to bomb Cuba coming from both the Joint Chiefs and the Executive Committee of the National Security Council. At the same time, John Kennedy and Nikita Khrushchev, the two men most responsible for the Cuban Missile Crisis, seemed locked in a hopeless ideological conflict. The U.S. and Soviet leaders had been following Cold War policies that now seemed to be moving inexorably toward a war of extermination.<br />Yet, as we have since learned, Kennedy and Khrushchev had been engaged in a secret correspondence for over a year that gave signs of hope. Even as they moved publicly step by step toward a Cold War climax that would almost take the world over the edge with them, they were at the same time smuggling confidential letters back and forth that recognized each other’s humanity and hoped for a solution. They were public enemies who, in the midst of deepening turmoil, were secretly learning something approaching trust in each other.<br />‘<br />On what seemed the darkest day in the crisis, when a Soviet missile had shot down a U2 spy plane over Cuba, intensifying the already overwhelming pressures on Kennedy to bomb Cuba, the president sent his brother, Attorney General Robert Kennedy, secretly to Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin. RFK told Dobrynin, as Dobrynin reported to Khrushchev, that the president “didn’t know how to resolve the situation. The military is putting great pressure on him…Even if he doesn’t want or desire a war, something irreversible could occur against his will. That is why the President is asking for help to solve this problem.”<br /><br />In his memoirs, Khrushchev recalled a further, chilling sentence from Robert Kennedy’s appeal to Dobrynin: “If the situation continues much longer, the President is not sure that the military will not overthrow him and seize power.”<br /><br />Sergei Khrushchev, Nikita’s son, has described his father’s thoughts when he read Dobrynin’s wired report relaying John Kennedy’s plea: “The president was calling for help: that was how father interpreted Robert Kennedy’s talk with our ambassador.”<br /><br />At a moment when the world was falling into darkness, Kennedy did what from his generals’ standpoint was intolerable and unforgivable. JFK not only rejected his generals’ pressures for war. Even worse, the president then reached out to their enemy, asking for help. That was treason.<br /><br />When Nikita Khrushchev had received Kennedy’s plea for help in Moscow, he turned to his Foreign Minister, Andrei Gromyko and said, “We have to let Kennedy know that we want to help him.”<br /><br />Khrushchev stunned himself by what he had just said: Did he really want to help his enemy, Kennedy? Yes, he did. He repeated the word to his foreign minister:<br /><br />“Yes, help. We now have a common cause, to save the world from those pushing us toward war.”<br /><br />How do we understand that moment? The two most heavily armed leaders in history, on the verge of total nuclear war, suddenly joined hands against those on both sides pressuring them to attack. Khrushchev ordered the immediate withdrawal of his missiles, in return for Kennedy’s public pledge never to invade Cuba and his secret promise to withdraw U.S. missiles from Turkey – as he would in fact do. The two Cold War enemies had turned, so that each now had more in common with his opponent than either had with his own generals. As a result of that turn toward peace, one leader would be assassinated thirteen months later. The other, left without his peacemaking partner, would be overthrown the following year. Yet because of their turn away from nuclear war, today we are still living and struggling for peace on this earth. Hope is alive. We still have a chance.<br /><br />What can we call that transforming moment when Kennedy asked his enemy for help and Khrushchev gave it?<br /><br />From a Buddhist standpoint, it was enlightenment of a cosmic kind. Others might call it a divine miracle. Readers of the Christian Gospels could say that Kennedy and Khrushchev were only doing what Jesus said: “Love your enemies.” That would be “love” as Gandhi understood it, love as the other side of truth, a respect and understanding of our opponents that goes far enough to integrate their truth into our own. In the last few months of Kennedy’s life, he and Khrushchev were walking that extra mile where each was beginning to see the other’s truth.<br /><br />Neither John Kennedy nor Nikita Khrushchev was a saint. Each was deeply complicit in policies that brought humankind to the brink of nuclear war. Yet, when they encountered the void, then by turning to each other for help, they turned humanity toward the hope of a peaceful planet.<br /><br />John Kennedy’s next “Bay of Pigs,” his next critical conflict with his national security state, was his American University Address. Saturday Review editor Norman Cousins summed up the significance of this remarkable speech: “At American University on June 10, 1963, President Kennedy proposed an end to the Cold War.”<br /><br />I believe it is almost impossible to overemphasize the importance of President Kennedy’s American University address. It was a decisive signal to both Nikita Khrushchev, on the one hand, and JFK’s national security advisers, on the other, that he was serious about making peace with the Communists. After he told the graduating class at American University that the subject of his speech was “the most important topic on earth: world peace,” he asked:<br /><br />“What kind of peace do I mean? What kind of peace do we seek?”<br />He answered, “Not a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war.”<br /><br />Kennedy’s rejection of “a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war” was an act of resistance to the military-industrial complex. The military-industrial complex was totally dependent on “a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war.” That Pax Americana policed by the Pentagon was considered the system’s indispensable, hugely profitable means of containing and defeating Communism. At his own risk Kennedy was rejecting the foundation of the Cold War system.<br /><br />In its place, as a foundation for peace, the president put a compassionate description of the suffering of the Russian people. They had been our allies during World War Two and had suffered mightily. Yet even their World War Two devastation would be small compared to the effects of a nuclear war on both their country and ours.<br /><br />In his speech, Kennedy turned around the question that was always asked when it came to prospects for peace – the question, “What about the Russians?” It was assumed the Russians would take advantage of any move we might make toward peace.<br /><br />Kennedy asked instead, “What about us?” He said, “Our attitude [toward peace] is as essential as theirs.” What about our attitude to the nuclear arms race?<br /><br />Within the overarching theology of our country, a theology of total good versus total evil, that was a heretical question, coming especially from the president of the United States.<br /><br />Kennedy said he wanted to negotiate a nuclear test ban treaty with the Soviet Union in Moscow – in their capitol, not ours – as soon as possible. To clear the way for such a treaty, he said he was suspending U.S. atmospheric tests unilaterally.<br /><br />John Kennedy’s strategy of peace penetrated the Soviet government’s defenses far more effectively than any missile could have done. The Soviet press, which was accustomed to censoring U.S. government statements, published the entire speech all across the country. Soviet radio stations broadcast and rebroadcast the speech to the Soviet people. In response to Kennedy’s turn toward peace, the Soviet government even stopped jamming all Western broadcasts into their country.<br /><br />Nikita Khrushchev was deeply moved by the American University Address. He said Kennedy had given “the greatest speech by any American President since Roosevelt.”<br /><br />JFK’s speech was received less favorably in his own country. The New York Times reported his government’s skepticism: “Generally there was not much optimism in official Washington that the President’s conciliation address at American University would produce agreement on a test ban treaty or anything else.” In contrast to the Soviet media that were electrified by the speech, the U.S. media ignored or downplayed it. For the first time, Americans had less opportunity to read and hear their president’s words than did the Russian people. A turn-around was occurring in the world on different levels. Whereas nuclear disarmament had suddenly become feasible, Kennedy’s position in his own government had become precarious.<br /><br />President Kennedy’s next critical conflict with his national security state, propelling him toward the coup d’etat he saw as possible, was the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty that he signed with Nikita Khrushchev on July 25, 1963, six weeks after the American University Address. The president had done an end run around the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He negotiated the Test Ban Treaty without consulting them, because they opposed it.<br />Kennedy was fiercely determined but not optimistic that the Test Ban Treaty be ratified by the defense-conscious Senate. In early August, he told his advisers that getting Senate ratification of the agreement would be “almost in the nature of a miracle.” He said if a Senate vote were held right then it would fall far short of the necessary two-thirds.<br /><br />Kennedy initiated a whirlwind public education campaign on the treaty, coordinated by Saturday Review editor Normal Cousins, who directed a committee of activists. By the end of August, the tide of congressional mail had gone from fifteen to one against a test ban to three to two against.<br /><br />In September public opinion polls showed a turnaround. 80 percent of the American people were now in favor of the Test Ban Treaty. On September 24, 1963, the Senate approved the treaty by a vote of 80 to 19 – 14 more than the required two-thirds. No other single accomplishment in the White House gave Kennedy greater satisfaction.<br /><br />On September 20, Kennedy spoke to the United Nations. He suggested that its members see the Test Ban Treaty as a beginning and engage together in an experiment in peace:<br /><br />“Two years ago I told this body that the United States had proposed, and was willing to sign, a Limited Test Ban treaty. Today that treaty has been signed. It will not put an end to war. It will not remove basic conflicts. It will not secure freedom for all. But it can be a lever, and Archimedes, in explaining the principles of the lever, was said to have declared to his friends: ‘Give me a place where I can stand – and I shall move the world.’<br />“My fellow inhabitant of this planet: Let us take our stand here in this Assembly of nations. And let us see if we, in our own time, can move the world to a just and lasting peace.”<br /><br />When he said these words, John Kennedy was secretly engaging in another risky experiment in peace. That same day at the United Nations, Kennedy told UN Ambassador Adlai Stevenson that his assistant William Attwood should go ahead “to make discreet contact” with Cuba’s UN Ambassador Carlos Lechuga. Was Fidel Castro interested in a dialogue with John Kennedy? A strongly affirmative answer would come back from Castro, who had been repeatedly urged by Khrushchev to begin trusting Kennedy. Kennedy and Castro actually began that dialogue on normalizing U.S.-Cuban relations, through the mediation of French journalist Jean Daniel who personally visited both men in the month leading up to the assassination. Daniel was actually eating lunch with Castro in his home on November 22, conveying Kennedy’s hopeful words, when the Cuban premier was phoned with the news of Kennedy’s death. Castro’s somber comment to Daniel was: “Everything is changed. Everything is going to change.”<br /><br />On October 11, 1963, President Kennedy issued a top-secret order to begin withdrawing the U.S. military from Vietnam. In National Security Action memorandum 263, he ordered that 1,000 U.S. military personnel be withdrawn from Vietnam by the end of 1963, and that the bulk of U.S. personnel be taken out by the end of 1965.<br /><br />Kennedy decided on his withdrawal policy, against the arguments of most of his advisers, at a contentious October 2 National Security Council meeting. When Defense Secretary Robert McNamara was leaving the meeting to announce the withdrawal to the White House reporters, “the President called to him, ‘And tell them that means all of the helicopter pilots, too.’”<br /><br />In fact, it would not mean that at all. After JFK’s assassination, his withdrawal policy was quietly voided. In light of the future consequences of Dallas, it was not only John Kennedy who was murdered on November 22, 1963, but 58,000 other Americans and over three million Vietnamese, Laotians, and Cambodians.<br /><br />In his reflections on Seven Days in May, John Kennedy had given himself three Bay-of-Pigs-type conflicts with his national security state before a possible coup. What about six?<br /><br />(1) The Bay of Pigs.<br />(2) The Cuban Missile Crisis.<br />(3) The American University Address.<br />(4) The Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.<br />(5) The beginning of a back-channel dialogue with Fidel Castro.<br />(6) JFK’s order to withdraw U.S. troops from Vietnam.<br /><br />This, however, is a short list of the increasing conflicts between Kennedy and his national security state.<br /><br />We can add to the list a seventh Bay of Pigs – the steel crisis, in which he profoundly alienated the military industrial complex before the Cuban Missile Crisis even took place. The steel crisis was a showdown the president had with U.S. Steel and seven other steel companies over their price-fixing violations of an agreement he had negotiated between U.S. Steel and the United Steelworkers’ union. In a head-on confrontation with the ruling elite of Big Steel, JFK ordered the Defense Department to switch huge military contracts away from the major steel companies to the smaller, more loyal contractors that had not defied him. After the big steel companies bitterly backed down from their price raises, JFK and his brother, Robert, were denounced as symbols of “ruthless power” by the Wall Street power brokers at the center of the military industrial complex.<br /><br />By an editorial titled, “Steel: The Ides of April” (the month in which Kennedy faced down the steel executives), Henry Luce’s Fortune magazine called to readers’ minds the soothsayer’s warning in Shakespeare of the assassination of Julius Caesar. Fortune was warning Kennedy that his actions had confirmed the worst fears of corporate America about his presidency, and would have dire consequences. As interpreted by the most powerful people in the nation, the steel crisis was a logical prelude to Dallas. It was a seventh Bay of Pigs.<br /><br />An eighth Bay of Pigs was Kennedy’s diplomatic opening to the fiery third-world leadership of President Sukarno of Indonesia. Sukarno was “the most outspoken proponent of Third World neutralism in the Cold War.” He had actually coined the term “Third World.” The CIA wanted Sukarno dead. It wanted what it saw as his pro-communist “global orientation” obliterated. During Eisenhower’s presidency, the CIA repeatedly tried to kill and overthrow Sukarno but failed.<br /><br />JFK, however, chose to work with Sukarno, hoping to win him over as an ally, which he did. Sukarno came to love Kennedy. The U.S. president resolved what seemed a hopeless conflict between Indonesia and its former colonial master, the Netherlands, averting a war. To the CIA’s dismay, in 1961 Kennedy welcomed Sukarno to the White House. Most significantly, three days before his assassination, President Kennedy said he was willing to accept Sukarno’s invitation to visit Indonesia the following spring. His visit to Indonesia would have dramatized in a very visible way Kennedy’s support of Third World nationalism, a sea change in U.S. government policy. That decision to visit Sukarno was an eighth Bay of Pigs.<br /><br />Kennedy’s Indonesian policy was also killed in Dallas, with horrendous consequences. After Lyndon Johnson became president, the CIA finally succeeded in overthrowing Sukarno in a massive purge of suspected Communists that ended up killing 500,000 to one million Indonesians.<br /><br />Last Sunday I interviewed Sergei Khrushchev about an important late development in the relationship between his father and President Kennedy. In his interview, Mr. Khrushchev confirmed that his father had decided in November 1963 to accept President Kennedy’s repeated proposal that the U.S. and the Soviet Union fly to the moon together. In Kennedy’s September 20, 1963, speech to the United Nations, he had once again stated his hope for such a joint expedition to the moon. However, neither American nor Soviet military leaders, jealous of their rocket secrets, were ready to accept his initiative. Nikita Khrushchev, siding with his own rocket experts, felt that he was still forced to decline Kennedy’s proposal.<br /><br />JFK was looking beyond the myopia of the generals and scientists on both sides of the East-West struggle. He knew that merging their missile technologies in a peaceful project would also help defuse the Cold War. It was part of his day-by-day strategy of peace.<br /><br />Sergei Khrushchev said his father talked to him about a week before Kennedy’s death on the president’s idea for a joint lunar mission. Nikita Khrushchev had broken ranks with his rocket scientists. He now thought he and the Soviet Union should accept Kennedy’s invitation to go to the moon together, as a further step in peaceful cooperation.<br /><br />In Washington, Kennedy acted as if he already knew about Khrushchev’s hopeful change of heart on that critical issue. JFK was already telling NASA to begin work on a joint U.S.-Soviet lunar mission. On November 12, 1963, JFK issued his National Security Action Memorandum 271, ordering NASA to implement his “September 20 proposal for broader cooperation between the United States and the USSR in outer space, including cooperation in lunar landing programs.”<br /><br />That further visionary step to end the Cold War also died with President Kennedy. The U.S. went to the moon alone. U.S. and Soviet rockets continued to be pointed at their opposite countries rather than being joined in a project for a more hopeful future. Sergei Khrushchev said, “I think if Kennedy had lived, we would be living in a completely different world.”<br /><br />In the final weeks of his presidency, President Kennedy took one more risky step toward peace. It can be seen in relation to a meeting he had the year before with six Quakers who visited him in his office. One thousand members of the Society of Friends had been vigiling for peace and world order outside the White House. President Kennedy agreed to meet with six of their leaders. I have interviewed all three survivors of that meeting with the president 47 years ago. They remain uniformly amazed at the open way in which President Kennedy listened and responded to their radical Quaker critique of his foreign policy. Among their challenges to him was a recommendation that the United States offer its surplus food to the People’s Republic of China. China was considered an enemy nation. Yet it was also one whose people were beset by a famine.<br /><br />Kennedy said to the Quakers, “Do you mean you would feed your enemy when he has his hands on your throat?”<br /><br />The Quakers said they meant exactly that. They reminded him it was what Jesus had said should be done. Kennedy said he knew that, and knew that it was the right thing to do, but he couldn’t overcome the China lobby in Washington to accomplish it.<br /><br />Nevertheless, a year and a half later in the fall of 1963, against overwhelming opposition, Kennedy decided to sell wheat to the Russians, who had a severe grain shortage. His outraged critics said in effect to him what he had said to the Quakers: Would you feed an enemy who has his hands on your throat?<br /><br />Vice President Lyndon Johnson said he thought Kennedy’s decision to sell wheat to Russia would turn out to be the worst political mistake he ever made. Today JFK’s controversial decision “to feed the enemy” has been forgotten. In 1963, the wheat sale was seen as a threat to our security – feeding the enemy to kill us. Yet JFK went ahead with it, as one more initiative for peace.<br /><br />The violent reaction to his decision was represented on Friday morning, November 22, 1963, by a threatening, full-page advertisement addressed to him in the Dallas Morning News. The ad was bordered in black, like a funeral notice.<br /><br />Among the charges of disloyalty to the nation that the ad made against the president was the question: “Why have you approved the sale of wheat and corn to our enemies when you know the Communist soldiers ‘travel on their stomach’ just as ours do?” JFK read the ad before the flight from Fort Worth to Dallas, pointed it out to Jacqueline Kennedy, and talked about the possibility of his being assassinated that day.<br /><br />“But, Jackie,” he said, “if somebody wants to shoot me from a window with a rifle, nobody can stop it, so why worry about it?”<br /><br />President Kennedy’s courageous turn from war to a strategy of peace provided many more than three Bay-of-Pigs-type causes for his assassination. Because he turned toward peace with our enemies, the Communists, he was continually at odds with his own national security state. Peacemaking was at the top of his agenda as president. That was not the kind of leadership the CIA, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the military industrial complex wanted in the White House. Given the Cold War dogmas that gripped those dominant powers, and given Kennedy’s turn toward peace, his assassination followed as a matter of course.<br /><br />That is how he seemed to regard the situation – that it would soon lead to his own death. JFK was not afraid of death. As a biographer observed, “Kennedy talked a great deal about death, and about the assassination of Lincoln.” His conscious model for struggling truthfully through conflict, and being ready to die as a consequence, was Abraham Lincoln. On the day when Kennedy and Khrushchev resolved the missile crisis, JFK told his brother, Robert, referring to the assassination of Lincoln, “This is the night I should go to the theater.” Robert replied, “If you go, I want to go with you.”<br /><br />Kennedy prepared himself for the same end Lincoln met during his night at the theater. Late at night on the June 5, 1961, plane flight back to Washington from his Vienna meeting with Nikita Khrushchev, a weary President Kennedy wrote down on a slip of paper, as he was about to fall asleep, a favorite saying of his from Abraham Lincoln – really a prayer. Presidential secretary Evelyn Lincoln discovered the slip of paper on the floor. On it she read the words: “I know there is a God – and I see a storm coming. If he has a place for me, I believe that I am ready.”<br /><br />Kennedy loved that prayer. He cited it repeatedly. More important, he made the prayer his own. In his conflicts with Khrushchev, then more profoundly with the CIA and the military, he had seen a storm coming. If God had a place for him, he believed that he was ready.<br /><br />For at least a decade, JFK’s favorite poem had been Rendezvous, a celebration of death. Rendezvous was by Alan Seeger, an American poet killed in World War One. The poem was Seeger’s affirmation of his own anticipated death.<br /><br />The refrain of Rendezvous, “I have a rendezvous with Death,” articulated John Kennedy’s deep sense of his own mortality. Kennedy had experienced a continuous rendezvous with death in anticipation of his actual death: from the deaths of his PT boat crew members, from drifting alone in the dark waters of the Pacific Ocean, from the early deaths of his brother Joe and sister Kathleen, and from the recurring near-death experiences of his almost constant illnesses.<br /><br />He recited Rendezvous to his wife, Jacqueline, in 1953 on their first night home in Hyannis after their honeymoon. She memorized the poem, and recited it back to him over the years. In the fall of 1963, Jackie taught the words of the poem to their five-year-old daughter, Caroline.<br /><br />I have thought many times about what then took place in the White House Rose Garden one beautiful fall day.<br /><br />On the morning of October 5, 1963, President Kennedy met with his National Security Council in the Rose Garden. Caroline suddenly appeared at her father’s side. She said she wanted to tell him something. He tried to divert her attention while the meeting continued. Caroline persisted. The president smiled and turned his full attention to his daughter. He told her to go ahead. While the members of the National Security Council sat and watched, Caroline looked into her father’s eyes and said:<br /><br />I have a rendezvous with Death<br />At some disputed barricade,<br />When Spring comes back with rustling shade<br />And apple-blossoms fill the air –<br />I have a rendezvous with Death<br />When Spring brings back blue days and fair.<br /><br />It may be he shall take my hand<br />And lead me into his dark land<br />And close my eyes and quench my breath –<br />It may be I shall pass him still.<br />I have a rendezvous with Death<br />On some scarred slope of battered hill,<br />When Spring comes round again this year<br />And the first meadow-flowers appear.<br /><br />God knows ‘twere better to be deep<br />Pillowed in silk and scented down,<br />Where love throbs out in blissful sleep,<br />Pulse nigh to pulse, and breath to breath,<br />Where hushed awakenings are dear….<br />But I’ve a rendezvous with Death<br />At midnight in some flaming town,<br />When Spring trips north again this year,<br />And I to my pledged word am true,<br />I shall not fail that rendezvous.<br /><br />After Caroline said the poem’s final word, “rendezvous,” Kennedy’s national security advisers sat in stunned silence. One of them said later the bond between father and daughter was so deep “it was as if there was ‘an inner music’ he was trying to teach her.”<br /><br />JFK had heard his own acceptance of death from the lips of his daughter. While surrounded by a National Security Council that opposed his breakthrough to peace, the president once again deepened his pledge not to fail that rendezvous. If God had a place for him, he believed that he was ready.<br /><br />So how can the why of his murder give us hope?<br /><br />Where do we find hope when a peacemaking president is assassinated by his own national security state?<br /><br />The why of the event that brings us together tonight encircles the earth. Because John Kennedy chose peace on earth at the height of the Cold War, he was executed. But because he turned toward peace, in spite of the consequences to himself, humanity is still alive and struggling. That is hopeful, especially if we understand what he went through and what he has given to us as his vision.<br /><br />At a certain point in his presidency, John Kennedy turned a corner and didn’t look back. I believe that decisive turn toward his final purpose in life, resulting in his death, happened in the darkness of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Although Kennedy was already in conflict with his national security managers, the missile crisis was the breaking point. At that most critical moment for us all, he turned from any remaining control his security managers had over him toward a deeper ethic, a deeper vision in which the fate of the earth became his priority. Without losing sight of our own best hopes in this country, he began to home in, with his new partner, Nikita Khrushchev, on the hope of peace for everyone on this earth – Russians, Americans, Cubans, Vietnamese, Indonesians, everyone – no exceptions. He made that commitment to life at the cost of his own. What a transforming story that is.<br /><br />And what a propaganda campaign has been waged to keep us Americans from understanding that story, from telling it, and from re-telling it to our children and grandchildren.<br /><br />Because that’s a story whose telling can transform a nation. But when a nation is under the continuing domination of an idol, namely war, it is a story that will be covered up. When the story can liberate us from our idolatry of war, then the worshippers of the idol are going to do everything they can to keep the story from being told. From the standpoint of a belief that war is the ultimate power, that’s too dangerous a story. It’s a subversive story. It shows a different kind of security than always being ready to go to war. It’s unbelievable – or we’re supposed to think it is — that a president was murdered by our own government agencies because he was seeking a more stable peace than relying on nuclear weapons. It’s unspeakable. For the sake of a nation that must always be preparing for war, that story must not be told. If it were, we might learn that peace is possible without making war. We might even learn there is a force more powerful than war. How unthinkable! But how necessary if life on earth is to continue.<br /><br />That is why it is so hopeful for us to confront the unspeakable and to tell the transforming story of a man of courage, President John F. Kennedy. It is a story ultimately not of death but of life – all our lives. In the end, it is not so much a story of one man as it is a story of peacemaking when the chips are down. That story is our story, a story of hope.<br /><br />I believe it is a providential fact that the anniversary of President Kennedy’s assassination always falls around Thanksgiving, and periodically on that very day. This year the anniversary of his death, two days from now, will begin Thanksgiving week.<br /><br />Thanksgiving is a beautiful time of year, with autumn leaves falling to create new life. Creation is alive, as the season turns. The earth is alive. It is not a radioactive wasteland. We can give special thanks for that. The fact that we are still living – that the human family is still alive with a fighting chance for survival, and for much more than that – is reason for gratitude to a peacemaking president, and to the unlikely alliance he forged with his enemy.<br /><br />So let us give thanks this Thanksgiving for John F. Kennedy, and for his partner in peacemaking, Nikita Khrushchev.<br /><br />Their story is our story, a story of the courage to turn toward the truth. Remember what Gandhi said that turned theology on its head. He said truth is God. That is the truth: Truth is God. We can discover the truth and live it out. There is nothing more powerful than the truth. The truth will set us free."<br /><br /><br />http://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2009/12/jfk-at-american-university.html<br /><br />http://zh-tw.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=193389907209&comments&ref=mfUnknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-41122526108939918822010-10-30T09:31:00.000-07:002010-10-30T11:23:54.505-07:00FBI Agent Adams Says Oswald Not Guilty ---But What Will You Do, When the Bootjacks Come for You?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiZBJRltVpkNUo5Jvqoq3MXKTLnG7Z6jLomPDD3KEFayXL0lvrivHMcED-74KHR7W2Rh8owMmu7bwniaJoLxSg7CxwiozPPT1o941ZZDwGDz2HNygCe4D0W4zf4T1gN6fg0n5u4e7BFfAQ/s1600/when+bootjacks+come+for+you.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 255px; height: 352px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiZBJRltVpkNUo5Jvqoq3MXKTLnG7Z6jLomPDD3KEFayXL0lvrivHMcED-74KHR7W2Rh8owMmu7bwniaJoLxSg7CxwiozPPT1o941ZZDwGDz2HNygCe4D0W4zf4T1gN6fg0n5u4e7BFfAQ/s320/when+bootjacks+come+for+you.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533899857681685666" /></a><br /><br />(CLICK ON THE POEM TO READ IT/PRINT IT)<br />This stunning poem by Martha Rose Crow depicts what can happen to us if we continue to ignore the truth about those who inherited power after the Kennedy assassination, and how they steered our nation to its present state of misery -- a country not only miserable itself, but inflicting agonies indescribable on several other countries as well. Choosing silence is easy...<span style="font-style:italic;">until the Bootjacks come for you....<br /></span><br /> It is time to remember that this government came into existence by killing John F. Kennedy. Those are hard words, but oh-so-true. By tracing who handed power over to whom, we can learn who should NOT be in power today.<br /><br /> To understand the root of the problem, it is essential to understand that Lee Harvey Oswald did not shoot Kennedy. The truth is that Lee Harvey Oswald was not guilty, no matter how many "official version" websites tell you otherwise. The same people who write these websites also support the wars that have made America enemies across the planet. They are the same people who pass lies around about us. But we are witnesses to the truth who love our country and want the truth revealed about how our country is being hijacked, our freedoms curtailed, and our future on auction to the highest bidder.<br /><br /> The enemies of our country support the military and the military industrial complex and the banking czars. Therefore, they receive support and praise from the media, while we who speak as Cassandra, to almost deaf ears, struggle to get the truth into your hands and endure insults, privations and even exile.<br /> We are patriots who love our country: they who pretend Oswald killed Kennedy, in the face of overwhelming evidence and witness testimony to the contrary, are supporting traitors and the heirs of traitors. Some think they are doing their country a service for the sake of its national security, when, in fact, they help perpetuate the lies and the liars that have illegally taken over our country and have been running it for the last half century. <br /><br /> In that time period, the American dream has shrunken to an American pipe-dream, with America as a benevolent country loving freedom now seen as a truly imperialistic country with the tentacles of a devouring octopus strangling peace everywhere. We manufacture more than half the world's weapons of war, and Afghanistan, which once had almost no opium production, is now a world leader in opium production--even helped along with fertilizer supplied by the American government (Don't believe that? Look it up!).<br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEifLxJIqKfCxCUOF7heczOi8qbJBCk8VnnJE5scOMAVOW7haCewoL4QRdG8UaOHBagwgmCn87-YK3phIJ9JuOo-btTONmyAr6GoR_-ZQ6c7tAhXs-Bb3cMPgLUZFims9JRz5mjYnR9Bdck/s1600/drone+tech+test+cartoon.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 295px; height: 320px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEifLxJIqKfCxCUOF7heczOi8qbJBCk8VnnJE5scOMAVOW7haCewoL4QRdG8UaOHBagwgmCn87-YK3phIJ9JuOo-btTONmyAr6GoR_-ZQ6c7tAhXs-Bb3cMPgLUZFims9JRz5mjYnR9Bdck/s320/drone+tech+test+cartoon.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533901417358972114" /></a><br />Winning hearts and minds in Pakistan....<br /><br />AND WHAT ABOUT "WINNING HEARTS AND MINDS" IN AMERICA? NO PROBLEM--WE TAKE WHATEVER IS THROWN AT US--SUCH AS SECRET TESTS OF DRONES TO BE USED IN OUR OWN COUNTRY, TO "WATCH OVER" US....<br /><object width="576" height="351"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2tHk9Q3Fv6g&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2tHk9Q3Fv6g&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="576" height="351"></embed></object><br />OF COURSE, WE'LL NEED THE DRONES TO ATTACK OUR ATTACKERS, SHOULD THEY SHOW THEIR FACES ON AMERICAN SOIL. NECESSARY, RIGHT -- SINCE WE'VE MADE SO MANY "FRIENDS" ACROSS THE WORLD WITH OUR PEACE-LOVING WAYS. <span style="font-weight:bold;">"...THE DRONE IN THE VIDEO IS DEBUTING IN THE HOUSTON AREA, GEORGE BUSH TERRITORY...NO SURPRISE THERE..."CAMERAS CAN ACTUALLY LOOK INTO PEOPLE'S HOMES OR FOLLOW THEM...WHICH RAISES NEW QUESTIONS...THEY CAN STAY AIRBORNE OVER HOUSTON 15-24 HOURS WITHOUT LANDING...."</span>POLICE THREATENED THE COURAGEOUS REPORTERS WHO MADE THIS VIDEO.<br /> <br /> <span style="font-weight:bold;">Time to watch a couple MORE videos, my friends....</span><br /><br /> The first video, just below, was recently presented by a Fox news TV station.<br /><br /> IT IS AN INTERVIEW OF (RET)FBI AGENT DON ADAMS, WHO INVESTIGATED JOE MILTEER'S THREAT AGAINST PRESIDENT KENNEDY,WHICH WAS APE RECORDED IN MIAMI, FLORIDA SHORTLY BEFORE KENNEDY WAS KILLED IN DALLAS. <br /><br /> ADAMS TELLS US HOW MILTEER THREATENED KENNEDY'S LIFE, BUT WAS NOT INTERROGATED AFTER THE ASSASSINATION--NOR IS HIS NAME EVEN MENTIONED IN THE WARREN COMMISSION'S RECORDS. ADAMS STATES QUITE SIMPLY THAT THE WARREN COMMISSION MEMBERS "WERE LIARS" WHEN THEY BLAMED LEE HARVEY OSWALD FOR KENNEDY'S MURDER.<br /><br /> ADAMS ALSO POINTS OUT MILTEER STANDING IN THE CROWD AT DEALEY PLAZA -- IN FACT, OTHER ENEMIES OF KENNEDY STOOD IN THAT PLAZA THAT FATEFUL DAY, AS WELL. <br /> WATCH THIS VIDEO, THEN COPY IT AND SEND IT TO OTHERS.<br /><br /><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Go0EmDeu5DY?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Go0EmDeu5DY?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object><br /> OF COURSE I HOPE YOU WILL READ MY BOOK-- AND THAT YOU WILL VISIT MY WEBSITE AND SEND OTHERS THERE, TO HELP ME KEEP SPEAKING OUT. WHILE WE STILL HAVE A VOICE ON THE INTERNET, WE MUST SPEAK OUT.<br /> THIS MAY BE OUR LAST CHANCE TO STOP OUR COUNTRY FROM GETTING PERMANENTLY DESTROYED BY GREEDY, IRRESPONSIBLE POLITICIANS WHOSE VERY SOULS HAVE BEEN PURCHASED BY THE EVER-GROWING ONE WORLD ESTABLISHMENT.<br /> DON'T LET THE FANCY WEBSITES AND 'TV SPECIALS' PROCLAIMING THE INNOCENT MAN, LEE HARVEY OSWALD, AS KENNEDY'S KILLER BE HEARD THIS NOVEMBER! DO NOT LET THEM DUPE THE PEOPLE YET AGAIN THIS YEAR. <span style="font-weight:bold;">STOP THEM IN THEIR TRACKS!</span><br /> TELL EVERYONE ABOUT <span style="font-weight:bold;">ME & LEE, HOW I CAME TO KNOW, LOVE AND LOSE LEE HARVEY OSWALD</span>. LEE OSWALD WAS A HERO. HE DID HIS BEST TO SAVE KENNEDY. HE TOLD ME, "IF I STAY, THAT WILL BE ONE LESS BULLET AIMED AT KENNEDY," BELIEVING HIS PLACE IN THE ASSASSINATION RING WOULD BE FILLED BY SOMEBODY ELSE IF HE FLED, AND ALSO, THAT THOSE HE LOVED WOULD BE MURDERED. HE HOPED THAT IN SOME WAY HE MIGHT EVEN BE ABLE TO SAVE KENNEDY IN TEXAS--THOUGH HE DOUBTED IT.<br /> NEVERTHELESS, HE STOOD HIS GROUND, HOPING TO SAVE THE LIVES OF OTHERS AND TO ASSIST AN ABORT TEAM THAT HE WAS TOLD WAS COMING TO HELP SAVE THE PRESIDENT. <br /><br /><object width="432" height="347"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Tb46jE6xHrs?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Tb46jE6xHrs?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="432" height="347"></embed></object><br />WHETHER THAT TEAM'S EXISTENCE WAS A LIE TO KEEP LEE QUIET AND IN PLACE, SO HE COULD BE CAPTURED AND BLAMED, I DO NOT KNOW. <br />BUT I DO KNOW THAT SOMEDAY LEE OSWALD WILL BE RECOGNIZED AS THE MAN WHO SAVED KENNEDY FROM DEATH IN CHICAGO, WHICH MEANT THAT OSWALD WOULD LOSE HIS OWN LIFE THREE WEEKS LATER IN DALLAS, WHERE THE COUP D'ETAT WAS SUCCESSFUL, AND WHERE A NEW GOVERNMENT THAT WOULD PURSUE WAR FOR PROFIT WOULD MOVE ACROSS THE PLANET, SPREADING DEATH AND DESTRUCTION IN THE NAME OF DEMOCRACY AND FREEDOM, WHILE STRIPPING THE GREAT NATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OF ITS WEALTH, PRESTIGE AND MUCH-VAUNTED FREEDOMS.<br /><br /> I MOURN FOR MY PEOPLE, TRAPPED WITH JUST TWO POLITICAL PARTIES TO CHOOSE FROM--BOTH CORRUPT AND SOLD-OUT TO THE HIGHEST BIDDERS. IMAGINE! CORPORATIONS, BANKS, INSURANCE COMPANIES, YOU NAME IT, CAN NOW, THANKS TO A CORRUPT SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT, GIVE AS MUCH $$$$$ AS THEY WISH TO A CANDIDATE!<br /> IN ANCIENT ROME, AS IT BECAME INCREASINGLY CORRUPT, THE OFFICE OF EMPEROR AT LAST SIMPLY WENT TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER. <br /> <br /> <span style="font-weight:bold;">That's no different from what's happening today in America.</span><br /><br />PRESIDENT OBAMA HAD NO CHANCE TO REFORM A THING.<br /><br /> I do not blame him. He has a family, and as one commentator said, "He was taken to the woodshed." Just as all other recent presidents. Assassination awaits those who do not comply. I was disgusted to see how bankers and financiers sitting as Obama spoke to the nation got up and shouldered their way past the President, their body language showing their contempt and how much power they had.<br /><br />If the people of my country had been given the $$$$$ that the banks got instead, we would not have good, hard-working American families homeless on the streets, while the bankers who stole their homes from them get multi-million dollar bonuses for destroying the middle class of a once-great nation.<br /><br />The people of American don't rebel because:<br />1) they are overworked<br />2)their nutrition and food makes them feel unhealthy, and drugs freely handed out by doctors, along with drugs bought on the street, keep many of them weak-willed, vulnerable, and selfish<br />3) medical care is inadequate for a majority of workers<br />4) their cities are inundated with violence --even as a lack of respect for privacy rights keeps individual citizens under increasingly unlawful surveillance<br />5) their once-respected and admired police are now feared and distrusted<br />6) lost jobs, religious prejudice and anger about illegal immigrants make the people unable to even think about the illegal wars that never stop --which drain Americans of their wealth and destroy their chances of peace as the Muslim world gets increasingly radicalized<br />7) no leader--no President--can stand up against the money-lords running the world, and now that "change" is seen to be a mere pipe-dream, many will give up trying to effect reform, or will turn to isolationism or violence<br />8) meanwhile, education is aimed at keeping the population so dumbed-down and insulated from the rest of the world that the people have no way to know if their leaders lie to them or not, because the media is owned by only a few big-shot organizations that depend on good relationships with the powers that be, and what "truth" is out there is buried or deleted if it is "inconvenient"<br />9)as my friend Martha Rose Crow said--"What will you do, when the Bootjacks come for you?"<br /><br /><br /><br />jvb<br /><br /> <br />A DEADLOCKED CONGRESS GUARANTEED THAT PEOPLE WOULD GIVE UP ON OBAMA, WHO ALSO ENHANCED THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN, CREATING YET MORE ENEMIES AGAINST THE USA.<br /> IF THE PAKISTANI BORDERS HAD SIMPLY BEEN SECURED TO KEEP THE TALIBAN OUT OF PAKISTAN, AND AFGHANISTAN ITSELF IGNORED, WHAT A DIFFERENCE EVEN THAT COULD HAVE MADE. BUT HOW COULD THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX HAVE MADE FORTUNES, WHILE SPILLING MUSLIM BLOOD AND THE BLOOD OF YOUNG AMERICAN SOLDIERS, IF THEY'D SIMPLY GUARDED THE BORDER? WILL AMERICA WAKE UP, OR DO WE WHO SPEAK OUT HAVE TO LOSE OUR LIVES AND OUR REPUTATIONS AND OUR LIVELIHOODS TO GET THE MESSAGE TO PEOPLE WHO SEEM TO CARE MORE ABOUT DIVORCES BY MOVIE STARS THAN THEIR COUNTRY?<br /> I MOURN FOR MY COUNTRY, AND FOR MY PEOPLE.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-6591197532058277012010-10-09T16:01:00.000-07:002010-10-09T17:05:10.401-07:00Dr. J. P. Hubert Speaks Up About the Kennedy Assassination<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiDjKqjwRTzu4HDmXDM2_s9uES-y_25biEeHp4DJkY9GEiCrsKU6HepMW0kgwRgtGgTdwUsp6UDlka637n4vB71yi37K9o_sIaQBrJkIRYh50tUoPnOCv-A4v4_T6EjiVzWvXWIqVPvQIg/s1600/me+and+lee+book+cover.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 210px; height: 320px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiDjKqjwRTzu4HDmXDM2_s9uES-y_25biEeHp4DJkY9GEiCrsKU6HepMW0kgwRgtGgTdwUsp6UDlka637n4vB71yi37K9o_sIaQBrJkIRYh50tUoPnOCv-A4v4_T6EjiVzWvXWIqVPvQIg/s320/me+and+lee+book+cover.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5526200200534905602" /></a><br />announcement: <span style="font-weight:bold;">ME & LEE</span> is now available from Trine Day,Amazon.com, etc. If you purchase ME & LEE at my official website run by Edward T. Haslam, at <a href="http://www.judythvarybaker.com">http://www.judyth vary baker.com </a> you will receive (eventually!) a personal letter of thanks from me. Because I live in exile, I rely on donations and your good will to continue on. And it is for this man--Lee Harvey Oswald--that I fight. When you realize he did not kill John F. Kennedy, then you must accept the hard truth:<br />our government cooperated to kill Kennedy.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjFdmd62L8J_qOssaDYKPZ9Iref1dHPWe579oGowPAiVvjGAkZceePttH0pBRELfJm7rLxz7l-IXzmg_sBeWM0IPLWB0i2Lk0GJ-RHMPqu0bLgpmnlPvwyyWQe6aMBoec8nZYc0O_S883A/s1600/lee+oswald+arrested+full+photo+rare+handcuffed+no+true+smirk.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 320px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjFdmd62L8J_qOssaDYKPZ9Iref1dHPWe579oGowPAiVvjGAkZceePttH0pBRELfJm7rLxz7l-IXzmg_sBeWM0IPLWB0i2Lk0GJ-RHMPqu0bLgpmnlPvwyyWQe6aMBoec8nZYc0O_S883A/s320/lee+oswald+arrested+full+photo+rare+handcuffed+no+true+smirk.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5526193327643890642" /></a><br /><p>"Before being given the opportunity to disclose his role as an intelligence operative and what he might have known about the conspiracy to kill JFK[9], Lee Harvey Oswald was murdered on national TV in a room full of police and FBI agents whose only responsibility was to protect him." Dr. J.P. Hubert, MD<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">Dr. J. P. Hubert's blog on the Moral Philosophy of Current Events is well-written and informative.<br /></span></p><p> His comments about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, Lee Harvey Oswald's innocence, and the catastrophe that has engulfed America ever since controlling powers moved in to take over the reins of government in a truly corrupt new reign of usurped power, are appropriate and well-referenced. Dr. James Fetzer first brought this blog to my attention a few months ago, and I reproduce most of it here, with references to various books available on the subject by the courageous <span style="font-style:italic;">Trine Day</span> publishing house that fit well with this topic:<br /><br /><a href="http://moralphilosophyofcurrentevents.blogspot.com/2010/08/after-jfk-assassination-true-coup-detat.html">moralphilosophyofcurrentevents.blogspot.com</a><br />3 August 2010 </p><br />It is now beyond reasonable doubt (BRD) that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by his own National Security State in what was a violent coup d'état that is, an overthrowing of the legitimate elected government of the United States by force through the use of the clandestine black-ops services of the CIA, elements of the Secret Service, the US military, the FBI and organized crime.[1]<br /><br /><img style="border: 0px;" src="http://photos.upi.com/45th_Anniversary_of_JFK_assassination/2bc914655b9dd9e14a0b8321b20fade1/45th-Anniversary-of-JFK-assassination_11.jpg" border="0" width="347" height="276" /><br /><br /><b>Probability and Statistics:</b><br /><br />Various scientific calculations have been done which indicate that there is less than 1 chance in a trillion that JFK's death was the result of one man acting alone. There were at least 15 separate violations made by the US Secret Service in their handling of Presidential Security in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963.[2] These were unprecedented breaches in protocol. It would have been unusual if even one of these breaks in procedure had occurred let alone 15 during one Presidential visit. It defies credulity to think that such a scenario could have occurred on the basis of chance alone. Obviously the Secret Service “stood-down” so as to facilitate the conspirator’s killing teams in accomplishing the dastardly deed.[3] This means there was an extremely well orchestrated conspiracy to kill the President.<br /><br />Perhaps even more astoundingly, during the 3 year period following the assassination of JFK and the murders of Lee Harvey Oswald and Officer J. D. Tippit, some 17 witnesses who were involved either directly or peripherally died, 72% of which were unnatural deaths, 52% being murders. The probability that even 15 of the 17 witnesses would be dead by 1967 is 100 quadrillion to 1 or 10(-17).[4]<br /><br />The 35th President of the United States was murdered at essentially high noon on a bright autumn day in the middle of an American city while his security detail looked on and did nothing. The conspirators’ message was simple; “we’re in charge and there is nothing you can do about it.” Within the first hour after the Assassination, a pre-arranged “patsy” who had been placed in position at the Texas School Book Depository[5] was hunted down and apprehended long before any agency should have even suspected that he might have been involved. Lee Harvey Oswald--who as a result of the FIA[6] and the JFK Records Act[7] is now known to have been an American intelligence operative[8]--whether wittingly or by some last minute ruse played the part of the “fall-guy." During the entire time Oswald was in custody he denied killing President Kennedy and Officer J. D. Tippit. There exists more and more evidence that Oswald was not involved in the killing of either JFK or Officer Tippit.<br /><br /><object width="400" height="280"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_zSghy2TkIY&hl=en_GB&fs=1"><br /><br /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><br /><br /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><br /><br /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_zSghy2TkIY&hl=en_GB&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="400" height="280"></embed></object><br /><br />Before being given the opportunity to disclose his role as an intelligence operative and what he might have known about the conspiracy to kill JFK[9], Lee Harvey Oswald was murdered on national TV in a room full of police and FBI agents whose only responsibility was to protect him. The night before his killing, the Dallas Police Department received 2 separate calls from unknown person(s) who reported that Oswald was to be murdered. Despite the warning, the Dallas Police made no attempt to prevent the killing of ostensibly the most important prisoner in US custody at the time. It defies all logic to believe that both JFK and Lee Harvey Oswald were killed by lone “deranged” gunmen.<br /><br /><b>Metaphysical Certainty:</b><br /><br />In light of all of the cumulative JFK Assassination evidence now available, there exists metaphysical certainty that JFK was killed by a massive conspiracy with the power not only to murder the President but to successfully perpetrate a cover-up of monumental proportions which included securing massive medical fraud in the forensic evidence.[10] David Lifton, Douglas P. Horne and Dr. David W. Mantik and others have amply documented the details of how the medical fraud was accomplished.[11] The absolutely critical concept to understand is that no foreign or domestic entity would have had the access, power and requisite technological expertise to direct and accomplish the cover-up other than the American National Security State including US military physicians, 3 of which conducted the sham autopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital.<br /><br /><b>Shadow Government in Control:</b><br /><br />Unless and until the United States publicly discloses to the citizenry that its duly elected government was overthrown in 1963 and that since then the replacement/imposter government has been at least technically/legally speaking illegitimate[12] it will likely be impossible to reverse the increasingly rapid disintegration of America. The reality is that since the murder of President John F. Kennedy, there has been an extra-constitutional imposter “government” in place which prior to that time existed only in the shadows. It has been given many different names including the “war party” the MIMIC (media, intelligence, military, industrial complex) the secret government, the shadow government etc. That entity or “Regime” as a result of the JFK assassination appears to have profoundly altered the trajectory of the United States by placing the country on a constant war footing and building and sustaining an enormous foreign military base presence throughout the world which serves to project American power and enlarge the “empire.”<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51D6ko1rzNL._SL500_AA300_.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 300px; height: 300px;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51D6ko1rzNL._SL500_AA300_.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Beginning with the Lyndon B. Johnson administration and his reversal of John F. Kennedy’s NSAM # 263 (within 4 days of the JFK Assassination) calling for an end to all US presence in Vietnam by 1965[13], the course which the US took was that of increasing militarization and empire-building rather than the move toward peace, nuclear disarmament and ending of the cold war begun by JFK in the wake of the Cuban Missile Crisis.[14] As should be readily apparent, the result has been catastrophic for the United States and much of the world. Since the death of President Kennedy, the confidence of the American people in their government has been drastically reduced suggesting that at a subliminal level at least, Americans are aware that something extremely troubling has transpired. Moreover, the polarization of the major political parties which now exists can be traced to the Johnson administration’s prosecution of the Vietnam War and its terrible sequelae.<br /><br /><b>Hegelian Dialectic and the Manipulation of US Population:</b><br /><br />A form of Hegelian dialectic[15] is currently being utilized successfully by the oligarchical “Regime” to control the masses through an artificial binary division of reality[16] into a politics of left vs.: right in combination with the unrelenting “bread and circus” entertainment extravaganza being foisted upon the people the latest incarnation of which is the absurd reality TV phenomenon. Most Americans are too busy attempting to survive to be able to sort through the maze of distractions. They seek refuge in meaningless electronic games, TV shows and sporting events as a way to escape from the dismal realities of their increasingly hopeless lives. For those with more time and the requisite interest in politics and current events, the shadow government provides a steady diet of right vs.: left diatribes carried out by various “experts”, talking heads and partisan political hacks many of whom function as US intelligence assets and "cut-outs" of various kinds.[17] Few Americans realize that this left/right dichotomy is totally artificial and contrived so as to limit the universe of acceptable public discourse.<br /><br /><b>Effect of Dumbing-Down of America:</b><br /><br />Americans have been “dumbed-down” for over 50 years such that as an aggregate entity we are no longer capable of reason or for that matter intellectually sound individual thought. The completely artificial bi-polar division between right and left, liberal and conservative so dominates the public discourse that one would think that it totally exhausts the entire panoply of possibilities. This of course is the sine que non of the Hegelian dialectic which is served up on a nightly basis in the form of cable “news” TV shows which attempt to promote an endless debate over which political worldview is best while demonizing its opponent. The idea that on many topics the position of neither left nor right is credible--seems to have been totally missed by most Americans.<br /><br /><br /><b>The Left/Right Divide and the Hiding of the Truth:</b><br /><br />For example, we have become accustomed to there being only 2 possibilities in any given dispute over issues of public policy; the position of the liberal (progressive) left and that of the neoconservative right.[18] How many Americans understand that the neoliberal left and the neoconservative right are but artificial constructs in the Hegelian tradition, designed to allow for the appearance of debate all the while serving to disguise the truth that the resolution/synthesis has already been predetermined by the oligarchical Regime currently in charge? The Regime has as its greatest weapon the fact that no one wishes to believe the truth. For most of us it is simply too painful, unnerving and overwhelming. As many propagandists have indicated, “the bigger the lie the more readily it will be believed.” It is viscerally more comfortable to believe the lie that our government exists of, by and for the people rather than for an elite few who wield all the power and influence and for whom everyone else exists only to be utilized, abused and discarded. The mercenary (all volunteer) US military is a perfect example of the latter being made up almost exclusively of the offspring of impoverished Americans. This has been the case since the draft was ended in the 1970’s.<br /><br /><b>Theater of the Absurd:</b><br /><br />Every four years the Regime treats us to another “theater of the absurd” in which US citizens are allowed to vote for one of 2 Presidential candidates, each of whom has been vetted by the oligarchy such that from its standpoint it matters little which one is elected. Irrespective of what campaign promises are made, once in power, the new Presidential administration hues to the wishes of the not so hidden “shadow government.” It should be intuitively obvious that no serious candidate for high office could rise to that level without demonstrating a willingness to regurgitate the “party line” of their respective political affiliation. As a result so-called third-party candidates are virtually never successful when running for the highest office in the land. The only real opportunity for rank and file US citizens to effect change in their government is to elect a Representative to the US House who is committed to representing their views. Unfortunately, the mega corporations now appear to enjoy monopoly control[19] due to the campaign finance laws which allow for virtually unlimited contributions to candidates.[20] The practical effect is to nullify the political power of the average citizen.<br /><br /><b>The Political Process is Broken:</b><br /><br />The current political process then is broken. So what can we do? It is obvious that under the current set of circumstances, it makes no difference who is elected President and what major political party has the White House or Congress for that matter. To say this of course is considered heresy among the pundit/ruling class who earn their livings by pretending the system is legitimate. Unfortunately however,...they are wrong. There are simply too many powerful individuals and multinational corporations who have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. Examples include the banking, health care, munitions and energy industries and their lobbies and individual pundits who make up the afternoon and evening chattering class on cable TV such as Chris Matthews, Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, Glen Beck, Ed Schultz, Keith Oberman and others.[21]<br /><br />All of the above individuals to one degree or another represent special interest groups across the political spectrum. None are truly independent thinkers. They owe their jobs to their willingness to hue a particular political line as representatives of the media entity to which they belong. For example, O’Reilly, Hannity and Beck regurgitate the Neoconservative party line for Fox News with...differences in style but not substance.<br /><img style="border: 0px;" src="http://justgetthere.us/blog/uploads/CorporateMediaT-Shirt.jpg" border="0" /><br />Matthews (frequently repeats the claim that JFK and RFK were both killed by a lone deranged individual and he accepts/advertizes the poor work of scholarship that is Pozner's "Case Closed" which is easily debunked), Oberman (who also accepts Pozner's conclusions in "Case Closed") and Schultz largely follow the left or liberal party line with minor differences in substance and major differences in style. All advance the liberal political views of MSNBC.<br /><br />CNN on the other hand touts itself as simply reporting the facts without an obvious political orientation. However...(i)t never criticizes the genocidal policies of the Jewish state so in that sense at least it is completely biased in favor of the Israeli Jews and against the Palestinian Arabs. It has failed to report the Apartheid nature of modern Israel where the human rights granted to Jews are denied to Arabs.<br /><br /><b>The Power of the Israel Lobby:</b><br /><br />Not one of the above cable entities or individual pundits dares to criticize the Israeli government or its immoral policies however. In fact no major network or cable entity is willing to risk doing so due to the power of the Zionist (Israel) Lobby. Only in foreign venues or on the internet among bloggers does one find a willingness to question Israel’s Apartheid/genocidal policies or the actions of the Zionist Lobby. There is a(n)...extensive Zionist Lobby which has infiltrated virtually every branch of the US government, most major ‘think-tanks” and much of US academia.<br />There exists only a very small Jewish minority in the United States who admit that the actions of the modern state of Israel are not only immoral but counterproductive to the ultimate survival of the Jewish state. Fortunately, in Israel, Jewish intellectuals and academics such as Ilan Pappe have begun to break the strangle hold that radical Zionist’s such as Benyamin Netanyahu, Igor Lieberman and others have held over successive Israeli governments.<br /><br /><b>Is there a Solution?</b><br /><br /><object width="400" height="280"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2dECSYm5bSM&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"><br /><br /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><br /><br /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><br /><br /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2dECSYm5bSM&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="280"></embed></object><br /><br />While the internet is still relatively unregulated, it behooves every US citizen to peacefully but actively spread the truth that in the wake of World War II/the creation of the CIA and the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the constitutional representative democratic republic which was brought into being in 1789 was replaced[22] with a not so secret shadow government which does the bidding of the elites and is antithetical to the needs, desires and goals of everyone else.<br /><br />This effort should include organizing at the state and local levels. It should include electing to the US House of Representatives individuals who cannot be purchased by the multinational corporations and special interest groups. Finding such highly morally committed individuals will not be easy.<br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51wDumXa%2BQL._SS500_.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 500px; height: 500px;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51wDumXa%2BQL._SS500_.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Finally, interested and committed individuals of like-mind should band together for the purpose of pooling their various resources in order to better oppose the corporate media and their relentless attempts to “brain-wash” the public. Time is short for the survival of the American experiment. Please help Spread the word!<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><br />[1] The evidence is simply overwhelming. For those who are not yet familiar with some of the seminal works, they include but are not limited to those in the selected reference section appended to this essay.<br />[2] Philosopher of Science Professor James H. Fetzer performed a calculation assuming that the probability that any one of them would be breached was only 10% which is more than likely too high. For even 12 to be breached at the same time yields a probability of 10(-12).<br />[3] Evidence now strongly suggests that there were likely at least 3 teams, one in the TSBD, one behind the fence at the grassy knoll, and one at the southwest end of the overpass in the storm drain. It is also possible that a 4th team was positioned at the southeast end of the overpass and another in the Dal-Tex building fairly close to ground level. The exact identity and number of the assassins is of course irrelevant to the issue of whether a conspiracy existed.<br />[4] Sylvia Meagher, <em>Accessories After the Fact. The Warren Commission, the Authorities and the Report.</em> (New York: Random House, 1975) chapter 16, p. 302.<br />[5] Only someone in the US Secret Service would have been privy to the last minute change in the Dallas parade route which took the motorcade directly past the TSBD on Elm Street rather than down Main Street which had been the published route up until that point. The “last-minute” change was no doubt arranged to lessen the number of witnesses who would see the shooting and to be certain that Oswald was placed in the correct strategic position to be framed.<br />[6] Abbreviation for Freedom of Information Act.<br />[7] Passed in 1992 in response to the Motion Picture by Oliver Stone about the JFK Assassination. The law is known as the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992. The Act ordered all assassination-related material to be placed in a single collection in the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).<br />[8] See for example, James Di Eugenio and Lisa Pease, Editors. <em>The Assassinations: Probe Magazine on JFK, MLK, RFK and Malcolm X. </em>(Los Angeles: Feral House, 2003) and John Newman. <em>Oswald and the CIA: The Documented Truth about the Unknown Relationship between the U.S. Government and the Alleged Killer of JFK. </em>(New York: Carroll and Graf, 1995).<br />[9] Judyth Vary Baker who alleges a romantic affair with Lee Harvey Oswald in the summer of 1963 while the two worked under-cover at the Reilly Coffee Co. of New Orleans also claims that Oswald discovered the plot to kill Kennedy and had hoped to derail it but was unable to do so. Oswald apparently suspected that the result might be his own death as well as President Kennedy’s. Please see the extensive set of interviews on this site in which Judyth Baker is questioned in detail about Oswald.<br />[10] This included altering the wounds on the body of JFK prior to the “official” autopsy, substituting a different brain, falsifying the location of the alleged back wound in order to make the magic bullet hypothesis plausible, altering the skull X-rays and photographs of the head etc. See Douglas P. Horne, <em>Inside the Assassination Records Review Board: The U.S. Government’s Final Attempt to Reconcile the Conflicting Medical Evidence in the Assassination of JFK,</em> Volumes I-V. (2009). Also see David Lifton. Best Evidence: <em>Disguise and Deception in the Assassination of John F. Kennedy</em>. (New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. 1980).<br />[11] See for example Douglas P. Horne, <em>Inside the Assassination Records Review Board: The U.S. Government’s Final Attempt to Reconcile the Conflicting Medical Evidence in the Assassination of JFK,</em> Volumes I-V. (2009), especially volume IV.<br />[12] We have lost the legitimate succession of power from one Presidential Administration to the next by direct “propagation” due to the violent removal of President John F. Kennedy from office and the resultant complete turnabout in policy that Lyndon B. Johnson ordered and presided over.<br />[13] Johnson signed NSAM # 273 which began the increasing build-up of land forces in Vietnam 4 days after JKF’s Assassination.<br />[14] For an excellent detailed discussion of President Kennedy’s move toward peace in the wake of the Cuban Missile Crisis see James W. Douglass, <em>JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died & Why It Matters.</em> (Maryknoll: Orbis Books, 2008).<br />[15] Problem, reaction, solution or (thesis, antithesis, synthesis).<br />[16] This metaphysical construct is extremely dangerous since it results in a complete polarization of the population into left vs.: right.<br />[17] See for example Carl Bernstein. “The CIA and the Media.” Rolling Stone, October 20, 1977 for a discussion of the many media personages who are under the control of the national security state.<br />[18] The traditional or Paleoconservative “right” no longer exists for all practical purposes in that the neoconservatives have taken over the right wing of the US political spectrum. Neoconservatism has its roots in Trotsky and its branches in Nazism/Fascism. Newt Gingrich and former Vice President Dick Cheney are illustrative of the more radicalized Neoconservative right.<br />[19] The Health Insurance Lobby was the major beneficiary of the recently passed Health Reform Bill, the Banking Lobby virtually wrote the Banking Reform legislation.<br />[20] "Bundling" of funds by large corporate donors is a favorite tactic.<br />[21] One possible exception is the courageous Dylan Ratigan who has been willing to speak truthfully about the reality of the present circumstances at least with respect to the various lobbies which control the Congress. He has not to date challenged the Zionist Lobby which presumably would result forthwith in his dismissal from MSNBC.<br />[22] A true violent Coup d'etat. I specifically use this term recognizing that Peter Dale Scott disagrees with the use of that term when applied to the JFK Assassination.<br /><br /><strong>References:</strong><br /><br />1. Bernstein, Carl. “The CIA and the Media.” <em>Rolling Stone</em>, October 20, 1977<br />2. Boyle, Francis A. <em>Biowarfare and Terrorism</em>. (Atlanta Georgia: Clarity Press Inc., 2005).<br />3. Boyle, Francis A. <em>Tackling America’s Toughest Questions</em>. (Atlanta Georgia: Clarity Press Inc., 2009).<br />4. Crenshaw, Charles A. et.al. <em>Trauma Room One: The JFK Medical Coverup Exposed</em>. (New York: Paraview Press, 2001).<br />5. Di Eugenio, James and Lisa Pease, Editors. <em>The Assassinations: Probe Magazine on JFK, MLK, RFK and Malcolm X.</em> (Los Angeles: Feral House, 2003).<br />6. Douglas, James W. <em>JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died & Why It Matters</em>. (Maryknoll: Orbis Books, 2008).<br />7. Fetzer, James H., Editor. <em>Assassination Science: Experts Speak Out on the Death of JFK.</em> (Chicago: Catfeet Press, 1998).<br />8. Fetzer, James H., Editor. <em>Murder in Dealey Plaza: What We Know Now that We Didn’t Know Then about the Death of JFK.</em> (Chicago: Catfeet Press, 2000).<br />9. Fetzer, James H., Editor. <em>The Great Zapruder Film Hoax: Deceit and Deception in the Death of JFK, </em>(Chicago: Catfeet Press, 2003).<br />10. Fonzi, Gaeton. <em>The Last Investigation</em>. (Ipswich, Mass.: Mary Ferrell Foundation Press, 1993).<br />11. Hersh, Burton. <em>The Old Boys: The American Elite and the Origins of the CIA</em>. (New York: Scribner’s, 1992).<br />12. Horne, Douglas P. <em>Inside the Assassination Records Review Board: The U.S. Government’s Final Attempt to Reconcile the Conflicting Medical Evidence in the Assassination of JFK</em>, Volumes I-V, 2009).<br />13. Hurt, Henry. <em>Reasonable Doubt</em>. (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1985).<br />14. Lane, Mark. <em>Plausible Denial: Was the CIA Involved in the Assassination of JFK?</em> (New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press, 1991).<br />15. Lifton, David. <em>Best Evidence: Disguise and Deception in the Assassination of John F. Kennedy. </em>(New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. 1980).<br />16. Livingstone, Harrison E. <em>High Treason 2.</em> (New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers Inc., 1992).<br />17. Livingstone, Harrison E. <em>Killing Kennedy: And the Hoax of the Century</em>. (New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers Inc., 1995).<br />18. Livingstone, Harrison E. <em>Killing the Truth. Deceit and Deception in the JFK Case</em>. New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers Inc., 1994).<br />19. Mangold, Tom. <em>Cold Warrior: James Jesus Angleton: The CIA’ Master Spy Hunter</em>. (New York: Simon and Shuster, 1992).<br />20. Meagher, Sylvia. <em>Accessories After the Fact.</em> (New York: Random House, 1975).<br />21. Melanson, Philip H. <em>Spy Saga: Lee Harvey Oswald and U.S. Intelligence</em>. (New York: Praeger, 1990).<br />22. Newman, John. <em>Oswald and the CIA: The Documented Truth about the Unknown Relationship between the U.S. Government and the Alleged Killer of JFK</em>. (New York: Carroll and Graf, 1995).<br />23. Prouty, L. Fletcher. <em>JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy.</em> (New York: Carroll Publishing Group, 1996).<br />24. Russell, Dick. <em>The Man Who Knew Too Much</em>. (New York: Carroll and Graf, 1992).<br />25. Scott, Peter Dale. <em>Deep Politics and the Death of JFK</em>. (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1993).<br />26. Scott, Peter Dale. <em>Deep Politics II: The New Revelations in U.S. Government Files 1994-1995.</em> (Ipswich, Mass: Mary Ferrell Foundation Press, 2003).<br />27. Talbot, David. <em>Brothers: The Hidden History of the Kennedy Years</em>. (London: Simon and Schuster UK Ltd, 2007).<br />28. Thompson, Josiah. <em>Six Seconds in Dallas: A Micro-study of the Kennedy Assassination Proving that Three Gunmen Murdered the President. </em>(New York: Bernard Geis Associates, 1967).Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-78065650409463465282010-09-10T14:51:00.000-07:002010-09-10T15:30:45.818-07:00JFK/THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION HOME PAGE -- NOT FOR SCHOLARS<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBUkNDH0bgCd82usoigxNjdksn5ddervOUpnXWJxyLPpS5FJ0SwBgsPM4-TKMmrz9qpcp30dVfRS0GJQR5BGWjEB1NbCMaQ1ZKx4FaU7xgJfIzaVyOgXYif_tAimy7XJHJXCJbbM2PWJg/s1600/judyth+july+63+FWB.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 254px; height: 320px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBUkNDH0bgCd82usoigxNjdksn5ddervOUpnXWJxyLPpS5FJ0SwBgsPM4-TKMmrz9qpcp30dVfRS0GJQR5BGWjEB1NbCMaQ1ZKx4FaU7xgJfIzaVyOgXYif_tAimy7XJHJXCJbbM2PWJg/s320/judyth+july+63+FWB.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5515412915389679186" /></a><br /><br />------------------------<br />JUDYTH VARY BAKER, 1963: I HAD AN AFFAIR WITH LEE HARVEY OSWALD, BUT STATE LEE WAS INNOCENT AND IN CONTACT WITH ME UNTIL LESS THAN 2 DAYS BEFORE THE ASSASSINATION. MY BOOK -- ME & LEE--WILL BE RELEASED AT THE END OF SEPTEMBER, 2010. I AM A WITNESS JOHN MCADAMS NEVER MET, YET HE CREATED AN LARGE,INACCURATE) WEBSITE ABOUT ME. HE MUST STAND BEFORE GOD ONE FINE DAY. PERHAPS HE IS AN ATHEIST, THOUGH HE WORKS AT A CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">JFK / The Kennedy Assassination Home Page: NOT FOR SCHOLARS<br />John McAdams is a professor at Marquette University, but that doesn't mean that academics should trust all that he writes regarding the Kennedy assassination.<br /><br />His material is presented in a biased, slanted manner.<br /><br />Your academic reputation might be impugned by doing so: beware.<br /><br />The "official version" touted by McAdams is loaded with subtle injections of vitriol, and his description of his home page for this topic is actually an accurate description of his own work, to wit:<br /><br />"A skeptical look at the welter of nonsense, misinformation, and disinformation surrounding the murder of JFK. Debunks various myths.</span><br /><br />That's how John McAdams characterizes the hundreds of books and thousands of articles that have been published defending Lee Harvey Oswald as an innocent man(Versus comparatively few books by those who should be listed as (1) having double-digit IQ's,(or) rewarded in some way to promote the Official Version).<br /><br />The method used is clever, but easily recognized, once understood:<br /><br />There are several approaches used by McAdams and others to promote the factoid that Oswald killed John Kennedy. I call them the <span style="font-weight:bold;">Seven Dealey Sins:</span><br /><br />1) They dismiss dissident thought as "nonsense, misinformation, disinformation" and "myths."<br />2) They call the dissidents names, such as "buffs" -- did you ever hear of a Holocaust Buff? But you'll hear about a "Kennedy Assassination Buff." Other pet terms are "wacky," "sinister" and "looney."<br />3) They present government findings as the "final word" --beyond fault or question, despite a mountain of evidence that exists showing that the government covered up the truth about Oswald and the assassination. Push the "findings" of the Official Version, even though the government, if involved (and it was) in Kennedy's killing would never indict itself. That's like expecting the Gestapo to give honest, accurate reports about Holocaust victims.<br />4) They pretend to be "fair" by presenting the dissident information and opinions, but in such a manner that the dissident information will always look inferior to government-sponsored evidence to the contrary.<br />5)They will use partial or altered quotations, materials out of context, and carefully selected "exhibits" that often, when examined, are found to be flawed, such as planted evidence or manipulated witness statements.<br />6) No mater how many have to be discounted, they will discount every single witness that can support Oswald's innocence: they are all "crackpots," "mistaken," or "lying." All of them! Only witnesses supporting the Official Version, no matter how poor their testimony, are acceptable. All witnesses who have died, according to the Official Version defenders, died of natural or accidental causes, or committed suicide, even if they were shot five times with a shotgun.<br /> Example: McAdams went so far as to state that the doctors who tried to save Kennedy's life in Parkland Hospital, after he was brought there, mortally wounded, did not have time to look at the head wounds. The experienced ER doctors --familiar with gunshot wounds--were supposed to have neglected checking Kennedy's head wounds! It is the ONLY way McAdams can dismiss so many doctors, nurses and others who reported seeing Kennedy's brains falling from the back of his head, etc. <br />7) the seventh deadly Dealey Sin is to leave out new evidence or attack those bringing forth new evidence or testimonies -- shades of <span style="font-style:italic;">Planet of the Apes</span> where the magisterial apes "see no evil, speak no evil and hear no evil" that does not fit with their belief system.<br /><br />Of course, those who have the same opinion as McAdams and his minions are praised for their fine work.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-20293376832163539812010-08-17T14:40:00.000-07:002010-08-17T15:19:34.421-07:00Man Arrested for Two Murders in One Hour Killed in Police Custody<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjGsW1vSAoXYgIb7OwO81YTcSmEvjxamabB5fWyTcBOj7EfhwOHdNM6PceDSOMHE5rlsyUDrexnUMBC7eD_IdqrSKGW15sRX3_AF1Am8Wzfc48cqErXrPc_Vf11GRfz6l01Z-QkVBSGXKI/s1600/arrested+in+china.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 214px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjGsW1vSAoXYgIb7OwO81YTcSmEvjxamabB5fWyTcBOj7EfhwOHdNM6PceDSOMHE5rlsyUDrexnUMBC7eD_IdqrSKGW15sRX3_AF1Am8Wzfc48cqErXrPc_Vf11GRfz6l01Z-QkVBSGXKI/s320/arrested+in+china.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5506501157708996562" /></a><br />Henry James Clavier, shown here being<br />transferred to jail by Miami police, was shot by a local<br />citizen moments after photo was taken. <br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">Man Arrested for Two Murders in One Hour Killed in Police Custody</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style:italic;">The Beech Times</span>, Miami, Fl, Aug. 17, 2010<br />A 24 year old former Navy officer who has ties to Iran, charged with the murder of a Senator and a police officer in Miami, has been gunned down himself by another former officer. Police say that Jason Roland, the killer of the accused assassin, Henry James Clavier, had learned that Clavier had spent several years in Iran and believed he was connected with an assassination ring run by Iran.<br />Roland was immediately disarmed by police after Clavier was shot during what was supposed to be a routine transfer of the prisoner from the city jail to county facilities.<br />Clavier, who was arrested Friday after a struggle with police shortly after he shot Miami police officer LeRoy Clampitt, had denied shooting anybody. However, Miami District Attorney William Dade said that “beyond any reasonable doubt, this man was guilty as charged. The evidence against him is strong, and is mounting.”<br /><br />But some concerns are emerging about the evidence. A rifle that the accused assassin, Henry Clavier, was said to have used to shoot Senator Kenneth Fitz, found discarded near the scene of the crime, was described yesterday by the two deputy sheriffs who found it as an M-14. The M-14 had no known ties to Clavier. But today, we have been told that the deputies were in error. The rifle was not an M-14. It was a Mauser from the Korean War era. “This Mauser has verified ties to the accused,” Dade told reporters. “Clavier purchased it in Chicago, early last April.” Dade said the revolver that killed officer Clampitt was also on purchase records from the same company. <br /> Also puzzling is the discovery that a map, said to have been created by Clavier, and used to plot the location of the Senator, has turned out to have been created for a different purpose. “It was a map showing the location of Clavier’s workplace,” Clavier’s mother told newsmen. <br /><br />“Though there may be some errors in reportage,” Miami DA Wade explained, “the evidence continues to pour in, and it is all pointing exclusively to Clavier. He was identified in several lineups as the man who shot Senator Fitz and Officer Clampitt.” <br />Clavier himself will not be tried for the murders, since he died this afternoon after being shot by Roland, who confessed, “I lost my cool and just decided to shoot him on an impulse.” Roland, who sprang from a crowd that had gathered to observe Clavier’s transfer from the city jail to the county jail, at which time he fatally shot Clavier, was immediately arrested. He has been charged with first degree murder, but some people consider Roland “a hero.”<br /><br />Clavier died an hour and a half after being wounded. He failed to make a deathbed confession, according to police who rode with Clavier in the ambulance. “He just shook his head and refused to say a word,” one officer stated. Another officer said Clavier never regained consciousness after being shot.<br /><br />Henry James Clavier’s ties to Iran’s top leaders were verified by the CIA.<br /><br />“This is a man who hated the United States,” <span style="font-style:italic;">The Times</span> was told by a member of the FBI who is also involved in investigating Clavier. “At one point, he renounced his American citizenship. I’m rather relieved to find out that he’s dead and can’t hurt any more people.”<br /><br />But one attorney, retained this afternoon by the accused assassin’s mother, argued that Clavier was “supportive” of Senator Fitz and had no motive to kill him. “I think we have a rush to judgment here,” he told reporters. “Clavier was not given access to a lawyer. You reporters heard him ask for a lawyer. Also, he was interrogated for hours, even though he needed medical attention because he’d been beaten up. And even though his name was in all the newspapers, when he was in the lineups, he was identified by name to the witnesses.”<br /><br />“Nonsense,” Wade responded. “He refused the services of a lawyer.”<br /><br />Clavier’s wife, Hannah Imri, age 21, is an immigrant from Iran. It is not known what officials intend to do with the couple's two daughters – 2 year old Sashina, who was born in Tehran, and six-week-old Parisa, who was born in Miami. Mrs. Clavier knows little English and is not an American citizen.<br /><br />“He did not own a rifle,” Mrs. Clavier initially insisted, but after extensive questioning, finally admitted today that Clavier did own a rifle. The CIA has taken Mrs. Clavier and her children into protective custody, and she will not be available for interviews “for at least six weeks,” according to an insider familiar with the situation. <br /><br />Clavier was known to be associated with anti-American hate groups in Chicago. “During questioning,” said one police officer, who refused to be identified, “at times he grinned, as if he was proud of what he had accomplished.”<br />Clavier will be in interred when a gravesite can be obtained: at present, no cemetery in the region has accepted requests for burial. <br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">====SO YOU DIDN’T HEAR ABOUT THIS DOUBLE MURDER AND HOMICIDE?====<br />That’s because it never happened. </span> All I’ve done is “reported” in the same general style that was used when America’s people first learned about Lee Harvey Oswald, who was accused of killing President John F. Kennedy and a Dallas police officer, J.D. Tippitt some 75 minutes after Kennedy’s death. Oswald was immediately proclaimed the ‘sole’ assassin; the information about the rifle, the map, a lawyer being withheld from Oswald, and the situation at the lineups are all parallel to Oswald’s case.<br /> <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi4KZ_vpUBWqCkcHxB-XMboVn69aSmkox-YDCgCxWj-uGrVNLQ12ZFsAQm1y1auf30K0eH1-Sb4Mm2XclHzWH7qd1-oLbkVqm1wT1eyVmoDMnKsRMnB_-b9YAPh-mV-Urp6eox2myjs2yo/s1600/New+york+times+Headline+assassin+lee.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 392px; height: 138px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi4KZ_vpUBWqCkcHxB-XMboVn69aSmkox-YDCgCxWj-uGrVNLQ12ZFsAQm1y1auf30K0eH1-Sb4Mm2XclHzWH7qd1-oLbkVqm1wT1eyVmoDMnKsRMnB_-b9YAPh-mV-Urp6eox2myjs2yo/s400/New+york+times+Headline+assassin+lee.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5506498918168910690" /></a><br /><br />-----------------------------------<br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">Whatever feelings you might have felt, reading about the “former Navy officer” </span>(Oswald was a former Marine) <span style="font-weight:bold;">and his ties to Iran </span>(Oswald had spent nearly 3 years in the USSR at the height of the Cold War), <span style="font-weight:bold;">what you felt might have resembled what many Americans probably felt on November 22, 1963-Nov. 24,1963 about Oswald, a man all informed and honest investigators now know, due to an overwhelming amount of evidence and witness statements was innocent of all charges.</span> <br /><br /> The government continues to withhold evidence, brands those who question their assertions "conspiracy theorists" and hides the truth --that a Coup d'etat occurred. Anyone who has not yet seen "JFK II" at Wim Dankbaar's JFKMurdersolved.com needs a good look at this introductory information.<br /> I hope this story helps give you perspective, and that some element of compassion for Oswald, and a desire for justice for him and his family, will be born within you.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWMUl_fQdsBepPWwjsOWrrvMZTTBOicgbi8JIrDszB5fJbCKlFKpIV0G-e1ccNgCtgQA7dXxQpv81mUc40XL4eS0bbMo2XTnOZd03kH5dMtl3XSuyeeIBBMZQmcd314ntdeeU1ZkeoU_8/s1600/lee+face+of+an+assassin+changed+world.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 300px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWMUl_fQdsBepPWwjsOWrrvMZTTBOicgbi8JIrDszB5fJbCKlFKpIV0G-e1ccNgCtgQA7dXxQpv81mUc40XL4eS0bbMo2XTnOZd03kH5dMtl3XSuyeeIBBMZQmcd314ntdeeU1ZkeoU_8/s400/lee+face+of+an+assassin+changed+world.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5506499803696666370" /></a><br /><br /><br />Judyth Vary BakerUnknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-87546003371411969382010-07-23T11:31:00.000-07:002010-09-10T13:04:24.596-07:00Defending Douglas Horne and Oswald: "Where Did the "Magic Bullet" End Up, If It Didn't Hit Connally?" HERE'S THE ANSWER!<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhEhg-AWxp2qBTycur-UExNk7I2YTaaNfx1lm_3hJ7mbqyBkDZ_JrnpnBVCSagA3KGxCxTYow0_fkac2P9uwp7i-jJrmeMPQbg3Dt6gE79zNvABL3eI2Le0LFgO2HPqpIFl3JcJktV5FBQ/s1600/magicbullet.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 370px; height: 358px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhEhg-AWxp2qBTycur-UExNk7I2YTaaNfx1lm_3hJ7mbqyBkDZ_JrnpnBVCSagA3KGxCxTYow0_fkac2P9uwp7i-jJrmeMPQbg3Dt6gE79zNvABL3eI2Le0LFgO2HPqpIFl3JcJktV5FBQ/s400/magicbullet.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5497199422185221138" /></a><br /><br /><br />------------------------------------------------------------------------<br /><br />(photo courtesy of Wim Dankbaar: http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com)<br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">"WHERE DID THE MAGIC BULLET END UP, IF IT DID NOT HIT CONNALLY?"<br /></span><br />answer:<br /><br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">FORGET ABOUT THE MAGIC BULLET -- THERE WAS ANOTHER BULLET "LODGED BEHIND THE PRESIDENT'S EAR"!</span><br /><br /><br />This was the argument used by attorney V. Bugliosi to convince a televised mock jury that "the Magic Bullet" made all the wounds in both President John F. Kennedy and Texas Gov. John Connally on November 22, 1963, though it retained a near-pristine condition and, furthermore, not enough material is missing from the specimen to account for the bullet fragments found in Connally's wrist. Look it up. <br /><br />The date of the mock trial was 1986. That's a long time ago, folks.<br /><br />Wikipedia cites it. Why? To help sway you to believe that Lee Harvey Oswald, the man accused of murdering Kennedy and seriously wounding Connally, did his dirty deed with just three bullets? The first shot attributed to Oswald missed so badly that it struck between the President's limo and the Secret Service's car following --though this was the closest of three shots that Oswald supposedly fired at JFK. <br /><br />But not all the dancing around with numbers that has been done to date can give honest researchers a <span style="font-style:italic;">fourth</span> bullet coming from any single rifle aimed at Kennedy within the time limits imposed.<br /><br />One bullet having missed, only two bullets were left. They had to account for the many wounds in two men who had been almost simultaneously struck.<br /><br />The original first draft of the Warren Commission Report stated that a bullet had entered Kennedy's <span style="font-weight:bold;">"back at a point slightly above the shoulder and to the right of the spine." <span style="font-style:italic;"></span></span>Ford realized that this provided a serious problem for the single bullet theory. As Dr. Michael L. Kurtz pointed out (JFK Assassination Debates): "If a bullet fired from the sixth-floor window of the Depository building nearly sixty feet higher than the limousine entered the president's back, with the president sitting in an upright position, it could hardly have exited from his throat at a point just above the Adam's apple, then abruptly change course and drive downward into Governor Connally's back."<br /><br />Ford obligingly made sure the location was described in the region of the "neck."<br /><br />The many government investigations mentioned in Wikipedia and elsewhere that determined Oswald was guilty were based on incomplete, missing and even falsified evidence. Even before Douglas Horne made new photos and information available, in his <span style="font-style:italic;">Inside the ARRB,</span>, Gary Aguilar, M.D. and Kathy Cunningham told us in May, 2003 (HOW FIVE INVESTIGATIONS INTO JFK’S MEDICAL/AUTOPSY EVIDENCE GOT IT WRONG : http://www.history-matters.com/essays/jfkmed/How5Investigations/How5InvestigationsGotItWrong_7.htm) that an incredible amount of evidence and information was destroyed or misrepresented concerning the important autopsy information we needed in order to prove how many bullets struck Kennedy was shot in the head, and where the bullets came from. read here what you'll not find in Wikipedia or on "Oswald-did-it" websites:<br /><br />"Besides the President’s brain and tissue slides, the camera that took JFK’s “best evidence” autopsy photographs has vanished, as have the HSCA tests that revealed that the camera failed a test to match them with the official photographs. The skull fragments that ostensibly proved the bullet’s direction by their supposed beveling characteristics have disappeared. Original autopsy notes were vaporized by JFK’s chief pathologist, who followed that up by signing false affidavits about them, and then by giving the Warren Commission misleading testimony. Also, multiple lines of evidence suggest that crucial – what might fairly be described as “diagnostic” – autopsy photographs are also missing, if not falsified."<br /><br />In 1997 the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) upon which Douglas Horne sat as a member obtained the release of a document showing Gerald Ford, an appointee to the Warren Commission who later became America's first President by appointment (through Nixon) had altered the first draft of an official description of the location of the entry of the Magic Bullet which had read: "A bullet had entered the base of the back of his neck slightly to the right of the spine." That description, as we now know, was already describing the bullet's entry point rather too high, but Ford wasn't satisfied. <br /><br />He raised the location of the wound still higher, to the lower back of the neck, to better support the single bullet theory. William C. Sullivan was J. Edgar Hoover's assistant in 1963. In his 1979 book (ignored by the films that put Oswald "on trial,") <span style="font-style:italic;">The Bureau: My Thirty Years in Hoover's FBI</span> Sullivan describes what Hoover thought of Ford's appointment to the Warren Commission:<br /><br />"Hoover was delighted when Gerald Ford was named to the Warren Commission. The director wrote in one of his internal memos that the bureau could expect Ford to "look after FBI interests," and he did, keeping us fully advised of what was going on behind closed doors. He was our man, our informant, on the Warren Commission."<br /><br />Wikipedia cites Bugliosi's quote in <span style="font-style:italic;">Reclaiming History </span>for this misleading statement:<br /><br />"Several films[The Trial of Lee Harvey Oswald (1964); The Trial of Lee Harvey Oswald (1977, unrelated to the first film); On Trial: Lee Harvey Oswald (1986)] have fictionalized a trial of Oswald. In 1986, a 21-hour unscripted mock trial was "held" on television, argued by actual lawyers before an actual judge,[144] with unscripted testimony from surviving witnesses to the events surrounding the assassination; the mock jury returned a verdict of guilty."<br /><br /> None of the films made mention of Gerald Ford's actions, nor did the juries have access to that information or so much more that we have today. But anything that Wikipedia and other big websites pushing the official version can drag out from the past -- even biased TV programs purporting to be "juried trails"-- to convince new and naive readers that Oswald was guilty is put out there for them to swallow, along with their pablum. <br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">DOUGLAS HORNE, ARRB, DESERVES PRAISE</span><br /><br />Most distressing is how badly Douglas Horne, a respected board member of the ARRB who has been instrumental in providing us with new, fresh evidence proving that Oswald was innocent, has been treated on the Internet. I am maligned, MYSELF, on a constant basis by the same yahoos, as well as by some good researchers whose books, theories or first impressions of me they feel they must yet cling to, but to attack Horne, after all he has done to set the record straight, is unconscionable.<br /><br />It seems that "frontier law" exists on the Internet, where anything can be said, however cruel, indecent or false, without consequence. <br /><br />I have heard that Douglas Horne, having provided us with five fine volumes of precious information straight from the records of the ARRB, is now withdrawing from such research and efforts. I sure know how he feels. I live in poverty and -- worse-- have been forced to live overseas for my safety. These are hard times, and the few donations that rarely come my way do not cover the expenses of having to live in countries where I, as an American, am forbidden to work. My family has sacrificed a great deal to help me live in saftey, but I can't see them. My grandchildren are growing up with no idea of who I really am. They have read what my Internet enemies have said about me -- we are supposed to forgive our enemies: I pray every day for a renewed ability to do so.<br /><br />I know how Doug Horne feels, more than most.<br /><br />One feels angry, frustrated, outraged at the lies, the misrepresentations, the grabbing-on of any details that can be found in our entire lives, inspected under a microscope, where we have been found at some time to have erred, with all our human frailties exposed as an indictment against us as decent, good, normal human beings.<br />But because the victors rewrite history, we should not give up. We should not despair.<br /><br /> Not I, that's for sure. Not while I still have breath. While I still have breath, then, listen to me.<br /><br />Horne's <span style="font-weight:bold;">Inside the ARRB, </span>Vol. I, provides invaluable new information about the case that you'll never find in a slanted Wikipedia article, or on one of the "Oswald-was-guilty" fancy websites that pop up on the first page of a Google search. And remember --this November, the filthy-rich will trot out yet another TV "special" behind which to hide their crimes -- having inherited their power by being the buddies of those who killed Kennedy--or who cooperated in letting it happen. This November, new viewers will be told Oswald DID IT. This November, Oswald will again be accused of slaying the very man he gave his life trying to protect.<br /><br />When I first spoke of Oswald's sacrifice in 1999, I was met with cries of amazement and disbelief, but evidence since then has kept emerging, until today, many people are beginning to realize why it was so important to kill Lee H. Oswald only 47 hours after his arrest, even if it had to be done right in front of the American people --just as Kennedy, too, was executed before the eyes of his own.<br /><br />The "jury trial" cited by Bugliosi and Wikipedia was in 1986. A long time ago, people ---I repeat --a long time ago -- and much new has been learned since then that Wikipedia and the encyclopedias the government hopes you will blindly trust still fail to mention. <br /><br />To their shame.<br /><br /><br />The official version pundits hope their obsolete and slanted "evidence" and "TV jury verdicts" will persuade you to believe Oswald was guilty. They want you to believe everything you're told. Freedom of speech itself in in jeopardy over the point.<br /><br /> In Jan. 2010, Cass Sunstein, an Obama regulatory czar, was revealed to have recommended in an academic paper that "conspiracy theorists" should be fined or otherwise hobbled for speaking out. (See WND's "Top Obama Czar: Infiltrate all 'conspiracy theorists': Presidential adviser wrote about crackdown on expressing opinions" viz: http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=121884). Sunstein wrote:<br /><br /><br />"What can government do about conspiracy theories?...We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories."<br /><br /> He then suggested infiltrating groups, injecting falsehoods, and all the things that in fact already occur to bedevil those of us who have stepped forward as witnesses and honest researchers in the JFK,MLK, RFK and Nine Eleven investigations.<br /><br />Free Speech is in jeopardy. <br /><br />Sunstein's paper prompted me to create a little sketch about Freedom of Speech:<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0CbFN4MstNuEZx9NmBalbalVh7t7H3nzWHnSpMrb90yLecJaSXhWdD6Qg1tso9v3JhbyutciKnanYRUcruKKt4zvbfme76kiv8VAQEFy_RRhAewCziecb4RGpQIMoYD4XA7yD7Gk2_WY/s1600/EVOLUTION+FREEDOM+OF+SPEECH.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 268px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0CbFN4MstNuEZx9NmBalbalVh7t7H3nzWHnSpMrb90yLecJaSXhWdD6Qg1tso9v3JhbyutciKnanYRUcruKKt4zvbfme76kiv8VAQEFy_RRhAewCziecb4RGpQIMoYD4XA7yD7Gk2_WY/s400/EVOLUTION+FREEDOM+OF+SPEECH.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5497207259304238146" /></a><br /><br /><br />Tellingly, witnesses such as myself who disagree with the Official Version are thrust into the "Conspiracy Theory" category, even though we have evidence the official version factions ignore. It is a dead zone in Wikipedia, where the label "conspiracy buff" or "conspiracy theorist" is applied (as I've heard from others, and repeat here, would Wikipedia and "official version" spin city experts call someone investigating the Holocaust a "Holocaust Buff" or a "Holocaust Theorist"?). <br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">A FOURTH BULLET</span><br /><br />It is important to note that the 1986 film mentioned above showed Bugliosi scoring<br />a point with the mock jury by asking, <span style="font-weight:bold;">where did the Magic Bullet that hit Kennedy bullet go, if it did not end up in Connally? </span><br /><br />At the risk of more trouble to myself, I stubbornly present to you one of the important evidence exhibits that Douglas Horne brought to the attention of those who still care about who write our history books: a document that tells us about a "fourth" bullet (possibly the original (non) "Magic Bullet") that was described as "lodged" behind Kennedy's ear.<br /><br />A bullet that HAD to disappear, or else a CONSPIRACY would be proven:<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi8HwDlR4YqFYiJP5W569p0cv3quRWOLV4y7gqp8VhSI54rodpGemYcKoe9WdYBK5_PfPgDsuUBVH4wntKVghab0wCPYDOFH2a7TjYHfXMEgfvWZH3cdm3lt7csUmCf4PoTK3sOOGYOgPc/s1600/BULLET+BEHIND+KENNEDYS+EAR+IGNORED+NOV+22.png"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 310px; height: 400px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi8HwDlR4YqFYiJP5W569p0cv3quRWOLV4y7gqp8VhSI54rodpGemYcKoe9WdYBK5_PfPgDsuUBVH4wntKVghab0wCPYDOFH2a7TjYHfXMEgfvWZH3cdm3lt7csUmCf4PoTK3sOOGYOgPc/s400/BULLET+BEHIND+KENNEDYS+EAR+IGNORED+NOV+22.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5497209268191935234" /></a><br /><br />A. H. Belmont (FBI Special Assistant to Hoover) told Tolson what he advised Dallas FBI agents to do regarding the handling of the rifle, as well as advising SAC Shanklin the following:<br /><br /> "I told SAC Shanklin that Secret service had one of the bullets that struck President Kennedy and the other is lodged behind the President's ear and we are arranging to get both of these."<br /><br /> No bullet 'lodged behind the president's ear" has ever been introduced into the evidence. What happened to it?<br /><br />Thanks to Doug Horne and the ARRB, we have a copy of this once-hidden document. I advise you to copy the document and send it to everybody this November when the TV specials try to ram the "Magic Bullet" theory down your throats, and your children's throats, again.<br /><br />Note that the report went to <span style="font-weight:bold;">Clyde Tolson<span style="font-style:italic;"></span></span>, second-in-command in the FBI under John Edgar Hoover himself (and Hoover's best 'friend' as we are quite aware).<br /><br /> This report was made on Nov. 22 -- it was the unfiltered truth, before this record vanished -- until uncovered by the ARRB and published by Douglas Horne.<br /><br />We have been told for decades that the bullet striking Kennedy exited through the throat and then entered Connally. Otherwise, a conspiracy had to be admitted. Why? A FOURTH BULLET WRECKS THE CASE.<br /><br />We have Douglas Horne to thank for providing evidence for where the so-called Magic Bullet probably ended its path.<br /><br />Buried behind Kennedy's ear.<br /><br />A billet Wikipedia and "Oswald-did-it" websites will never tell your sons and daughters existed.<br /><br />Consider visiting my website. Tell people that yes, my new book really IS going to be published later this summer, after a long delay. The book has been expanded. <br />Your pre-purchase at my website can help me keep fighting the good fight.<br /><br />God bless my country. Now -- ask God to give you the guts to spread the truth.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">JVB</span>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309326213416127654.post-20627893214376010042010-06-20T19:23:00.000-07:002010-06-20T20:25:51.495-07:00LEE OSWALD, CALLED A LIAR: A REFUTATION, PART TWO<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPMgW7wXBroi5dZ1G2PH6VmAF79JrMwYF7hSd3unkB96bvguXKgZKyT0iHfuQMNu3V8dSO1K9QV7Rua5BlSWwE8j1W1rXwNHr13Qk9Cuuj2Snk8uXjOAxBuDejeTKTnP3l3nohITv2Zaw/s1600/jCS+Lee+timecard_1%5B1%5D.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 342px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPMgW7wXBroi5dZ1G2PH6VmAF79JrMwYF7hSd3unkB96bvguXKgZKyT0iHfuQMNu3V8dSO1K9QV7Rua5BlSWwE8j1W1rXwNHr13Qk9Cuuj2Snk8uXjOAxBuDejeTKTnP3l3nohITv2Zaw/s400/jCS+Lee+timecard_1%5B1%5D.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5485048561450194322" /></a><br /><br /><br /><br /><strong>==please go to Scribd.com to see this article with all photos and with better editing...this is the original version!==</strong><br /><br /><strong>LEE OSWALD, CALLED A LIAR: A REFUTATION, PART TWO</strong><br /><br />AN ARTICLE, POSTED ON AN ATTACK WEBSITE AGAINST LEE OSWALD, ARGUES TO THE UNINFORMED PERSON THAT LEE OSWALD WAS A CONSUMMATE LIAR. BUT WAS HE LYING BECAUSE HE WAS A BAD GUY, OR DID HE LIE BECAUSE HE WAS A DOUBLE AGENT, WORKING FOR THE CIA? THE ARTICLE, “LEE’S LIES” WAS WRITTEN BY A SOPHISTICATED PROFESSIONALWHO HAS BEEN A LOBBYIST. THIS WRITER KNEW A GREAT DEAL ABOUT LEE H. OSWALD, YET FAILED TO MENTION ANYWHERE IN HIS ARTICLE THAT LEE’S LIES MIGHT HAVE BEEN FOR A HIGHER CAUSE AS A DOUBLE AGENT. EXPLORE THIS ARTICLE WITH ME, AND DECIDE FOR YOURSELF IF THE ARTICLE WAS ‘FAIR.’ JVB<br /><br /><br /><br /><strong>Reinvestigating the article “Lee's Lies”</strong><br /><br />LOOKING AT “LEE’S LIES” BY Brian Dautch<br />WITH CORRECTIONS AND COMMENTS BY JUDYTH VARY BAKER<br /><br />Brian Dautch works in Washington, D.C. He was a former member of the Council for Marketing and Opinion Research, Director of Government Affairs. <br />Review: Part One ended with a comment that an intelligent and sophisticated accountant, George Bouhe, was well-connected to George DeMohrenschildt (CIA ties), to geologists, to oil magnates, and also to the Paines, who were closely associated with the Oswalds: Lee Oswald’s wife was living with Ruth Paine. <br /><br /><br />Dautch reported that Lee Oswald failed to tell Bouhe, who had given him some significant help, enough details about his private life. He also complained that Oswald was also too short with him in phone calls. Dautch criticizes Oswald for his::<br />“When the befuddled Bouhe finally asked Oswald where he was staying, Oswald told him he was at the Carlton Boarding House in the Oak Cliff section of Dallas. In truth, Oswald had never been there at all.(13) Later, Oswald would use Bouhe and others as references for job applications without their knowledge, and would usually provide the potential employer with inaccurate addresses for such acquaintances.(14) “<br />Let’s forget about the fact that where Oswald was staying at the time was not necessarily anybody’s business. Oswald was calling Bouhe regularly, as agreed. Once again, Dautch never mentions the possibility that Oswald may have had reasons not to tell Bouhe additional details. For example, I (a witness—see the book Me & Lee: How I Came to Know, Love and Lose Lee Harvey Oswald) ) and former secret service agent for JFK, Abraham Bolden (see James Douglass’ excellent book, JFK and the Unspeakable –Why He Died and Why It Matters) both testify that Lee was trying to save President Kennedy. Lee gave me enough information to convince me that he had good reasons to become “friendly” with those hostile to Kennedy in order to try to learn more information useful in saving Kennedy’s life. When Oswald returned from the Soviet Union to Texas, it was not long before he found himself and his Russian wife the center of attention of White Russians and other anti-communist groups associated with Big Oil. Anti-Kennedy talk was rampant in Texas: I, myself was a resident there from 1965 through 1985, and again in 2000-2001 (anti-Kennedy sentiments in Dallas, at least, persisted—talk to any Dallas policeman and find out for yourself. Also ask yourself why a man who, himself, is an icon in the Kennedy assassination --Robert Groden-- and others in Dallas who were selling or advertising “conspiracy theory” books in Dealey Plaza were arrested in mid-June, 2010 by the Dallas Police – while the Oswald-did-it circus act in the Sixth Floor Museum there won’t sell any of those books!).<br /><br /><strong>But back to the matter of a “lying Oswald” -- and why he lied.</strong><br />Since Texas oil men included many right-wing cheerleaders, such as Hunt, Murchison and Byrd, who were vehemently anti-Kennedy, it behooved Oswald not to disclose details about his interest in Kennedy and his desire to protect him. All honest researchers who have investigated the matter know that Oswald admired Kennedy. Since he also denied shooting Kennedy, seeking fame for such an action has no basis in fact. <br />However, the “official versions” in the case stress that Oswald was having difficulties with his wife, and in a hissy-fit, decided to shoot Kennedy. It is particularly inconvenient to the aficionados of the “official version” that I have come forward stating that Oswald and I were having a love affair and that Oswald had no intention of returning to his wife. Perhaps this is why I have been driven overseas due to threats and harassment.<br /><br />The “official version” systematically uses testimony that supports the “Oswald did it” theme, while ignoring evidence and witnesses who might have disputed it. Certainly nobody came looking for me, nor for the Clinton-Jackson witnesses who saw Lee Oswald with Clay Shaw and David Ferrie. Witnesses such as Orest Pina, who testified seeing Oswald with FBI agents, or Dr. Michael Kurtz, a noteworthy historian in Louisiana who personally saw Oswald working with Guy Banister, are typically not mentioned or their statements are ignored, attacked, or minimized.<br />Shamefully, witnesses who supported the “official version” sometimes had “help” to make sure they wouldn’t change their stories or submit to interviews by researchers who might ask the wrong questions. <br /><br />If you visit “The Realist Archive Project” at http://www.ep.tc/realist/53/12.html, you will land on a lengthy interview and article about Marguerite Oswald, Oswald’s mother (“The Unsinkable Marguerite Oswald”) who is described as an intelligent, if frustrated woman seeking justice for her slain son. I have personally never seen a mainstream article (this is an underground magazine from 1964) that gave Marguerite anything but body blows, using her as a punching bag to convince everybody about how bad her son must have been, since his mother was such a mercenary and silly clod.<br /><br />But of even greater interest, to me, was the experience the writer of the article, Harold Feldman, had with Helen Markham and her husband. Who was Markham? She was the witness who identified Oswald in a lineup as having shot Officer J. D. Tippit half an hour before Oswald’s arrest in a movie theater where, according to several witnesses, Oswald had been <em>au locale </em>for half an hour. <br /><br />The troubling truth is that we cannot be certain who ducked into the theater without paying fifteen minutes after Oswald was reported to have gone into the theater, where he purchased a bag of popcorn for himself and then proceeded, after a stint in the balcony, to go to the main floor and sit beside several different people, as if seeking a contact among them (his final choice was a pregnant woman). We do know that a witness reported seeing an Oswald lookalike being removed forcibly from the back of the theater while Oswald was being dragged out the front. For years the witness thought Oswald was taken away through the back door of that theater. It doesn’t help matters that police reported finding a wallet at the Tippit murder scene with Oswald’s ID in it at almost the same time that police in the patrol car, driving from the theater, reported finding a wallet on Oswald’s person with Oswald ID. An overkill of evidence in this case – and not the only instance of such – does not set our minds at ease.<br /><br /><strong>Nor does the fact that “Dallas DNA” has uncovered way too many innocents convicted of crimes they never committed in that famed bastion of Texas justice and police integrity.</strong> A glance at the Internet brings forth a few interesting websites:<br /><strong>About the Show : Dallas DNA : Investigation Discovery </strong><br />Backed by the Innocence Project of Texas, this is a groundbreaking project to open the Texas Justice system and get many people exonerated.<br />investigation.discovery.com/tv/dallas-dna/about.html - Cached -<br /><strong>'Dallas DNA' questions strength of our convictions </strong>28 Apr 2009 ... No other reality show on television can offer a prize even close to the one given to the winners on Investigation Discovery's new "Dallas ...<br />www.nydailynews.com/.../2009-04-28_dallas_dna_questions_strength_of_our_convictions.html -<br /><br />Feldman, author of “The Unsinkable Marguerite Oswald” related a disturbing event that I had never seen quoted anywhere until researcher Linda Minor brought it up: Feldman actually took Marguerite Oswald to meet Helen Markham and her husband. He wanted to check out Helen’s story about seeing Oswald shoot Tippit for himself, since it is well known that Markham had been coached to pick out Oswald in the line-up. Here’s a little of what Feldman had to say about the visit:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUvlJ6gqquc0HB1Zn7Epssvz44ucTxYbH53vzIbV4GQE_QTvrC-TAjQHGSvoP0fMMu5XjjNSWyYiX9DA2FbxWMyLbgaP4XA87xjOlcEizteVaWXLE3dExB-7Shrgnms774Ii0gbAbBXxw/s1600/marguerite+helen+markham+quote+realist+mag+howard+feldman.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 283px; height: 400px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUvlJ6gqquc0HB1Zn7Epssvz44ucTxYbH53vzIbV4GQE_QTvrC-TAjQHGSvoP0fMMu5XjjNSWyYiX9DA2FbxWMyLbgaP4XA87xjOlcEizteVaWXLE3dExB-7Shrgnms774Ii0gbAbBXxw/s400/marguerite+helen+markham+quote+realist+mag+howard+feldman.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5485049835170746786" /></a><br /><br /><br /><br />So we would be wise to ask ourselves just how much Lee Oswald thought he could trust those right-wing folks in Dallas who so quickly befriended him and his wife. The “official version” does have its flaws. <br />An examination of Dautch’s references show that all of them come from “Oswald-did-it” sources, especially from the “official version” biography, Marina and Lee, by Patricia McMillan. In fact, this entire damning essay about Lee Oswald makes use of only four sources, of the thousands available. And all of them are notoriously hostile concerning the accused assassin. The Warren Commission Report and Marina and Lee are used as sources for 23 of the 26 citations. The other two sources are Oswald’s Game, by Jean Davison (2 citations), and Case Closed by Gerald Posner (1 citation). <br />It’s only fair that we should look a few more places for information about Bouhe and why he was upset about the fact that Oswald didn’t tell him he correct address. Here is what A. J. Weberman says about Bouhe (most of his information is revelatory, though I don’t always agree with his analyses—but then, he didn’t know Oswald):<br />“ …OSWALD'S whereabouts from October 19, 1962, to November 2, 1962, were not discoverable by the Warren Commission. He was not with Marina Oswald, who had moved out of their apartment on Mercedes Street in Fort Worth that OSWALD had rented in August 1962. With the help of Russian exile George Bouhe who had contact with the Texas Employment Commission, OSWALD was referred to the Jagger-Chiles-Stovall Photographic Company on October 11, 1962. On October 12, 1962, he began work there as a trainee. From October 9, 1962, when OSWALD listed Gary Taylor's address on his application for a Post Office Box, until October 11, 1962, OSWALD was [also] unaccounted for.”(Nodule 10)<br /><br />Stop the presses! Bouhe had referred Lee to the Jaggars-Chiles-Stovall job where Lee told me he had memorized maps (this is a direct contradiction to what George DeMohrenschild said, according to researcher Bruce Campbell Adamson -- that Lee got his job through an employment agency. I’ll go with Adamson’s statement until corrected, since in New Orleans, Lee preended to get his job through an employment agency: that was his regular explanation for both pre-arranged jobs.). Lee worked at J-C-S six days a week, usually alone there on Saturdays. Later, JCS bosses would say Oswald was a very poor worker who caused problems—if so, why did he get so much overtime, and why do we have meticulous record-keeping by Oswald, showing consistent and constant work completed? Lee told me he was forced to leave J-C-S as his work there for a government agency assignment was finished. JCS did all kinds of photography work, but they also created classified maps for the Department of Defense.<br /><br /><br /><br />Robert Walker stated that he interviewed a part-JGS owner, Bill Chiles. <br />He reported to a newsgroup on Aug 13, 2007 that “Bill stated that Oswald was generally a crappy employee, that we [sic] wore thick black military-type boots, was surly, and to the concern of Bill at least, walked around speaking in Russian….Bill told me the [sic] hired Oswald through the state employment agency (whatever that was at the time)… Since they did some work for the US Government, Bill was concerned about this guy enough to call the FBI. Bill told the FBI that this guy named Oswald was clunking around in military boots, speaking in Russian and making a nuisance of himself. Bill said the FBI put him on hold, and then came back with (and I am paraphrasing here) "...yeah, we know about Oswald, he's okay."<br /><br />However, Lee told me that near the end of what he considered a good assignment that he liked there, that he had to provide an excuse to get asked to leave. Peculiarly, Lee did not tell me that he was fired, but only asked to leave. Could it be possible that Chiles is repeating some old lines from a script played out years earlier? Let’s look a little closer at Lee’s work record at J-C-S:<br />First of all, Lee was working at least 54 hours a week, as his own hand-written work records reveal.<br /><br /><br /><br />A typical work day for Oswald was more than 9 hours---about 56 hours a week, not 40 hours a week as reported by Dautch. So who is doing the lying now?<br />Mr. Chiles still complains, decades later, that Oswald was a poor worker. But why? Would Oswald be working there so many weeks, including overtime-- and get paid for it—if he happened to be such a poor employee?<br /><br /><strong>Let’s look at what one researcher found out: “Innocent looking Gates <br />Advertisement leads us to Lee Harvey Oswald! “ </strong><br />A blogger (http://press.kscdirect.com/?p=2330 posted an article (in 2007, I’m told) where he relates to us what he learned in the “official version” about Oswald working at J-C-S. It’s the negative stuff we’ve already heard about. But then he does some thinking for himself.<br />“OK, now all of the above is the “official” story of Oswald’s work history with Jaggars-Chiles-Stovall. Some theories point out some other information and testimony that leads to conjecture. <br />For instance…Oswald’s meticulously kept logs… seem to show a very hard worker who frequently put in extra hours. In fact, he was such a highly regarded employee that he frequently was allowed to work in the building on the weekends, all by himself. So did he see classified material? No one seems to know for sure, but it’s doubtful that Mr. Stovall would have wanted to admit as much before the Warren Commission. But some of Oswald’s co-workers suggested that might have been the case. The main work that Jaggars-Chiles-Stovall did for the DoD involved maps, including maps of Cuba which Oswald may or may not have memorized. Who knows?”<br /><br /><br />[insert from this witness --Judyth Vary Baker: I know. Lee told me he had memorized maps about Cuba when he was in Texas to prepare himself for a possible assignment into Cuba. Lee loved maps and could rattle off not only every city and town, but even the names of rivers, mountains and coves in Cuba. I have mentioned this since 1999.]<br />“Doesn’t it seem odd that a hard worker who worked long hours and kept such meticulous logs would be fired for “inefficiency, lack of precision, (and) inattention”. One theory holds that Oswald was let go on April 1st so he could pursue the career picked out for him by the CIA (or other entity): the April 10th attempted assassination of General Edwin Walker. Oh my, this just keeps getting better and better!<br /><br />Very interesting sidenote: As noted above, Oswald was fired from Jaggars-Chiles-Stovall on April 1, 1963. That happens to be the day after the famous pictures of him holding a rifle in his backyard were taken by his wife, Marina. That is of course assuming that she was actually the person who took the pictures. They could be fakes, right?” <br />(Source retrieved: press.kscdirect.com/?p=233 March, 2010.)<br /><br />[note from Judyth Vary Baker: Lee was told he was fired on April 1st, but continued working through April 6.] Please see Dr. James Fetzer and Jim Marrs’ front-page Op-Ed article about the fakery associated with the infamous backyard photos, at:<br />http://www.opednews.com/articles/THE-DARTMOUTH-JFK-PHOTO-FI-by-Jim-Fetzer-091116-941.html.<br />Poor Marina Oswald was under great pressure to lie.<br />It seems all sorts of people are lying concerning the article “Lee’s Lies.” But let us continue with our discussion and observations. So far, Dautch hasn’t impressed us with anything close to accuracy. He mentioned Lee having a forty-hour work week when it was generally 54 hours a week. But we will be generous. He was quoting the Warren Report. It’s not constructed to make Oswald look decent, let alone a hard worker. Remember that the next time you read in Wikipedia that ‘two government investigations concluded that Oswald killed Kennedy.’ Surely our boy Dautch is going to come up with something that can blacken Oswald’s character without any doubts or restrictions. He next accusation is a doozy, and seems to fit the bill—about Lee Oswald, his wife and the matter of paying for the treatment of their sick baby, June Lee, at Parkland Hospital: <br /><br /><br />“Lee and Marina's infant daughter, June, became sick and had to be taken to (of all places) Parkland Memorial Hospital, where President Kennedy was taken after being fatally wounded. Lee felt he would be unable to pay the bill, and consequently told an incredible series of lies to try to avoid paying for June's treatment (which consisted only of brief examinations for the baby's fever of 103 degrees). He lied about his address, said he was not employed (he was, at an advertising photography firm called Jaggars-Chiles-Stovall, making as much as $1.50 per hour for a forty-hour work week [note from JVB: we can’t blame Dautch for just looking at the Official Version of Lee’s 56-hour-work weeks at J-C-S: apparently he believed the Warren Report which says: “He worked a 40-hour week at approximately $1.35 per hour” (Appendix 13, p 719)]…<br />to continue…<br />“… and that he did not receive unemployment compensation of any kind.(15) Finally, Lee received, and paid, a bill for only two dollars.(16) <br />Time to see if there are any problems with this story. <br />We find from WC testimony that the witness to the event, Lydia Dymitruk, was not yet an American citizen. Russian-born; she says she was a friend of Bouhe, who met the Oswalds at George DeMohrenschildt’s home (she calls him, familiarly, “George” in her testimony). The account given by Mrs. Dymitruk is at first sight 100% believable, and Lee Oswald comes off looking very badly: the baby had been ill at least three days, and Oswald did not want to take the baby to the hospital because he said they couldn’t afford it. Mrs. Dymitruk [though unmarried, on her own in the US at that time, she is identified as a married woman by the WC ] stated that Oswald and his wife argued about taking the baby to the hospital. It seems that Oswald did not think the baby was that sick and did not want to spend the money.<br />Mr. JENNER. He did not want to go?<br />Mrs. DYMIITRUK. …no. So then he decide that he want to go to the hospital<br />and take his baby. I said, “All right.” So, we went to the hospital and we found a doctor. And there were children waiting and we wait. So he took care of the baby. He-the doctor took a blood test and took a X-ray-a lung X-ray and, I don’t know, all kind of tests, right away. So, on the way back-he got some kind of papers, I think it was two copies or<br />three copies of papers-<br />Mr. JENNER. From the hospital?<br />Mrs. DYMITRUK. From the doctor to go to the service desk….so.copies of papers-<br />Mr. JENNER. From the hospital?<br />Mrs. DYMITRUK. From the doctor to go to the service desk.<br />Mk. JENNER. Yes.<br /><br />Mrs. DYMIITRUK. So, at the service desk-he was standing here [indicating],<br />I was behind him, and Marina was behind me with the baby… the<br />service desk asked question-the address and if he’s working, and he said “No.”<br />Mr. JENKER. Not working?<br />Mrs. DYMITRUK. No. ‘Then she said, “Do you have unemployment-do you<br />get some unemployment money?”<br />He said “No”<br />And she’ said: “ Well, how do you live then?”<br />He said, “Well, friends helping me.”<br />And Marina-she was behind me-and she says, “What a liar !”<br />And they argue again.<br /><br />[WHOA! Our witness is telling the WC that way back in November, 1962, not very long in the USA, Marina Oswald understood the questions the service desk attendant asked Lee Oswald in English ---about whether he was employed, whether he had unemployment checks, and so on – and that Marina, elsewhere described as knowing only the words “yes” and “no” in English, pointing at things in the grocery store, as described by George DeMohrenschildt, here clearly understands what Lee Oswald is being asked in English, and she is disgusted and angry. Right in the hospital, she starts arguing with Oswald!]<br /><br />Mr. JENNEK They argued-<br />Mrs. DYMITRUK. Yeah. You know, one thing, he said, “1 don’t want to pay<br />any penny. It’s suppose to be free. Doctors and everything in Russia is free.<br />It’s suppose to be free here, too.”<br />I didn’t like that at all. I was disgusted.<br />Mr. JENNEB. You were disgusted-<br />Mrs. DYMITBUK. Yes. [pp. 67-68]<br />.[I am rather worried that this testimony is accepted at face value, since in November, 1963, over a year later, Marine Oswald states that she cannot speak or understand any English and had been isolated from learning any English by her husband. However, I understood from Lee that Marina did know English. Perhaps Marina “blew her cover” by saying that Lee was lying to the person at the service desk.<br />That she knew English must be established now, as my witness, Anna Lewis, relates how Marina called Anna at her work at Thompson’s Restaurant, in New Orleans, asking if her husband was there. Anna, knowing very well that Lee and I had miserable marriages and were having an affair, replied that she never kept tabs like that on her customers. How did Marina know about Thompson’s restaurant? Answer: the restaurant gave away free matches with covers showing the restaurant’s name, address and phone number, and both Lee and I brought them home to light our gas stoves.<br /><br /><br /><br />==MARINA OSWALD AND HER KNOWLEDGE OF ENGLISH===<br />[By the way, people change. What I mention here is the Marina Oswald who was an orphan, forced to find a way for herself in a hostile world where her only way to be employed and rise in the world was through cooperation with her government in certain affairs with foreign men, and an education (she got a degree in Pharmacy).<br />We are not in her shoes and it’s cruel to judge her. She raised two daughters who became responsible, fine citizens despite the onus and pressure on her and on them. Marina worked for years in Dallas at an Army-Navy store and had another child by a second marriage. I repeat—people change. Now to the facts of the girl who met Lee when she was 19 years old: only a portion of the article is mentioned here. For more details, visit: http://oswaldsmother.blogspot.com/2009/10/from-marina-prusakova-with-love.html]<br />“From Marina Prusakova, with Love” by George Bailey<br />One apparent falsehood Marina maintained for years is that she did not speak English when she arrived in America with her defector husband. In her Warren Commission testimony she required the need of a translator to answer questions. Years later in Garrison grand jury testimony, when asked who she spoke to when they landed in New York, she said no one as she didn’t speak English. In fact she stated numerous times in her testimony that she didn’t speak English at all in her first years in America. She also said in grand jury testimony that back in 1963 she was taking English lessons from George Bola who just happened to be Jack Ruby’s next-door neighbor. However, her statements of not being able to speak and understand English is at odds with the facts as we now know them.<br />Here is a list of points that dispel this myth:<br />In 1961 while still in Russia, Lee mails Marina a letter written in English… Robert Webster, another American defector, said he knew Marina and she spoke good English with a heavy accent…Descriptions on the back of photos taken in Russia are in Marina’s handwriting in Russian and English…Warren Commission, CE-100. Marina’s stenographic notebook found by the Dallas Police written in English. They also found a second notebook with Marina’s handwriting in English. There are other notebooks with her English writing in the National Archives. <br />• Business manager James Martin testified that she understood everything said to her in English…Robert Oswald in an FBI affidavit said Marina spoke to him in English, without a translator, in regards to a business contract with James Martin. A contract written only in English… Marguerite Oswald in Warren Commission testimony mentions numerous conversations with Marina—all in English…Marina gets trapped in Garrison grand jury testimony saying she called Reily Coffee Company looking for Lee. She was asked how should could do that, she replied she knew “a few words.”<br /><br />Though filled with inconsistencies in the evidence the WC fails to explore these apparent contractions. As usual, don’t tell us more than we want to know. Marina knowing English well enough to write and speak would raise questions of where she learned it; she was after all, a graduate of pharmacy school. And why would she need it anyway? She would only need if she were an operative for the State. And Oswald was not the only American defector she met in Russia. She also met and spoke with Robert Webster, though she denies this though her address book had the address of the apartment building he stayed in.<br /><br />Interestingly, Lee Oswald spoke excellent Russian but not much of it in Russia. Befriended by the Ziger family, they report Oswald only spoke in English with their father translating. We know from released transcripts that his apartment was bugged by the KGB and fluent Russian speaking could have brought about an arrest for espionage. The Russians were already suspicious of him upon his arrival. It seems he only spoke Russian to Marina as she said he spoke well enough to have a Baltic accent. But why did he trust her to the exclusion of all others? It may be that she was an operative and needed him as her ticket out of Russia and into the United States. Former KGB defector, Petr Deryabin said that any Russian woman that wanted to marry a foreigner and leave had to agree<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to work for the KGB. Marina got her permission slip fast—in 7 days. Marriage certificates were issued by the secret police, which were also issued promptly.”<br /><br />…[She marries a] foreigner after only knowing him for 6 weeks, having a child with him, and then uprooting her life to move to another country where she does not speak the language (obviously false) or know anyone ….If she married a foreigner to come over to play spy all plans were shattered with the assassination of John Kennedy. The KGB wanted no part of that. For the Warren Commission she went along with the flow. Now she says her late husband was innocent of any crime. “<br /><br />=============================<br />So Marina knew English well enough to understand that her husband had lied. I note that the hospital sent the baby home after the tests, only handing them a bill. The witness said she drove them home again. Little June was at the right age for having fevers from teething. There is no mention of stopping at a pharmacy, or of any medications ordered. Perhaps Oswald lied for a good reason: they had recently moved to a new apartment, trying to patch up their shaky marriage, and money was tight. They would visit Robert Oswald, Lee’s brother, that Thanksgiving, in a family get-together. General reports abound that Oswald adored June and cared about her health. He was not so assiduous about Marina’s health, failing to get her much-needed dental treatment that year. Marina’s friends in Dallas got her teeth taken care of. The marriage was not going well: the couple had serious physical battles going on until they split again and Oswald moved to New Orleans. After Marina rejoined Oswald in New Orleans, physical abuse on his part ceased, as noted by researchers. Their inability to get along may explain some of Oswald’s actions during this period.<br />But Dautch doesn’t see it that way:<br />“At this point, Lee's lies had now included his wife, those who tried to befriend him, and hospital personnel who only wanted to help improve the health of his only daughter. The web of deception was growing ever larger.”<br />But was it? Oswald and his family returned to the US in June, 1962. The incident at the hospital apparently occurred well after November 17. The family had been in Texas close to six months by that time, and if they had been there only another fortnight, they would have qualified for vastly reduced rates due to their very low income level. Lee<br /><br /><br /><br />Oswald lies and says he isn’t employed. Even so, he doesn’t get ‘free’ treatment—but he pays only the equivalent of $20 in today’s fund—a true pittance.<br />Interestingly, it is Ruth Paine who lied about the “six month rule” concerning Parkland and charges for Marina Oswald in the third week of October, 1963 when she arranged for vastly reduced rates for Rachel’s birth there, asserting that Marina had been living in Texas for six months, when in fact, Marina had been outside Texas between May and September of 1963 and no longer qualified for reduced fees. So Ruth Paine lied, just as Lee Oswald did, about hospital charges.<br />But we do have to chalk this one up as a real LIE. Good going, Mr. Dautch! What does he have to show us next?<br />“Oswald purchased two firearms in the year 1963, both of which would be implicated in the Kennedy Assassination and the subsequent murder of Dallas Police Officer J.D. Tippit. In ordering the firearms, he lied about two major pieces of information, one of which did not seem to present Oswald with an advantage of any kind. When purchasing the rifle, he lied about his name, citing it as "A. Hidell" on the money order when sending away for the gun on March 12, 1963 to Klein's Sporting Goods in Chicago for the total sum of $21.45.(17) “<br />Dautch assumes the firearms were purchased by Oswald. Linda Minor and others have assembled much information contending that he did not. In fact, the very name “Hidell” has been found on other ID cards One researcher, who is basically anti-Oswald, wrote: <br />“The best explanation that I have read on the origin of the Hidell name is from Dick Russell's book on Richard Case Nagell. The "Hid" part of the name is an acronym for HQ Intelligence Division, which was a branch of Army Intelligence active in the Far East. The "ell" part of the name comes from the last three names of the surname of the man who gave Oswald his alias--Nagell himself. The Man Who Knew Too Much (NY: Carroll and Graf, 1992, pp. 170-174). <br />From my own blog:<br />Controversy in the case resides in the fact that Oswald, and the rifle associated with the murder of JFK, cannot be decisively linked to each other. Lee Harvey Oswald indeed was accused of using a 6.5 x 52 mm Italian Carcano M91/38 bolt-action rifle, serial number C2766. And it is true that the rifle was sold as military surplus through Klein's Sporting Goods Company. However, records indicate that<br /><br /><br /><br />Oswald was at work at Jaggars-Chiles-Stovall at the time he supposedly mailed a money order and order form to obtain the rifle. <br />Oswald kept a meticulous work sheet, accounting for what he was doing every fifteen minutes or so. The order for the rifle was sent from a post office over 6 miles distant. Oswald's lunch period was too short to have made the trip there and back, as he had no car and bus service to there did not exist. Further, [according to testimony] Oswald never left his workplace with others. The order was sent from Dallas to Chicago, IL but arrived, somehow, the very next day, even though it was not sent air mail. Atop that, the order was filled that same day and the rifle was shipped the same day --we are talking about some 24 hours of elapsed time between Dallas and the rifle getting shipped out-- a physical impossibility at the time. <br /><br />The serial number of the money order form used shows it was issued late in 1963, not in 1962. The order form was also sloppily written, when Oswald, in fact, due to problems with dyslexia, always carefully printed out such forms. A second order form, for a revolver 'discovered' later, is carefully printed, as if forgers finally learned how to create a better forgery. Belief that the order form was manufactured to frame Oswald is also based on the fact that no box of cartridges was ever found in Oswald's possessions, and that only four bullets could be found. It implies that Oswald never fired the rifle before Nov. 22nd because he had no ammunition.<br />Dautch is correct that by using the name “Hidell” that Oswald obtained no advantage by doing so. In fact, “Hidell” is the ONLY link between the gun purchases and Oswald—through an ID card the WC wants us to believe was cooked up while he worked at Jaggars-Chiles-Stovall.. But then, Lee Oswald was supposed to have trekked some 6 miles without a car on his half-hour lunch break to mail one of the mail-order coupons from a post office further away than a nearby drop-box. And quite surprising about “Hidell”—–James Fetzer vetted the witness, Chauncey Holt, who said HE made the ID for Oswald. Holt’s daughter, Karyn, told me she agreed on that matter as well. <br />Dautch doesn’t give the reader a clue that there is another side to the “Hidell” story. Why didn’t Dautch tell us about the problem with the Klein order? Why didn’t he mention Chauncy Holt ? Perhaps Holt isn’t mentioned because he has been systematically discredited on “official version” websites, despite the fact that photographs of Holt have been identified by a forensics expert: see Wim Dankbaar’s information about Holt at http://www.JFKmurdersolved.com , and be sure to visit the Forum located there.<br /><br /><br />Along with civil debate at the Deep Politics Forum, at http://www.deeppoliticsforum.com, which I hope will continue to honor Peter Dale Scott, who has done so much to open the eyes of America about Kennedy’s murder, Dankbaar’s website is the only one that presents information about James Files, the only person whose confession to having shot at Kennedy has been steadily attacked by the Oswald-did-it contingent. This suggests to me that James Files’ account needs to be taken more seriously, particularly since his confession has been subjected to a voice-stress analysis test where Files came out looking pretty good.<br />To return to our problems with the Klein order, there is so much wrong about the Klein order that it would take an entire essay to show how far from the truth Mr. Dautch has taken the reader by now. I am tempted to call his article “Dautch’s Lies” at this point.<br />He even believes that “Hidell” is pronounced the way marina told everybody:<br />“Hidell, which rhymes with the name of Oswald's political hero "Fidel,"”… was the fictitious name of the only member of Oswald's Fair Play for Cuba Committee.(18) Prior to this, when purchasing the .38 special Smith and Wesson revolver cited as the murder weapon against Officer Tippit, he claimed his age was 28, when in fact he was 23 at the time. It was not necessary for Oswald to tell this lie, since at the age of 23 he was easily old enough to purchase a gun, and revealing his actual age to Klein's would not have been problematic in the least.(19) <br />=== Let’s be reasonable. If Lee Oswald used a fake name, why would he use a REAL birthdate? First we have to determine that Lee wrote out the order, which Dautch entirely neglects to prove. I have serious doubts about the authenticity of the first form “found” after seeing how sloppily it was made out:<br /><br /><br />You can have all the tiny arrows you like, pointing to where it’s “Oswald’s handwriting” but nothing can make up for the sloppiness used to fill out the form, and Oswald wasn’t sloppy on order forms. He could be sloppy on envelopes and letters, where an error could be easily corrected. If we ignore this matter, there is a more important one, regarding the length of the rifle barrel that was ordered. Researcher Tom Purvis stated the problem well, in a post to an Internet forum:<br />Thomas H. Purvis<br />Aug 25 2005, 04:43 AM<br />Many persons have argued the premise that LHO ordered the 36-inch length TS Carbine, and therefore, this is what he should have received from Klein's.<br /><br /><br /><br />However, the Klein's documents claim that the weapon shipped to LHO, serial# C2766 was one of 100 rifles which were 40.2-inchs in length (Short Rifle), and of which C2766 was one of these rifles which was ultimately shipped to LHO.<br /><br />In support of this claim, the WC & Kleins have provided the order; shipping; & receiving invoices (previously referenced), as well as the packing list for each of the ten crates of rifles shipped. These packing list were completed by Crescent Firearms and included with each carton/crate of rifles shipped and which constitutes the listing by serial number of the 10 weapons shipped in each of the 10 cartons/crates which were shipped by Lipschultz Freight and received by Klein's Sporting Goods.<br /><br />Waldman Exhibit No. 3<br /><br />http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/...Vol21_0359b.htm<br /><br />Adequate evidence to dispute the claim of the 100 rifle shipment having been the 40.2--inch length Short Rifle has always been available from these documents.<br />Just that not unlike many other aspects of the evidence, no one has taken the time to evaluate it.<br /><br />The Shipping Invoice, as completed by Lipschultz Fast Freight, (the shipping company), indicates a total weight for the shipment as having been 750 pounds.<br />With 10 crates/cartons, this would equate to a weight of 75 pounds per carton.<br /><br />Therefore, 10 of whatever rifle was shipped, plus the weight of the shipping carton/crate/package which Crescent Firearms packed the 10 weapons in, weighed in at an even 75 pounds.<br /><br />Unloaded weight for the 6.5mm Carcano M91/38 Short Rifle (40.2 inch length) is 7.6279 pounds per rifle.<br />Therefore, 10 of these weapons, by themselves, without any shipping carton or crate, would weigh in at 76.279 pounds.<br /><br />And, 100 of these weapons alone, without the weight of the shipping crates/cartons, would weigh in at 762.79 pounds.<br />12.79 pounds more than was the total shipping weight of 750 pounds which included the rifles and the cartons/crates/containers in which the rifles were packed.<br /><br />However, the unloaded weight of the 6.5mm Carcano M91/38 TS Carbine (36 inch length) is 7.0988 pounds per weapon.<br /><br /><br /><br />10 rifles would equate to 70.988 pounds, and 100 of these rifles would equate to a weight of 709.88 pounds of actual rifle.<br /><br />Thereby leaving approximately 40.12 pounds of weight for the shipping cartons/crates/containers.<br />Or, a weight of 4.012 pounds of weight for each of the 10 cartons in which the weapons were shipped.<br /><br />Based upon the independent and separate weighing of the weapons and their carton/crate/container, by an independent third party, (Lifschultz Freight), these 100 weapons could not have been the 6.5mm Carcano M91/38 Short Rifle, as the weight of the rifles alone would have exceeded the total shipping weight of the rifles and cartons/crates/containers as determined by the shipping company and billed to and paid by Klein's Sporting Goods. <br /><br />Math Counts!<br />[NOTE by JVB: the weight discrepancy was reported years earlier by John Armstrong, as well]<br />Lee was careful filling out order forms, employment records, etc., because he had a mild form of dyslexia and could likely wreck the coupon or form. He generally printed them--carefully. Sure enough, by the time the FBI ‘found’ the second coupon, it was nicely PRINTED. Perhaps the forgers involved got better – and learned. This is the other side of the coin, my friends.<br />I do not see anything in the Klein coupons and orders that should persuade us that Lee Oswald lied. However, we can be persuaded that SOMEBODY likely created some lies about Oswald having ever created the first money order. How BOTH packages arrived THE SAME DAY at the post office is also a matter of interest, since they were ordered separately and on different DAYS.====<br />The W.C.’s handwriting examiners concluded that almost everything they had was written by Oswald, including the order forms.<br />….but let’s soldier on…..here’s Dautch’s next set of “Lee’s Lies”:<br />“Lee as Political Activist”<br />“Speaking of the aforementioned Fair Play for Cuba Committee, the<br /><br /><br />information provided to pedestrians walking the streets of New Orleans also contained a number of less than truthful statements. First of all, the pamphlet, distributed in early June 1963, contained the name "A.J. Hidell," Oswald's alternate identity (rhyming with "Fidel," as mentioned earlier).<br />[and which pronunciation JVB contends is not true, as mentioned earlier…] <br />“Oswald would also have Marina sign the name "Hidell", who was "President" of the New Orleans Chapter of the F.P.C.C., on Oswald's so-called membership card.(20) “<br />===Poor Marina! She testified that Lee Oswald forced her to write the false name “Hidell” on Oswald’s FPCC membership card, and that she didn’t want to do anything nasty like that. Let’s think about this for a moment. The Warren Commission said “Purtell and McNally conclude the name "A. J. Hidell" was written on the 1963 Fair Play for Cuba card by the same person who wrote the exemplars attributed to Marina Oswald.” <br />We know Marina Oswald wrote addresses in English on letters she wrote while in the US. She was able to handle cursive English, even as she was telling people she could not understand any form of English. Cursive, of course, is an advanced way to write English for foreigners, who begin with block letters. The ‘ignorant’ Marina is forced to sign “Hidell” for Lee Oswald -- because she is perfectly able to do so. Her objections to doing so may be regarded as an example of her dedication to total honesty, such as her testimony regarding her inability to understand English. Though we are looking at a list of “Lee’s Lies” we somehow keep adding items to a list of “Marina’s Lies.”<br />============Dautch continues on:<br />“Secondly, the pamphlet stated that "lectures" would be included in Committee Activities, although he would undoubtedly have been the only person doing any "lecturing."(21) <br />===But Mr. Dautch, if nobody joined, why hold lectures? Talk about fishing for something to object to! Oswald actually wasn’t interested in holding meetings or having anybody “join” –he was interested –and so was the CIA and the FBI – in who took handbills. Who would be interested. Who would care about contacting Oswald about the FPCC. More than anything else, Oswald was creating an image for himself as a pro-Castroite—even though he had been seen working with Guy Banister: even the researcher Reitzes [before he turned into a McAdams acolyte] has provided convincing information about Lee Oswald working with Guy Banister, as reported by the noted historian and<br /><br /><br />Michael Kurtz to researcher D. Reitzes: (those of you who already know this information can scroll down to my comments on the matter):<br />"One feature of Oswald's five-month sojourn in New Orleans that has never been revealed is the fact that he made several trips to Baton Rouge in the summer of 1963. According to witnesses, Oswald accompanied a prominent leader of the White Citizens' Council and of other segregationist organizations to Baton Rouge six or eight times in July and August…Oswald…was wearing what appeared to be 'dressy clothes.’…<br /><br />"…in May 1963, Michael Kurtz attended an informal meeting in an unoccupied LSU-NO classroom where Guy Banister debated a number of students on the issue of integration. Banister was introduced by an LSU student named George Higganbothan.”<br /><br />“ Kurtz knew of Banister; he'd seen him on campus on perhaps a half-dozen occasions to this and would see him a few times more. Guy Banister brought a young man to the meeting with him; Banister introduced the young man…Lee Oswald. Banister debated integration with the students, arguing for a return to full segregation and criticizing the group for attending an integrated school. ..”(Author's interview of October 5, 1998).”<br /><br />“George Higgenbothan told Kurtz that Oswald and Banister made a second visit to LSU, however, and the second time it was the alleged leftist OSWALD who argued passionately against desegregation” (Interview with<br />Michael L. Kurtz, December 2, 1998). Higgenbothan had told the Orleans Parish DA's office in 1967 that he indeed had known Oswald (Garrison files)…Kurtz saw Banister and Oswald together once more, when he was working that summer for the New Orleans Times-Picayune, located across the street from the Newman Building at 544 Camp Street and 531 Lafayette…After the assassination, Kurtz informed the FBI of Oswald's connection to Banister. "They didn't seem too interested," he says. Kurtz wrote a book about the assassination in 1978, Crime of the Century: The Kennedy Assassination from a Historian's Perspective, in which he mentioned the incident in passing. (The book was reissued in 1993 with some new material; the Oswald-Banister incidents are discussed on pages xxxviii-xl of the introduction.)…”<br /><br />How much of this information does Dautch bring up? None of it. Dautch never tells the reader that the Fair Play for Cuba Committee matter was possibly run by Oswald to attract pro-Catroites, and that the CIA and FBI wanted the FPCC to be associated with communists so it could get discredited. Oswald wrote to the Communist Party during this same time period.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />If Oswald was posing for the FBI/CIA in the matter, then the FPCC chapter he organized, that never had a meeting and never had a list of members, was simply a ploy-- and of course, it will be replete with all the trappings of a ploy. Though Dautch plods on, the reader needs to keep in mind that the FPCC activities involving Lee Oswald may have been conducted for reasons uninspected by Dautch:<br />“Finally, the pamphlet by its nature, mentioning prominently the "New Orleans Charter Member Branch," clearly implied that the organization was quite large, when in truth Oswald was its one and only member. Now, Oswald's web of deception was growing to include people he did not even know.”<br />How one can say that designating an organization as a Chapter, in order to start the organization, constitutes a “lie” because the chapter was not “quite large” as its name “implied”? The very word “Branch” actually implies that it’s just a twig, not a mighty oak yet. Hmmmmm! Is this the best Dautch can do? He plods on to his next argument, which seems to be crafted to convince only those who never look at any other article about Oswald:<br />“Oswald was not reluctant to lie to the United States government, including statements he made to Agent Louis Quigley of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). While being held on the charge of disturbing the peace, Oswald asked to speak to an FBI agent, who turned out to be Quigley.”<br />It happens to be Saturday, when the FBI office downtown is essentially closed – but lo and behold, a guy who was arrested for handing out pamphlets asks for an FBI agent to come visit him—and somebody shows up. Oswald and three others were arrested, but only Oswald ended up getting charged – he was the “pro Castro sympathizer” after all.<br />But Dautch is telling us something that’s rather extraordinary—that he is somebody the FBI would respond to. The event would be recorded in the FBI office. If Oswald was trying to establish credentials to enter Cuba safely, an FBI interrogation after being arrested as a pro-Castro sympathizer would help. It would provide Oswald with a patina of importance, should he enter Cuba for the US government. Whether Quigley knew it or not, this was all part of a sheep-dipping operation to create a legend for Lee Oswald as “pro-Castro.”<br />He needed it. Oswald had been on campuses until college classes closed down for the summer, with former FBI agent and anti-Castro activist Guy Banister. Now he had to erase all that conservative crud clinging to him, and create a new persona. But Dautch<br /><br /><br />makes no comment about any of that. It is obviously not his job to introduce the other side of things at any time– we have had to do that for you. Dautch hurries on to make his next point:<br />“Oswald told Agent Quigley about some very basic personal information which the Bureau knew to be false.(22) For example, Oswald lied about Marina's maiden name, claiming it was "Prossa" and claimed to have been married to her in Fort Worth, TX. When these comments are taken in combination with Oswald's reticence on the topic of the F.P.C.C. and its specific details in talking with Quigley, the interview essentially boiled down to Oswald requesting permission to talk to the FBI purely so he could lie to them.”<br />Comment: If Lee Oswald planned to go into Cuba and wanted this record to show he was “pro-Castro” he would not necessarily give 100% correct information. Why should he? Would he tell the U.S. FBI his Russian wife’s real name? On the other hand, how much of the information the FBI gave us about this interview can be trusted? Look elsewhere for evidence rigging, such as the disappearance of Oswald’s Minox spy camera. The FBI pressured the Dallas Police to change the Minox camera –used by spies—to a Minox “light meter.” As if the man would own a Minox light meter –and rolls of Minox film, too -- but not the camera? However, the camera had a unique number if it had been issued for spy purposes. It therefore had to vanish. Not only does evidence vanish, but also articvles about the evidence: Dr. Howard Platzman’s article about the Minox cannot be found (at least by me, today, in June, 2010) has vanished, while an Oswald-did-it website proclaims that nobody can ‘prove’ the Minox ever existed. That same website attacks me, as well, because I—a living witness- saw the Minox on May 9, 1963, in New Orleans, the day Lee Oswald and I were hired together by the William B. Reily Coffee Company.<br />Getting tired of Dautch’s omissions? We’re almost finished.<br />Lee's "Revolutionary Resume"<br />Later in the summer of 1963, Oswald spent a good deal of time preparing, for the New York School for Marxist Study, a resume of his life and many of the activities it had (or had not) included. Often referred to as the "Revolutionary Resume" (for reasons I will discuss momentarily), it spoke of time he spent as a "Radio Speaker and Lecturer" (he was once soundly routed in a radio debate in New Orleans),<br />But Oswald was on TV briefly, was in a 5-minue radio interview, and then was in a nearly half-hour radio debate with three others. … “soundly routed” hardly describes the situation, where Oswald held up well against three others, only being flustered when his defection was brought up, out of the blue. Listen to the ‘debate’ yourself online – and you’ll possibly agree with me that this 23-year-old young man did well—though that is hardly the point. He was a “radio speaker” – and yes, he was a “lecturer” – which matter is totally ignored by Dautch. Dautch never mentions any debates on campus with Banister. Remember this?:<br />George Higgenbothan told Kurtz that Oswald and Banister made a second<br />visit to LSU, however, and the second time it was the alleged leftist<br />OSWALD who argued passionately against desegregation (Interview with Michael L. Kurtz, December 2, 1998, by D. Reitzes)<br />Nor does Dautche reveal that Oswald spoke for an hour and ten minutes at Spring Hill College, lecturing a full hall of graduate students studying for the priesthood at Seminary, there, accompanied by their professors, who were mostly astute Jesuits. Oswald then fielded questions for another twenty minutes. Why does Dautch not mention this? [The Jesuits would have reminded Dautch that omission is a sin, just as is commission.]<br />“ ….his "Street Agitation" (a reference to the time <br />Correction: we have two leaflettting events in New Orleans, one in Dallas, and one at the Dumaine Wharf (which was street-side), One resulted in arrest…the Dumaine Wharf event resulted in a warning…nor is there any mention of Oswald’s being among those who demonstrated against Adlai Stevenson…we might say Oswald stretched things a bit, but again, as his actions with banister, etc. demonstrate, he was writing up these ‘credentials’ to look good to the enemy, which did not happen to be the USA (Dautch would no doubt disagree). <br />“…..he handed out the F.P.C.C. documents in New Orleans, for which he was arrested and soon released after a charge of disturbing the peace was filed), an "Organizer" (meaning, presumably, the one-man New Orleans Chapter of the F.P.C.C. itself), a "Photographer" (meaning the time he spend working at Jaggars-Chiles-Stovall),<br />Whoops! Yet another error on Dautch’s part. Oswald owned sophisticated camera equipment and George DeMohrenschildt commented on the fine quality of Oswald’s framed black-and-white photos, which Oswald had dark-room processed himself. Oswald placed “photographer” on many of his job application forms and it was his desire to work as a photographer; simply because he could not get hired as one does not mean that he was “just” a J-C-S employee—he was doing photo pre-productions, worked with mattes and Exacto knives there (personal knowledge) and blew up or reduced photos. Where is the “lie” here? It is Dautch who is hiding many details from the reader.<br /><br /><br />“…a "Marxist," "Defector," and "Resident of U.S.S.R."(23) <br />Remember for whom this was written. Is Dauch trying to tell us that Lee Oswald was NOT a defector? Not a Marxist? At last—a glimmer of hope for Dautch! But no—he also mentions “Resident of U.S.S.R” – does he imply this is a lie, too? At any rate, having described the document and its mixed bag of “qualifications”, Dautch then states:<br />“…Later, Oswald took this resume to Mexico City, hoping to impress the Cuban Embassy with the qualifications it represented. Oswald wanted to gain entry to Cuba in order to fight for the man he often called "Uncle Fidel."(24) <br />We have Marina (as always, a reliable witness) telling us what Oswald thought of “Uncle Fidel” – and then we have the truth, of which Dautch has nary a clue. Oswald had an assignment in Mexico City –not the subject of his paper—and prepared information he felt he might need to fulfill it. The whole incident must be the focus of another paper. But briefly, Dautch’s omission of such items as REAL lectures betrays only his own reluctance to be totally honest.<br />“On October 14, 1963, Oswald rented an eight-by-twelve foot room at 1026 North Beckley Street, in Dallas' Oak Cliff neighborhood, using the name O.H. Lee. At this point, Oswald was lying to virtually anyone who asked what his name was, including the landlady and manager at this particular boarding house, Gladys Johnson.(25) <br />What a big, bad lie! Has anyone looked into what the term “safe house” means?<br />This is the house to which Oswald fled after the assassination, before the slaying of Officer Tippit. <br />Even Dautch dare not say Oswald killed JFK and then Tippit, but by using the word ‘fled’ he makes it seem that way. Oswald ‘fled’ – if we are to believe the Warren Commission and the Dallas Police—by means of public transport—a BUS—a CAB—and then, after leaving the boarding house, he ‘fled’ to a movie theater, where he bought popcorn.<br />Not long after visiting this, his last residence, Oswald was lying yet again.<br />Lee in Custody<br />Oswald was questioned about his involvement in both cases between the afternoon of November 22 and the morning of November 24. Although<br /><br /><br />many of the notes from the interrogation were destroyed, some of Oswald's statements were made on the record. <br />NOTE: should we trust what police SAY Oswald said? Maybe he said it---but maybe not. We do know that Oswald was not allowed legal representation—while the Official Word from the police actually said Oswald refused a lawyer, though arraigned for two important murders in the middle of the night, out of the public eye, and even though, in public Oswald asked for legal representation, and at another point bitterly sated he had been denied legal representation in what he called a “short and sweet” hearing. So much for what the police reported as to Oswald’s statements, though Dautch wants the reader to believe every word they report.<br />We cannot take the statements that Dautch offers without a close look at the provenance of each statement. We already have evidence that Dautch will not give us ALL the information—just what he can use that can incriminate Oswald. <br />Among them were claims that he purchased the revolver in Fort Worth, that he did not receive any packages addressed to "Hidell," at his P.O. Box, such as that which contained the rifle, [but the postal service ‘lost’ the receipts thereof] and that he did not in fact, own a rifle at all….(26) [<br />I wish to attest here that Oswald also told me he did not own a rifle. He said it could not easily be carried without being noticed. I often consider the fact that Oswald, to “try to shoot Walker” had to transport the rifle on a city bus, then supposedly buried it, unburied it, then supposedly used it, then BURIED it again (!) according to Marina. After a few days. He supposedly unburied the rifle and brought it home again—presumably by bus as well—hidden in what? – a cello case?<br />Even more telling is Marina’s statement, which I believe was extorted from her, that her husband practiced firing his rifle by shooting at leaves – in the city limits! <br />“When it was discovered that Oswald was not telling the truth with regard to any of these claims, the lies finally caught up to Oswald--the police and FBI refused to believe much of anything he said.”<br />This could also be worded the following way: “Kill the President, will you?” was shouted out when Oswald was arrested. He could have been St. Francis of Assisi and they would have assumed he was lying.<br />“Now, he had nowhere left to turn, no place left to run, no one left to deceive. Lee Harvey Oswald's years of lies had finally caught up<br /><br /><br />to him. Everything he had gotten away with had come full circle, and he was seemingly paying all at once for a lifetime of deceit. <br />What Oswald paid for, with his life, was the pricer he paid for serving his country as a spy who could be sacrificed as a patsy by the very government that had trained this young patriot.<br />Had Oswald trapped himself because, when his penultimate scheme (to get into Cuba) failed and his life was "spinning out of control" (Gerald Posner's term) he resorted in desperation to the one final act that would give him the place in history he believed he deserved?<br />Dautch must bring this up because nobody has ever been able to establish a TRUE MOTIVE for Oswald’s supposed assassination of a President of which even Marina testified, from Oswald, she had only heard good things. <br />But then , I suppose we should discard this statement from Marina, since she lied so often. Yet I think I believe her when she said that when she heard Kennedy was dead, she wept. Dautch now wishes the reader to believe that some kind of Karma finally was at work—all those lies had come around full circle, and he was trapped…but did Oswald really want a “place in history he believed he deserved? “ <br />If so, why did Oswald deny killing anybody? A voice stress analysis test proves that Oswald told the truth. VSA analyses are more accurate than lie detector tests. The VSA said Oswald was telling the truth. Place that against what Dautch has to say, and use your good sense.<br />Or was Oswald's love of spy games, aliases, and false fronts turned against him by people vastly better at that sort of thing than he was? <br />Only now does Dautch hint that he understands that Oswald was involved in “spy games.” What a “game”—to enter the USSR at the height of the Cold War and to get out alive! See my book Me & Lee –How I Came to Know, Love and Lose Lee Harvey Oswald – for more information about how he managed to do that.<br />Regardless, it is hard to avoid the feeling that Lee Harvey Oswald's web of deceit wound up ensnaring him. <br />A professional writer, a lobbyist, has just offered you, the reader, a great example of the kind of disinfo that has paralyzed the American people so that the murder of John F. Kennedy –and those who profited by it—has gone without an honest <br /><br />government-sponsored investigation. No fox can be expected to guard the henhouse. Lee Oswald was an innocent man. Intelligent readers will find the information is out there. The cat is out of the bag, folks. Enough of us who have survived to speak out to you have come forth with our testimonies. Though Oswald was blamed -- just as the Conspiracists planned – the truth is coming out. Let nothing stop it, for our country’s sake. For the sake of democracy. For the sake of yourselves, and your children.<br /><br /><br />----References used by the author of “Lee’s Lies” (shame on him!):<br />1. MacMillan, Priscilla, Marina and Lee, Harper and Row, New York, 1977, p. 62.<br />2. Ibid. <br />3. Ibid., pp. 162-5. <br />4. Ibid., p. 80. <br />5. Ibid., p. 115. <br />6. Ibid., p. 80 <br />7. Ibid., p. 98. <br />8. Davison, Jean, Oswald's Game, W.W. Norton, New York, 1983, p. 99. <br />9. Ibid., p. 100. <br />10. Marina and Lee, p. 117. <br />11. Ibid., p. 115. <br />12. Ibid., p. 205. <br />13. Ibid. <br />14. Ibid., p. 205, p. 312. <br />15. Ibid., p. 236. <br />16. Ibid. <br />17. Warren Commission Report, p. 119. <br />18. Ibid., p. 122. <br /><br /><br />19. Marina and Lee, p. 253. <br />20. Ibid., p. 324. <br />21. Ibid., p. 321.<br />22. Warren Commission Report, p. 436. <br />23. Marina and Lee, p. 364.<br />24. Ibid., p. 329. <br />25. Posner, Gerald, Case Closed, Random House, New York, 1993, p. 201. <br />26. Warren Commission Report, p. 181. <br />________________________________________Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1